Knowledge

:Featured picture candidates/File:Desargues theorem.svg - Knowledge

Source 📝

145:. The lines Aa and Bb are shown as meeting somewhat to the right of the point labeled the center of perspectivity, and below the line Cc. This flaw is visible even at the nominal size, and is more obvious in the larger renditions linked on the file description page. I agree the diagram has high EV, and the flaw is small enough that it shouldn't hinder understanding, but I think a diagram should be free of visible defects to become an FP. -- 45: 34: 40:- Perspective triangles. When produced, corresponding sides of the triangles meet at collinear points along the axis of perspectivity. The lines which run through corresponding vertices on the triangles meet at a point called the center of perspectivity. Desargues' theorem guarantees that the truth of the first condition is necessary and sufficient for the truth of the second. 303:
On reflection, I have another concern. It seems like the axis of perspectivity is parallel to the line Cc, but I don't believe this is a requirement for perspective triangles, and showing them as parallel could mislead readers into believing this is a necessary condition. I don't believe showing them
180:
No, he's right, and I'm surprised I didn't spot it. Look at the dashed lines- they cross (on dashes) around 4mm to the right and 2mm below the center of the dot representing the center of perspectivity (at least, it does on my screen, sorry for the not-so-technical explanation). This should really be
326:
feel that it makes the diagram easier to follow. I certainly see where you are coming from, but I remember when I did this kind of thing at school, making one of the lines completely horizontal, if possible, did make the issue a little simpler.
345:
One of the lines being horizontal is okay. What he's saying is making two of the lines horizontal implies a relationship where there needn't be one. I've made an adjustment for this, thank you again Avenue.
475: 465: 258:
Thanks for fixing this. Is there any chance of making the lines a bit thicker (like the original)? It lets you see the diagram at article size clearly.
58:
Its easier to make sense of than "In a projective space, two triangles are in perspective axially if and only if they are in perspective centrally".
470: 17: 105:. Not much to say here, but I didn't understand before I looked at the image, and did understand afterwards. The image quality is good. 163:
I'm really not seeing that. To me the lines all go through the exact same point. Perhaps it's confusing because the lines are dashed?
451: 433: 416: 399: 372: 354: 336: 313: 284: 267: 249: 232: 214: 194: 171: 154: 134: 114: 95: 304:
as parallel makes the diagram significantly easier to follow, either, so I would prefer for those lines not to be parallel. --
203:
I see it now. I've made an alternate to account for this. Let me know if I need to make any alterations to it. I
447: 263: 91: 68: 412: 332: 228: 190: 123: 110: 64: 443: 259: 87: 429: 368: 348: 309: 278: 243: 208: 165: 150: 128: 424:. This version addresses my concerns. High EV, makes the article much easier to follow. -- 407:. Not only have the technical fixes been made, but I think the ALT is a little prettier. 408: 395: 328: 224: 186: 106: 76: 44: 459: 425: 364: 305: 146: 33: 126:
would be extremely difficult to understand without this image. Very valuable.
391: 43: 32: 223:
I'd prefer the default size of the alt to be a little bigger.
185:
until this is fixed or an explanation is forthcoming.
8: 322:This occurred to me too, but I personally 476:Featured picture nominations/March 2010 440:Promoted File:Desargues theorem alt.svg 18:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates 7: 61:Articles in which this image appears 466:Ended featured picture nominations 24: 241:Done. Now defaults at 578×430. 1: 276:Lines are a bit thicker now. 471:Featured picture nominations 492: 452:05:29, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 434:23:37, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 417:18:31, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 400:23:47, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 373:23:37, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 363:Thank you! Fast work. -- 355:15:17, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 337:09:11, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 314:06:38, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 285:13:30, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 268:05:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 250:00:38, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 233:00:13, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 215:23:05, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 195:18:07, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 172:17:14, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 155:10:09, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 135:18:21, 3 March 2010 (UTC) 115:18:15, 3 March 2010 (UTC) 96:00:16, 2 March 2010 (UTC) 69:Perspective (geometry) 51: 41: 47: 36: 84:Support as nominator 124:Desargues' theorem 65:Desargues' theorem 52: 42: 28:Desargues theorem 483: 351: 281: 246: 211: 181:fixed. As such, 168: 131: 491: 490: 486: 485: 484: 482: 481: 480: 456: 455: 390:Good now IMO.-- 349: 279: 244: 209: 166: 129: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 489: 487: 479: 478: 473: 468: 458: 457: 437: 436: 419: 402: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 358: 357: 340: 339: 317: 316: 300: 299: 298: 297: 296: 295: 294: 293: 292: 291: 290: 289: 288: 287: 271: 270: 253: 252: 236: 235: 218: 217: 198: 197: 175: 174: 158: 157: 137: 117: 98: 80: 79: 74: 71: 62: 59: 56: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 488: 477: 474: 472: 469: 467: 464: 463: 461: 454: 453: 449: 445: 444:Makeemlighter 441: 435: 431: 427: 423: 420: 418: 414: 410: 406: 403: 401: 397: 393: 389: 386: 385: 374: 370: 366: 362: 361: 360: 359: 356: 353: 352: 344: 343: 342: 341: 338: 334: 330: 325: 321: 320: 319: 318: 315: 311: 307: 302: 301: 286: 283: 282: 275: 274: 273: 272: 269: 265: 261: 260:Noodle snacks 257: 256: 255: 254: 251: 248: 247: 240: 239: 238: 237: 234: 230: 226: 222: 221: 220: 219: 216: 213: 212: 206: 202: 201: 200: 199: 196: 192: 188: 184: 179: 178: 177: 176: 173: 170: 169: 162: 161: 160: 159: 156: 152: 148: 144: 141: 138: 136: 133: 132: 125: 121: 118: 116: 112: 108: 104: 103: 99: 97: 93: 89: 88:Noodle snacks 85: 82: 81: 78: 75: 72: 70: 66: 63: 60: 57: 54: 53: 50: 46: 39: 35: 29: 26: 19: 439: 438: 421: 404: 387: 347: 323: 277: 242: 207: 204: 182: 164: 142: 139: 127: 122:The lead at 119: 101: 100: 83: 48: 37: 27: 422:Support ALT 405:Support ALT 350:Jujutacular 280:Jujutacular 245:Jujutacular 210:Jujutacular 205:Support ALT 167:Jujutacular 130:Jujutacular 460:Categories 409:J Milburn 329:J Milburn 225:J Milburn 187:J Milburn 107:J Milburn 77:DynaBlast 143:original 38:Original 388:Support 120:Support 102:Support 73:Creator 426:Avenue 365:Avenue 306:Avenue 183:oppose 147:Avenue 140:Oppose 55:Reason 16:< 448:talk 430:talk 413:talk 396:talk 392:Mbz1 369:talk 333:talk 310:talk 264:talk 229:talk 191:talk 151:talk 111:talk 92:talk 49:ALT 462:: 450:) 442:-- 432:) 415:) 398:) 371:) 335:) 324:do 312:) 266:) 231:) 193:) 153:) 113:) 94:) 86:-- 67:, 446:( 428:( 411:( 394:( 367:( 331:( 308:( 262:( 227:( 189:( 149:( 109:( 90:(

Index

Knowledge:Featured picture candidates
Desargues theorem


Desargues' theorem
Perspective (geometry)
DynaBlast
Noodle snacks
talk
00:16, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
J Milburn
talk
18:15, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Desargues' theorem
Jujutacular
18:21, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Avenue
talk
10:09, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Jujutacular
17:14, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
J Milburn
talk
18:07, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Jujutacular
23:05, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
J Milburn
talk
00:13, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Jujutacular

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.