34:
102:
I'm not going to vote on this one since I'd probably get accused of COI or something. But jjron did also say "unfortunately the focus on that looks to have just missed". It is either out of focus or just very soft, not to mention noisy, I don't think it is close to the technical requirements. The
53:
141:. Sorry, I think it's an excellent picture, but the focus isn't right so doesn't meet FPC criteria. To me this is a perfect candidate for VPC rather than FPC and would support it if I saw it there. --
174:
264:
103:
background of this shot is clearer, particularly at thumbnail size, this is why I submitted it over my own image when I did a 5x expansion of the article for
254:
56:
17:
124:
Even if technical quality isn't perfect, I think the background is more pleasing and less distracting, making this image stand out to me more.
259:
240:
216:
204:
187:
168:
150:
133:
116:
94:
231:
90:
226:
183:
112:
84:
179:
129:
108:
196:
195:
I agree that this one is a better version. The bird stands out more and is much clearer to see.
158:
The loss of detail due to the soft focus is a problem, and the noise likewise. I would suggest
65:
41:
73:
159:
200:
146:
164:
248:
125:
213:
212:
I have better shots of this bird in sharp focus which I'll try upload soonish --
33:
142:
104:
52:
jjron suggested that this might be a worthy competitor to the
107:. But I still think the pair are complementary.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
265:Featured picture nominations/January 2009
32:
57:Egretta novaehollandiae Tasmania 3.jpg
7:
255:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
62:Articles this image appears in
28:White-faced Heron, alternative
1:
260:Featured picture nominations
241:15:28, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
217:01:18, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
205:09:40, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
188:01:51, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
169:19:23, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
151:13:57, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
134:23:37, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
117:08:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
95:02:15, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
281:
59:, and I have to agree.
45:
36:
81:Support as nominator
54:currently nominated
46:
238:
86:Papa Lima Whiskey
66:White-faced Heron
42:White-faced Heron
272:
232:
167:
156:Regretful Oppose
87:
280:
279:
275:
274:
273:
271:
270:
269:
245:
244:
163:
85:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
278:
276:
268:
267:
262:
257:
247:
246:
223:Not promoted
220:
219:
207:
190:
171:
153:
136:
119:
97:
77:
76:
71:
68:
63:
60:
50:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
277:
266:
263:
261:
258:
256:
253:
252:
250:
243:
242:
239:
236:
230:
229:
224:
218:
215:
211:
208:
206:
202:
198:
194:
191:
189:
185:
181:
180:Noodle snacks
177:
176:
172:
170:
166:
161:
157:
154:
152:
148:
144:
140:
137:
135:
131:
127:
123:
120:
118:
114:
110:
109:Noodle snacks
106:
101:
98:
96:
92:
88:
82:
79:
78:
75:
72:
69:
67:
64:
61:
58:
55:
51:
48:
47:
43:
39:
35:
29:
26:
19:
234:
227:
222:
221:
209:
192:
173:
155:
138:
122:Weak Support
121:
99:
80:
37:
27:
139:Weak Oppose
74:Glen Fergus
249:Categories
175:Nominated
165:Elucidate
44:foraging.
228:Muhammad
178:at VPC.
126:Fletcher
38:Original
214:Fir0002
193:Support
100:Comment
70:Creator
210:Oppose
160:WP:VPC
105:WP:DYK
49:Reason
197:A302b
143:jjron
16:<
235:talk
201:talk
184:talk
147:talk
130:talk
113:talk
91:talk
251::
225:--
203:)
186:)
162:.
149:)
132:)
115:)
93:)
83:--
40:-
237:)
233:(
199:(
182:(
145:(
128:(
111:(
89:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
