50:
34:
42:
304:. I opened two windows and flipped back and forth between the original and the edit, and the only visible difference I see (at full size) is the lightening of the fins. If there really is a difference in the two backgrounds, my monitor isn't properly calibrated, because I don't notice a thing.
117:
PPS: Fir, I liked your first version better (on commons image page), the unsharp masking you used to bring out the scales did strange things to the background! If you can get back the original background and still keep the better scales, I could make new fins for you... ;-)
102:(see my comments further down). I brought out some detail in the pelvic fins, which are almost black in the original. Nice fish! Edible? ;-P PS: Horrible problems with wiki tha past two days - up & downloads stall or break, has anyone else noticed? --
57:
Closing some noms today and realized just how few fish FP's there are. This pic shows a
Pennant fish in the Melbourne Aquarium. It's sharp and has a nice background (not easy in an Aquarium!) and shows an interesting (at least I think) fish.
250:. Its not a bad photo and I agree that they're difficult take good photos of, but I can't help but think that the background bokeh isn't realistic looking. Is that really how it looked out of camera or did you blur it, Fir0002?
417:
as clearly. Tewy: edit 1 is done from the displayed original, but there was an earlier version which is in edit 2 now - I definitely like the background better in that one. I think edit 2 also addresses Diliff's concern.
77:. I only like the orginal though, the edits are too pixelated. Great encyclopedic value and good quality. The only issue is the slight blown highlights, but those are hard to avoid considering the fish reflecting scales.
170:
As mentioned, I brought detail to the black fins (and the scales above them). However, this can be seen only when viewed in full size (I hope you did), on a properly calibrated monitor (I hope yours is)...
272:
No blur applied, that's how it looked. Can't tell you off hand, but I'd have been using a pretty large aperture due to the low light which would have contributed to the bg blur I suppose. --
413:: Yes, edit 2 is what I "wanted". Fir: if you can get all supporters of edit 1 to switch to edit 2, you can remove my edit 1, since the change there is incorporated in edit 2, even if not
184:
No, I mean I literally can't see Edit 1, even when I try to open just its image page, but it must just be me for some reason cos obviously others can see it (can see Edit 2). --
281:
I think the BG looks manipulated in the original, too. To me, it appears to be unsharp masking with large radius, to bring out the scales. Fir fixed it in edit 2. --
464:
450:
426:
405:
389:
363:
350:
333:
320:
289:
276:
263:
242:
223:
201:
188:
179:
163:
135:
126:
110:
90:
69:
17:
147:(Original - I don't get what's going on with the edit Janke, I can't even see it). Lovely photo. However can I suggest this pic be added to the
193:
Do you see three (or even four) dark gray circles in the calibration image? If not, your monitor doesn't display shadow detail well. --
259:
445:
49:
221:
308:
33:
155:, and its mention in that article, it's not even in the same Family. Until there's an article on
84:
80:
159:, or this actual species, Butterflyfish is about as close as I can find on Knowledge (XXG). --
256:
423:
360:
347:
339:
286:
216:
198:
176:
123:
107:
41:
458:
441:
400:
148:
330:
273:
239:
152:
132:
66:
251:
419:
356:
343:
282:
194:
185:
172:
160:
119:
103:
383:
314:
436:
236:
355:
PS: The bg is the same in original and edit 1, see comment below. --
151:
article as well or instead, as despite its resemblance to the
131:
Nice edit... I mean that doesn't look realistic at all! ;-)--
399:
nice pic, the edit is nice cause you get to see the fins. -
433:
Promoted Image:Pennant coralfish melb aquarium edit2.jpg
235:— I told you already, man. Try a career in photography.
381:. Better background, and the fins are shown. --
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
53:Edit 2, I think this is what Janke wanted
45:Edit 1, brings out details in pelvic fins
48:
40:
32:
37:Pennant Coralfish, Melbourne Aquarium
7:
465:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
302:Support either original or edit 1
340:not all people agree with that
1:
451:18:18, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
427:06:44, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
406:03:21, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
390:17:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
364:08:24, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
351:06:49, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
334:23:08, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
321:20:38, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
309:Fish are friends, not food.
290:08:02, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
277:23:08, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
264:18:20, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
243:17:49, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
224:16:18, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
202:07:59, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
189:07:51, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
180:17:11, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
164:13:47, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
136:05:37, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
127:13:28, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
111:13:16, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
91:11:22, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
70:11:15, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
481:
54:
46:
38:
52:
44:
36:
55:
47:
39:
449:
404:
262:
28:Pennant Coralfish
472:
439:
403:
386:
338:It appears that
317:
254:
219:
215:- Looks great --
87:
480:
479:
475:
474:
473:
471:
470:
469:
455:
454:
384:
315:
306:Oh, and Janke,
217:
85:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
478:
476:
468:
467:
457:
456:
430:
429:
408:
397:Support edit 2
394:
393:
392:
379:Support edit 2
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
324:
323:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
267:
266:
245:
226:
209:
208:
207:
206:
205:
204:
167:
166:
141:
140:
139:
138:
114:
113:
93:
72:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
477:
466:
463:
462:
460:
453:
452:
447:
443:
438:
434:
428:
425:
421:
416:
412:
409:
407:
402:
398:
395:
391:
388:
387:
380:
377:
376:
375:
374:
365:
362:
358:
354:
353:
352:
349:
345:
341:
337:
336:
335:
332:
328:
327:
326:
325:
322:
319:
318:
311:
310:
305:
303:
299:
298:
291:
288:
284:
280:
279:
278:
275:
271:
270:
269:
268:
265:
261:
258:
253:
249:
246:
244:
241:
238:
234:
232:
227:
225:
222:
220:
214:
211:
210:
203:
200:
196:
192:
191:
190:
187:
183:
182:
181:
178:
174:
169:
168:
165:
162:
158:
154:
150:
149:Butterflyfish
146:
143:
142:
137:
134:
130:
129:
128:
125:
121:
116:
115:
112:
109:
105:
101:
99:
96:Support edit
94:
92:
89:
88:
83:
82:
76:
73:
71:
68:
64:
61:
60:
59:
51:
43:
35:
29:
26:
19:
432:
431:
414:
410:
396:
382:
378:
313:
307:
301:
300:
247:
230:
228:
212:
156:
153:Moorish Idol
144:
97:
95:
79:
78:
74:
65:Self Nom. --
62:
56:
27:
248:Weak oppose
342:... ;-) --
260:(Contribs)
218:ZeWrestler
157:Heniochus
459:Category
446:contribs
401:Ravedave
229:Support
213:Suppport
411:Comment
331:Fir0002
274:Fir0002
145:Support
133:Fir0002
81:Nautica
75:Support
67:Fir0002
63:Support
329:;-) --
257:(Talk)
252:Diliff
233:edit 2
231:edit 1
86:Shades
420:Janke
415:quite
357:Janke
344:Janke
283:Janke
240:→Talk
195:Janke
186:jjron
173:Janke
161:jjron
120:Janke
104:Janke
16:<
442:talk
424:Talk
385:Tewy
361:Talk
348:Talk
316:Tewy
287:Talk
237:♠ SG
199:Talk
177:Talk
124:Talk
108:Talk
437:KFP
461::
444:|
435:--
422:|
418:--
359:|
346:|
312:--
285:|
255:|
197:|
175:|
171:--
122:|
118:--
106:|
448:)
440:(
100:2
98:1
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
