51:
73:
62:
87:
Highly encyclopedic set of images with good EV for illustrating the concept of colour balance in photography. Has everything you could want: a subject in a neutral-coloured shirt which underscores the differences, a colour pallette so you can see how different colours are affected by colour balance,
303:
because they are indeed faked. The lighting fixtures are photosouped onto the basic image, and don't give the correct distribution of lights and shadows. Leave them out, and fix the "cool" image (should be blueish, not greenish), and I might support.
257:, the images (although faked) are uncorrected (i.e. as shot or raw) sensor renderings given neutral, warm, and cold light sources. The designators are not necessarily the temperature of the (rendered) images. The labels given here are misleading!?
102:
413:
the fake part is only one part of one user's opinion, read all of the comments above, the images don't represent what the "reason" section of the nomination claims they do.
507:
497:
17:
434:
I could care less that they are faked, but the color is way off on image three, as mentioned above, and that just utterly destroys it for me.
502:
237:
461:. I think this is a great idea for a featured picture set, but I share concerns about the faking and the not-quite-right colours.
390:
446:
483:
470:
453:
422:
397:
375:
354:
329:
312:
286:
266:
245:
227:
185:
163:
149:
129:
282:
383:- I cannot see why a faked picture should be opposed. No matter it is faked or filtered, it is still possessing EV. -
325:
277:
All labels per the files. I'm out of town ATM, but I'll compare these in
Lightroom when I've got acess to it.
241:
278:
146:
340:
321:
110:
195:
159:
125:
388:
466:
441:
255:
418:
371:
350:
345:
all 3 images are nominated as a set (see "title" of the nomination and the "reason" section).
262:
223:
212:
180:
141:
191:
155:
121:
408:
384:
309:
462:
491:
480:
436:
94:
414:
367:
346:
258:
219:
208:
103:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured pictures/Photographic techniques, terms, and equipment
305:
50:
72:
61:
154:
Support stricken, as MITB has not been on
Knowledge (XXG) for 25 days. —
88:
and different sources of lighting which offer different colour balances.
71:
60:
49:
173:
Presumably faked - no-one holds still that long - but faked
35:
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.
236:. To my eye, "neutral" looks colder than "cold".
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
320:Which one of these three is nominated? --
508:Featured picture nominations/July 2016
139:For the first and the second pictures.
7:
91:Articles in which this image appears
498:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
254:If I read the source correctly
1:
503:Featured picture nominations
215:) 00:38, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
57:– 1: Neutral colour balance
524:
484:11:33, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
471:13:27, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
99:FP category for this image
454:20:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
423:17:54, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
398:15:14, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
376:03:50, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
355:03:50, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
330:17:21, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
313:05:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
287:05:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
267:03:58, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
246:02:51, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
228:01:04, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
186:07:33, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
164:10:54, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
150:07:29, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
130:06:26, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
79:– 3: Cold colour balance
68:– 2: Warm colour balance
80:
69:
58:
39:Voting period ends on
75:
64:
53:
385:The Herald (Benison)
118:Support as nominator
28:Colour balance (set)
279:Crisco 1492 mobile
81:
70:
59:
230:
218:withholding vote
47:
515:
451:
449:
444:
439:
412:
344:
217:
184:
38:
36:
523:
522:
518:
517:
516:
514:
513:
512:
488:
487:
447:
442:
437:
435:
406:
395:
338:
178:
37:
34:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
521:
519:
511:
510:
505:
500:
490:
489:
477:Not Promoted
474:
473:
456:
428:
427:
426:
425:
401:
400:
391:
378:
360:
359:
358:
357:
341:Rainbow Archer
333:
332:
322:Rainbow Archer
315:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
270:
269:
249:
248:
238:86.185.218.109
231:
201:
200:
199:
192:Chris Woodrich
168:
167:
166:
156:Chris Woodrich
132:
122:Chris Woodrich
114:
113:
108:
105:
100:
97:
92:
89:
85:
45:06:26:33 (UTC)
33:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
520:
509:
506:
504:
501:
499:
496:
495:
493:
486:
485:
482:
478:
472:
468:
464:
460:
457:
455:
450:
445:
440:
433:
430:
429:
424:
420:
416:
410:
405:
404:
403:
402:
399:
396:
394:
389:
386:
382:
379:
377:
373:
369:
366:– per above.
365:
362:
361:
356:
352:
348:
342:
337:
336:
335:
334:
331:
327:
323:
319:
316:
314:
311:
307:
302:
298:
297:
288:
284:
280:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
268:
264:
260:
256:
253:
252:
251:
250:
247:
243:
239:
235:
232:
229:
225:
221:
216:
214:
210:
206:
202:
197:
193:
189:
188:
187:
183:
182:
176:
172:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
152:
151:
148:
144:
143:
138:
137:
133:
131:
127:
123:
119:
116:
115:
112:
109:
106:
104:
101:
98:
96:
95:Color balance
93:
90:
86:
83:
82:
78:
74:
67:
63:
56:
52:
48:
46:
42:
29:
26:
19:
476:
475:
463:Josh Milburn
458:
431:
392:
380:
363:
317:
300:
233:
204:
203:
181:Adam Cuerden
179:
174:
170:
140:
135:
134:
117:
76:
65:
54:
44:
40:
32:
27:
459:Weak oppose
393:my strength
41:5 Aug 2016
492:Categories
409:The Herald
299:Regretful
147:MITB_talk
111:Alex1ruff
481:Armbrust
438:Cat-five
318:Question
77:Original
66:Original
55:Original
415:Bammesk
381:Support
368:Bammesk
347:Bammesk
259:Bammesk
234:Comment
220:Bammesk
209:Bammesk
205:Support
190:Yep. —
171:Support
136:Support
107:Creator
432:Oppose
364:Oppose
301:Oppose
84:Reason
452:----
306:Janke
120:– —
16:<
467:talk
419:talk
372:talk
351:talk
326:talk
310:Talk
283:talk
263:talk
242:talk
224:talk
213:talk
196:talk
175:well
160:talk
145:---
142:MITB
126:talk
43:at
494::
479:--
469:)
421:)
387:•
374:)
353:)
328:)
308:|
304:--
285:)
265:)
244:)
226:)
207:–
177:.
162:)
128:)
465:(
448:c
443:t
417:(
411::
407:@
370:(
349:(
343::
339:@
324:(
281:(
261:(
240:(
222:(
211:(
198:)
194:(
158:(
124:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
