Knowledge (XXG)

:Featured list candidates/List of Chicago Landmarks - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

492:. We were going to try to go for 60%, but there was a loss in enthusiam, especially from our hardest workers. I understand we have to uphold standards, but producing another 40 or 50 articles is not something I expet to be able to convince people to spend another week on. We will stand on what we have produced and if that is not good enough it will fail. It is, however, a complete and thorough list. Also consider that even the redlinks each have a citation to a link for all the details. Note the hundreds of citations which may lessen the importance of producing blue links.-- 369: 323: 225: 641:
Seriously consider abbreviating your references section. I've made some suggestions on the talk page about a style of references that would be very much more compact. The article takes a very long time to load. The HTML alone is between 350 and 400KB depending on browser. Of that, about 130 to 150KB
598:
templates. I intend to create several more including places of worship, skyscrapers and possibly schools, monuments, theatres, etc. I am wondering if you know how to minimize KB usage for color coordinating the table cells by row along with this effort. It might make sense to have each house row
262:
The second section is a secondary list of Chicago Landmarks. The first section is for official Landmarks designated by the Mayor and City Council that may or may not also by NRHP or NHL properties. The second section is for landmarks in Chicago that have not been designated by the Mayor or City
599:
be one color, each district another, each place of worship yet another and so on. However, I only know how to add color by cell and the article is already long in the tooth in terms of KB measurement. Cell by cell coloring would take up a lot of space. What do you think? --
401:
that I needed some advice on the date sorting formatting. There must be an optimal way to use sortability with dating. I guess if I had YYYY-MM-DD format that would be one way. Is there another. If there is agreement that this is not needed then I will drop it.
527:
push. Several others were created by other members to get us to over 50% linked. Now, some other members of the project have started adding articles in hopes of improving the usefulness of the page and thus its viability as a
263:
Council, but rather by the Federal institutions. Thus, the first section has more prominent images. I think there may be a space issue in the second section dependin on your viewing preferences and display settings.
385:. I removed the table sort function though. This table is not optimized for sorting so it adds no useful function here (unless someone really wants to know all which were designated in April, or March). 357:
Regarding the images, the second table is in fact of a lesser width than the first, leading me to believe there shouldn't be a problem with normal sized thumbnails. --
469:
first worked on the page there about 75% redlinks. Then we spent another week just on creating articles for the redlinks and now it is about 45%.
453:
Sorry, but I think there are still seizably too much redlinks in this table for it to be featured. The other elements of it are fine, though.
590:
About 50 or 60 articles have been stubified in the lasst 3 days. I think we have over 70%, but I don't want to count. I have been creating
37: 17: 595: 472:
Most FLs curently have at least 70% blue links. Considering what is left is only going to be filled in very slowly, that it not enough.
635:
The table uses "NRHP" and "NHL" without explaining them. Could those be added in parenthesis after the full name in the lead sections.
609: 546: 502: 412: 339: 301: 273: 242: 133: 77: 613: 591: 550: 506: 489: 416: 343: 305: 277: 246: 137: 81: 617: 554: 510: 420: 347: 309: 281: 250: 141: 85: 649: 622: 582: 559: 515: 476: 457: 439: 425: 389: 363: 352: 314: 286: 255: 214: 203: 178: 146: 115: 90: 56: 433:, I think it's alright now, definitely more trouble than it's worth. In that case, my objections have been addressed. -- 160:
That's probably the worst self-referential sentence I've ever seen. Try not to advertise a weakness of Knowledge (XXG).
638:
Move the key up to the top. Make it horizontal rather than vertical. Choose a different colour than bright green.
27: 152:
Why are so many of the dates missing? Explain to me what they are, exactly, and why several fields have "NA"?
46:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.
605: 542: 498: 408: 335: 297: 269: 238: 129: 73: 523:
You can tell from my user page that I have personally already created about 3 dozen landmarks for this
485: 466: 64: 434: 358: 209: 173: 533: 600: 537: 493: 403: 330: 292: 264: 233: 208:
I didn't understand the function of the columns. I thought it was all missing information. --
124: 68: 524: 647: 529: 386: 579: 473: 454: 319:
To make a table sortable, just use "wikitable sortable" instead of "wikitable".
188: 100: 643: 53: 484:
You are free to vote how you feel, but when we were at 25% blue links we (
63:
This list is being nominated because it is a good list produced by the
158:
Redirects will take you to the wikipedia page when the names differ.
99:- A very nicely developed list, and quite useful as a reference. -- 48:
The closing editor's comments were: 10 days, 5 support, 0 oppose.
291:
I don't know how to make the list sortable. How do you do this?
165:
Why are the thumbnails of a smaller size in the second section?
170:
Wouldn't it be beneficial to have this list as being sortable?
532:. So far I count seven new Landmarks since June 25th at 398: 187:I only see one Chicago designation date missing.-- 632:It now has enough blue links. Some suggestions: 36:The following is an archived discussion of a 8: 534:WP:WPChi#Newly_Created_Chicago_Related_Pages 232:I have deleted the sentence in point #2. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured list candidates 618:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM 555:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM 511:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM 421:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM 348:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM 310:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM 282:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM 251:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM 142:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM 86:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM 7: 596:Template:Chicago Landmark districts 536:with the promise of more to come. 24: 592:Template:Chicago Landmark houses 367: 321: 223: 642:is the references section. -- 1: 669: 221: 650:13:51, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 623:07:19, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 583:17:06, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 560:16:01, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 516:03:03, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 477:16:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 458:05:26, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 440:21:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 426:21:43, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 390:18:53, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 364:16:12, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 353:16:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 315:14:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 287:14:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 256:14:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 215:05:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 204:01:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 179:01:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 147:00:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 116:00:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 91:00:11, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 57:02:29, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 28:List of Chicago Landmarks 43:Please do not modify it. 38:featured list nomination 490:shoot for a majority 437: 397:I left Phoenix2 a 361: 212: 176: 621: 558: 514: 435: 424: 359: 351: 313: 285: 254: 210: 174: 145: 89: 660: 603: 540: 496: 406: 375: 371: 370: 333: 329: 325: 324: 295: 267: 258: 236: 227: 226: 200: 198: 196: 127: 123:- as nominator. 112: 110: 108: 71: 45: 668: 667: 663: 662: 661: 659: 658: 657: 656: 488:) were told to 368: 366: 322: 320: 259: 231: 229: 224: 194: 192: 190: 106: 104: 102: 41: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 666: 664: 655: 654: 653: 652: 639: 636: 627: 626: 625: 594:and reworking 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 562: 446: 445: 444: 443: 442: 379: 378: 377: 376: 355: 289: 260: 222: 219: 218: 217: 184: 183: 182: 181: 167: 162: 154: 118: 61: 60: 59: 32: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 665: 651: 648: 645: 640: 637: 634: 633: 631: 628: 624: 619: 615: 611: 607: 602: 597: 593: 589: 586: 585: 584: 581: 577: 574: 571: 561: 556: 552: 548: 544: 539: 535: 531: 526: 522: 519: 518: 517: 512: 508: 504: 500: 495: 491: 487: 483: 480: 479: 478: 475: 471: 470: 468: 464: 461: 460: 459: 456: 452: 451: 447: 441: 438: 432: 429: 428: 427: 422: 418: 414: 410: 405: 400: 396: 393: 392: 391: 388: 384: 381: 380: 374: 365: 362: 356: 354: 349: 345: 341: 337: 332: 328: 318: 317: 316: 311: 307: 303: 299: 294: 290: 288: 283: 279: 275: 271: 266: 261: 257: 252: 248: 244: 240: 235: 220: 216: 213: 207: 206: 205: 202: 201: 186: 185: 180: 177: 171: 168: 166: 163: 161: 159: 155: 153: 150: 149: 148: 143: 139: 135: 131: 126: 122: 119: 117: 114: 113: 98: 95: 94: 93: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 70: 66: 58: 55: 51: 47: 44: 39: 34: 33: 29: 26: 19: 629: 601:TonyTheTiger 587: 575: 572: 538:TonyTheTiger 520: 494:TonyTheTiger 481: 462: 449: 448: 430: 404:TonyTheTiger 394: 382: 372: 331:TonyTheTiger 326: 293:TonyTheTiger 265:TonyTheTiger 234:TonyTheTiger 189: 172:Toodles. -- 169: 164: 157: 156: 151: 125:TonyTheTiger 120: 101: 96: 69:TonyTheTiger 62: 49: 42: 35: 486:WP:CHICOTW 467:WP:CHICOTW 65:WP:CHICOTW 573:Tentative 436:Phoenix2 387:Rmhermen 360:Phoenix2 228:Resolved 211:Phoenix2 175:Phoenix2 630:Support 588:Comment 580:Circeus 576:support 521:Comment 474:Circeus 463:Comment 455:Circeus 431:Support 399:message 395:Comment 383:Support 121:Support 97:Support 50:Promote 525:WP:FLC 450:Oppose 644:Colin 530:WP:FL 482:Reply 465:When 54:MarcK 16:< 373:Done 327:Done 52:. -- 614:bio 551:bio 507:bio 417:bio 344:bio 306:bio 278:bio 247:bio 138:bio 82:bio 67:. 620:) 578:. 557:) 513:) 423:) 350:) 312:) 284:) 253:) 230:– 199:ni 144:) 111:ni 88:) 40:. 646:° 616:/ 612:/ 610:c 608:/ 606:t 604:( 553:/ 549:/ 547:c 545:/ 543:t 541:( 509:/ 505:/ 503:c 501:/ 499:t 497:( 419:/ 415:/ 413:c 411:/ 409:t 407:( 346:/ 342:/ 340:c 338:/ 336:t 334:( 308:/ 304:/ 302:c 300:/ 298:t 296:( 280:/ 276:/ 274:c 272:/ 270:t 268:( 249:/ 245:/ 243:c 241:/ 239:t 237:( 197:i 195:k 193:u 191:K 140:/ 136:/ 134:c 132:/ 130:t 128:( 109:i 107:k 105:u 103:K 84:/ 80:/ 78:c 76:/ 74:t 72:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Featured list candidates
List of Chicago Landmarks
featured list nomination
MarcK
02:29, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
WP:CHICOTW
TonyTheTiger
t
c
bio
tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM
00:11, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Kukini
00:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
TonyTheTiger
t
c
bio
tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM
00:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Phoenix2
01:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Kukini
01:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Phoenix2
05:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
TonyTheTiger
t
c
bio

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.