277:
49:
34:
334:
Funny, I thought you started this discussion when you didn't AGF about the intentions of the voters. And yes, I'd hate to let it be if there was an unresolved issue. But you're more than happy to disappear and dig your head into the sand when you're actually asked to explain yourself, aren't you?
115:
Blurring on tail and distracting background (white bits) - I thought I was viewing some form of optical illusion picture until I read the details as I just didn't see the animal... Still support though as once you know what ur looking for it is a good picture of an animal I had never seen so good
412:
Try defocussing your eyes and looking at the thumbnail- you see a series of white triangles. They look like the focus of the picture. This feels much more BBC than
Knowledge (XXG)- I suppose that's a compliment, but I'm not certain it's something we should be featuring. However, I realise how
454:
because of the very light triangles. Camouflage per se is not bad. If the whole photo were occupied by a lizard-colored tree trunk or something like that, that would be fine. But here, the eyes are drawn to the triangles.
317:
I'm not sure you should have been starting this discussion at all. Certainly by this point, Muhammad's nomination is suffering from the long discussion, if anything. But then you'd hate to just let it be, wouldn't you?
133:. Composition is interesting and eye catching. It's the sort of composition that you tend to see in wildlife photography competitions. Shame you didn't get it more straight-on, so that everything was in focus.
63:
Reptilian FPs are few and lizards seem to be doing well so here's another one. The only picture in its article. Previous image in article was of lower quality and probably misidentified( or juvenile)
296:
It's a very different image, of a different species, in a different part of the world. And I wouldn't actually say it's a better image anyway. So what point were you trying to make exactly?
378:
the picture, I just don't think it's really FPC material because of the distracting background. I, too, didn't actually realise I was looking at a lizard for a few seconds.
157:
I think this is slightly but significantly below our standards, and if it were from any photographer that isn't an FPC regular, we almost certainly wouldn't promote it.
569:
559:
17:
564:
545:
525:
504:
481:
464:
440:
426:
407:
387:
351:
329:
312:
291:
265:
250:
229:
212:
198:
168:
149:
125:
107:
495:
398:
98:
280:
took three minutes to find. FPC unknown photographer, been lingering for two and a half years without getting nominated.
392:
I agree the lizard is difficult to see at first but I think it's more camouflage in the setting than the background --
325:
287:
164:
490:
393:
93:
82:
460:
319:
281:
158:
521:
512:- The composition is beautiful and I would gladly support the picture in Commons FP. But here we should
489:
I recovered the sky colour from the white triangles. I hope the blue triangles are not distracting. --
436:
422:
383:
276:
431:
Prefer edit slightly EV-wise, but still neutral, as I am not certain I can assess this properly.
261:
225:
208:
121:
456:
517:
345:
306:
244:
192:
143:
218:
477:
432:
418:
379:
234:
Sorry, I was being lazy, but I'm sure he knew what I meant, even if others didn't. :-)
69:
553:
257:
221:
204:
117:
48:
516:
focus our assessment on EV, and the light, sharpness and angle are not the best --
534:
336:
297:
235:
183:
134:
44:
commonly called the Dull day gecko in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania on a palm frond
473:
33:
217:
Scratch that - Assume Good Faith... Confused me as it's normally written
73:
47:
32:
413:
inconsistent that sounds, so consider my oppose withdrawn. I am
175:Discussion mostly irrelevant to the nomination
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
570:Featured picture nominations/March 2010
256:No probs - was just a tad confuzled...
7:
66:Articles in which this image appears
560:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
275:
472:I absolutely love the image!--
1:
76:(Under camouflage in defense)
565:Featured picture nominations
586:
546:12:29, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
526:01:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
505:10:16, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
482:23:14, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
465:20:23, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
441:12:42, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
427:18:01, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
408:17:04, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
388:16:29, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
352:15:11, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
330:14:57, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
313:14:13, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
292:13:46, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
266:15:10, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
251:14:13, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
230:13:28, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
213:13:24, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
199:13:12, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
169:12:21, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
150:10:14, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
126:09:38, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
108:09:12, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
182:Nice of you to AGF. :-P
56:
45:
51:
36:
90:Support as nominator
83:Muhammad Mahdi Karim
57:
46:
502:
405:
350:
321:Papa Lima Whiskey
311:
283:Papa Lima Whiskey
268:
249:
197:
160:Papa Lima Whiskey
148:
105:
577:
541:
538:
496:
399:
348:
344:
343:
339:
322:
309:
305:
304:
300:
284:
279:
255:
247:
243:
242:
238:
195:
191:
190:
186:
161:
146:
142:
141:
137:
99:
585:
584:
580:
579:
578:
576:
575:
574:
550:
549:
539:
536:
367:
366:
346:
341:
337:
320:
307:
302:
298:
282:
245:
240:
236:
193:
188:
184:
176:
159:
144:
139:
135:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
583:
581:
573:
572:
567:
562:
552:
551:
531:Not promoted
528:
507:
487:Edit1 uploaded
484:
470:Strong support
467:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
273:
272:
271:
270:
269:
253:
177:
174:
173:
172:
171:
152:
128:
110:
86:
85:
80:
77:
70:Dull day gecko
67:
64:
61:
42:Phelsuma dubia
30:
28:Phelsuma dubia
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
582:
571:
568:
566:
563:
561:
558:
557:
555:
548:
547:
543:
542:
532:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
508:
506:
503:
500:
494:
493:
488:
485:
483:
479:
475:
471:
468:
466:
462:
458:
453:
450:
442:
438:
434:
430:
429:
428:
424:
420:
416:
411:
410:
409:
406:
403:
397:
396:
391:
390:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
372:
368:
353:
349:
340:
333:
332:
331:
327:
323:
316:
315:
314:
310:
301:
295:
294:
293:
289:
285:
278:
274:
267:
263:
259:
254:
252:
248:
239:
233:
232:
231:
227:
223:
220:
216:
215:
214:
210:
206:
202:
201:
200:
196:
187:
181:
180:
179:
178:
170:
166:
162:
156:
153:
151:
147:
138:
132:
129:
127:
123:
119:
114:
111:
109:
106:
103:
97:
96:
91:
88:
87:
84:
81:
78:
75:
71:
68:
65:
62:
59:
58:
55:Recovered sky
54:
50:
43:
39:
35:
29:
26:
19:
535:
530:
529:
513:
509:
498:
491:
486:
469:
457:Calliopejen1
451:
414:
401:
394:
375:
370:
369:
154:
130:
113:Weak Support
112:
101:
94:
89:
52:
41:
37:
27:
518:Alvesgaspar
374:. Sorry. I
371:Weak oppose
554:Categories
433:J Milburn
419:J Milburn
380:J Milburn
514:restrict
492:Muhammad
395:Muhammad
258:Gazhiley
222:Gazhiley
205:Gazhiley
118:Gazhiley
95:Muhammad
38:Original
415:neutral
131:Support
79:Creator
74:Reptile
510:Oppose
452:Oppose
347:(Talk)
338:Ðiliff
308:(Talk)
299:Ðiliff
246:(Talk)
237:Ðiliff
219:WP:AGF
194:(Talk)
185:Ðiliff
155:Oppose
145:(Talk)
136:Ðiliff
116:ev...
60:Reason
203:AGF?
53:Edit1
16:<
522:talk
499:talk
478:talk
474:Mbz1
461:talk
437:talk
423:talk
402:talk
384:talk
376:love
326:talk
288:talk
262:talk
226:talk
209:talk
165:talk
122:talk
102:talk
540:din
537:Mae
556::
544:\
524:)
480:)
463:)
439:)
425:)
417:.
386:)
342:«»
328:)
303:«»
290:)
264:)
241:«»
228:)
211:)
189:«»
167:)
140:«»
124:)
92:--
72:,
40:-
533:—
520:(
501:)
497:(
476:(
459:(
435:(
421:(
404:)
400:(
382:(
324:(
286:(
260:(
224:(
207:(
163:(
120:(
104:)
100:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
