51:
335:; so had its limitations. More DOF will end up in more busy background without a flash which I don't have. We considered the other version in Commons; but the female is not much sharp in that view. The male is more in focus there only because the focus is in between the male and female. Here, in the current nomination, we can even see the two main eyes of her. Note that
305:
these damn webs move immensely at even the slightest of air motions bringing the spider in and out of focus all the time and that the critters rarely do you the favor of staying put. You have my utmost respect for capturing this shot, but you also have my confidence that you can do better next time. By the way, I think I like this other
304:
The depth of field could be improved by increasing the f-stop. Probably flash would be necessary in that case, which would darken the background, too. But I hate it when "could/would/should" enter the discussion, especially when it comes to a nature shot. Believe me, I've been there and I know that
376:
EV was important for my support on
Commons and is even more important here on WP. There are trade-offs with increasing f-stop (diffraction, subject isolation, higher ISO noise). Considering the male is actively moving, and in a different plane, I don't see this being improved. --
279:
No need for that Jee, it's a fair point that has been raised. However, I'm with you on this. The quality is as good as it gets and while the background is slightly distracting, the EV makes up for it. The male in the background adds context to the image too.
218:- I find the background much too distracting and the photo is not of comparable quality to the other featured pictures of arachnids. Having both sexes in the picture is excellent EV for sexual dimorphism, but I find it a pity that the male is blurry. --
253:
249:
574:
339:
sp. have poor visibility and their eyes are less prominent compared to other spiders. They detect the presence of their prey from the motion on their webs. They are
245:
82:
564:
139:- Very clear, nice colorful but unobtrusive background, good color in spider itself. Interesting detail of smaller spider -- offspring or dinner?
569:
17:
340:
290:
539:
526:
504:
484:
462:
442:
423:
401:
384:
360:
318:
299:
270:
227:
196:
165:
148:
131:
114:
332:
306:
355:
285:
265:
191:
109:
175:
50:
520:
478:
436:
417:
397:
352:
314:
262:
223:
188:
161:
144:
127:
106:
74:
309:
better. The background is somewhat better and the male is much sharper. Add it as an alt? --
514:
495:
472:
453:
430:
411:
393:
382:
179:
471:
Oops, I left
Muhammad. But was doubting whether to include that 1/2 or not. Thanks.. -
347:
328:
310:
257:
219:
183:
157:
140:
123:
101:
90:
558:
536:
501:
459:
178:
is complicated. Sometimes, the males are being eaten by the female; otherwise they
378:
500:
I have no idea, why someone would count a weak oppose as a half support.
240:
this nomination if any one can show me a more detailed picture of an
252:. I've on idea how is it possible to focus two subjects if they in
49:
345:
I will be away in weekend; can't comment before next
Tuesday.)
429:
6 supports, 1/2 opposes.. Enough consensus..Promoted... -
68:
One of the most detailed photograph of a
Argiope sp. so far
408:
Promoted File:Argiope pulchella at
Nayikayam Thattu.jpg
392:
I'm okay with the background, and the EV is very high.
35:
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.
331:
for the detailed review. This is one of my last work
343:even while rest under leaf outside their web. (
8:
458:Actually it's 6 supports and a half oppose.
575:Featured picture nominations/January 2015
535:Actually it's "6 supports, 1/2 opposes".
18:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates
7:
182:to ensure their sperms are used. :)
71:Articles in which this image appears
565:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
341:connected by a string to the web
256:, especially one is restless.
1:
570:Featured picture nominations
540:13:40, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
527:13:38, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
505:13:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
485:13:24, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
463:13:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
443:12:41, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
424:12:41, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
402:21:38, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
385:14:31, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
361:02:23, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
319:23:07, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
300:07:42, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
271:02:04, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
228:23:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
197:02:47, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
166:20:44, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
149:18:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
132:15:16, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
115:04:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
591:
333:with my old Panasonic FZ28
91:Jeevan Jose, Kerala, India
79:FP category for this image
180:survive as handicapped
61:
39:Voting period ends on
122:- Gosh, it's hairy.
53:
513:Then?? Only six.. -
98:Support as nominator
62:
346:
297:
75:Argiope pulchella
59:Argiope pulchella
47:
28:Argiope pulchella
582:
499:
457:
358:
350:
344:
291:
268:
260:
194:
186:
176:mating behaviour
112:
104:
38:
36:
590:
589:
585:
584:
583:
581:
580:
579:
555:
554:
493:
451:
356:
348:
266:
258:
192:
184:
110:
102:
37:
34:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
588:
586:
578:
577:
572:
567:
557:
556:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
530:
529:
508:
507:
488:
487:
466:
465:
446:
445:
405:
404:
387:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
322:
321:
302:
274:
273:
231:
230:
212:
211:
210:
209:
208:
207:
206:
205:
200:
199:
169:
168:
152:
151:
134:
117:
94:
93:
88:
85:
80:
77:
72:
69:
66:
45:04:58:08 (UTC)
33:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
587:
576:
573:
571:
568:
566:
563:
562:
560:
541:
538:
534:
533:
532:
531:
528:
524:
523:
518:
517:
512:
511:
510:
509:
506:
503:
497:
492:
491:
490:
489:
486:
482:
481:
476:
475:
470:
469:
468:
467:
464:
461:
455:
450:
449:
448:
447:
444:
440:
439:
434:
433:
428:
427:
426:
425:
421:
420:
415:
414:
409:
403:
399:
395:
391:
388:
386:
383:
380:
375:
372:
371:
362:
359:
354:
351:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
325:
324:
323:
320:
316:
312:
308:
303:
301:
298:
295:
289:
288:
283:
278:
277:
276:
275:
272:
269:
264:
261:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
234:
233:
232:
229:
225:
221:
217:
214:
213:
204:
203:
202:
201:
198:
195:
190:
187:
181:
177:
173:
172:
171:
170:
167:
163:
159:
156:
155:
154:
153:
150:
146:
142:
138:
135:
133:
129:
125:
121:
118:
116:
113:
108:
105:
99:
96:
95:
92:
89:
86:
84:
81:
78:
76:
73:
70:
67:
64:
63:
60:
56:
52:
48:
46:
42:
29:
26:
19:
521:
515:
479:
473:
437:
431:
418:
412:
407:
406:
389:
373:
336:
293:
286:
281:
241:
237:
215:
136:
119:
97:
58:
54:
44:
41:22 Jan 2015
40:
32:
27:
216:Weak oppose
174:Yes; their
559:Categories
516:The Herald
496:The Herald
474:The Herald
454:The Herald
432:The Herald
413:The Herald
394:Rreagan007
254:two planes
236:I wish to
522:here I am
480:here I am
438:here I am
419:here I am
329:Ebertakis
311:Ebertakis
220:Ebertakis
158:Hafspajen
141:CorinneSD
124:Hafspajen
83:Arachnids
537:Armbrust
502:Armbrust
460:Armbrust
287:Muhammad
238:withdraw
55:Original
390:Support
374:Support
337:Argiope
327:Thanks
282:Support
250:Commons
242:Argiope
137:Support
120:Support
87:Creator
248:or in
65:Reason
410:-- -
379:Colin
307:photo
16:<
398:talk
315:talk
294:talk
246:here
244:sp.
224:talk
162:talk
145:talk
128:talk
43:at
561::
525:)
483:)
441:)
422:)
400:)
317:)
284:--
226:)
164:)
147:)
130:)
100:–
57:–
519:(
498::
494:@
477:(
456::
452:@
435:(
416:(
396:(
381:°
357:e
353:e
349:J
313:(
296:)
292:(
267:e
263:e
259:J
222:(
193:e
189:e
185:J
160:(
143:(
126:(
111:e
107:e
103:J
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
