527:– I'm a bit concerned about the scope of this list, as I don't see any evidence provided that analysts consider the 18-strikeout mark to be significant. Why is this that much better than recording 16 or 17 strikeouts in a game? If we're doing it strictly on the basis of math, I wonder whether that is a strong enough reason.
119:
630:
notes that 18 was the previous record ("Koufax’s total of 18 strikeouts in the game broke Dizzy Dean’s 26-year-old
National League record, and tied the major league record held by Cleveland Indian ace Bob Feller."). I think that's the reason why 18 has been the unwritten and unofficial "benchmark".
702:
Okay, well thank you for taking the time and effort to explain this, I very much appreciate it and understand that it's annoying when you've made such a decent effort at a FLC. I'm happy that this should run its normal course at FLC, but, if you don't mind, I'll leave my comments open for others to
611:
I don't think so. That's a writer's personal opinion mixed in with lots of other personal opinion. I'm looking for something where multiple reliable sources have remarked that 18 strikeouts is a benchmark, definitively, rather than just the opinion of one journalist (who uses language like "crappy
577:
I'm very concerned that this "18 strikeouts" is an artificial record. We do need independent sources that suggest this benchmark is more significant than, say, 20 strikeouts. The notes relating to the selection of 18 strikeouts simply point to rules of baseball, nothing to substantiate that anyone
300:
I tell a lie, another bit. Could you provide a text footnote for Randy
Johnson's extra inning game? For an inexperienced reader it might be odd to see "9 IP" for a game listed under the extra-innings section. Just something brief like "Although the game went into extra innings, Johnson was relieved
687:
for exactly the same reason—that there weren't any sources specifically referring to the subject title. That was flatly rejected. So, as long as there are several sources (e.g. tables) covering the stats and there are no counter-examples available (i.e. a 16, 17 or 19 K table), then it is not an
632:
90:
85:
678:
provide a list of 18 K pitchers, but they don't explain why it's significant. They simply present the list as if it were the widely accepted benchmark. Furthermore, precedent has been set where a simple list is enough to establish the benchmark. I actually
94:
199:
at some point in the extra innings section? Also, a more general note, but both fn 'a' and the explanation of why the extra innings list is separate feel slightly conversational. So happy to see this, I assume (given the 'in one game' title that you used
77:
680:
665:
There's no need to be sorry. It's actually good that FLC has reviewers like you that scrutinize candidates extensively and carefully before passing them. That way, the FL standards are always held very high. And no, neither
225:
81:
135:
635:
indirectly mentions 18 Ks, in that Sheets was "just the 20th time in major league history a pitcher has fanned 18 or more in a nine-inning game" and that "o throw just 116 pitches with 18 strikeouts is almost unheard of."
243:
201:
73:
66:
549:
18 has been the benchmark since Feller reached the mark in 1938, setting an MLB record for the live-ball era. It stayed that way for 21 seasons before Koufax could tie it and 31 seasons before
Carlton broke it
650:
Again, I'm sorry to be a pain in the ass/butt/arse but I still can't really see a series of reliable sources noting this as a genuinely widely accepted benchmark. Does
Baseball Almanack or similar list it?
752:
712:
697:
660:
645:
621:
606:
587:
566:
540:
517:
492:
474:
456:
423:
398:
348:
328:
310:
291:
273:
255:
213:
184:
167:
56:
597:
that uses 18 Ks as the benchmark (i.e. "Is 14 strikeouts in a playoff game against a great offensive team more dominating than 18 strikeouts against a crappy team in May"). Good enough? —
684:
140:
551:
242:
of a game. Second point—linked extra innings in section. And your four HRs list wasn't only the model; it's the clear inspiration for this list and my recently promoted
195:
Couple of questions. First, does fn 'a' really serve a purpose? It has cites, but nothing to do with the 18 strikeout line it's alluding to. Second, could you link to
671:
232:
as to why the cutoff point is 18, as opposed to 17 or 19. It's basically to help people who aren't familiar with baseball to understand how 18 Ks equals ~
40:
175:
I am nominating this for featured list because I feel it has been improved significantly over the past few months and now meets all 6 FL criteria. —
407:
For the note about strikeouts, perhaps note that these 18 of 27 strikeouts were also made by the same pitcher, as pitchers can change during games
30:
17:
675:
382:
to date - replace with As of 2013, or As of March 2013, or some other specific and non-relative date, to ensure verifiability
229:
432:
thirteen were right-handed and five pitched left-handed - a link to a relevant article about handedness in baseball?
708:
656:
617:
583:
554:
440:
627:
704:
652:
613:
579:
513:
470:
369:
344:
306:
269:
209:
120:
Featured list candidates/List of Major League
Baseball pitchers with 18 strikeouts in one game/archive1
557:, though I didn't include this as a source since it's a "blog" (albeit from a reliable news source). —
745:
594:
534:
578:
other the blogger and the nominator really considers 18 to be of any particularly significant note.
693:
641:
602:
562:
488:
452:
419:
394:
324:
287:
251:
180:
163:
224:
The fn is meant to explain why 18 Ks was chosen as the number. I previously got comments on the
246:
FL as well. Someone had to start somewhere and get the ball rolling, so thank you for that! —
509:
466:
365:
340:
302:
265:
205:
735:
553:. I'm hypothesizing that's why there's all this lore behind 18. 18 is also mentioned in
528:
53:
689:
637:
598:
558:
484:
448:
444:
415:
390:
320:
283:
247:
176:
159:
196:
111:
667:
626:
There's no non-paywall source that specifically mentions 18 Ks as a benchmark.
703:
see just in case they have the same thoughts and thought processes we've had.
202:
List of Major League
Baseball hitters with four home runs in one game
74:
List of Major League
Baseball pitchers with 18 strikeouts in one game
67:
List of Major League
Baseball pitchers with 18 strikeouts in one game
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
264:
Last thing, the Bob Feller picture's alt text could use some work.
145:
107:
103:
99:
59:
414:
Done. Stated "...were made by a single pitcher..." —
439:
No. The closest articles related to handedness are
685:
List of Major League
Baseball runs scored champions
760:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
766:No further edits should be made to this page.
301:by another pitcher after just nine innings."
41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured list candidates
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
508:on prose and images. Looks pretty good! —
359:
124:
670:or Baseball Reference have a list. Only
362:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured list candidates
127:
117:
7:
389:Done. Utilized "...as of 2013". —
24:
1:
204:at least in part as a model?
783:
698:21:43, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
661:17:37, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
646:17:35, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
622:17:03, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
607:11:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
588:10:22, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
567:23:44, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
541:22:16, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
518:22:49, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
493:17:56, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
475:14:36, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
465:Otherwise looks peachy. —
457:17:46, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
424:17:56, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
399:17:46, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
349:15:29, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
329:15:03, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
311:14:15, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
292:14:54, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
274:14:11, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
256:14:46, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
214:14:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
753:15:17, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
713:20:08, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
378:Comments from Crisco 1492
185:11:40, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
168:11:40, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
57:10:02, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
763:Please do not modify it.
732:Everything looks good!--
483:Thanks for the review! —
36:Please do not modify it.
31:featured list nomination
364:Resolved comments from
441:Left-handed specialist
688:artificial record. —
633:This paywall source
226:article's talk page
502:
501:
171:
153:
152:
774:
765:
751:
748:
741:
738:
705:The Rambling Man
681:attempted to AFD
668:Baseball Almanac
653:The Rambling Man
614:The Rambling Man
580:The Rambling Man
537:
531:
363:
360:
241:
240:
236:
230:my own talk page
156:
125:
115:
97:
38:
782:
781:
777:
776:
775:
773:
772:
771:
770:
761:
746:
739:
736:
733:
535:
529:
347:
309:
272:
238:
234:
233:
212:
88:
72:
70:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
780:
778:
769:
768:
756:
755:
726:
725:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
572:
571:
570:
569:
544:
543:
521:
520:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
478:
477:
462:
461:
460:
459:
445:Switch pitcher
434:
433:
429:
428:
427:
426:
409:
408:
404:
403:
402:
401:
384:
383:
374:
373:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
343:
332:
331:
314:
313:
305:
297:
296:
295:
294:
277:
276:
268:
261:
260:
259:
258:
217:
216:
208:
173:
172:
158:Nominator(s):
151:
150:
149:
148:
146:External links
143:
138:
130:
129:
123:
122:
69:
64:
63:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
779:
767:
764:
758:
757:
754:
749:
743:
742:
731:
728:
727:
714:
710:
706:
701:
700:
699:
695:
691:
686:
682:
677:
673:
669:
664:
663:
662:
658:
654:
649:
648:
647:
643:
639:
634:
629:
625:
624:
623:
619:
615:
610:
609:
608:
604:
600:
596:
592:
591:
590:
589:
585:
581:
576:
568:
564:
560:
556:
555:The Economist
552:
548:
547:
546:
545:
542:
538:
532:
526:
523:
522:
519:
515:
511:
507:
504:
503:
494:
490:
486:
482:
481:
480:
479:
476:
472:
468:
464:
463:
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
437:
436:
435:
431:
430:
425:
421:
417:
413:
412:
411:
410:
406:
405:
400:
396:
392:
388:
387:
386:
385:
381:
380:
379:
376:
375:
371:
367:
361:
350:
346:
342:
339:
336:
335:
334:
333:
330:
326:
322:
318:
317:
316:
315:
312:
308:
304:
299:
298:
293:
289:
285:
281:
280:
279:
278:
275:
271:
267:
263:
262:
257:
253:
249:
245:
244:2 grand slams
231:
227:
223:
222:
221:
220:
219:
218:
215:
211:
207:
203:
198:
197:extra innings
194:
193:
189:
188:
187:
186:
182:
178:
170:
169:
165:
161:
155:
154:
147:
144:
142:
139:
137:
134:
133:
132:
131:
126:
121:
118:
116:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
68:
65:
62:
60:
58:
55:
51:
48:The list was
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
762:
759:
734:
729:
612:team"!)...
574:
573:
524:
505:
377:
337:
191:
190:
174:
157:
141:Citation bot
71:
49:
47:
35:
28:
628:History.com
595:ESPN source
510:Crisco 1492
467:Crisco 1492
366:Crisco 1492
341:Staxringold
303:Staxringold
266:Staxringold
206:Staxringold
530:Giants2008
54:Giants2008
690:Bloom6132
676:USA Today
638:Bloom6132
599:Bloom6132
593:Found an
559:Bloom6132
485:Bloom6132
449:Bloom6132
416:Bloom6132
391:Bloom6132
321:Bloom6132
284:Bloom6132
248:Bloom6132
177:Bloom6132
160:Bloom6132
192:Comments
136:Analysis
50:promoted
730:Support
672:MLB.com
575:Comment
525:Comment
506:Support
338:Support
319:Done. —
282:Done. —
128:Toolbox
91:protect
86:history
737:Astros
95:delete
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
747:Talk
740:4477
709:talk
694:talk
683:the
674:and
657:talk
642:talk
618:talk
603:talk
584:talk
563:talk
536:Talk
514:talk
489:talk
471:talk
453:talk
443:and
420:talk
395:talk
370:talk
345:talk
325:talk
307:talk
288:talk
270:talk
252:talk
228:and
210:talk
181:talk
164:talk
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
447:. —
52:by
711:)
696:)
659:)
644:)
620:)
605:)
586:)
565:)
539:)
516:)
491:)
473:)
455:)
422:)
397:)
372:)
327:)
290:)
254:)
183:)
166:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
61:.
33:.
750:)
744:(
707:(
692:(
655:(
640:(
636:—
616:(
601:(
582:(
561:(
533:(
512:(
487:(
469:(
451:(
418:(
393:(
368:(
323:(
286:(
250:(
239:3
237:⁄
235:2
179:(
162:(
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.