37:
174:. Another quality panorama, and proof that you do actually get some sun in Tasmania. Out of interest (and something to add to the image page, perhaps), how many frames did you use for this pano? It is both very high res and fairly sharp, and it almost seems as though the foreground trees are slightly sharper than the background, although that could well be an illusion. One other thing, there is a strange line in the parkland about 3/4 of the way towards the right. Is that a stitching error (looks unlikely tho) or the path of where a mower has driven through?
200:
sometime too.. Was that taken pre-DSLR? The quality isn't nearly as good, and ideally the composition would be focused more on Hobart itself. Would also be interesting to see at dawn/dusk when there is still a bit of light in the sky and a glow of the city lights, but a daylight shot would be fine
219:
I do have to get around to doing that, which should be fairly easy now exams are over. It will be a matter of timing to pick a day with fairly minimal haze. Dawn/Dusk could be cool as well but it'd be a matter of luck to avoid clouds on top of the mountain at that time of day, Not sure how much
192:
I think I can see the line you are refering to and I don't think its a stiching error. The grass there doesn't get mowed that often (I go birding there quite a bit). The most likely thing is probably a path that has been formed by people/animals walking along it repeatedly. It was 40 portrait
193:
orientation images (across about 150 degrees), which is tending towards the overkill side, but i prefer to have overlapping frames just in case one misses focus or something (eg richmond bridge) and stitching errors seem less likely.
103:
High EV in this picture showing large scale features of terrain, river, as well as local plant life and architecture. Do you know what is going on at the far left... it looks like the river is dammed and there are some big cranes.
43:
36:
332:
320:
297:
281:
260:
233:
214:
187:
166:
152:
130:
113:
95:
356:
346:
17:
351:
197:
119:
277:
210:
183:
224:. When repeated the whole field of view needs to be rotated left and the focus set more on hobart itself i think.
68:
229:
221:
126:
91:
64:
254:
58:
High quality and informative for the relative articles, best possible vantage point for that area.
225:
122:
109:
87:
76:
248:
141:
312:
274:
207:
180:
149:
162:
340:
105:
47:
291:
268:. I see the bridge on the far left side you nominated a couple of weeks back. :-)
306:
269:
252:
is disguising as a shepherd and yodeling in the beautiful scenery.</joke: -->
202:
175:
329:
145:
220:
detail there is to see at that sort of time. It was taken pre-slr with a
327:
Promoted Image:Austins Ferry and
Derwent River from Poimenna Reserve.jpg
28:
Austins Ferry and the
Derwent River from Poimenna Reserve
253::) This is a really wonderful panoramic image.--
140:. Haven't searched for hidden stitch errors or
46:Derwent river as seen from Poimenna Reserve,
8:
160:Great panorama. Nice, broad view, good EV.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
357:Featured picture nominations/November 2008
196:PS: I'd like to see you re-shoot the
7:
120:Image:Bridgewater Causeway Crop.jpg
347:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
246:I would not be surprised if the
118:Hehe, It is the bridge shown in
35:
289:Nice detail, I like the view.
61:Articles this image appears in
1:
333:07:47, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
352:Featured picture nominations
321:04:13, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
298:01:44, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
282:14:28, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
261:16:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
234:00:15, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
215:22:46, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
201:too. Thanks in advance. ;-)
188:22:39, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
167:18:54, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
153:17:41, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
131:00:17, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
114:17:14, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
96:14:06, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
198:panorama from Mt Wellington
373:
69:Derwent River (Tasmania)
222:Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ5
65:Austins Ferry, Tasmania
84:Support as nominator
144:, though... ;-) --
280:
213:
186:
364:
294:
272:
205:
178:
165:
39:
372:
371:
367:
366:
365:
363:
362:
361:
337:
336:
292:
161:
52:
51:
50:
45:
40:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
370:
368:
360:
359:
354:
349:
339:
338:
324:
323:
300:
284:
263:
240:
239:
238:
237:
236:
194:
169:
155:
135:
134:
133:
98:
80:
79:
74:
71:
62:
59:
56:
42:
41:
34:
33:
32:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
369:
358:
355:
353:
350:
348:
345:
344:
342:
335:
334:
331:
328:
322:
319:
316:
315:
311:
308:
304:
301:
299:
296:
295:
288:
285:
283:
279:
276:
271:
267:
264:
262:
259:
257:
251:
250:
245:<joke: -->
244:
241:
235:
231:
227:
226:Noodle snacks
223:
218:
217:
216:
212:
209:
204:
199:
195:
191:
190:
189:
185:
182:
177:
173:
170:
168:
164:
159:
156:
154:
151:
147:
143:
139:
136:
132:
128:
124:
123:Noodle snacks
121:
117:
116:
115:
111:
107:
102:
99:
97:
93:
89:
88:Noodle snacks
85:
82:
81:
78:
77:Noodle snacks
75:
72:
70:
66:
63:
60:
57:
54:
53:
49:
48:Austins Ferry
44:
38:
29:
26:
19:
326:
325:
317:
313:
309:
305:well done. —
302:
290:
286:
265:
255:
247:
242:
171:
157:
137:
100:
83:
27:
341:Categories
314:discussion
278:(Contribs)
211:(Contribs)
184:(Contribs)
163:Elucidate
106:Fletcher
303:Support
293:Spencer
287:Support
266:Comment
256:Caspian
243:Support
172:Support
158:Support
138:Support
101:Support
73:Creator
307:αἰτίας
275:(Talk)
270:Diliff
208:(Talk)
203:Diliff
181:(Talk)
176:Diliff
55:Reason
330:MER-C
249:Waldo
146:Janke
142:Waldo
16:<
258:blue
230:talk
150:Talk
127:talk
110:talk
92:talk
343::
273:|
232:)
206:|
179:|
148:|
129:)
112:)
94:)
86:--
67:,
318:•
310:•
228:(
125:(
108:(
90:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
