Knowledge (XXG)

:Featured picture candidates/File:White peach and cross section.jpg - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

45: 34: 158:
I think the article needs a picture of both a nectarine and a peach and the cross sections are a good way to have that picture. Also having them as both whites clearly shows that nectarines and peaches are the same fruit (despite what many people think). For me the advantage is aesthetic - but I
143:
is it helpful to the article to show a cross section of a peach, and also a cross section of a nectarine? Also what's the advantage in three samples rather than just two? Full peach and cross section would make for a smaller image, addressing Terri's concern about it being "imposing".
199: 235: 225: 211: 182: 163: 153: 135: 118: 99: 87: 17: 230: 159:
guess there's also extra EV as you get a better overall impression on the shape of the peach thanks to the two different views. --
195: 95:
White peaches are generally quite pale and this specimen was no exception - the edit oversaturates things (too red). --
191: 114: 126:
Not sure about the placement of this in the article, seems a bit imposing, but the picture itself is fine.
44: 149: 110: 33: 131: 178: 219: 145: 160: 127: 96: 84: 73: 208: 174: 65: 40:- White peach and its cross section on a white background 206:
Promoted File:White peach and cross section edit.jpg
190:- Fir really is the master of this type of image. 8: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates 43: 32: 236:Featured picture nominations/March 2009 7: 226:Ended featured picture nominations 24: 28:White Peach and its cross section 62:Articles this image appears in 59:Very good technicals + good ev 1: 51:Black point adjustment/curves 231:Featured picture nominations 252: 212:08:20, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 200:19:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 183:13:22, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 164:06:25, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 154:23:30, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 136:10:43, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 119:07:41, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 100:06:25, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 88:07:06, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 109:- Fixed over exposure. 52: 41: 47: 36: 81:Support as nominator 192:Shoemaker's Holiday 124:Weak support Edit 1 93:Weak Oppose Edit 1 53: 42: 243: 251: 250: 246: 245: 244: 242: 241: 240: 216: 215: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 249: 247: 239: 238: 233: 228: 218: 217: 203: 202: 188:Support either 185: 168: 167: 166: 138: 121: 107:Support Edit 1 104: 103: 102: 77: 76: 71: 68: 63: 60: 57: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 248: 237: 234: 232: 229: 227: 224: 223: 221: 214: 213: 210: 207: 201: 197: 193: 189: 186: 184: 180: 176: 172: 171:Support edit1 169: 165: 162: 157: 156: 155: 151: 147: 142: 139: 137: 133: 129: 125: 122: 120: 116: 112: 111:Noodle snacks 108: 105: 101: 98: 94: 91: 90: 89: 86: 82: 79: 78: 75: 72: 69: 67: 64: 61: 58: 55: 54: 50: 46: 39: 35: 29: 26: 19: 205: 204: 187: 170: 140: 123: 106: 92: 80: 48: 37: 27: 220:Categories 146:Fletcher 38:Original 161:Fir0002 141:Comment 128:Terri G 97:Fir0002 85:Fir0002 74:Fir0002 70:Creator 56:Reason 49:Edit 1 209:MER-C 175:Avala 66:Peach 16:< 196:talk 179:talk 150:talk 132:talk 115:talk 173:.-- 222:: 198:) 181:) 152:) 134:) 117:) 83:-- 194:( 177:( 148:( 130:( 113:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
White Peach and its cross section


Peach
Fir0002
Fir0002
07:06, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Fir0002
06:25, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Noodle snacks
talk
07:41, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Terri G
talk
10:43, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Fletcher
talk
23:30, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Fir0002
06:25, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Avala
talk
13:22, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Shoemaker's Holiday
talk
19:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
MER-C
08:20, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Categories

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.