Knowledge (XXG)

:Featured picture candidates/Full Moon Luc Viatour.jpg - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

364:(a similar size to Io - 1700km radius compared to Io's 1800km). From Earth, the only way to tell that the Moon is not a perfect sphere is to look at it through a telescope or binoculars at a bit where shadows from crater walls etc. are visible. For this video of Io, the light source is in the same direction from Io as the 'camera', so no such shadows appear. It would be possible to use a normal map of Io's surface to simulate these, but because of the direction of the light source, there's really no point. 106: 301:
Nice idea. I just have trouble believing that Io is a perfect sphere. It's probably an irregular shape, maybe slightly oval, but definitely with some bumps on the surface by the looks of it. Can we not produce such a rendering? I know there are ways to apply raster graphics textures as depth maps on
457:
We have identified 115 mountain structures (covering ~3% of the surface) and 541 volcanic centers, including paterae (calderas and dark spots) and shield volcanoes. The average length of an Ionian mountain is 157 km, with the longest being 570 km. The mean height of Ionian mountains is 6.3 km, and
332:
has a reference about why Mount Everest isn't actually necessarily the highest mountain, for instance. I don't think we need to argue about the fact that in the nominated image, the texture is projected on a perfect sphere. As for the rest of your argument, can I put a ? Also, please note that the
231:
I can't see any difference in the colour balance, but I just noticed that the new version's only about 4s long. I think the problem with the south pole being cut off is the mediawiki applet when it's a thumbnail - it always cuts off the bottom 10px or so as a scrubber. Anyway, I've re-encoded it
454:
Once again, your comments come across as irrelevant. The fact that one of the pictures I cited shows an eruption has nothing to do with the fact that the surface of Io is not as even as you claim, clearly visible in both the cited pictures, and a consistent property of Io, regardless of when the
240:
options to sort out the aspect ratio and padding) and then ffmpeg2theora to convert to ogg/theora. The length is slightly different (NASA's original mpeg wasn't sure whether it was 25 of 30fps) so it's now 28.8s instead of 24s, but I don't think it makes much difference to the animation. The
316:
If the Earth were scaled down to six feet in diameter, Mount Everest would be a thin coat of paint. All the substantial moons and solid rocky planets are near-perfect spheres. Io is a Galilean moon; it's got enough mass to be spherical, and any aberration wouldn't be visible in a scaled
384:: "As a by-product of this activity, sulfur, sulfur dioxide gas and silicate pyroclastic material (like ash) are blown up to 500 km (310 mi) into space, producing large, umbrella-shaped plumes...". You might just as well say that the Earth's atmosphere is a part of the Earth's surface. 402:, as photos and videos are frozen in time. This animation should accurately represent the point in time when the probe passed. A natural satellite is a 3D object. This candidate animation fails to capture planet shape and surface structure, and so it fails on the grounds that it is 337:
article suffers the same problem. You can verify this by the fact that no "anti-aliasing" is present, i.e. the borders were drawn as hard pixels by a computer program that does not support anti-aliasing. Meanwhile, my argument about non-perfect shape would seem to be supported by
379:
The image and video you link to don't show that Io isn't a perfect sphere. Io is volcanically active, hence the change in surface in the image. The video is of a volcanic eruption in progress, but the plume hardly counts as a part of Io's surface. From
189:. I think ffmpeg2theora was putting 640x480 in the metadata but encoding the actual file in the correct 640x440. Anyway, I've gone back to the original NASA mpeg and re-encoded it with ffmpeg2theora -x 640 -y 440 and it seems to fix the ratio problem. 41: 88: 71: 436:). When Voyager flew by Io there was an eruption, but there were plenty of times during the Galileo mission when there were no eruptions which would be visible on this scale. Still, if you want to oppose, go ahead : ). 455:
pictures are taken. In fact, the time between those two exposures substantiates my argument: Io is not a perfect sphere, and this property is invariant through time. From one of the sources cited in the article:
232:
again so it is now 640x480, with padding instead of scaling (to fix both aspect ratio and south pole issue). This time I used an intermediate step of very high quality (about 4000kbps)
46: 45: 42: 47: 93: 92: 89: 94: 75: 74: 34: 164:
Please forgive me if I'm missing something or if it isn't really a defect, but the object appears oval in shape... shouldn't it be round. I think the aspect ratio is wrong.
76: 509:
but the images themselves quite clearly show that it is pockmarked and it's a pretty impressive achievement to be able to watch a complete rotation of a distant satellite.
328:
Earth is not a good reference for several reasons (much larger, has an atmosphere, has liquid on the surface), but even so, Earth has bumps far larger than mountains.
398:
It's good that you bring up the moon, as the featured picture I added to the nomination should convince you of its unevenness. The fact that Io's surface changes is
44: 570: 91: 560: 73: 17: 241:
re-encoding has also had the side effect of making the file appear the right length instead of 25mins when using the mplayer plugin on firefox.
424:
I have to disagree again - firstly, the animation you linked to and the data used for this video were taken by different probes (this video -
565: 43: 90: 546: 532: 518: 497: 468: 445: 415: 393: 355: 323: 311: 289: 272: 250: 226: 215: 198: 173: 156: 72: 169: 112:
Existing FP of the Earth's Moon, showing surface irregularities typical of natural satellites without significant atmosphere.
23: 528: 493: 464: 411: 351: 307: 206:
Thanks for fixing the aspect ratio. However, the South pole is now sliced off, and the color balance has changed.
165: 524: 489: 460: 407: 347: 343: 303: 220:
Maybe try a different browser? I see the South Pole on my system and the color balance looks the same.
360:
I agree that Earth isn't a perfect reference, but the same argument can be applied more validly to the
429: 514: 441: 389: 339: 268: 246: 194: 211: 510: 105: 554: 437: 385: 264: 242: 190: 433: 207: 63: 318: 221: 151: 543: 286: 425: 381: 334: 134: 125: 55: 282: 263:. Can't help the MediaWiki problems, but it's a feature-worthy clip.-- 186: 121: 59: 237: 233: 182: 523:
There are tools that allow you to use textures as elevation maps.
329: 361: 505:. The composite does make it look almost perfectly spherical 253:. Sorry about the huge comment, feel free to ignore it ; ). 458:
the highest known mountain is Boösaule Montes (17.5+/-3km).
181:
The aspect ratio is wrong when played on the MediaWiki
24:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates/A day on Io
281:If there's a MediaWiki problem, report it at 101:- Correct aspect ratio, length, padding, etc. 8: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates 104: 86: 69: 39: 120:A composite of a full day rotation on 571:Featured picture nominations/May 2008 7: 142:NASA Voyager and Galileo spacecraft 561:Ended featured picture nominations 31: 346:, which are also in the article. 317:representation as small as this. 185:, but it's OK when played with 131:Articles this image appears in 1: 333:photograph at the top of the 566:Featured picture nominations 83:- With correct aspect ratio 587: 488:given the above argument. 547:07:02, 2 June 2008 (UTC) 533:10:29, 1 June 2008 (UTC) 519:15:30, 31 May 2008 (UTC) 498:15:20, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 469:21:54, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 446:16:57, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 416:15:20, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 394:14:34, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 356:13:09, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 324:11:53, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 312:08:01, 28 May 2008 (UTC) 290:13:16, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 273:01:33, 27 May 2008 (UTC) 251:11:54, 26 May 2008 (UTC) 227:06:07, 26 May 2008 (UTC) 216:03:08, 26 May 2008 (UTC) 199:10:27, 25 May 2008 (UTC) 174:08:09, 25 May 2008 (UTC) 157:05:26, 25 May 2008 (UTC) 344:Image:Tvashtarvideo.gif 113: 102: 84: 67: 432:; the animated GIF - 261:Support Alternative 2 108: 97: 79: 50: 430:Galileo (spacecraft) 236:(so I could use the 166:Capital photographer 148:Support as nominator 340:Image:Iosurface.jpg 62:active body in the 114: 103: 85: 68: 525:Papa Lima Whiskey 517: 490:Papa Lima Whiskey 461:Papa Lima Whiskey 408:Papa Lima Whiskey 348:Papa Lima Whiskey 304:Papa Lima Whiskey 95: 77: 48: 22:(Redirected from 578: 513: 321: 224: 154: 96: 78: 49: 27: 586: 585: 581: 580: 579: 577: 576: 575: 551: 550: 319: 222: 152: 87: 70: 40: 38: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 584: 582: 574: 573: 568: 563: 553: 552: 538: 537: 536: 535: 500: 482: 481: 480: 479: 478: 477: 476: 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 449: 448: 419: 418: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 367: 366: 365: 295: 294: 293: 292: 276: 275: 258: 257: 256: 255: 254: 201: 176: 159: 144: 143: 140: 137: 132: 129: 118: 37: 32: 30: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 583: 572: 569: 567: 564: 562: 559: 558: 556: 549: 548: 545: 542: 541:Not promoted 534: 530: 526: 522: 521: 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 503:Support alt 2 501: 499: 495: 491: 487: 484: 483: 470: 466: 462: 459: 453: 452: 451: 450: 447: 443: 439: 435: 431: 427: 423: 422: 421: 420: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 397: 396: 395: 391: 387: 383: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 363: 359: 358: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 336: 331: 327: 326: 325: 322: 315: 314: 313: 309: 305: 302:a 3D object. 300: 297: 296: 291: 288: 284: 280: 279: 278: 277: 274: 270: 266: 262: 259: 252: 248: 244: 239: 235: 230: 229: 228: 225: 219: 218: 217: 213: 209: 205: 202: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 177: 175: 171: 167: 163: 160: 158: 155: 149: 146: 145: 141: 138: 136: 133: 130: 127: 123: 119: 116: 115: 111: 110:Not nominated 107: 100: 99:Alternative 2 82: 65: 61: 57: 54:- One day on 53: 36: 33: 25: 19: 540: 539: 507:at the edges 506: 502: 485: 456: 434:New Horizons 403: 399: 298: 260: 208:Pete Tillman 203: 178: 161: 147: 109: 98: 80: 64:solar system 60:volcanically 51: 81:Alternative 58:, the most 35:A day on Io 555:Categories 404:inaccurate 400:irrelevant 511:Pstuart84 426:Voyager 1 382:Io (moon) 335:Io (moon) 135:Io (moon) 438:Time3000 386:Time3000 283:Bugzilla 265:ragesoss 243:Time3000 191:Time3000 124:'s moon 52:Original 299:Comment 204:Comment 187:mplayer 179:Comment 139:Creator 122:Jupiter 486:Oppose 320:Durova 238:ffmpeg 234:MPEG-4 223:Durova 183:applet 162:Oppose 153:Durova 117:Reason 544:MER-C 330:Earth 287:MER-C 16:< 529:talk 515:Talk 494:talk 465:talk 442:talk 428:and 412:talk 390:talk 362:Moon 352:talk 342:and 308:talk 269:talk 247:talk 212:talk 195:talk 170:talk 557:: 531:) 496:) 467:) 444:) 414:) 406:. 392:) 354:) 310:) 285:. 271:) 249:) 214:) 197:) 172:) 150:-- 126:Io 56:Io 527:( 492:( 463:( 440:( 410:( 388:( 350:( 306:( 267:( 245:( 210:( 193:( 168:( 128:. 66:. 26:)

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates/A day on Io
A day on Io
Io
volcanically
solar system

Jupiter
Io
Io (moon)
Durova
05:26, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Capital photographer
talk
08:09, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
applet
mplayer
Time3000
talk
10:27, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Pete Tillman
talk
03:08, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Durova
06:07, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
MPEG-4
ffmpeg
Time3000
talk
11:54, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.