375:, such as: Low quality because of x, y, z. On a different note, why isn't a photo of an amputation, in an article about amputation, not appropriate!! If it is appropriate to be in the article, then it's appropriate to be FP, assuming (or given) it meets the eight requirements of the FP criteria. We are not here to judge what we think is appropriate to display. We are here to recognize (give a star to) photos that improve the encyclopedia, by improving at least one article, period, per the FP criteria.
51:
302:
per FP criteria 1 and 7. My sympathies for
Kallerna and thanks for electing to share the image, but the focus is on the back of the hand rather than the injury site, and neither the file description nor the caption in the article explains what happened here. (It's an accidental injury, right? At what
324:
I just took this photo for myself, but realizing it could have some EV, I uploaded it to
Commons. Did not think there would be need for details of the accident. The accident happened with a table planer, and the amputation was made after that in operating room. The photo was taken about a week after
371:: "All objections should be accompanied by a specific rationale that, if addressed, would make you support the image." Not appropriate for FP is not a specific rationale. Nor are things like "I don't like it", "bad photo", "low quality", etc. etc. Oppose rationals should be
303:
stage was this photo taken? Seems like emergency sutures were made. Is the clear material the wound dressing and the black stuff blood clots? Did this require further surgery for wound closure?) --
222:– I've been thinking about this. I think this is a better depiction than the infobox image because it shows the affected area before recovery. It is sharp where it needs to be.
423:
330:
I did not nominate the picture. However, I got to say I somehow like the picture: a really common object everyone knows with a small twist to make it interesting.
87:
196:
Close calls for me, too. I have more respect for tools for woodworking than for metal - they are faster & sharper. Here are some of my efforts in metal:
413:
17:
264:
says nothing about the main-page. We pick images that improve the quality of the encyclopedia by improving its articles, per the FP criteria.
418:
122:– It's a poor illustration of the general topic of amputation, and we don't need such a gruesome image on the Main Page. This is not the
399:
384:
355:
334:
312:
294:
273:
248:
231:
206:
187:
169:
156:
135:
114:
351:
287:
149:
364:
347:
308:
380:
269:
261:
227:
183:
110:
244:
203:
239:
My personal opinion, I don't think it's appropriate to be shown on main page. (sorry!) --
50:
407:
396:
331:
304:
166:
131:
95:
376:
265:
223:
179:
106:
62:
257:
240:
199:
79:
58:
127:
49:
165:
Yep, I thought that woodwork was one of my safest hobbies... :)
178:
I have had some close calls, wish you a smooth recovery.
35:
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.
88:Knowledge (XXG):Featured pictures/Sciences/Biology
367:, the instructions on top of this page say in
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
260:, we don't pick images for the main-page,
424:Featured picture nominations/April 2020
7:
76:Articles in which this image appears
414:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
1:
419:Featured picture nominations
147:to be a story here... :) —
440:
356:09:31, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
335:05:30, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
313:10:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
295:00:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
274:01:11, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
249:00:38, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
232:22:46, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
207:17:47, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
188:22:46, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
170:17:46, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
157:00:31, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
136:22:04, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
115:20:59, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
84:FP category for this image
73:Good quality and high EV
400:21:36, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
385:02:20, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
346:not appropriate for FP
66:
39:Voting period ends on
53:
103:Support as nominator
67:
124:Weekly World News
47:
431:
292:
290:
154:
152:
38:
36:
439:
438:
434:
433:
432:
430:
429:
428:
404:
403:
288:
286:
150:
148:
37:
34:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
437:
435:
427:
426:
421:
416:
406:
405:
393:Not Promoted
390:
389:
388:
387:
359:
358:
340:
339:
338:
337:
327:
326:
325:the operation.
316:
315:
297:
289:Rhododendrites
279:
278:
277:
276:
252:
251:
234:
216:
215:
214:
213:
212:
211:
210:
209:
191:
190:
173:
172:
160:
159:
151:Rhododendrites
138:
117:
99:
98:
93:
90:
85:
82:
77:
74:
71:
45:20:59:38 (UTC)
33:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
436:
425:
422:
420:
417:
415:
412:
411:
409:
402:
401:
398:
394:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
365:Charlesjsharp
363:
362:
361:
360:
357:
353:
349:
348:Charlesjsharp
345:
342:
341:
336:
333:
329:
328:
323:
320:
319:
318:
317:
314:
310:
306:
301:
298:
296:
291:
284:
281:
280:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
256:
255:
254:
253:
250:
246:
242:
238:
235:
233:
229:
225:
221:
218:
217:
208:
205:
201:
197:
195:
194:
193:
192:
189:
185:
181:
177:
176:
175:
174:
171:
168:
164:
163:
162:
161:
158:
153:
146:
142:
139:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
118:
116:
112:
108:
104:
101:
100:
97:
94:
91:
89:
86:
83:
81:
78:
75:
72:
69:
68:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
46:
42:
29:
26:
19:
392:
391:
372:
368:
343:
321:
299:
282:
236:
219:
144:
140:
123:
119:
102:
63:index finger
54:
44:
40:
32:
27:
262:FP criteria
41:3 May 2020
408:Categories
143:- there's
80:Amputation
59:amputation
57:– Partial
28:Amputation
332:—kallerna
167:—kallerna
397:Armbrust
373:specific
305:Paul_012
96:Kallerna
55:Original
377:Bammesk
322:Comment
283:Support
266:Bammesk
224:Bammesk
220:Support
180:Bammesk
141:Comment
107:Tomer T
92:Creator
344:Oppose
300:Oppose
258:Gnosis
241:Gnosis
237:Oppose
120:Oppose
70:Reason
200:Janke
16:<
381:talk
369:Bold
352:talk
309:talk
270:talk
245:talk
228:talk
204:Talk
198:] --
184:talk
132:talk
126:. –
111:talk
293:\\
155:\\
145:got
128:Sca
61:of
43:at
410::
395:--
383:)
354:)
311:)
285:—
272:)
247:)
230:)
202:|
186:)
134:)
113:)
105:–
379:(
350:(
307:(
268:(
243:(
226:(
182:(
130:(
109:(
65:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
