34:
242:
The point being that I've been doing this for a little while, I should have known better. Wasn't thinking on this one -- it was so close to being promoted the last time around that I just assumed the full-size version was fine when in fact it's just too blurry and noisy. For some reason viewing the
232:
Don't be so hard on yourself. It is a very stunning image at smaller sizes. Some people are more picky than others when it comes to detail at 100%. It is my understanding that for FP, that sort of thing does matter, but if it didn't, I would have supported this image
46:
184:. The thumbnail is very nice, however, the image is technically problematic at 100%. Color noise, shallow depth of field puts the nose out of focus, the image isn't that sharp to begin with.--
272:
237:
226:
188:
176:
151:
118:
86:
145:
112:
17:
128:
to apologise for not looking at 100%. I always do but I thought this one was fine since it was very close to being nominated last time.
243:
full-size images at my office is ridiculously slow, so I didn't bother with examining it until after I read the above comments.
49:
but failed, mostly due to its size. A larger size was uploaded but it was too late. Thus, I am re-nominating it now.
171:
33:
161:. While the informative caption and the frog's expression are lovely, the image is very noisy and blurred. --
135:
102:
42:
251:
205:
140:
107:
65:
266:
220:
131:
98:
80:
197:
by nominator. That was pretty lame of me. This has no chance in hell of making it to FP status.
258:
246:
234:
212:
200:
185:
167:
72:
60:
95:. Great quality, great encyclopedic value, very encyclopedic caption, too.
162:
32:
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
7:
124:I know it's the archive, but just
24:
1:
273:03:34, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
238:00:28, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
227:22:15, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
189:20:52, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
177:19:25, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
152:07:15, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
119:17:45, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
87:17:21, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
291:
37:What are you lookin' at??
43:White-lipped Tree Frog
38:
28:White-lipped Tree Frog
36:
39:
270:
224:
175:
84:
282:
271:
264:
261:
256:
249:
225:
218:
215:
210:
203:
165:
148:
143:
138:
115:
110:
105:
85:
78:
75:
70:
63:
41:This image of a
290:
289:
285:
284:
283:
281:
280:
279:
259:
252:
247:
244:
213:
206:
201:
198:
146:
141:
136:
113:
108:
103:
73:
66:
61:
58:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
288:
286:
278:
277:
276:
275:
192:
191:
179:
156:
155:
154:
89:
45:was nominated
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
287:
274:
268:
263:
262:
257:
255:
250:
241:
240:
239:
236:
231:
230:
229:
228:
222:
217:
216:
211:
209:
204:
196:
190:
187:
183:
180:
178:
173:
169:
164:
160:
157:
153:
150:
149:
144:
139:
134:
133:
127:
123:
122:
121:
120:
117:
116:
111:
106:
101:
100:
94:
90:
88:
82:
77:
76:
71:
69:
64:
56:
53:Nominate and
52:
51:
50:
48:
44:
35:
29:
26:
19:
253:
245:
207:
199:
194:
193:
181:
158:
130:
129:
125:
97:
96:
92:
91:
67:
59:
54:
40:
27:
47:once before
233:myself.--
195:Withdrawn
235:Andrew c
186:Andrew c
172:contribs
182:Opposse
132:Nautica
99:Nautica
93:Support
55:support
159:Oppose
248:howch
202:howch
62:howch
16:<
267:chat
221:chat
168:talk
137:Shad
126:have
104:Shad
81:chat
163:KFP
260:ng
214:ng
170:|
74:ng
57:.
269:}
265:{
254:e
223:}
219:{
208:e
174:)
166:(
147:s
142:e
114:s
109:e
83:}
79:{
68:e
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
