893:
AND a season page. Then again, you're only missing 3, so it's not like you're missing the first couple of seasons, but have the later ones. I have to assume that if they are there for the episodes before, after, and in between these vacant spaces then they must be there for the ones you don't have as well. One thing I would like to ask, where did this production number come from? Production numbers are hard to accurately verify. Please tell me they didn't come from TV.com or IMDb.com (which are virtually the same in their respect in fact that we cannot cite them as sources because of the way they attain a good portion of their content). The reason I mention this is because, not only are they hard to reliably verify, but they really hold not actual value to the article. The average reader won't understand what they are (kind like listing viewership numbers for anything other than the overrall viewership, e.g. 17/60 males...average readers don't understand that in a table). If an episode was filmed out of order, then it's easier to put a star beside it and put a "
1570:
episodes in that section? Pointless really. People can do the math themselves, it isn't hard. People can also see that the show first released a DVD set in 2003 and finally in 2007, they don't need a separate line telling them such. You don't need a link to season 1 and then a link to season 1's DVD section in the same line. Maybe each row should stand alone (which I question, and have sent a request to the guideline page for clarification, as this is the first time I have read such a thing on that page), but not each cell. You don't need need the title "The O.C. - The
Complete First Season", as you're presenting it as if it has its own page.
1653:. You should not force editors to have to go to another page just to edit this one. If an anon doesn't know how to actually do that, they will be quite confused as to how to edit this page when they click the "edit" button on each section. You have to remember, this isn't YOUR page, it's everyone's page and it must be designed so that ANY person that comes along and sees a problem can fix it. It should not be designed so that someone has to put in a request to have someone fix the page for them because they cannot figure out that the actual list is on another page and is being mirrored over here.
1768:
transcluding link, people will be wondering where the section went on the LOE page (and if you don't check the page regularly you won't know it is missing because the edit doesn't appear on the LOE page). If you aren't reading carefully into someone's edits on a season page (maybe they made a lot of good edits and accidentally removed one of the code tags in the process)? I've seen this happen and go unnoticed for quite awhile because (as you said), since the LOE page wasn't going do go through any real changes, no one bothered to check to make sure it appeared good on a regular basis.
1905:
something was released. Not that hard. Don't get pissed because I'm trying to get you to pull the page up to a higher standard than I have been seeing in FLCs lately. To clarify, my oppositioni on the other FLC was over the huge chunk of repeated information being presented, in this case, the only information I'm saying should be present is the release dates for each region for each season.
2102:
1791:
1520:
1357:
707:
627:
572:
519:
502:
479:
466:
441:
428:
415:
402:
376:
256:
196:
183:
170:
156:
901:). Now, I'm going out of town, so I won't be able to respond any any responses/rebuttles to my comments. For the initial reason I was brought here, I have to side with Matthew on this one, because it's clear that the numbers are there for all the other episodes, and why these three cannot be found is odd to me.
1566:
The more I look at this page the more I find things wrong with it. First, there was the fact that all of the tables were linked to the season pages, so you had to go to the season pages just to edit them and even then certain edits would not be reflected here. I have personally fixed this. You should
1904:
A little different in this case, as you're providing an overview of when each season was released on a page that is an overview of the entire series. I didn't say repeat it all, I said add some release dates so that the reader doesn't have to go visit every single damn article just to find out when
1387:
as an example) this puts the column headings in strange alignments on the individual season pages (somewhere between left and centre align). IMO this equally in breach of Cr. 6, and as there doesn't seem to be a solution that satisfies both. Surely 1 list with a slight problem is better that 4 with
1106:
Then why aren't they listed? If you know them, then they should be there. If you have a source for them, then use it. If you don't, then you don't know what they are, and are hypothesizing what they are. Also, the season average is based on the final, official numbers. The numbers you have for each
216:
this is because the note is in a transcluded table. The link down works, but not back up as I guess it tries to go to the transcluded article. I cannot see a way round this, without transcluding the notes section from the season pages, but this wouldn't allow the wording to differ, hence I have not
2145:
Is there a reason to use the full month names in the table? Are 3 letter abreviations not considered standard enough to be used? I noticed beacuse some cause entries to be twice as high as others, which attracts the eye. Abbreviating would fix this. Other than that, this looks as good as the other
1699:
I think it's useful to transclude the tables, because the information in the tables will not change very often. There are no plot summaries, which are typically the parts that receive the most edits. I suggested this format in the other FLC because I saw it used in other episode list FLs, however.
1059:
No, you couldn't do that math yourself. If you don't know the 3 numbers, then they could theoretically be anything. As one number could be higher than you calculated, while another could be lower, and in such case they would offset each other in the average for the season. If you have the original
892:
Personally, I have always believed in the philosophy (only when it comes to these types of situations), if you don't have it all then don't list it partially. Viewing figures are nice, but they are not necessary given that (unfortunately) at the moment you have an individual page for each episode,
1569:
Next, why do we ever list the DVDs if you provide no information about them? This page keeps linking everything away. That DVD section should have release dates for Region 1, 2, and 4...given that the lead of the page claims that the DVDs have been released in all of the sections. Counting up the
822:
It was promoted without viewing figures because they weren't initially included and so the "complete set of items" rule didn't apply. The set of items that were there were episode and series numbers, titles, writers, directors, airdates and prod codes. Adding in only some viewing figures provides
1767:
That's also a pitfall, because if there is something wrong on one page it will be wrong on both pages. If someone comes in and messes up the code on the season three page, it will be noticed on the LOE page but not the season three page (depending on the error). If the error has to do with the
1723:
It's very useful, to people that know how to use it. But, assuming that nothing will change doesn't mean that it won't, and limiting the editors that can edit the page to ones that know how to edit a transcluded section is not what
Knowledge (XXG) was designed for. It wasn't meant to basically
1281:
My issue with them is over their relevance. What relevance do they hold for the average reader? Does the average reader even know what they mean? Most don't, and if you have to explain that it shows if they were filmed out of order, then you might as well do that in prose and drop the needless
986:
I have to agree with the others. If all of the figures are not available, it can not be considered to meet "Comprehensiveness" as is. I can not imagine that figures are not available for those few episodes if they are available from all. If those few pages from the ABC Net site are broken, I'd
2078:
You know my stance on the prod codes, but I would keep the ratings. It's nice to see the transition in ratings as the seasons went on (as opposed to making that season only, in which case you'd have to look at every season page to get an idea of how the ratings increased/decreased over time).
2011:
I've just never really been a big fan of transcluding lists, especially when it comes to FLs. It is confusing for IPs and even veteran users to edit. I'd prefer to see the tables here have some differences from the season tables. Perhaps the production code or ratings could be removed? --
921:
Actually, the airdates are referenced, sort of, to the one general reference, however you have to go through and click on each individual episode to see the airdate. Might be better if the nom replaced that general ref with more specific ones for the individual ep pages at same site. --
1992:
They are not meant to be there, it was just that
Bignole copied the info from the season pages. If you think that they shouldn't transclude i'll get to work on remove the excess stuff that doesn't need to be there (the things that didn't transclude before)
897:" section below the respective table and indicate that said episode was filmed early (but only when you have a reliable source to prove that). You also need a source for those airdates. TVGuide and MSN are some good sources for airdates (see
1674:
475:"In America airing of "The Return of the Nana"" either a comma or a word is missing from after "America". You should use "United States" or "US", too, since "America" could be seen to encompass Mexico, Canada, Cuba, the West Indies, etc.
677:
It's just a small selection of episodes, which changes regularly. Like right now, all the episodes they have, Friends, Gilmore Girls and The OC have
Thanksgiving and Christmas episodes up. A couple of weeks ago it was a different theme.
795:
let me know. However, that said Season 1 was originally promoted without any viewer figures. Other episode lists contain no figures, remaining comprehensive without them, but surely removing 89 verifiable viewing figures goes against
1893:. The information is all presented elsewhere, what the hell is the point in mindlessly repeating it elsewhere. In fact you have said "what I find to be unnecessary is the repetative issuing of information in each of the pages" at a
1863:
The official DVD names are "The O.C. - The
Complete ... Season" and as such are named like that, regardless of them not having their own article, and as for take a leaf from Smallville, it sums up episodes, double standards perhaps?
437:"For registered members of the US iTunes Store, episodes of the first, second, and fourth season are available to purchase and download." This implies not all episodes of the seasons are available, but my guess is that they all are.
1894:
1232:
shown on screen at the end of each episode's credits, so the episodes are the reference for this. I don't know if including them in an episode list is something to be discussed in a FLC. The article is utilizing
655:. I cannot therefore see what information (episodes) are available. I would happy for the addition of this with the a summary of episodes on Hulu (above) however I would need a US user to do this, as I can not
1576:
Last (at the moment), where are the writers and directors for those two special episodes? Documentaries DO have writers and directors. There is no need to ignore them just because these are not official
817:
1050:
886:
1462:
1273:
1219:
1022:
731:
672:
2073:
2038:
2006:
1449:, season 3 is not of the same width as the other seasons and the air date wraps onto 2 lines in season 1 & 4, which I guess is also undesirable by Cr. 6 (and probably forced by the template too)
957:
2182:
1979:
I agree with
Bignole that everything should be on the page, not transcluded from somewhere else. Why there are episode summaries when I press the edit button, but they don't show up on the page? --
1171:
1317:
276:
2122:
1811:
1694:
1612:
1544:
1512:
1401:
1101:
987:
recommend emailing their webmaster and asking them to fix those pages. I also must second the question on those production numbers. If they are from TV.com or IMDB, the column needs to go. --
71:
462:
and were broadcast on Fox in the weeks leading up to the season premiere. The first documents the shows impact on popular culture, and the second provides "a day in the life" of the show."
1492:
230:
91:
1938:
talk page on this issue. It seems that others are slightly confused as well. I've asked for clarification on linking a name each time it appears when it appears in 3 rows in a row.
1724:
seclude pages from the public. Scrolling reference boxes were nice too, but we discourage them because they forced people to actually have to scroll through to exam sources.
565:
1642:
one doesn't, that does not mean it is right! I have added back the transclusion as, thanks to you, I found a way to fix the visual appeal width issue at the same time.
165:"Season three was twenty-five episodes long, but only sixteen episodes were ordered for the final fourth season as falling ratings meant the show was cancelled."--: -->
450:"This section indexes official specials and recap episodes that were made specifically by the creators of The O.C." Don't refer to WP. How about something like "Two
1867:
No, it lists the number of episodes in the season. I do not believe it actually holds the readers' hands and says "2+2=4". It allows them to add it up themselves.
1440:
860:
1631:
1406:
1384:
166:
Season three was twenty-five episodes long, but only sixteen episodes were ordered for the final fourth season as falling ratings led to the show's cancellation.
2094:
2051:
2020:
1718:
1486:
1122:
1004:
916:
757:
699:
248:
962:
I was actually meaning that you should place a ref name tag in "Original
Airdate" section of each table. That will easily show that each season is referenced.
944:
I think replacing one encompassing general reference by 92 specific ones is excessive, and as such will leave it as it is, unless further objection is raised.
192:"For registered members of the US iTunes Store episodes of the first, second, and fourth season are available to purchase and download." Comma after "Store".
1635:
1965:
as article is easy to follow (works good as a table of contents to other articles) and well verified with multiple references. Good job! Sincerely, --
773:
Try to find the missing viewing figures. The empty table cells make it glaringly obvious that the information is missing. Does this meet criterion 3 at
40:
488:
I don't see the four general references as necessary. Wouldn't The OC Insider be better since it also offers airdates? If you do stick with it, use
823:
another set of items, and that set is not complete. I'm happy to wait and see if anyone else comments on this though. Perhaps request someone from
1626:) a 11,972 byte page to 100,003 bytes without adding any information. How is that a good idea. Featured episode lists commonly transclude e.g.
1107:
episode are the estimated figures. The official numbers are usually not calculated until about a week later (well, not released until then).
557:
1186:
Production codes are listed at the end of each episodes credits. If you want web verification they cannot all be found in any one place but
30:
17:
1430:
850:
747:
689:
593:
539:
332:
2217:"The O.C.' returns with two specials featuring exclusive behing-the-scenes footage, Thursday, Sept. 16, and Thursday, Sept. 23, on FOX"
515:
is a website and doesn't need formatting. Just remove TV Guide from the publisher=field, and put TVShowsOnDVD there instead of at work=
1000:
935:
1146:
1436:
856:
753:
695:
599:
545:
338:
1499:, and it does not apply here. "Table entries are an exception to this; each row of a table should be able to stand on its own".
2159:
1987:
1969:
1953:
1920:
1882:
1856:
1783:
1762:
1739:
1668:
1593:
1349:
1299:
1153:
1079:
977:
939:
603:
549:
342:
314:
295:
108:
140:
801:
797:
791:) I have also trawled through every Mediaweek Programming Insider from then with no luck. If anyone knows anywhere else
1639:
2175:
2115:
2066:
2031:
1999:
1804:
1687:
1604:
1537:
1505:
1455:
1394:
1310:
1304:
They are part of the template, and as
Matthew said the validity of their inclusion is not really something for FLC.
1266:
1212:
1164:
1094:
1043:
1033:
1015:
950:
879:
810:
724:
665:
269:
223:
84:
1088:
related to the
Nielsen Share rating. That leaves one missing, which can be worked out with maths from the average.
64:
2025:
I have removed the "hidden" episode summaries. Do you think the production codes and ratings should go as well?
1835:
1673:
I can see your point of view, however it doubles the required maintenance and transclusion was requested at the
1424:
844:
741:
683:
587:
533:
352:
326:
310:
1744:
Also, another advantage of using it is so that there isn't two versions of the same information on two pages.
1334:
I disagree. If a FLC can determine what needs to be added, then it can determine what should not be included.
787:. I have tried to find these beleive me. But ABC Medianet has broken pictures or ratings before Feb 11 2004 (
994:
929:
74:, and the four season it covers (& transcludes are in parts) are all featured. I think it meets all the
1650:
2049:
2018:
1985:
1927:
For "not each cell ", the rows do not link something that has been linked in the row before, it says rows
1257:
800:, and that not including them per comprehensiveness goes against improving Knowledge (XXG), and should be
179:"Additionally The O.C. The Complete Series was released on November 27, 2007" Comma after "Additionally".
2170:
2155:
2110:
2061:
2026:
1994:
1799:
1682:
1627:
1599:
1532:
1500:
1450:
1446:
1413:
1389:
1305:
1261:
1237:
1207:
1159:
1140:
1089:
1038:
1010:
945:
874:
805:
719:
660:
264:
218:
79:
1935:
1496:
1468:
988:
923:
828:
370:
1834:
directors for the specials. They have no writers as such, as they are just clips, cast interviews etc.
2056:
I would leave the ratings, not sure bout the prodcodes. It would require a new template to be made. (
1527:
I have sorted the Cr. 6 Visual appeal and managed to transclude the tables at 99% length, thanks to
1755:
1711:
1420:
1256:
The production codes appear right at the end of the credits, like this one for the pilot episode -
840:
737:
679:
583:
529:
492:
459:
322:
306:
147:"The show ran until February 22, 2007, with a total of 92 episodes split over four seasons."--: -->
1837:
451:
291:
244:
236:
134:
119:
104:
2166:
2089:
2044:
2013:
1980:
1948:
1915:
1877:
1851:
1778:
1734:
1663:
1588:
1481:
1344:
1294:
1117:
1074:
1061:
972:
911:
774:
75:
53:
1646:
386:
2151:
1194:
which lists some of the production codes in a summary box next on individual episode pages (
1132:
836:
512:
2216:
788:
1645:
Size isn't a problem. The 100k is all code, thus it doesn't meet the idea of the article
1203:
1187:
1028:
824:
1746:
1702:
656:
1966:
287:
240:
130:
115:
100:
1027:
Assuming the webmaster doesn't fix this, the missing figures can be calculated from
2080:
1939:
1906:
1868:
1842:
1769:
1725:
1654:
1579:
1472:
1335:
1285:
1108:
1065:
963:
902:
832:
366:
1571:
781:. It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing a complete set of items"
1377:
Give all four tables of the seasons the same column widths so everything aligns
898:
528:
Sorry, I meant it doesn't need itallicising, but I guess you knew what I meant.
1195:
455:
395:
391:
148:
The show ran until
February 22, 2007, with 92 episodes split over 4 seasons.
582:
Everything else looks good. FL Criteria 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7 appear to be met.
1060:
url (I read above about somethinb being "broken"), then have you tried the
361:
621:
I can see this info. but before it's addition please see comment below.
609:
Consider whether it's worth mentioning that the Fox/NBC joint venture
1199:
645:
641:
1567:
never send someone to another page to edit the one that they are on.
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
653:
150:
MOSNUM says to make comparative quantities written out the same way
1445:
Further comment - I know this is by no means justification but in
424:
Use "United States" before "US", and "United Kingdom" before "UK"
1467:
Adjust it, it should be completely over. Another issue. Linking.
1247:
field. I feel that part of the discussion should be taken up at
610:
411:"The show" implies it's a one-off. "The series" is better, IMHO
2169:
says that months should be expressed as "whole words". Thanks,
2208:
1191:
614:
564:
describe it as a soap opera, rather a teen drama. What about
1084:
But two of them are not theoretically anything, as they are
1419:. Any alignment is forced by that template. <shrugs: -->
652:
Not being from the US, the link automatically redirects to
1798:
Translcusion is gone, per discussion with Scorpion0422.
1677:
I have not reverted your change at the moment, and have
1471:. You should only link a name once, not every instance.
2060:) But I will do this if there is enough demand for it.
2057:
2043:
It's up to you, it doesn't matter to me either way. --
1831:
1678:
1623:
1528:
1127:
873:
Request for comment made to all above mentioned users.
715:
217:
done it. I am very open to suggestions on this though.
57:
736:
That appears to be a good summary, and works for me.
1388:problems. Please let me know your opinion on this.
1228:Just confirming that production codes for The O.C.
566:Category:Lists of drama television series episodes
2188:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
718:is an accurate description of what is available.
1651:Just because others did it doesn't make it right
263:, thanks for that I didn't think it would work.
2165:The 3 letter month abbreviations are not used.
1598:First indented points below are responses from
305:Good list, good introduction and well sourced.
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
1675:List of The Office (US TV series) episodes FLC
2194:No further edits should be made to this page.
2109:, prod codes have gone, ratings have stayed.
1889:The thing you consider as a "DVD table" is a
41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured list candidates
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
1934:There seems to be dissention over at the
205:The Note system is not working properly.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured list candidates
2200:
556:Categories need fixing. It appears in
390:"troubled teenager". I'd also prefer "
351:- Sorry I missed the PR, I was having
1681:from Gary who brought this up there.
1383:. I have considered this, but (using
804:. Let me know your thoughts on this.
558:Category:Lists of soap opera episodes
7:
1495:with The Rambling Man before about
511:Ref 4 needs formatting correctly.
458:, were produced to complement the
78:. Thanks in advance for comments,
24:
1901:repetition of DVD release dates.
239:system. I can do it if you want.
2100:
1789:
1518:
1469:This page is severely overlinked
1355:
1260:(apologies for the low quality)
705:
625:
570:
517:
500:
477:
464:
439:
426:
413:
400:
374:
254:
194:
181:
168:
154:
1:
1970:15:14, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
1954:23:15, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
1921:23:15, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
1883:23:15, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
1857:23:15, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
1784:23:44, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
1763:23:40, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
1740:23:39, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
1719:23:35, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
1695:23:32, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
1669:23:15, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
1613:20:41, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
1594:13:40, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
1545:20:41, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
1513:12:41, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
1487:00:34, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
1463:18:03, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
1441:16:57, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
1402:15:44, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
1350:00:34, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
1318:22:56, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
1300:22:25, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
1274:09:48, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
1220:18:44, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
1172:12:41, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
1154:22:07, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
1123:00:34, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
1102:22:56, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
1080:22:25, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
1051:19:14, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
1023:18:44, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
1009:I have emailed the webmaster
1005:11:06, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
978:22:25, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
958:18:44, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
940:11:06, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
917:19:57, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
887:17:53, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
861:16:57, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
818:15:44, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
758:02:50, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
732:17:53, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
700:16:57, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
673:15:44, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
604:07:12, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
550:16:57, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
343:02:50, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
315:00:46, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
296:18:46, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
277:16:01, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
249:00:36, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
231:19:00, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
109:16:12, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
92:23:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
2183:14:40, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
2160:13:14, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
2123:17:07, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
2095:23:30, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
2074:22:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
2052:22:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
2039:22:34, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
2021:22:29, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
2007:22:19, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
1988:22:11, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
1812:22:34, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
1365:17:07, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
659:the content on the WB site.
454:, not part of the official
70:This has undergone a brief
2244:
1638:etc. Just because "your"
65:List of The O.C. episodes
2191:Please do not modify it.
1190:that verfy them include
36:Please do not modify it.
31:featured list nomination
1258:Image:TheOCprodcode.jpg
560:, but no article about
99:, all issues resolved.
56:01:46, 6 December 2008
1897:. Now you are arguing
613:carries some episodes
1622:You have just taken (
1572:Take a page from here
1447:List of Lost episodes
1202:who also list some. (
321:Resolved issues from
899:the MSN listing here
1243:which includes the
2219:. The Futon Critic
237:Template:Ref label
2180:
2120:
2092:
2087:
2071:
2036:
2004:
1951:
1946:
1918:
1913:
1880:
1875:
1854:
1849:
1809:
1781:
1776:
1737:
1732:
1692:
1679:requested comment
1666:
1661:
1609:
1591:
1586:
1564:- Formal oppose.
1542:
1510:
1484:
1479:
1460:
1435:
1429:
1399:
1366:
1347:
1342:
1315:
1297:
1292:
1271:
1217:
1169:
1152:
1120:
1115:
1099:
1077:
1072:
1062:Internet Archives
1048:
1020:
975:
970:
955:
914:
909:
889:
884:
855:
849:
839:to comment here?
829:User:Collectonian
815:
779:Comprehensiveness
752:
746:
729:
694:
688:
670:
598:
592:
544:
538:
385:"troubled teen":
337:
331:
274:
228:
114:Resolved issues,
89:
54:User:Scorpion0422
2235:
2228:
2227:
2225:
2224:
2205:
2193:
2176:
2116:
2108:
2104:
2103:
2090:
2085:
2081:
2067:
2047:
2032:
2016:
2000:
1983:
1949:
1944:
1940:
1916:
1911:
1907:
1878:
1873:
1869:
1852:
1847:
1843:
1805:
1797:
1793:
1792:
1779:
1774:
1770:
1761:
1758:
1752:
1735:
1730:
1726:
1717:
1714:
1708:
1688:
1664:
1659:
1655:
1605:
1589:
1584:
1580:
1538:
1526:
1522:
1521:
1506:
1482:
1477:
1473:
1456:
1433:
1427:
1418:
1412:
1395:
1364:
1363:
1359:
1358:
1345:
1340:
1336:
1311:
1295:
1290:
1286:
1267:
1249:
1248:
1246:
1242:
1236:
1213:
1188:reliable sources
1165:
1149:
1143:
1138:
1135:
1118:
1113:
1109:
1095:
1075:
1070:
1066:
1044:
1029:reliably sourced
1016:
991:
973:
968:
964:
951:
926:
912:
907:
903:
880:
872:
853:
847:
837:User:Thedemonhog
811:
750:
744:
725:
713:
709:
708:
692:
686:
666:
633:
629:
628:
596:
590:
578:
574:
573:
542:
536:
525:
521:
520:
513:TVShowsOnDVD.com
508:
504:
503:
497:
491:
485:
481:
480:
472:
468:
467:
452:special episodes
447:
443:
442:
434:
430:
429:
421:
417:
416:
408:
404:
403:
382:
378:
377:
335:
329:
270:
262:
258:
257:
224:
202:
198:
197:
189:
185:
184:
176:
172:
171:
162:
158:
157:
85:
38:
2243:
2242:
2238:
2237:
2236:
2234:
2233:
2232:
2231:
2222:
2220:
2207:
2206:
2202:
2198:
2189:
2172:Rambo's Revenge
2112:Rambo's Revenge
2101:
2099:
2083:
2063:Rambo's Revenge
2045:
2028:Rambo's Revenge
2014:
1996:Rambo's Revenge
1981:
1942:
1909:
1891:Series overview
1871:
1845:
1801:Rambo's Revenge
1790:
1788:
1772:
1756:
1747:
1745:
1728:
1712:
1703:
1701:
1684:Rambo's Revenge
1657:
1601:Rambo's Revenge
1582:
1534:Rambo's Revenge
1519:
1517:
1502:Rambo's Revenge
1493:this discussion
1475:
1452:Rambo's Revenge
1416:
1410:
1391:Rambo's Revenge
1356:
1354:
1338:
1307:Rambo's Revenge
1288:
1263:Rambo's Revenge
1244:
1240:
1234:
1209:Rambo's Revenge
1161:Rambo's Revenge
1147:
1141:
1133:
1111:
1091:Rambo's Revenge
1068:
1040:Rambo's Revenge
1037:be acceptable?
1012:Rambo's Revenge
989:
966:
947:Rambo's Revenge
924:
905:
876:Rambo's Revenge
807:Rambo's Revenge
771:
770:
721:Rambo's Revenge
706:
704:
662:Rambo's Revenge
644:'s new website
626:
624:
571:
569:
518:
516:
501:
499:
495:
489:
478:
476:
465:
463:
440:
438:
427:
425:
414:
412:
401:
399:
375:
373:
345:
299:
298:
266:Rambo's Revenge
255:
253:
235:Consider using
220:Rambo's Revenge
195:
193:
182:
180:
169:
167:
155:
153:
123:
81:Rambo's Revenge
68:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2241:
2239:
2230:
2229:
2215:(2004-08-26).
2199:
2197:
2196:
2185:
2140:
2139:
2138:
2137:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2133:
2132:
2131:
2130:
2129:
2128:
2127:
2126:
2125:
1973:
1972:
1960:
1959:
1958:
1957:
1956:
1925:
1924:
1923:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1616:
1615:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1515:
1421:Matthewedwards
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1277:
1276:
1251:
1250:
1223:
1222:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
960:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
841:Matthewedwards
769:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
760:
738:Matthewedwards
680:Matthewedwards
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
584:Matthewedwards
580:
579:
554:
553:
552:
530:Matthewedwards
509:
486:
473:
448:
435:
422:
409:
396:teenaged drama
383:
346:
323:Matthewedwards
320:
319:
318:
317:
307:BritishWatcher
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
280:
279:
203:
190:
177:
163:
124:
113:
112:
67:
62:
61:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2240:
2218:
2214:
2213:Press release
2210:
2204:
2201:
2195:
2192:
2186:
2184:
2181:
2179:
2174:
2173:
2168:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2161:
2157:
2153:
2149:
2144:
2124:
2121:
2119:
2114:
2113:
2107:
2098:
2097:
2096:
2093:
2088:
2086:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2072:
2070:
2065:
2064:
2059:
2055:
2054:
2053:
2050:
2048:
2042:
2041:
2040:
2037:
2035:
2030:
2029:
2024:
2023:
2022:
2019:
2017:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2005:
2003:
1998:
1997:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1986:
1984:
1978:
1975:
1974:
1971:
1968:
1964:
1961:
1955:
1952:
1947:
1945:
1937:
1933:
1932:
1930:
1926:
1922:
1919:
1914:
1912:
1903:
1902:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1888:
1884:
1881:
1876:
1874:
1866:
1865:
1862:
1858:
1855:
1850:
1848:
1841:That's cool.
1840:
1839:
1838:
1836:
1833:
1829:
1813:
1810:
1808:
1803:
1802:
1796:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1782:
1777:
1775:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1759:
1753:
1751:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1738:
1733:
1731:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1715:
1709:
1707:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1693:
1691:
1686:
1685:
1680:
1676:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1667:
1662:
1660:
1652:
1648:
1647:being too big
1644:
1643:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1618:
1617:
1614:
1610:
1608:
1603:
1602:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1592:
1587:
1585:
1578:
1573:
1568:
1563:
1560:
1559:
1546:
1543:
1541:
1536:
1535:
1530:
1525:
1516:
1514:
1511:
1509:
1504:
1503:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1485:
1480:
1478:
1470:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1461:
1459:
1454:
1453:
1448:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1438:
1432:
1426:
1422:
1415:
1408:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1400:
1398:
1393:
1392:
1386:
1382:
1379:
1378:
1376:
1375:Visual appeal
1373:Criterion 6.
1372:
1371:
1362:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1348:
1343:
1341:
1333:
1319:
1316:
1314:
1309:
1308:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1298:
1293:
1291:
1283:
1279:
1278:
1275:
1272:
1270:
1265:
1264:
1259:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1239:
1231:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1221:
1218:
1216:
1211:
1210:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1184:
1173:
1170:
1168:
1163:
1162:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1151:
1150:
1144:
1137:
1136:
1129:
1128:There you go.
1126:
1125:
1124:
1121:
1116:
1114:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1100:
1098:
1093:
1092:
1087:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1078:
1073:
1071:
1063:
1058:
1057:
1052:
1049:
1047:
1042:
1041:
1036:
1035:
1030:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1021:
1019:
1014:
1013:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1002:
999:
996:
992:
985:
979:
976:
971:
969:
961:
959:
956:
954:
949:
948:
943:
942:
941:
937:
934:
931:
927:
920:
919:
918:
915:
910:
908:
900:
896:
891:
890:
888:
885:
883:
878:
877:
871:
870:
869:
868:
862:
858:
852:
846:
842:
838:
834:
830:
826:
821:
820:
819:
816:
814:
809:
808:
803:
799:
794:
790:
786:
783:
782:
780:
776:
772:
759:
755:
749:
743:
739:
735:
734:
733:
730:
728:
723:
722:
717:
712:
703:
702:
701:
697:
691:
685:
681:
676:
675:
674:
671:
669:
664:
663:
658:
654:
651:
648:
647:
646:
643:
639:
632:
623:
622:
620:
617:
616:
615:
612:
608:
607:
606:
605:
601:
595:
589:
585:
577:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
541:
535:
531:
527:
526:
524:
514:
510:
507:
494:
487:
484:
474:
471:
461:
460:second season
457:
453:
449:
446:
436:
433:
423:
420:
410:
407:
397:
393:
388:
384:
381:
372:
371:WP:Overlinked
368:
364:
363:
358:
357:
356:
354:
350:
344:
340:
334:
328:
324:
316:
312:
308:
304:
301:
300:
297:
293:
289:
278:
275:
273:
268:
267:
261:
252:
251:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
233:
232:
229:
227:
222:
221:
215:
212:
211:
210:
209:
204:
201:
191:
188:
178:
175:
164:
161:
151:
146:
145:
144:
142:
139:
136:
132:
128:
121:
117:
111:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
93:
90:
88:
83:
82:
77:
73:
66:
63:
60:
58:
55:
51:
48:The list was
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
2221:. Retrieved
2212:
2203:
2190:
2187:
2177:
2171:
2147:
2142:
2141:
2117:
2111:
2105:
2091:(Contact me)
2082:
2068:
2062:
2033:
2027:
2001:
1995:
1976:
1962:
1950:(Contact me)
1941:
1928:
1917:(Contact me)
1908:
1898:
1895:previous FLC
1890:
1879:(Contact me)
1870:
1853:(Contact me)
1844:
1806:
1800:
1794:
1780:(Contact me)
1771:
1749:
1736:(Contact me)
1727:
1705:
1689:
1683:
1665:(Contact me)
1656:
1619:
1606:
1600:
1590:(Contact me)
1581:
1575:
1565:
1561:
1539:
1533:
1531:by Bignole.
1523:
1507:
1501:
1483:(Contact me)
1474:
1457:
1451:
1414:episode list
1396:
1390:
1380:
1374:
1360:
1346:(Contact me)
1337:
1312:
1306:
1296:(Contact me)
1287:
1280:
1268:
1262:
1238:episode list
1229:
1214:
1208:
1166:
1160:
1139:
1131:
1119:(Contact me)
1110:
1096:
1090:
1085:
1076:(Contact me)
1067:
1045:
1039:
1032:
1031:data. Would
1017:
1011:
997:
990:Collectonian
974:(Contact me)
965:
952:
946:
932:
925:Collectonian
913:(Contact me)
904:
894:
881:
875:
833:User:Bignole
812:
806:
798:common sense
792:
784:
778:
726:
720:
710:
667:
661:
649:
630:
618:
581:
575:
561:
522:
505:
482:
469:
444:
431:
418:
405:
379:
367:iTunes Store
360:
348:
347:
302:
271:
265:
259:
225:
219:
213:
207:
206:
199:
186:
173:
159:
149:
137:
126:
125:
96:
95:
86:
80:
69:
49:
47:
35:
28:
2152:Dillypickle
1936:WP:OVERLINK
1577:"episodes".
1497:WP:OVERLINK
1134:thedemonhog
714:, assuming
353:some issues
72:peer review
2223:2008-11-21
2146:FLs, so i
1832:have added
1640:Smallville
1636:The Office
1245:prod code=
1204:An example
827:, such as
493:cite video
456:continuity
392:teen drama
1931:columns.
1491:I've had
1196:like this
789:Like this
568:instead?
394:" to be "
2167:WP:MONTH
2084:BIGNOLE
2058:See this
2046:Scorpion
2015:Scorpion
1982:Scorpion
1967:A Nobody
1943:BIGNOLE
1910:BIGNOLE
1872:BIGNOLE
1846:BIGNOLE
1773:BIGNOLE
1729:BIGNOLE
1658:BIGNOLE
1583:BIGNOLE
1476:BIGNOLE
1431:contribs
1339:BIGNOLE
1289:BIGNOLE
1158:Thanks,
1112:BIGNOLE
1086:directly
1069:BIGNOLE
1001:contribs
967:BIGNOLE
936:contribs
906:BIGNOLE
851:contribs
748:contribs
690:contribs
640:As does
594:contribs
562:The O.C.
540:contribs
362:The O.C.
349:Comments
341:) as of
333:contribs
288:Dabomb87
241:Dabomb87
141:contribs
131:Dabomb87
127:Comments
116:Dabomb87
101:Dabomb87
76:criteria
50:promoted
2148:support
2143:Comment
1977:Comment
1963:Support
1529:an edit
1381:Comment
1282:columns
802:ignored
785:Comment
650:Comment
619:On hold
389:--: -->
387:WP:TONE
365:" and "
303:Support
214:Comment
208:On hold
97:Support
2178:(talk)
2118:(talk)
2069:(talk)
2034:(talk)
2002:(talk)
1807:(talk)
1690:(talk)
1607:(talk)
1562:Oppose
1540:(talk)
1508:(talk)
1458:(talk)
1397:(talk)
1313:(talk)
1269:(talk)
1215:(talk)
1200:CNBC-e
1198:) and
1167:(talk)
1097:(talk)
1046:(talk)
1018:(talk)
953:(talk)
895:Notes:
882:(talk)
813:(talk)
793:please
775:WP:FL?
727:(talk)
668:(talk)
657:verify
642:The WB
369:" are
272:(talk)
226:(talk)
87:(talk)
1748:Gary
1704:Gary
1632:D:TNG
1620:What!
1437:email
1409:uses
1407:D:TNG
1385:D:TNG
1148:edits
857:email
825:WP:TV
754:email
696:email
600:email
546:email
339:email
129:from
16:<
2156:talk
2106:Done
1795:Done
1757:talk
1750:King
1713:talk
1706:King
1628:Lost
1624:diff
1524:Done
1425:talk
1361:Done
1142:talk
1034:this
995:talk
930:talk
845:talk
742:talk
716:this
711:Done
684:talk
631:Done
611:Hulu
588:talk
576:Done
534:talk
523:Done
506:Done
483:Done
470:Done
445:Done
432:Done
419:Done
406:Done
380:Done
327:talk
311:talk
292:talk
260:Done
245:talk
200:Done
187:Done
174:Done
160:Done
135:talk
120:talk
105:talk
2209:FOX
1929:not
1899:for
1611:at
1230:are
1192:IGN
835:or
52:by
2211::
2158:)
1830:I
1649:.
1634:,
1630:,
1574:.
1439:)
1417:}}
1411:{{
1284:.
1241:}}
1235:{{
1206:)
1145:•
1064:?
1003:)
938:)
859:)
831:,
756:)
698:)
602:)
548:)
498:.
496:}}
490:{{
398:"
355:.
313:)
294:)
247:)
152:.
143:)
107:)
59:.
33:.
2226:.
2154:(
2150:.
1760:)
1754:(
1716:)
1710:(
1434:•
1428:•
1423:(
1130:–
998:·
993:(
933:·
928:(
854:•
848:•
843:(
777:"
751:•
745:•
740:(
693:•
687:•
682:(
597:•
591:•
586:(
543:•
537:•
532:(
359:"
336:•
330:•
325:(
309:(
290:(
243:(
138:·
133:(
122:)
118:(
103:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.