34:
368:
The new crop is much better, and it's a good photo, but I would like the detail in the buildings to be a little more crisp. Can't do that without re-taking the whole sequence again of course. If the sequence were taken without the water in the first place, zoomed in closer to the skyline, you could
123:. Stitching discoloration and misallignment very noticeable. The horizon curvature might be less noticeable if the area of the photo taken up by lake Michican was reduced. However, Image:Chicago_Skyline_at_Sunset.png is already a featured picture and, while a bit blurry, is still better. --
41:
This image was taken
October 1st from Adler Planetarium. This image is a composite of 8 high resolution images. The current image of the Chicago skyline is fuzzy and a little out of date. Chicago is a gorgeous city and has so much to offer.
283:. I like it, this picture fits perfectly in the Chicago article and it shows how beautiful the Chicago skyline is. Also it needs the right part because Navy Pier is a very important part of Chicago and the lake is beautiful.
45:
I spent a lot of time working on alignment and stitching with hopes that it would be more to every one's liking. I also reduced the amount of air and water that occupy the image.
48:
There are 3 new versions available including the one above. The one which I like best has much more air and water. Also I put up a version which eliminates Shedd and Navy Pier.
443:
156:
50% of photo taken up by water. If you had the same series with sharper focus on the buildings and perhaps only 20% water, it might change my vote. See
315:. Stitching errors (for instance the sky isn't a smooth gradient), blown highlights, and it could be sharper. Good picture, but not FP in my opinion. --
423:
17:
157:
429:
397:
385:
373:
360:
323:
305:
287:
261:
249:
228:
209:
164:
148:
127:
115:
99:
65:
173:
413:
418:
339:
188:
78:
33:
284:
124:
409:
354:
299:
295:
243:
239:
203:
142:
138:
93:
370:
161:
112:
37:
Chicago
Skyline stretching from Shedd Aquarium to Navy Pier taken from Adler Planetarium
437:
382:
346:
334:
258:
236:. This is much better, but you might want to cut off a bit from the right hand side.
195:
183:
85:
73:
292:
Cut the sailboât at the very least. I realized that the navy pier is worth keeping.
394:
225:
62:
224:
New
Versions Available with better stitching, no curvature, and less water/sky.
108:
317:
274:
270:
70:
First of all, it needs to be in an article. Until then, it's ineligible.
177:
277:
is an important historical landmark and tourist attraction of
Chicago.
273:(last 1/4 of the image) or just the sail boat and empty water? Note:
32:
257:. Good quality, though the right hand side could be cut.
393:
I took it:) I'll have a better version sometime soon.
176:(already Featured), so it got dumped from the
107:due to curved horizon and stitching errors. --
8:
331:. The stitching is too obvious in the sky.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
180:article (not by me, I should point out).
7:
172:. Too similar to the better-quality
174:Image:Chicago Skyline at Sunset.png
444:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
28:Chicago from Adler Planetarium
1:
430:19:37, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
398:01:21, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
386:19:27, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
374:18:06, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
361:16:14, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
324:02:46, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
306:05:55, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
288:16:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
262:12:35, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
250:11:10, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
229:05:35, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
210:00:10, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
165:13:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
149:10:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
128:10:24, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
116:07:12, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
100:06:28, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
66:06:05, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
460:
135:. Very poor stitching.
38:
36:
269:. Should I cut off
39:
358:
207:
97:
451:
426:
421:
416:
359:
352:
349:
344:
337:
320:
302:
246:
208:
201:
198:
193:
186:
145:
98:
91:
88:
83:
76:
459:
458:
454:
453:
452:
450:
449:
448:
434:
433:
424:
419:
414:
381:per stitching.
369:pull it off. --
347:
340:
335:
332:
318:
300:
244:
218:
196:
189:
184:
181:
143:
86:
79:
74:
71:
54:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
457:
455:
447:
446:
436:
435:
404:Not promoted
401:
400:
388:
376:
363:
326:
310:
309:
308:
278:
264:
252:
231:
217:
214:
213:
212:
167:
151:
130:
118:
102:
68:
53:
50:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
456:
445:
442:
441:
439:
432:
431:
428:
427:
422:
417:
412:
411:
405:
399:
396:
392:
389:
387:
384:
380:
377:
375:
372:
367:
364:
362:
356:
351:
350:
345:
343:
338:
330:
327:
325:
322:
321:
314:
311:
307:
304:
303:
298:
297:
291:
290:
289:
286:
282:
279:
276:
272:
268:
265:
263:
260:
256:
253:
251:
248:
247:
242:
241:
235:
232:
230:
227:
223:
220:
219:
215:
211:
205:
200:
199:
194:
192:
187:
179:
175:
171:
168:
166:
163:
159:
155:
152:
150:
147:
146:
141:
140:
134:
131:
129:
126:
122:
119:
117:
114:
110:
106:
103:
101:
95:
90:
89:
84:
82:
77:
69:
67:
64:
60:
57:Nominate and
56:
55:
51:
49:
46:
43:
35:
29:
26:
19:
408:
407:
403:
402:
390:
378:
365:
341:
333:
329:Oppose still
328:
316:
312:
294:
293:
280:
266:
254:
238:
237:
234:Weak Support
233:
221:
190:
182:
169:
158:this skyline
153:
137:
136:
132:
120:
104:
80:
72:
58:
47:
44:
40:
27:
371:Bridgecross
366:Weak Oppose
313:Weak oppose
216:New Version
162:Bridgecross
52:Old Version
275:Navy Pier
271:Navy Pier
438:Category
383:HighInBC
259:Glaurung
410:Nautica
395:Buphoff
296:Nautica
285:Dbhatt4
281:Support
267:Comment
255:Support
240:Nautica
226:Buphoff
222:Comment
178:Chicago
139:Nautica
125:S0uj1r0
63:Buphoff
59:support
391:Oppose
379:Oppose
301:Shades
245:Shades
170:Oppose
154:Oppose
144:Shades
133:Oppose
121:Oppose
105:Oppose
336:howch
185:howch
109:Janke
75:howch
16:<
415:Shad
355:chat
319:Tewy
204:chat
160:. --
113:Talk
94:chat
61:. -
440::
406:--
348:ng
197:ng
111:|
87:ng
425:s
420:e
357:}
353:{
342:e
206:}
202:{
191:e
96:}
92:{
81:e
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
