Knowledge (XXG)

:Featured picture candidates/File:Virgin of the Rocks (Louvre).jpg - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

190: 51: 341:
Well, it is a matter of personal taste, in this case. But things has to be seen in context in art history. Considering how people were drawing and painting before Leonardo, one has to be amazed how outstanding this man was. Nowadays one can take things for granted, because many painters learned the
381:
Van Gogh blown up ... what heresy! But quite true of course. I had a look for images of the Louvre version of the Madonna of the Rocks and couldn't find any good ones. The Louvre doesn't allow flash photography, so any photograph would have to be taken in natural light. There are some Flickr
65:
Iconic picture of Leonardo da Vinci. Leonardo was an Italian Renaissance painter, sculptor, architect, musician, mathematician, engineer, inventor, anatomist, geologist, cartographer, botanist, and writer and who knows what more. He is considered to be one of the greatest painters of all
323:. I rate the whole things as roughly on a par of those cam versions of the latest blockbuster films you see uploaded to Usenet the day after their release, and I can't support it. Too iconic for me I'm afraid, though I agree it's not displeasing: its authenticity another matter. 366:
has wonderfull, light blue and pink pictures, that nobody cares for ... because are not considered regular van Gogh's-style). But not Leonardo... And we should really try to get a decent file on Knowledge (XXG) of this masterpiece.
316: 387: 259: 354:, because he was. As we are talking about this, I do admit that there are certain paintings that are blown up by the market, and don't have the value in the same way, like - some of the 312: 85: 460: 450: 319:. On Commons you are supposed to indicate digital restorations, but I can't see any indication offered. I'm pretty sure what's been done here far exceeds 350:
can never be too iconic, that is just not possible. Leonardo da Vinci is one of the few people one can without any problem say that that man was a
17: 435: 422: 399: 376: 332: 287: 271: 251: 233: 181: 165: 147: 129: 112: 455: 242:
Can't open the Russian site, and the second has painfully obvious cracks in the painting, such that I doubt it would last in the article. —
138:
Sigh. Yes, I had my doubts - but it seems like big mistake of us not to have a decent file on Knowledge (XXG) of this masterpiece.
315:
which reached its status on the basis of a single vote from the nominator. The image in turn seems to be a processed version of
395: 328: 222: 189: 391: 324: 267: 247: 161: 125: 382:
versions, but they aren't very good and "all rights reserved" in any case. You can try Featuring the
372: 283: 177: 143: 108: 72: 218: 50: 347: 320: 228: 93: 76: 263: 243: 208: 157: 121: 368: 279: 212: 173: 139: 104: 444: 432: 419: 262:. Looks like it's based on a photograph and not a scan (I think I see noise here) — 156:, but we'd just lose information if I tried to use this as my source file. — 343: 363: 355: 390:
as restored a few minutes ago by yours truly :). Happy to support that.
359: 351: 172:
Yes, that would be nice. It is really a shame not to have this one.
188: 120:- The circle crop at the top was very poorly done. Very jagged. — 49: 428: 35:
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.
86:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
342:techniques and even made them exagerated, like in 152:If I had a pre-crop version I could probably do 317:of this point-and-shoot Canon PowerShot photo 8: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates 278:If Crisco sees noises that's not good. ( 311:It's the same gallerix.ru image as this 57:– Now the picture is clearly iconic, 461:Featured picture nominations/June 2014 7: 69:Articles in which this image appears 451:Ended featured picture nominations 258:Oh, the Russian site's version is 24: 362:pictures, for example, yes. (And 1: 456:Featured picture nominations 477: 221:any better? Failing that, 82:FP category for this image 400:21:42, 29 June 2014 (UTC) 377:19:42, 29 June 2014 (UTC) 333:18:37, 29 June 2014 (UTC) 288:16:34, 29 June 2014 (UTC) 272:15:38, 29 June 2014 (UTC) 252:15:35, 29 June 2014 (UTC) 234:14:49, 29 June 2014 (UTC) 182:14:36, 29 June 2014 (UTC) 166:14:27, 29 June 2014 (UTC) 148:12:09, 29 June 2014 (UTC) 130:11:25, 29 June 2014 (UTC) 113:11:10, 29 June 2014 (UTC) 436:12:56, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 423:12:56, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 388:National Gallery version 194: 58: 39:Voting period ends on 192: 53: 429:Withdrawn nomination 392:Coat of Many Colours 325:Coat of Many Colours 313:Commons valued image 193:Commons valued image 101:Support as nominator 28:Madonna of the rocks 73:Virgin of the Rocks 195: 59: 348:Leonardo Da Vinci 94:Leonardo da Vinci 77:Leonardo da Vinci 47: 468: 232: 216: 38: 36: 476: 475: 471: 470: 469: 467: 466: 465: 441: 440: 384:Coatzee bequest 226: 206: 37: 34: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 474: 472: 464: 463: 458: 453: 443: 442: 439: 438: 416:Not Promoted 412: 409: 407: 406: 405: 404: 403: 402: 336: 335: 305: 304: 303: 302: 301: 300: 299: 298: 297: 296: 295: 294: 293: 292: 291: 290: 255: 254: 237: 236: 187: 186: 185: 184: 170: 169: 168: 133: 132: 115: 97: 96: 91: 88: 83: 80: 70: 67: 63: 45:11:10:09 (UTC) 33: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 473: 462: 459: 457: 454: 452: 449: 448: 446: 437: 434: 430: 427: 426: 425: 424: 421: 417: 413: 410: 401: 397: 393: 389: 385: 380: 379: 378: 374: 370: 365: 361: 357: 353: 349: 345: 340: 339: 338: 337: 334: 330: 326: 322: 318: 314: 310: 307: 306: 289: 285: 281: 277: 276: 275: 274: 273: 269: 265: 261: 257: 256: 253: 249: 245: 241: 240: 239: 238: 235: 231: 230: 224: 220: 214: 210: 205: 204: 203: 202: 201: 200: 199: 198: 197: 196: 191: 183: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 150: 149: 145: 141: 137: 136: 135: 134: 131: 127: 123: 119: 116: 114: 110: 106: 102: 99: 98: 95: 92: 89: 87: 84: 81: 78: 74: 71: 68: 64: 61: 60: 56: 52: 48: 46: 42: 29: 26: 19: 415: 414: 411: 408: 383: 308: 229:Adam Cuerden 227: 153: 117: 100: 54: 44: 40: 32: 27: 264:Crisco 1492 244:Crisco 1492 209:Crisco 1492 158:Crisco 1492 122:Crisco 1492 41:9 Jul 2014 445:Categories 260:on Commons 369:Hafspajen 344:Manierism 280:Hafspajen 213:Hafspajen 174:Hafspajen 154:something 140:Hafspajen 105:Hafspajen 433:Armbrust 420:Armbrust 364:van Gogh 356:van Gogh 321:WP:FP?#8 79:and more 55:Original 386:of the 360:Picasso 118:Comment 90:Creator 352:genius 346:. But 309:Oppose 62:Reason 66:time. 16:< 396:talk 373:talk 329:talk 284:talk 268:talk 248:talk 223:this 219:this 211:and 178:talk 162:talk 144:talk 126:talk 109:talk 358:or 217:Is 43:at 447:: 431:. 418:-- 398:) 375:) 331:) 286:) 270:) 250:) 225:? 180:) 164:) 146:) 128:) 111:) 103:– 75:, 394:( 371:( 327:( 282:( 266:( 246:( 215:: 207:@ 176:( 160:( 142:( 124:( 107:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
Madonna of the rocks

Virgin of the Rocks
Leonardo da Vinci
Knowledge (XXG):Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Leonardo da Vinci
Hafspajen
talk
11:10, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Crisco 1492
talk
11:25, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Hafspajen
talk
12:09, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Crisco 1492
talk
14:27, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Hafspajen
talk
14:36, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Crisco 1492
Hafspajen
this
this
Adam Cuerden
14:49, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Crisco 1492

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.