51:
76:
This photo never fails to amaze me everytime I look at it. For a photo which is now nearly 40 years old, the quality is absolutely AMAZING! It has often been said that it looks like a computer generated image, but low and behold, it is absolutely real, and is quite probably the most amazing photo of
231:. Cropped tail, poor lighting and too many distracting details - for example, the numerous marks on the plain body and on the ground in front. Maybe this all (except for tail) can be tweaked by editing, but I would rather reshoot.
178:
Tail is clipped, background is too busy, distracting and unappealing with that ugly dome thing, as well as that poorly placed light-post looking like a giant aerial in thumb. --
282:
258:
240:
223:
204:
187:
170:
153:
136:
120:
272:
17:
161:- Not much more to add to this discussion. High resolution, plane is centered. A blown highlight on the nose, but I don't think it's that bad.
277:
149:
106:
50:
236:
145:
254:
91:
232:
200:
166:
250:
218:
196:
162:
183:
65:
129:
83:
61:
266:
117:
100:
link to category from WP:FP that best describes the image (check categories first)
213:
179:
87:
58:
49:
195:-- As above, especially on the clipped wing and tight crop.
94:(a future article on the history of the Aeroflot fleet)
35:
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.
212:Poor lighting, blown highlights, bad framing.
28:Aeroflot Tupolev Tu-104B at Arlanda, July 1972
77:this vintage Soviet aircraft that I have seen
8:
283:Featured picture nominations/September 2011
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
7:
80:Articles in which this image appears
273:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
259:09:54, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
241:10:31, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
224:22:23, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
205:18:20, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
188:13:49, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
171:01:20, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
154:23:37, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
137:16:06, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
121:13:19, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
1:
278:Featured picture nominations
299:
97:FP category for this image
92:User:Russavia/SU fleet
69:
39:Voting period ends on
53:
114:Support as nominator
70:
233:Materialscientist
47:
290:
221:
216:
134:
133:
38:
36:
298:
297:
293:
292:
291:
289:
288:
287:
263:
262:
219:
214:
131:
130:
107:Lars Söderström
66:Arlanda Airport
37:
34:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
296:
294:
286:
285:
280:
275:
265:
264:
247:Not Promoted
244:
243:
226:
207:
190:
173:
156:
139:
123:
110:
109:
104:
101:
98:
95:
84:Tupolev Tu-104
81:
78:
74:
62:Tupolev Tu-104
45:13:19:57 (UTC)
33:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
295:
284:
281:
279:
276:
274:
271:
270:
268:
261:
260:
256:
252:
251:Makeemlighter
248:
242:
238:
234:
230:
227:
225:
222:
217:
211:
208:
206:
202:
198:
194:
191:
189:
185:
181:
177:
174:
172:
168:
164:
160:
157:
155:
151:
147:
143:
140:
138:
135:
127:
124:
122:
119:
115:
112:
111:
108:
105:
102:
99:
96:
93:
89:
85:
82:
79:
75:
72:
71:
67:
63:
60:
56:
52:
48:
46:
42:
29:
26:
19:
246:
245:
228:
209:
192:
175:
158:
141:
128:, high EV--
125:
113:
68:in July 1972
54:
44:
40:
32:
27:
197:Alvesgaspar
163:Crisco 1492
41:30 Sep 2011
267:Categories
132:Someone35
146:Мурад 97
118:Russavia
88:Aeroflot
59:Aeroflot
55:Original
176:Oppose.
159:Support
142:Support
126:Support
103:Creator
229:Oppose
220:(talk)
215:JFitch
210:Oppose
193:Oppose
73:Reason
180:jjron
64:B at
16:<
255:talk
237:talk
201:talk
184:talk
167:talk
150:talk
43:at
269::
257:)
249:--
239:)
203:)
186:)
169:)
152:)
144:--
116:--
90:,
86:,
57:-
253:(
235:(
199:(
182:(
165:(
148:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
