320:
Do we have any more info about the games? Usually lists of video games include title, developer, publisher, and year. I'm not pushy about needing a developer column since we have the publisher list, but I think a column with year of release would be helpful and necessary to make this a complete
180:
I'm not too impressed with the list itself. The note section only has a few notes, most have a dash, one is blank. Maybe a year column would benefit? What is the difference between "PC", "Windows", and "Windows PC"; all three are under that one column. You have a cancelled game, a game that was
144:, its interesting to see that relatively few "mainstream" games have ever dared to receive an AO rating, and I bet you most people don't even realize there's something higher than M! I did a lot of cleanup lately, adding some more backstories, filling out references, adding a lead, etc.
80:
380:
Reiterating the need for release dates, or at least release years, especially for the blacklinked items. If the only source used does not contain them then it is not an adequate source for an FL, we'll need more.
424:
265:
I fixed up the Thrill Kill mention, but I can't seem to find release years for those remaining AO games that are otherwise unremarkable and lacking notes (aside from Lula 3D; which I also got a chance to add to
400:- no response from nominator or edits to article for a month regarding adding developer or release date to table; that you would have to find another source beyond the ESRB for those is not a valid excuse. --
336:
Instead of having a ref next to the game title, it might be better to place it in a separate column since there are individual references for each title here and not one overarching reference. See
267:
51:
46:
435:
column, for uniformity with other FL quality list pages I've come across. Also, I've left a helpful reminder note about this ongoing discussion page at user talk for
55:
38:
225:"was given the AO rating for its violent content, so much so that when its publisher" - 'so much so' what? It was rated so much? Sentence needs reworking.
234:
You seem to have notes only on the non-sexual games- any way to get notes for the others, or would they all just be "digital nudity and explicit sex"?
96:
190:
These are all video games that were rated AO by the ESRB; how can the criteria for inclusion be any clearer? And I fixed up those formatting issues.
527:
479:
450:
413:
390:
374:
283:
257:
203:
174:
157:
132:
493:
17:
101:
508:
367:
302:
42:
473:
34:
27:
270:
as well). This table is sourced directly from the ESRB pages, which don't distinctly list developers or release years.
222:
Might also be worth mentioning its equivalents in other countries, or that it's like NC-17, if you can find sources.
427:). The list page is certainly useful, but valid concerns have indeed been raised above. I think the refs from the
240:
If you add notes to the other games, you can drop the sorting on the notes column, since the result is arbitrary.
277:
197:
151:
126:
337:
365:
300:
465:
170:
353:
in the See also section to add a link to the Video games Portal, which may be helpful for readers.
523:
436:
272:
192:
146:
121:
501:
386:
360:
295:
459:
407:
347:
322:
251:
321:
list. I can see PresN noted this, but I would say it's necessary to meet criteria 3a of
340:
for a suggestion on how this might be accomplished, and would neaten up the title field.
231:
I'd add a release date (or at least release year) column, as well as a developer column.
446:
166:
519:
228:
Since the platform column is sortable, every instance of each term should be linked.
72:
515:
382:
402:
356:
There's an extra ] next to the word
Windows in the last paragraph of the lead.
246:
219:
I'd mention when the ESRB started, probably at the end of the first paragraph.
181:
re-rated, there seems to be no real criteria for inclusion here. I'm confused.
441:
500:, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see
330:
314:
141:
326:
81:
Featured list candidates/List of AO-rated video games/archive1
333:
to fill in some of the information on some of these games.
140:
This is a particularly notable subject; in line with the
106:
68:
64:
60:
268:List of video games notable for negative reception
458:I have to agree with Red Phoenix here about 3a.
514:template in place on the talk page until the
8:
343:Though not necessary, you may want to place
237:The Joy of Sex should sort under J, not T.
85:
88:
78:
431:column should be moved instead to the
7:
317:and utilize column and row scopes.
24:
18:Knowledge:Featured list candidates
1:
391:15:56, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
375:22:19, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
325:. You may want to try using
284:06:04, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
258:05:59, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
204:00:33, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
175:23:58, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
158:18:37, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
133:18:37, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
528:09:46, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
480:10:10, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
451:12:17, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
414:19:49, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
35:List of AO-rated video games
28:List of AO-rated video games
423:(having stumbled here from
313:Tables need to comply with
544:
509:featured list candidates
425:my FLC discussion page
338:List of Sega 32X games
370:remember the past...
305:remember the past...
476:
468:
136:
114:
113:
535:
518:goes through. -
513:
507:
504:, and leave the
474:
466:
462:
410:
405:
371:
363:
352:
346:
306:
298:
282:
280:
275:
254:
249:
202:
200:
195:
156:
154:
149:
131:
129:
124:
117:
86:
76:
58:
543:
542:
538:
537:
536:
534:
533:
532:
511:
505:
460:
408:
403:
372:
369:
361:
350:
344:
307:
304:
296:
278:
273:
271:
252:
247:
198:
193:
191:
152:
147:
145:
127:
122:
120:
49:
33:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
541:
539:
531:
530:
485:
483:
482:
453:
417:
416:
394:
393:
368:
358:
357:
354:
341:
334:
318:
303:
289:
288:
287:
286:
242:
241:
238:
235:
232:
229:
226:
223:
220:
211:
210:
209:
208:
207:
206:
183:
182:
163:Quick comments
138:
137:
119:Nominator(s):
112:
111:
110:
109:
107:External links
104:
99:
91:
90:
84:
83:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
540:
529:
525:
521:
517:
510:
503:
499:
495:
491:
488:
487:
486:
481:
477:
472:
469:
463:
457:
454:
452:
448:
444:
443:
438:
437:ViperSnake151
434:
430:
426:
422:
419:
418:
415:
412:
411:
406:
399:
396:
395:
392:
388:
384:
379:
378:
377:
376:
373:
366:
364:
355:
349:
342:
339:
335:
332:
328:
324:
319:
316:
312:
311:
310:
308:
301:
299:
293:
285:
281:
276:
274:ViperSnake151
269:
264:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
256:
255:
250:
239:
236:
233:
230:
227:
224:
221:
218:
217:
216:
215:
205:
201:
196:
194:ViperSnake151
189:
188:
187:
186:
185:
184:
179:
178:
177:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
159:
155:
150:
148:ViperSnake151
143:
135:
134:
130:
125:
123:ViperSnake151
116:
115:
108:
105:
103:
100:
98:
95:
94:
93:
92:
87:
82:
79:
77:
74:
70:
66:
62:
57:
53:
48:
44:
40:
36:
29:
26:
19:
497:
490:Closing note
489:
484:
470:
455:
440:
439:. Cheers, —
432:
428:
420:
401:
397:
359:
291:
290:
245:
243:
213:
212:
162:
161:
139:
118:
102:Citation bot
32:
362:Red Phoenix
297:Red Phoenix
461:DragonZero
502:WP:FLC/ar
496:has been
494:candidate
167:Mattximus
520:SchroCat
498:archived
492:: This
475:Contribs
323:WP:WIAFL
292:Comments
214:Comments
97:Analysis
421:Comment
331:Allgame
315:MOS:DTT
89:Toolbox
52:protect
47:history
456:Oppose
398:Oppose
383:Golbez
348:portal
56:delete
433:Notes
429:Title
294:from
279:Talk
199:Talk
153:Talk
142:NC-17
128:Talk
73:views
65:watch
61:links
16:<
524:talk
467:Talk
447:talk
442:Cirt
404:Pres
387:talk
248:Pres
171:talk
69:logs
43:talk
39:edit
516:bot
329:or
327:IGN
165:by
526:)
512:}}
506:{{
478:)
449:)
389:)
381:--
351:}}
345:{{
309::
244:--
173:)
71:|
67:|
63:|
59:|
54:|
50:|
45:|
41:|
522:(
471:·
464:(
445:(
409:N
385:(
253:N
169:(
75:)
37:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.