312:? Anyway, at least it's in the correct article now. But this somehow shows a bigger problem with FPC. I've just seen it too often recently that people upload a new picture, slam it into whatever article it might fit, and nomitate it for FPC. The quality of nominations would benefit if those pictures would spend a little time in the articles and get a chance to be peer reviewed by article contributors. Whats the big deal about Featured Picture status anyway that some people want to bag FPs by the dozen? The focus should lie on illustrating the articles with the best pictures possible. --
257:- Appears to be a Green (Carolina) Anole, in a different family, not a Gecko at all. It is a nice picture, but falls short of exceptional in several aspects: lacking depth of field (too much of subject is unfocused), composition (the missing tail unbalances the shot), and the green spots on the white chin are a bit washed out. I judge the photo currently illustrating the Carolina Anole article to be a better FPC, as it is exceptional in high-res.
77:
34:
141:
Three "dead pixels" removed. Unfortunately if I had included the tail, it would've been a giant blur. The quality of the actual lizard is high because I'm using a high F-Stop.. making the depth-of-field large enough to focus on a curving tail & the lizard would've resulted in an image of much
291:
for the correction, but I really don't see reasoning *not* to put it in the
Carolina Anole article. It's still large and illustrative, and even if there are minor flaws to get all pissy about in an FPC debate, it's still a nice image. Putting it in the gallery.
275:
article, where it was just recently inserted by the photographer, and put back the old (real) gecko image. As of now the nominated pic is not used in any article. I did not add it to the
165:
I'd consider supporting a version with the tail included, even if it is out of focus due to shallow DOF. Not the current version with the tail chopped off though.
84:
436:
17:
419:
407:
395:
374:
358:
333:
316:
304:
283:
261:
249:
237:
220:
199:
182:
154:
136:
119:
99:
389:
300:
150:
95:
166:
354:
117:
218:
178:
very nearly FPC quality, but the upper back is blurred -- looks like he moved during the exposure.
233:
258:
404:
383:
293:
143:
88:
367:
350:
330:
196:
112:
416:
276:
208:
61:
43:
430:
229:
179:
313:
280:
246:
76:
382:
as others have mentioned (it is not in an article). Try submitting it to commons.
128:
326:
192:
47:
33:
127:- The tail is cut, plus three dead pixels in the upper part of the pic. —
349:. The in-focus leaves in the foreground on the right are distracting.
403:
if it's in an article, also the the forground leaves should be blured
272:
108:
66:
50:
39:
279:
article since it already resembles a gallery. Hence oppose.--
85:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates/Gecko
8:
187:Close, but no cigar... (that actually means
321:I absolutely agree with Dschwen above. FPC
271:. You are right, I removed this pic in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
32:
7:
207:Good sharpness. Very clear picture.
437:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
245:But I'd like one with the tail --
75:
1:
191:;-) I miss some tail, too. --
420:05:38, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
396:00:05, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
375:10:31, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
359:15:19, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
334:07:46, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
317:16:10, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
305:14:16, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
284:09:23, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
262:04:50, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
250:05:07, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
238:23:20, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
221:23:20, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
200:21:30, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
183:14:48, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
155:13:30, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
137:06:13, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
120:01:59, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
100:01:30, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
57:A high-res, clear shot of a
453:
323:is not a photo competition
83:Self Nom - Replacing old
408:23:06, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
380:Ineligible for FP status
228:. I want more tail too.
54:
36:
111:gecko to shame. --
55:
444:
372:
303:
296:
213:
153:
146:
142:lower quality.
134:
131:
115:
98:
91:
79:
452:
451:
447:
446:
445:
443:
442:
441:
427:
426:
368:
298:
294:
269:Strongly Oppose
216:
209:
148:
144:
132:
129:
113:
93:
89:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
450:
448:
440:
439:
429:
428:
424:
414:Not promoted
411:
410:
398:
377:
361:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
277:Carolina Anole
265:
264:
252:
240:
223:
214:
202:
185:
172:
171:
170:
169:
160:
159:
158:
157:
122:
102:
62:Carolina Anole
44:Carolina Anole
30:
28:Gecko Revision
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
449:
438:
435:
434:
432:
425:
422:
421:
418:
415:
409:
406:
402:
399:
397:
394:
392:
388:
386:
381:
378:
376:
373:
371:
366:Great image!
365:
362:
360:
356:
352:
348:
345:
344:
335:
332:
328:
324:
320:
319:
318:
315:
311:
308:
307:
306:
302:
297:
290:
287:
286:
285:
282:
278:
274:
270:
267:
266:
263:
260:
256:
253:
251:
248:
244:
243:( + ) Support
241:
239:
235:
231:
227:
224:
222:
219:
217:
212:
206:
203:
201:
198:
194:
190:
186:
184:
181:
177:
174:
173:
168:
164:
163:
162:
161:
156:
152:
147:
140:
139:
138:
135:
126:
123:
121:
118:
116:
110:
106:
103:
101:
97:
92:
86:
82:
78:
74:
73:
72:
70:
68:
63:
60:
52:
49:
45:
42:
41:
35:
29:
26:
19:
423:
413:
412:
400:
390:
384:
379:
369:
363:
346:
322:
309:
288:
268:
254:
242:
225:
210:
204:
188:
175:
124:
104:
80:
64:
58:
56:
38:
27:
405:Wolfmankurd
167:84.9.223.82
59:green gecko
370:Lejean2000
351:deeptrivia
114:ZeWrestler
107:-puts the
417:Raven4x4x
310:All pissy
431:Category
230:enochlau
180:chowells
65:for the
37:A green
401:Support
364:Support
314:Dschwen
295:drumguy
281:Dschwen
247:Fir0002
226:Neutral
205:Support
176:Neutral
145:drumguy
125:Neutral
105:Support
90:drumguy
81:Support
69:article
48:Eastern
347:Oppose
301:speak?
289:Thanks
255:Oppose
211:Andrew
189:oppose
151:speak?
96:speak?
387:roken
327:Janke
273:gecko
259:BCool
193:Janke
109:GEICO
67:gecko
51:Texas
40:gecko
16:<
393:egue
355:talk
331:Talk
325:. --
234:talk
197:Talk
133:el8
130:Pix
46:in
433::
357:)
329:|
299:-
236:)
215:18
195:|
149:-
94:-
87:.
71:.
391:S
385:B
353:(
232:(
53:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
