Knowledge

:Featured list candidates/List of parasites of the marsh rice rat/archive1 - Knowledge

Source 📝

314:
think it's hazardous to generalize from that. That said, I was able to add a few bits from Kinsella and something about Lyme. The marsh rice rat carries a hantavirus, but it's apparently transmitted directly rodent-to-rodent, not through a mite or so. As far as I know, there's no real record of diseases caused by the parasites in the rats themselves. On the one hand, I can't image it's good for a rat to have 30,000 worms sitting in its small intestine (Kinsella didn't even bother to count some nematodes individually); on the other hand, every single rice rat Kinsella examined was infected with some parasites, and those are normal populations.
515:
In most cases, the "common name" would just be an anglicized version of the scientific name (i.e., digeneans, apicomplexans), which doesn't help much. I thought it would be cleaner to consistently use scientific names. For the groups that do have a real common name, it is mentioned in the first line
309:
I'd like to see more information about parasites in the intro. Do the ectoparasites live on the skin surface? Burrow in the hair follices? Do they feed on flesh rat flesh or dead skin cells? Do they cause diseases to the rats? Do endoparasites flow through the rat's blood? Are they vectors for viral
168:
This is a first of its kind on FLC, and indeed is only the second such list of parasites on Knowledge. I have had to consult many sources to compile this list (and got some help from Lance Durden, who has done some great work on ectoparasites, including those of this species) and I believe it is now
313:
I know the intro is rather thin, but that is because there are very few synthetic studies of marsh rice rat parasites (in fact, the only one is Kinsella (1988), which is also only nine pages). There are some papers that do answer some of these questions for individual parasites, of course, but I
614:, but I have been unable to find more in the literature. (Notice, for example, that the endoparasites are almost exclusively known from Florida—if someone does a study of the scale and depth of Kinsella (1988) in Texas or Virginia, they may find a very different endoparasite fauna.) 117: 228:
Sorry, I forgot about this (there's disadvantages to having 9000 things on your watchlist). I had a close look, but couldn't see anything to complain about. Very esoteric, but scholarly and thorough. Meets all the criteria for a Featured List.
169:
complete. All entries in the list are bluelinked (except for one I discovered while checking dab links—I'll rectify that later today); I had to write new articles on most. If passed, this list will complete a featured topic on
468:
is there any information on how any of these parasites impact on the health of their host? It would be great to add if known. if not known, is it possible to source a statement saying that their effects are unknown or poorly
391:
I don't think you need quote marks for using one word like "unprecedented". It might actually be better to clarify to "a number unequalled in other rodent studies (or does he mean mammals, vertebrates or all life
687:
It is in capitals when it is at the beginning of a sentence, and in lowercase when it is not; it is before the page number when I would say "pages x to y", and behind it when I would say "z pages".
88: 83: 92: 511:
I am wondering for accessability whether using common names would be better than scientific ones for the subheadings above each group of parasite. I can see reasons for both ways however.
75: 663:
As explained in the key (and explained a little more clearly now), this is simply a fraction, and the reason for the /29 is that one study looked at the parasites of 29 rice rats.
133: 473:
No and no, unfortunately. As I wrote to Sasata above, they probably do have some effect, but the rats also seem to do pretty well despite having loads of worms with them.
280:
The current title sounds more natural to me at least, though. But the decision is subjective and I have no real problem with your proposed title. Thanks for the support.
660:
Any clear reason why prevalence is given in such a weird way (e.g. 14/29?) Perhaps a note to let non-experts understand why x/29 is such an important descriptor.
786:
The term "clade" is used without explanation or link under "Apicomplexa". Personally, I don't care... but not everyone would agree. I'd be happy with a link.
79: 823: 813: 746: 737: 711: 701: 639: 618: 597: 579: 569: 538: 495: 431: 418: 381: 318: 302: 284: 275: 249: 238: 219: 199: 179: 160: 71: 64: 40: 138: 298:
The concepts seem similar, but I'm not a parasitologist and I prefer to use the phrase the sources use, which is "intermediate host".
30: 17: 565: 534: 491: 414: 377: 776:
In the "Present in other species?" column, you switch between "Yes;" and "Yes," at least once or twice. (very minor)
733: 697: 635: 603:
But please cite smartly, make a note that "Kinsella, 1988, p. 278" sources one column, unless otherwise noted.
325:
It's mentioned that 45 species on the marsh rice rat is "unprecedented"; are there similar studies with, say,
684:
Is it Pp. or pp.? and does it go in front or behind the page numbers? At least be internally consistent...
257: 805: 427:
Sorry, clarified that it is unprecedented in rodents, and took something close to your suggested wording.
610:. Thanks for your support. I have little doubt that there are in fact more parasites that occur on or in 729: 693: 631: 593: 589: 403:
I just thought that altering it as above allows one to clarify what it is being compared with...?
559: 528: 485: 408: 371: 310:
diseases? Can these parasites be transferred to domestic pets? Are mouse rice rats kept as pets?
186: 799: 335: 327: 652:"an unequaled number in rodents" perhaps would be better as "a number unequaled in rodents"? 820: 743: 708: 615: 576: 428: 315: 299: 281: 271: 246: 234: 215: 196: 176: 157: 347: 555: 524: 481: 404: 367: 339: 53: 343: 724:
Forcing the column widths using an explicit % or px width. For further info, see
109: 718:
Would recommend each col is the same width from section to section, if possible.
267: 230: 211: 725: 210:
Here's some thoughts on the intro. I'll read and comment on the rest later.
171: 118:
Featured list candidates/List of parasites of the marsh rice rat/archive1
256:
Is the title correct? Why not "List of marsh rice rat parasites"? Eg. "
676:
Musser's ref seems to have a pp. despite it being only a single page.
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
266:
One is more succinct, and doesn't repeat the word "of" twice.
189:
and at two user talk pages to ask for reviews of this article.
780:
I changed all to semicolons, except where it says "Yes, but".
295:
is "intermediate host" equivalent to vector (epidemiology)?
334:
Not as far as I know. Kinsella did similar studies on the
263:
I don't see much advantage in either title, to be honest.
143: 649:
remarkably bold list and one I welcome whole-heartedly.
671:
No good reason, really; I removed the one (?) instance.
607: 194: 192: 190: 105: 101: 97: 57: 796:
Everything else looked fine to my eyes. Good job! –
175:. I am looking forward to your comments and reviews. 452:- I think I'd change it to "to its omnivorous diet" 366:: sorry, got distracted and forgot about this one. 396:Well, I use quote marks because it is a quote. :-) 834:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. 588:a good exhaustive(?) list, from the biology dep. 43:. No further edits should be made to this page. 840:No further edits should be made to this page. 260:" vs. "List of species of the genus Amanita" 29:The following is an archived discussion of a 8: 480:I figured that might be the case...ah well. 625: 122: 628: 125: 115: 72:List of parasites of the marsh rice rat 65:List of parasites of the marsh rice rat 41:Knowledge talk:Featured list candidates 770:: Nice list! Just a few small things: 721:Seems a good idea; how is that done? 7: 679:Don't see what you're referring to. 24: 18:Knowledge:Featured list candidates 450:...'to its omnivorous food habits 350:, which together had 19 species. 338:, which had 25 species, and the 185:Note that I've left messages at 1: 550:Overall, looking pretty good 857: 824:16:17, 13 July 2010 (UTC) 814:21:44, 12 July 2010 (UTC) 747:16:17, 13 July 2010 (UTC) 738:07:36, 13 July 2010 (UTC) 712:19:33, 12 July 2010 (UTC) 702:19:10, 12 July 2010 (UTC) 640:14:06, 14 July 2010 (UTC) 516:of the introductory text. 285:06:23, 14 July 2010 (UTC) 276:01:04, 14 July 2010 (UTC) 239:01:02, 14 July 2010 (UTC) 180:06:42, 29 June 2010 (UTC) 161:06:42, 29 June 2010 (UTC) 837:Please do not modify it. 619:16:12, 6 July 2010 (UTC) 598:13:03, 6 July 2010 (UTC) 580:06:23, 5 July 2010 (UTC) 570:03:23, 5 July 2010 (UTC) 539:06:39, 5 July 2010 (UTC) 496:06:39, 5 July 2010 (UTC) 432:15:45, 5 July 2010 (UTC) 419:06:41, 5 July 2010 (UTC) 382:03:15, 5 July 2010 (UTC) 319:18:33, 4 July 2010 (UTC) 303:18:33, 4 July 2010 (UTC) 250:18:33, 4 July 2010 (UTC) 220:17:46, 4 July 2010 (UTC) 200:16:35, 4 July 2010 (UTC) 36:Please do not modify it. 31:featured list nomination 707:Thanks for the review! 668:Why include 0% places? 630:Resolved comments from 575:Thanks for the review! 258:List of Amanita species 819:Thanks for reviewing. 552:despite quibbles above 245:Thanks for reviewing. 56:20:51, 14 July 2010 364:- taking a look now 760: 759: 336:hispid cotton rat 328:Rattus norvegicus 164: 151: 150: 848: 839: 811: 808: 802: 730:The Rambling Man 694:The Rambling Man 632:The Rambling Man 629: 626: 154: 123: 113: 95: 38: 856: 855: 851: 850: 849: 847: 846: 845: 844: 835: 806: 800: 798: 331:to compare to? 86: 70: 68: 34: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 854: 852: 843: 842: 829: 827: 826: 794: 793: 792: 791: 783: 782: 781: 762: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 742:Thanks; done. 715: 714: 691: 690: 689: 688: 682: 681: 680: 674: 673: 672: 666: 665: 664: 658: 657: 656: 643: 642: 624: 623: 622: 621: 583: 582: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 518: 517: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 499: 498: 475: 474: 462: 461: 460: 459: 458: 457: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 422: 421: 398: 397: 385: 384: 354: 353: 352: 351: 348:oldfield mouse 323: 322: 321: 307: 306: 305: 293: 292: 291: 290: 289: 288: 287: 253: 252: 242: 241: 203: 202: 166: 165: 156:Nominator(s): 149: 148: 147: 146: 144:External links 141: 136: 128: 127: 121: 120: 67: 62: 61: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 853: 841: 838: 832: 831: 830: 825: 822: 818: 817: 816: 815: 812: 809: 803: 789: 788: 787: 784: 779: 778: 777: 774: 773: 772: 771: 769: 765: 748: 745: 741: 740: 739: 735: 731: 727: 723: 722: 720: 719: 717: 716: 713: 710: 706: 705: 704: 703: 699: 695: 686: 685: 683: 678: 677: 675: 670: 669: 667: 662: 661: 659: 655:Yes, changed. 654: 653: 651: 650: 648: 645: 644: 641: 637: 633: 627: 620: 617: 613: 609: 605: 604: 602: 601: 600: 599: 595: 591: 587: 581: 578: 574: 573: 572: 571: 567: 564: 561: 557: 553: 540: 536: 533: 530: 526: 523:fair enough. 522: 521: 520: 519: 514: 513: 512: 509: 508: 507: 506: 497: 493: 490: 487: 483: 479: 478: 477: 476: 472: 471: 470: 466: 465: 464: 463: 456:Yes, changed. 455: 454: 453: 451: 447: 446: 445: 444: 433: 430: 426: 425: 424: 423: 420: 416: 413: 410: 406: 402: 401: 400: 399: 395: 394: 393: 389: 388: 387: 386: 383: 379: 376: 373: 369: 365: 362: 361: 356: 355: 349: 345: 341: 340:Florida mouse 337: 333: 332: 330: 329: 324: 320: 317: 312: 311: 308: 304: 301: 297: 296: 294: 286: 283: 279: 278: 277: 273: 269: 265: 264: 262: 261: 259: 255: 254: 251: 248: 244: 243: 240: 236: 232: 227: 224: 223: 222: 221: 217: 213: 209: 208: 201: 198: 195: 193: 191: 188: 184: 183: 182: 181: 178: 174: 173: 163: 162: 159: 153: 152: 145: 142: 140: 137: 135: 132: 131: 130: 129: 124: 119: 116: 114: 111: 107: 103: 99: 94: 90: 85: 81: 77: 73: 66: 63: 60: 58: 55: 51: 48:The list was 44: 42: 37: 32: 27: 26: 19: 836: 833: 828: 801:VisionHolder 797: 795: 785: 775: 767: 766: 763: 761: 692: 646: 612:O. palustris 611: 606:Good point, 585: 584: 562: 551: 549: 531: 510: 488: 467: 449: 448: 411: 390: 374: 363: 359: 357: 344:cotton mouse 326: 225: 206: 205: 204: 170: 167: 155: 139:Citation bot 69: 49: 47: 35: 28: 726:Help:Table 590:Sandman888 768:Comments 647:Comments 566:contribs 556:Casliber 535:contribs 525:Casliber 492:contribs 482:Casliber 415:contribs 405:Casliber 378:contribs 368:Casliber 360:comments 358:Support 207:Comments 172:Oryzomys 134:Analysis 54:Dabomb87 50:promoted 790:Linked. 764:Support 586:Support 392:forms?) 226:Support 126:Toolbox 89:protect 84:history 821:Ucucha 744:Ucucha 709:Ucucha 616:Ucucha 577:Ucucha 469:known? 429:Ucucha 346:, and 316:Ucucha 300:Ucucha 282:Ucucha 268:Sasata 247:Ucucha 231:Sasata 212:Sasata 197:Ucucha 187:WT:TOL 177:Ucucha 158:Ucucha 93:delete 807:talk 110:views 102:watch 98:links 16:< 734:talk 698:talk 636:talk 608:done 594:talk 560:talk 529:talk 486:talk 409:talk 372:talk 272:talk 235:talk 216:talk 106:logs 80:talk 76:edit 52:by 736:) 728:. 700:) 638:) 596:) 568:) 554:. 537:) 494:) 417:) 380:) 342:, 274:) 237:) 218:) 108:| 104:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 82:| 78:| 59:. 33:. 810:» 804:« 732:( 696:( 634:( 592:( 563:· 558:( 532:· 527:( 489:· 484:( 412:· 407:( 375:· 370:( 270:( 233:( 214:( 112:) 74:(

Index

Knowledge:Featured list candidates
featured list nomination
Knowledge talk:Featured list candidates
Dabomb87

List of parasites of the marsh rice rat
List of parasites of the marsh rice rat
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
Featured list candidates/List of parasites of the marsh rice rat/archive1
Analysis
Citation bot
External links
Ucucha
06:42, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Oryzomys
Ucucha
06:42, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
WT:TOL



Ucucha

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.