70:
51:
181:
A really good shot of a subject living in the outdoors, but I don't think it's perfect. I agree the composition is nice, and the quality is good. But I don't like the hard shadows and the hooves are missing, so I don't think the EV is humongous. The image seems also a bit ccw tilted.
277:
I'd say any of the animal images in that article are pretty peripheral and exchangeable, unless there happens to be a species that is endemic to the crater, and I don't think that's the case (not for any of the large animals shown).
368:
There's no reason not to replace it there now. The EV for this is clearly in the
Rhinoceros articles, so it wouldn't impact the nom. Discussion about which one is better in that article then really belongs on the article talk page.
84:
High quality, well composed image giving a pretty complete view of the species. Used in a prominent capacity (taxo box). While some may want the feet to be shown, it's important to remember that no one mows the
215:
Take a peek at our FP gallery of large
African mammals and you'll see that a number of them have their feet obscured. It's the reality of the environment. You'll probably see the same thing with hard sunlight.
237:
added - tilt corrected version (note: I also tried a minor sharpening and think it would benefit from that, but the only edits I've done here is the tilt correction and then cropping back to rectangular).
263:, much worse quality (scanned film image)shows the crater's walls. This one does not. So, yes, it is a good image of a rhino, but I am not sure it is a valued image of rhinos in the crater.--
430:
per nom, though as I said above, it could be sharpened. Unfortunately the horn itself, such a key characteristic, is particularly lacking in sharpness (and, no, that's
574:
564:
17:
569:
201:
Compared to the other photos in the article (except the zoo one), it compares very well in the "how much of the animal is visible" stakes.
324:
Agreed that there's weak EV there, I wasn't aware of a previous image (this one had been in the article when I came across it).
260:
147:
511:
477:
550:
532:
515:
498:
481:
462:
443:
422:
396:
378:
351:
333:
317:
291:
272:
247:
225:
210:
192:
173:
156:
133:
142:
546:
505:
494:
471:
392:
206:
169:
164:
Love it! Perfect (but still interesting) composition, love the shallow focus, great res, etc etc etc...
69:
329:
221:
186:
129:
542:
490:
458:
388:
305:
297:
256:
202:
165:
99:
62:
50:
189:
526:
416:
91:
439:
374:
287:
243:
347:
325:
313:
300:
is less than EV of the other image. Otherwise it is a good image with a good EV, and I
268:
217:
183:
125:
558:
453:
114:
58:
435:
370:
283:
239:
95:
343:
309:
264:
282:
that was the only article it was in then it would certainly lack EV. --
342:, but I guess I will replace it back, when the nomination is over.--
68:
49:
339:
35:
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.
141:
Good quality, EV and Well isolated from background. --
539:
470:
like I did in the first round of POTY on
Commons.--
308:
with an old one that was used to be there before.--
296:It is what I meant, EV of the this image used in
8:
304:it, but I believe it should be replaced in
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
255:I am not sure about use of this image in
575:Featured picture nominations/April 2011
7:
88:Articles in which this image appears
524:. Looks to be correct orientation.
565:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
451:Checks out on my criteria sheet.
414:Nice quality, good composition.
1:
488:Everybody okay with the edit?
570:Featured picture nominations
504:I don't care; prefer both.--
591:
397:08:47, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
379:03:31, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
352:15:36, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
334:15:25, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
318:14:16, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
292:12:39, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
273:12:03, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
248:11:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
226:15:25, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
211:14:23, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
193:11:21, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
174:06:34, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
157:05:50, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
134:03:52, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
104:FP category for this image
76:- Tilt corrected version.
551:03:32, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
533:23:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
516:17:16, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
499:21:25, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
482:17:03, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
463:08:32, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
444:10:35, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
423:19:35, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
387:Agree 100% with jjron.
77:
66:
39:Voting period ends on
510:
476:
72:
53:
507:ā«Greatorangepumpkinā«
473:ā«Greatorangepumpkinā«
122:Support as nominator
78:
67:
306:Ngorongoro Crater
298:Ngorongoro Crater
257:Ngorongoro Crater
154:
100:Ngorongoro Crater
63:Ngorongoro Crater
47:
582:
529:
514:
508:
480:
474:
419:
338:It was replaced
148:
92:Black rhinoceros
38:
36:
28:Black Rhinoceros
590:
589:
585:
584:
583:
581:
580:
579:
555:
554:
527:
506:
472:
434:just a pun). --
417:
37:
34:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
588:
586:
578:
577:
572:
567:
557:
556:
536:
535:
518:
485:
484:
465:
446:
425:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
382:
381:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
322:
321:
320:
250:
231:
230:
229:
228:
213:
196:
195:
176:
162:Strong support
159:
136:
118:
117:
112:
109:
105:
102:
89:
86:
82:
45:03:52:46 (UTC)
33:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
587:
576:
573:
571:
568:
566:
563:
562:
560:
553:
552:
548:
544:
543:Makeemlighter
540:
534:
531:
530:
523:
520:I prefer the
519:
517:
513:
509:
503:
502:
501:
500:
496:
492:
491:Makeemlighter
489:
483:
479:
475:
469:
466:
464:
460:
456:
455:
450:
447:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
428:Support Edit1
426:
424:
421:
420:
413:
410:
409:
398:
394:
390:
386:
385:
384:
383:
380:
376:
372:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
336:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
294:
293:
289:
285:
281:
276:
275:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
251:
249:
245:
241:
236:
233:
232:
227:
223:
219:
214:
212:
208:
204:
200:
199:
198:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
180:
177:
175:
171:
167:
163:
160:
158:
155:
152:
146:
145:
140:
137:
135:
131:
127:
123:
120:
119:
116:
113:
110:
106:
103:
101:
97:
93:
90:
87:
83:
80:
79:
75:
71:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
46:
42:
29:
26:
19:
538:
537:
525:
521:
487:
486:
467:
452:
448:
431:
427:
415:
411:
389:Aaadddaaammm
301:
279:
252:
234:
203:Aaadddaaammm
178:
166:Aaadddaaammm
161:
150:
143:
138:
121:
107:Animals: -->
73:
54:
44:
40:
32:
27:
528:Jujutacular
418:Jujutacular
59:black rhino
559:Categories
96:Rhinoceros
41:8 May 2011
326:Cowtowner
218:Cowtowner
126:Cowtowner
85:Savannah.
454:SMasters
261:My image
144:Muhammad
115:Ikiwaner
55:Original
468:Support
449:Support
412:Support
302:Support
253:Comment
179:Neutral
139:Support
111:Creator
108:Mammals
81:Reason
436:jjron
371:jjron
284:jjron
240:jjron
235:Edit1
74:Edit1
16:<
547:talk
522:edit
495:talk
459:talk
440:talk
393:talk
375:talk
348:talk
344:Mbz1
340:here
330:talk
314:talk
310:Mbz1
288:talk
269:talk
265:Mbz1
244:talk
222:talk
207:talk
170:talk
151:talk
130:talk
57:- A
432:not
61:in
43:at
561::
549:)
541:--
497:)
461:)
442:)
395:)
377:)
369:--
350:)
332:)
316:)
290:)
280:If
271:)
259:.
246:)
238:--
224:)
209:)
190:tn
187:Źs
184:ka
182:--
172:)
132:)
124:--
98:,
94:,
545:(
512:T
493:(
478:T
457:(
438:(
391:(
373:(
346:(
328:(
312:(
286:(
267:(
242:(
220:(
205:(
168:(
153:)
149:(
128:(
65:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
