34:
244:
concept, so any position you could move the knot into without breaking the string is a valid representation - hence I can also praise the creator for choosing particularly clear forms to illustrate them in. It is admittedly true that it does help if you're a topology geek, or at least an amateur one,
299:
I wasn't saying this image was wrong... but, I don't tend to like adding sources to someone else's image since they should, ideally, source exactly what they used... not something found afterwards. Since you are the creator if you used that page could you just add it saying you used it to help
245:
and it's also admittedly true that it's a very basic drawing. Still, we shouldn't knock things just because they're simple, particularly in cases like this where the simplicity aids in understanding, so I must support.
254:
469:: I wish this picture could be more interesting to everyone, but I feel that adding color or something else would be distracting and detract from its encyclopedic value.
430:
Alexander-Briggs notation is just an arbitrary ordering of the knots, the large number is the number of crossings, and the subscript is just the arbitrary order used by
191:. I've chosen to change my vote, because I have little expertise in this area. The image does not look particularly striking to me, but that's not for me to decide. :)
554:
544:
17:
64:
I think this diagram meets all of the applicable criteria, it helps readers visualize the differences and similarities between different knots.
549:
203:
177:
146:
I think some colour would make it more interesting and engage the viewer more. Nothing fancy, perhaps make the captions coloured.
240:
I think this diagram does a superb job at illustrating a somewhat-difficult topological concept clearly and cleanly. Knots are a
250:
151:
246:
147:
505:
I've made the lines thicker now, and also made sure all the ends look like they would meet under the crossing.
530:
518:
498:
482:
455:
425:
408:
376:
351:
336:
311:
294:
271:
232:
209:
183:
155:
138:
122:
219:: This picture was created to illustrate what the different knots look like, not as an artistic expression.
198:
172:
165:. It's simple and informative, but also uninteresting. It is not an example of Knowledge (XXG)'s best work.
421:
372:
348:
308:
268:
300:
create the image? We just need to make sure images, since they are parts of articles, live up to
194:
168:
135:
70:
417:
368:
512:
476:
449:
439:
431:
402:
388:
345:
330:
305:
288:
265:
226:
116:
96:
78:
45:
367:. Is this a complete catalog of these classes of knots, or was any selection involved?
301:
538:
416:
per nom. Useful and encyclopedic. Caption could explain what the subscripts mean.
131:
323:
to get the diagrams, I've updated the image description at commons to reflect this.
279:
492:
490:
I agree with Jkasd. I would prefer that the lines be a bit thicker in the knots.
435:
392:
241:
74:
53:
49:
41:
527:
507:
471:
444:
397:
384:
325:
283:
221:
111:
91:
82:
317:
33:
344:, it doesn't fully have the "awe" factor but it is a well done image.
321:
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
264:there is some sourcing for this image...
304:, especially when they become featured.
32:
395:. I've updated the caption to clarify.
278:The knots can be found in many places,
555:Featured picture nominations/June 2008
7:
545:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
383:This is a complete table of all
67:Articles this image appears in
1:
525:Promoted Image:Knot_table.svg
130:very well done illustration.
550:Featured picture nominations
438:and the article in progress
436:Knot theory#Tabulating knots
316:I created the picture with
571:
531:10:09, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
54:Alexander-Briggs notation
519:16:21, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
499:14:32, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
483:04:40, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
456:18:57, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
426:18:48, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
409:18:44, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
377:18:21, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
352:04:25, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
337:15:48, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
312:06:03, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
295:14:48, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
272:05:21, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
255:20:12, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
233:16:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
210:22:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
184:14:39, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
156:06:40, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
139:03:38, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
123:01:39, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
391:up to seven excluding
320:, but I used KnotPlot
57:
36:
148:Capital photographer
107:Support as nominator
434:and G. Briggs. See
247:Shoemaker's Holiday
497:
71:knot (mathematics)
58:
491:
562:
515:
510:
495:
479:
474:
452:
447:
405:
400:
333:
328:
291:
286:
229:
224:
206:
201:
180:
175:
119:
114:
99:
94:
52:) labelled with
570:
569:
565:
564:
563:
561:
560:
559:
535:
534:
513:
508:
493:
477:
472:
450:
445:
440:Knot tabulation
432:J. W. Alexander
403:
398:
389:crossing number
331:
326:
289:
284:
227:
222:
204:
199:
178:
173:
117:
112:
97:
92:
79:knot tabulation
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
568:
566:
558:
557:
552:
547:
537:
536:
522:
521:
502:
501:
485:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
380:
379:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
275:
274:
257:
235:
214:
213:
212:
158:
141:
125:
103:
102:
88:
85:
68:
65:
62:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
567:
556:
553:
551:
548:
546:
543:
542:
540:
533:
532:
529:
526:
520:
517:
516:
511:
504:
503:
500:
496:
489:
486:
484:
481:
480:
475:
468:
465:
464:
457:
454:
453:
448:
441:
437:
433:
429:
428:
427:
423:
419:
415:
412:
411:
410:
407:
406:
401:
394:
393:mirror images
390:
386:
382:
381:
378:
374:
370:
366:
363:
362:
353:
350:
347:
343:
340:
339:
338:
335:
334:
329:
322:
319:
315:
314:
313:
310:
307:
303:
298:
297:
296:
293:
292:
287:
281:for example.
280:
277:
276:
273:
270:
267:
263:
262:
261:Oppose unless
258:
256:
252:
248:
243:
239:
236:
234:
231:
230:
225:
218:
215:
211:
208:
207:
202:
197:
196:
190:
187:
186:
185:
182:
181:
176:
171:
170:
164:
163:
159:
157:
153:
149:
145:
142:
140:
137:
133:
129:
126:
124:
121:
120:
115:
108:
105:
104:
101:
100:
95:
89:
86:
84:
80:
76:
72:
69:
66:
63:
60:
59:
55:
51:
50:mirror images
47:
43:
40:- A table of
39:
35:
29:
26:
19:
524:
523:
506:
487:
470:
466:
443:
418:Spikebrennan
413:
396:
369:Spikebrennan
364:
342:Weak support
341:
324:
282:
260:
259:
237:
220:
216:
193:
192:
188:
167:
166:
161:
160:
144:Weak Support
143:
127:
110:
106:
90:
44:up to seven
37:
27:
385:prime knots
242:topological
75:knot theory
48:(excluding
42:prime knots
539:Categories
83:prime knot
28:Knot table
46:crossings
365:Question
318:Inkscape
132:Cat-five
38:Original
494:Spencer
488:Comment
467:Comment
414:Support
238:Support
195:Nautica
189:Neutral
169:Nautica
128:Support
87:Creator
162:Oppose
61:Reason
528:MER-C
387:with
302:WP:RS
16:<
514:kasd
478:kasd
451:kasd
422:talk
404:kasd
373:talk
346:gren
332:kasd
306:gren
290:kasd
266:gren
251:talk
228:kasd
217:Note
200:Shad
174:Shad
152:talk
136:talk
118:kasd
98:kasd
349:グレン
309:グレン
269:グレン
541::
442:.
424:)
375:)
253:)
205:es
179:es
154:)
134:-
109:--
81:,
77:,
73:,
509:J
473:J
446:J
420:(
399:J
371:(
327:J
285:J
249:(
223:J
150:(
113:J
93:J
56:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
