34:
50:, and proved spectacularly successful on both sides of the Atlantic. However, American copyright law of the time did not respect British copyright, and most of the productions in America - probably including the one here advertised - were unauthorised and gave no income to the creators. In order to attempt to gain American copyright on their next opera,
139:
It's a matter of convinience. When you go to jpeg, you normally trade a marginal amount of detail for a significantly smaller file size, and low-compression jpeg artifacts are practically invisible in textures, which is why the format lends itself to photographs. For pictures like
72:, the current WikiProject Gilbert and Sullivan featured article drive. There are no other featured images of H.M.S. Pinafore. Improved & restored. The somewhat less restored image is an FP on commons, where they hate engravings, so I figure it has a good chance here. =)
144:, which are detailed, but not really textured, jpeg artifacts are more easily visible and the difference in file sizes is smaller, so PNG is better. But for something like this, which is well textured, jpeg might be an alternative to a 7MB download.
141:
134:
191:
103:
262:
125:
Why on earth would we want to change from a lossless medium to a lossy one? Anyway, JPG only really works for photographs. I find for engravings it messes things up.
226:
212:
182:
148:
120:
252:
17:
257:
206:
220:
A fine restoration. A discussion over formats really ought to be segregated from consideration of whether this should be featured.
130:
99:
238:
164:
126:
95:
178:
201:
52:
47:
174:
197:
160:
111:
aren't images preferred not to be in png? Would there be any way of converting this to jpeg?
116:
78:
69:
42:
145:
246:
57:
156:
221:
235:
112:
33:
155:I think PNG should be fine for this type of image.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
68:Easily the best illustration we have for
263:Featured picture nominations/August 2008
60:in order to stage its official première.
32:
46:was the fourth collaboration between
7:
253:Ended featured picture nominations
56:, the entire company was taken to
24:
233:Promoted Image:HMSPinafore2.png
75:Articles this image appears in
1:
258:Featured picture nominations
239:09:53, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
227:02:43, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
213:13:30, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
183:23:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
165:23:32, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
149:21:12, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
135:22:33, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
121:21:42, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
104:21:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
279:
190:. Per my reasons in the
53:The Pirates of Penzance
61:
36:
92:Support as nominator
48:Gilbert and Sullivan
192:previous nomination
127:Shoemaker's Holiday
96:Shoemaker's Holiday
62:
270:
224:
209:
204:
278:
277:
273:
272:
271:
269:
268:
267:
243:
242:
222:
207:
202:
79:H.M.S. Pinafore
70:H.M.S. Pinafore
43:H.M.S. Pinafore
31:
28:H.M.S. Pinafore
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
276:
274:
266:
265:
260:
255:
245:
244:
230:
229:
215:
185:
175:Intothewoods29
169:
168:
167:
153:
152:
151:
106:
88:
87:
84:
81:
76:
73:
66:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
275:
264:
261:
259:
256:
254:
251:
250:
248:
241:
240:
237:
234:
228:
225:
219:
216:
214:
211:
210:
205:
200:
199:
193:
189:
186:
184:
180:
176:
173:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
147:
143:
138:
137:
136:
132:
128:
124:
123:
122:
118:
114:
110:
107:
105:
101:
97:
93:
90:
89:
85:
82:
80:
77:
74:
71:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:New York City
55:
54:
49:
45:
44:
39:
35:
29:
26:
19:
232:
231:
217:
196:
195:
187:
171:
108:
91:
51:
41:
37:
27:
86:A.S. Seer's
247:Categories
146:Thegreenj
109:Question
38:Original
218:Support
198:Nautica
188:Support
172:Support
157:Kaldari
83:Creator
223:Durova
65:Reason
236:MER-C
113:Clegs
16:<
203:Shad
179:talk
161:talk
142:this
131:talk
117:talk
100:talk
249::
208:es
194:.
181:)
163:)
133:)
119:)
102:)
94:--
40:-
177:(
159:(
129:(
115:(
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
