46:
34:
61:
71:
I guess I should stick to photography... :) Found a young tree with these tiny critters crawling over it so took a few snaps. High quality and high enc value. It was a shame I cropped off the ant's antennae but they were moving very fast (both the ant and the antennae) so it was quite fortunate I got
279:
I assume you mean by "DOF unfortunately" that it is too shallow? In which case this is somewhat unusual since it has identical aperture and if anything better angle to Alt 2 in terms of getting more in focus. It is perhaps unfortunate that the other tree hopper is there, but that is how they cluster
266:
Sure, on the original version i found the DOF unfortunatly and the insect in the background distracting. Alt 2 has better DOF but the flashlight especially on the branch is too harsh for my taste. --
192:
lol, yeah well I think generally when you talk about insects and stuff you do it in mm. Exif is stripped when saving for web in photoshop (which I do to reduce file size as you can see below...) --
240:
Alt 1 is decidedly the best for my taste but the framing on the ant with the distracting leaf is unfortunate. I would like to see the EXIF data to get an better idea of the picture's situation. --
179:
I'd like some Exif data too, why do you strip it from your pictures? anyway, nice shot. and uh, 10mm in length... could we just simplify things and call it a centimeter? ;-) -
375:
365:
53:
17:
351:
339:
327:
301:
288:
270:
257:
244:
232:
196:
183:
171:
155:
146:
133:
113:
101:
89:
370:
319:
The cleanest composition for mine, the other hoppers in the background in the others are a bit distracting, especially in thumbnail.
142:
on a eucalypt branch", reason is that it is a high quality image with high enc value. Why do you say that the crops are too tight? --
167:
Always amazing detail. The ant sort of detracts the subject, but it helps give us an idea on just how large the treehopper is.
281:
151:
I prefer more space around the critters but I supposed this style of cropping is kind of a trademark of yours.
109:- Bad flash lighting, insufficient DOF, tight crops. It would be nice to make the Exif info available -
298:
267:
241:
323:
as the flash reflection is a little bright. (Now this nom is going to be confusing to close.) --
222:
284:
distracting the very much OOF secondary hopper shouldn't make too much of a difference...? --
152:
130:
110:
45:
33:
60:
168:
359:
336:
285:
254:
211:
193:
143:
86:
180:
348:
324:
76:
98:
297:
Unfortunate DOF or shallow DOF that's one way of putting it ;) --
280:
along the branch; and surely if you didn't find the other terns in
208:- Nice close up, i find the others distracting slightly --
138:Proposed caption is "Two-lined gum treehopper,
335:prefer alt 1, as ant interaction is very enc.
346:Promoted Image:Two-lined gum treehopper03.jpg
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
52:- being harvested by a meat eater ant - a
376:Featured picture nominations/October 2007
59:
44:
32:
253:Is there any reason for your oppose? --
7:
366:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
282:Image:Crested tern444 edit.jpg
1:
371:Featured picture nominations
352:03:55, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
340:19:47, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
328:12:21, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
302:01:21, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
289:00:31, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
271:23:54, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
258:23:03, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
245:15:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
233:09:52, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
197:03:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
184:00:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
172:20:13, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
156:12:03, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
147:03:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
134:14:41, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
114:13:28, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
102:13:05, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
90:10:23, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
392:
37:Two-lined gum treehopper,
28:Two-lined gum treehopper
68:
57:
42:
165:Support Alternative 1
140:Eurymeloides bicincta
95:Support Alternative 1
72:it in frame at all.
63:
48:
39:Eurymeloides bicincta
36:
41:on a eucalypt branch
317:Weak Support Alt 2.
333:Support alt 1 or 2
129:for nominating? -
69:
58:
43:
383:
231:
228:
225:
217:
214:
206:Support Original
177:Support original
123:Proposed caption
391:
390:
386:
385:
384:
382:
381:
380:
356:
355:
226:
223:
215:
212:
209:
121:- Where is the
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
389:
387:
379:
378:
373:
368:
358:
357:
343:
342:
330:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
299:Central Powers
292:
291:
274:
273:
268:Central Powers
261:
260:
248:
247:
242:Central Powers
235:
202:
201:
200:
199:
187:
186:
174:
162:
161:
160:
159:
158:
149:
104:
92:
67:- more face on
54:cloned version
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
388:
377:
374:
372:
369:
367:
364:
363:
361:
354:
353:
350:
347:
341:
338:
334:
331:
329:
326:
322:
318:
315:
314:
303:
300:
296:
295:
294:
293:
290:
287:
283:
278:
277:
276:
275:
272:
269:
265:
264:
263:
262:
259:
256:
252:
251:
250:
249:
246:
243:
239:
236:
234:
230:
229:
219:
218:
207:
204:
203:
198:
195:
191:
190:
189:
188:
185:
182:
178:
175:
173:
170:
166:
163:
157:
154:
150:
148:
145:
141:
137:
136:
135:
132:
128:
124:
120:
117:
116:
115:
112:
108:
105:
103:
100:
96:
93:
91:
88:
84:
81:
80:
79:
78:
73:
66:
65:Alternative 2
62:
55:
51:
50:Alternative 1
47:
40:
35:
29:
26:
19:
345:
344:
332:
320:
316:
237:
221:
210:
205:
176:
164:
139:
126:
122:
118:
106:
94:
82:
74:
70:
64:
49:
38:
27:
153:Alvesgaspar
131:Alvesgaspar
111:Alvesgaspar
83:Support Any
75:Appears in
56:also exists
360:Categories
238:Oppose all
107:Oppose all
77:Leafhopper
169:Puddyglum
337:Debivort
125:and the
119:Question
286:Fir0002
255:Fir0002
194:Fir0002
144:Fir0002
87:Fir0002
181:Fcb981
127:Reason
349:MER-C
325:jjron
16:<
321:Weak
213:Chil
99:Mbz1
216:dzy
362::
227:lk
224:Ta
220:¤
97:--
85:--
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
