51:
225:
Please don't question my integrity. Question my votes by all means, but do try to be polite. Doppler on Wheels is a truck-based system. The article is about the mobile system. The picture I refer to illustrates the truck-based system well. The size is of image is irrelevant, that image is not up for
65:(USA) captured during the VORTEX2 project. In the velocity image on the left, Blues/green represent winds moving towards the radar, and reds/yellows indicate winds moving away from the radar. The reason that some of the darker blues contain red/yellow within them is a trait known as
370:. I just find it to be rather unfulfilling in comparison to the image, especially with the reduced quality of the video compared to the image (click to play the video thumbnail and you'll see what I mean). With either form you have to click twice to animate
115:
69:, where the winds are moving faster than the radar can detect. In the reflectivity image on the right, the main body of the storm can be seen, with the appendage on the bottom of the storm being a
151:– high-quality and high-resolution animation of what is sometimes called the most thoroughly documented tornado in history. I'll always be amazed by the "eye" of the tornado on display here. –
118:
123:
121:
117:
116:
122:
205:
The only other image in the DoW article is a 0.17mp photo of a vehicle carrying the instrument. Do you genuinely believe that's a better illustration of the technology in question? –
438:
120:
73:, which is associated directly with the tornado, and the tornado circulation itself can be seen as the doughnut like shape in the later part of the animation.
428:
244:
I'd argue the article is as much about the project's findings and research as its infrastructure and logistics. It certainly should be, even if not now. –
17:
99:
264:
I think a system photograph and an output image would fall under two different scopes (compare
Commons' VI). Both would be acceptable to me. —
433:
119:
307:- Is this supposed to be animated? If yes, why not just have a video and thus provide a better approximation of the output? —
392:- GIFs of this size just don't work for me. At least with a video you just need to click once to see the clouds move. —
367:
414:
401:
382:
350:
333:
316:
299:
273:
255:
235:
216:
196:
179:
162:
143:
374:, and given that the image provides better quality in a thumbnail I find the image form to be more practical.
294:
231:
192:
253:
214:
160:
397:
312:
269:
58:
346:
187:
Doesn't seem to be the most valuable on the hook echo article nor the
Doppler on Wheels article.
227:
188:
62:
246:
207:
153:
91:
393:
357:
308:
265:
175:
341:
shouldn't this be a video, and not an image you have to click twice to see the animation?
329:
361:
342:
422:
411:
375:
171:
136:
107:
50:
325:
87:
70:
66:
113:
49:
81:
High quality, high EV, and adds significantly to its article.
170:- High quality image with excellent encyclopedic value.
35:
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
100:Knowledge (XXG):Featured pictures/Sciences
439:Featured picture nominations/April 2017
61:image of a tornadic thunderstorm near
7:
84:Articles in which this image appears
110:/Center for Severe Weather Research
429:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
1:
366:A video form already exists:
434:Featured picture nominations
455:
372:at full resolution/quality
368:File:05june-dow7-wide2.ogv
300:19:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
217:22:53, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
197:09:55, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
180:01:10, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
163:23:10, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
144:20:40, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
96:FP category for this image
415:22:15, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
402:01:40, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
383:12:17, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
351:12:49, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
334:21:35, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
317:13:47, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
274:13:47, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
256:02:57, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
236:08:01, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
128:
74:
39:Voting period ends on
126:
53:
133:Support as nominator
129:
75:
63:La Grange, Wyoming
124:
92:Doppler on Wheels
59:Doppler on wheels
47:
446:
380:
365:
298:
249:
210:
156:
141:
125:
38:
36:
454:
453:
449:
448:
447:
445:
444:
443:
419:
418:
376:
355:
292:
247:
208:
154:
137:
114:
37:
34:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
452:
450:
442:
441:
436:
431:
421:
420:
408:Not Promoted
405:
404:
394:Chris Woodrich
387:
386:
385:
336:
319:
309:Chris Woodrich
302:
295:LivioAndronico
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
266:Chris Woodrich
259:
258:
239:
238:
220:
219:
200:
199:
182:
165:
146:
112:
111:
105:
102:
97:
94:
85:
82:
79:
45:20:40:46 (UTC)
33:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
451:
440:
437:
435:
432:
430:
427:
426:
424:
417:
416:
413:
409:
403:
399:
395:
391:
388:
384:
381:
379:
373:
369:
363:
359:
354:
353:
352:
348:
344:
340:
337:
335:
331:
327:
323:
320:
318:
314:
310:
306:
303:
301:
297:
296:
290:
287:
286:
275:
271:
267:
263:
262:
261:
260:
257:
254:
251:
250:
243:
242:
241:
240:
237:
233:
229:
228:Charlesjsharp
224:
223:
222:
221:
218:
215:
212:
211:
204:
203:
202:
201:
198:
194:
190:
189:Charlesjsharp
186:
183:
181:
177:
173:
169:
166:
164:
161:
158:
157:
150:
147:
145:
142:
140:
134:
131:
130:
109:
106:
103:
101:
98:
95:
93:
89:
86:
83:
80:
77:
76:
72:
68:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
46:
42:
29:
26:
19:
407:
406:
389:
377:
371:
338:
321:
304:
293:
288:
248:Juliancolton
245:
209:Juliancolton
206:
184:
167:
155:Juliancolton
152:
148:
138:
132:
54:
44:
40:
32:
27:
358:Crisco 1492
108:Josh Wurman
41:9 May 2017
423:Categories
127:Video form
362:Mattximus
343:Mattximus
88:Hook echo
71:hook echo
28:Hook echo
412:Armbrust
305:Question
67:Aliasing
55:Original
322:Support
289:Support
168:Support
149:Support
104:Creator
390:Oppose
378:Ks0stm
339:Oppose
185:Oppose
172:Mifter
139:Ks0stm
78:Reason
326:Jobas
16:<
398:talk
360:and
347:talk
330:talk
313:talk
270:talk
232:talk
226:FP.
193:talk
176:talk
57:– A
43:at
425::
410:--
400:)
349:)
332:)
324:--
315:)
291:--
272:)
252:|
234:)
213:|
195:)
178:)
159:|
135:–
90:,
396:(
364::
356:@
345:(
328:(
311:(
268:(
230:(
191:(
174:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
