51:
184:
The colouring strikes me as pretty dull as though it was taken in relatively poor light (lighting on the vegetation seems to confirm this), but I'm not entirely clear on the colour of this building. Images seem to range from a pretty murky dirty yellow, to quite dazzling white; apparently the castle
189:
the correct colour these days? Also not a fan of the sky, as it doesn't give much contrast with the colour of the building in this image. Image size is a bit stingy, given the size of the building. --
328:
82:
318:
131:
This is the lead image for the article. I don't think that a stronger caption is needed in this case because the entire article is about this subject.
17:
117:
Its an excellent picture, but it has a very weak caption. If someone will fix the caption so it is more informative, i will give full support.
323:
273:
249:
per my reasoning above (as no explanation has been forthcoming). White buildings come up better with good lighting and blue skies. --
155:
304:
286:
258:
241:
215:
198:
176:
160:
139:
126:
109:
150:
300:
230:
280:
211:
296:
237:
122:
268:
207:
105:
74:
58:
254:
194:
174:
137:
50:
312:
225:
118:
101:
250:
190:
169:
132:
90:
49:
223:
I love the composition, but per jjron, distracting lighting. --
35:
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.
83:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
8:
185:has undergone a recent restoration, so what
68:Strong EV, high quality and good composition
168:strong EV for its article, decent quality.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
329:Featured picture nominations/December 2011
266:per jjron; colours look a little dull.
7:
71:Articles in which this image appears
319:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
1:
305:00:05, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
287:16:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
259:00:19, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
242:09:25, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
216:20:27, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
199:11:25, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
177:04:30, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
161:03:18, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
140:04:30, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
127:20:08, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
110:22:43, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
324:Featured picture nominations
345:
79:FP category for this image
61:
39:Voting period ends on
53:
98:Support as nominator
151:TropicalAnalystwx13
62:
159:
149:– Great image! –
75:Bratislava Castle
59:Bratislava Castle
47:
28:Bratislava Castle
336:
283:
278:
271:
233:
228:
153:
38:
36:
344:
343:
339:
338:
337:
335:
334:
333:
309:
308:
281:
274:
269:
231:
226:
37:
34:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
342:
340:
332:
331:
326:
321:
311:
310:
293:Not Promoted
290:
289:
261:
244:
218:
201:
179:
163:
144:
143:
142:
112:
94:
93:
88:
85:
80:
77:
72:
69:
66:
45:22:43:03 (UTC)
33:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
341:
330:
327:
325:
322:
320:
317:
316:
314:
307:
306:
302:
298:
297:Makeemlighter
294:
288:
285:
284:
279:
277:
272:
265:
262:
260:
256:
252:
248:
245:
243:
239:
235:
234:
229:
222:
219:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
200:
196:
192:
188:
183:
180:
178:
175:
173:
172:
167:
164:
162:
157:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
136:
135:
130:
129:
128:
124:
120:
116:
113:
111:
107:
103:
99:
96:
95:
92:
89:
86:
84:
81:
78:
76:
73:
70:
67:
64:
63:
60:
56:
52:
48:
46:
42:
29:
26:
19:
292:
291:
275:
267:
263:
246:
224:
221:Weak support
220:
208:Aaadddaaammm
203:
186:
181:
170:
165:
146:
133:
115:Weak Support
114:
97:
54:
44:
40:
32:
27:
264:Weak oppose
206:per jjron.
204:Weak oppose
41:20 Dec 2011
313:Categories
238:Contact
182:Comment.
119:Dusty777
55:Original
166:Support
147:Support
102:Tomer T
87:Creator
282:stoned
247:Oppose
65:Reason
251:jjron
227:Extra
191:jjron
16:<
301:talk
255:talk
212:talk
195:talk
171:Pine
156:talk
134:Pine
123:talk
106:talk
91:MJJR
276:the
270:Nik
232:999
43:at
315::
303:)
295:--
257:)
240:)
214:)
197:)
187:is
125:)
108:)
100:--
57:–
299:(
253:(
236:(
210:(
193:(
158:)
154:(
121:(
104:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
