45:
34:
53:
446:
Yes, that's true. I will upload an uncaptioned version to
Commons. Unfortunately, the original is a rather sloppy Photoshop composition, not an SVG, so I can't upload it. However, I specifically didn't use any fancy backgrounds or gradients because you can just take the eraser or a black pen-tool and
432:
The use of text labels in a diagram such as this is unavoidable, but that still leaves problems changing it for use in other languages. I'm assuming uploading a source document (like an SVG) isn't possible? I'll support if you upload an alternate version to commons (linked from the image page of the
418:
Unfortunately, I don't have the time to fix this right now. I just took a picture from the article, inverted it, scaled it up and put it in there. I'd have to redo that part of the drawing... Please feel free to go ahead and do it yourself, though, if you can. I'd really appreciate it. At least, it's
183:
the new edit. One little tweak would make it even better: The legend under zig-zag is almost touching the armchair version. A little more space, if you please... (Also, isn't it common practise to have the nearer parts red, the parts further away blue, to give a more intuitive feeling of depth? Just
102:
You are right, I was a bit quick in nominating this... A created a new picture that probably has more encyclpedic value. As an alternative to the new one, one could also crop it to just the two tubes. What do you think? Regarding coloring and atom size: Physical accuracy sometimes has to take the
414:
While most of the text labels are nicely antialiased, those in the diagram in the top left look strange when viewed full-size. It looks either like an artifact of interpolated scaling or the application of a filter (perhaps a blur) post text rendering. It would be nice if this could be fixed.
268:
I don't think there's a way to show it graphically without ruining the picture, and explaining it thoroughly would be a bad idea as you said, but it might be important to note somewhere (it can be a very small note) that they are actually benzene and not cyclohexane, for encyclopedic value. -
92:
I'm not too thrilled. Whats the encyclopedic value? What do the colors mean? Are atomic radii physically motivated? The interesting thing about carbon nanotubes is the roll-up vector and how it influences the properties. It is missing in the image caption. What type of NT are we looking at?
197:
OK, I shuffled things around a bit, everything is more evenly spaced now. About the coloring: To be honest, I really don't know what's customary, I have close to no experience with modeling molecules... I cannot really remember why I put the blue end first :-)
164:
I'd like to have a zig-zag one too, but unfortunately I have been unable to find the data (in any format, pdbh ,ib, xyz, whatever) of a zig-zag one and frankly don't have the energy and knowledge to build one from the ground up myself. I'll keep
475:. I don't like the black background; it should be white instead. And even if you like the black, why is there a transparent bar on the left side? Finally, the image is not at the Commons, so it is less useful to other Wikimedia projects.
258:
Any ideas on how I might work that in? I don't want to obscure the very basic information what nanotubes are all about by adding stuff that 98% of readers won't even attempt to understand. An unobstrusive, clear way would be nice, though.
248:... but reluctantly. I wish this could show, or at least have a caption about how they all have to be benzene and sp2 hybridized. Right now it just seems to be a lot of cyclohexanes, which would be impossible because of the curvature. -
144:
I like the new one, but could you add it to the article and you might want to get rid of the text (replace it with a zig-zag one?) and put the text in the article caption and on the Image page. Did that make any sense?
103:
back seat. If you make nanotubes in one color and with bigger atoms, you can't see the structure at all. "Rainbow" like coloring is more or less the only way to really make the structure easy to understand, IMO.
427:
Damn, I was hoping I could still slip that change in without anybody noticing :-) I have the original of the picture on a different PC, but will correct that before voting ends.
544:
169:
Nevermind, I just found the data I needed. I also added small line-drawing schematics to make the structure more obvious. I also added it to the article.
17:
224:. Impressive looking, informative, clear. Layout could be played around with more, but as long as it's of comparable quality, I'll support it.--
424:
The spelling of "zigzag" isn't consistent - in the topright diagram it's spelled "zig-zag" with a hyphen, in the top left without one.
433:
current image) with all the text labels (including the math labels in the top left diagram) removed, to allow easier translation. --
527:
515:
492:
483:
467:
451:
441:
403:
391:
372:
363:
341:
329:
317:
305:
293:
274:
263:
253:
240:
228:
216:
202:
192:
173:
158:
136:
124:
107:
97:
87:
120:. Is there any way you can relayout the pic, keeping all three illustrations but moving the text to the caption? --
438:
419:
only apparent if you look at it at full resolution, which is way beyond what fits on 99% of screens out there.
357:
152:
507:
434:
368:
OK, I'll add some references. All the information is in the article and referenced there, though.
116:
New picture is nice, the only problem I have now is the text. It is not readable in thumbnail size
480:
387:
44:
291:
447:
get rid of the captions in less than a minute. Not ideal, but since we can't upload .PSDs...
351:
146:
33:
502:
189:
61:
524:
302:
236:
does an excelent job at showing what a carbon nanotube looks like, and it looks nice.--
213:
52:
538:
489:
476:
448:
383:
369:
260:
237:
225:
199:
170:
104:
84:
464:
326:
314:
287:
133:
121:
94:
69:
400:
338:
185:
270:
249:
212:
because I think it illustrates the topic well and has pretty colours :-)
64:
article. I think it illustrates the structure of nanotubes quite well.
132:
strike the language comment, I was on commons with my mind :-) --
346:
Can you provide a reference for the image? That'd be great.
399:
although I think, white background would be more elegant
313:. This has become an excellent illustration now. --
488:Being in commons is _not_ a requirement for FPC.
56:3D model of the view inside a carbon nanotube
8:
522:Promoted Image:Types of Carbon Nanotubes.png
72:'s comments, please vote on the newer one.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
51:
43:
32:
48:Chart on Carbon Nanotube Naming Scheme.
7:
68:: I made another image according to
545:Ended featured picture nominations
337:It illustrates the article well.--
24:
1:
528:06:17, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
516:16:11, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
493:15:09, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
484:08:35, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
468:09:11, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
452:01:52, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
442:00:19, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
404:10:27, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
392:00:49, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
373:01:59, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
364:01:15, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
342:11:46, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
330:07:38, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
318:07:13, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
306:07:10, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
294:07:05, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
275:06:35, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
264:01:59, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
254:03:34, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
241:02:03, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
229:01:31, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
217:00:06, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
203:23:33, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
193:23:16, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
174:22:54, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
159:20:42, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
137:18:42, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
125:18:35, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
108:18:26, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
98:17:07, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
88:16:51, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
37:Types of carbon nanotubes.
561:
118:, and not language neutral
60:A model I created for the
39:Vote on this one, please.
28:Inside a Carbon Nanotube
57:
49:
41:
55:
47:
36:
350:even if you don't.
58:
50:
42:
514:
139:
552:
511:
505:
301:- Yes yes yes!--
131:
560:
559:
555:
554:
553:
551:
550:
549:
535:
534:
509:
435:Finlay McWalter
238:Lewk_of_Serthic
62:carbon nanotube
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
558:
556:
548:
547:
537:
536:
532:
519:
518:
497:
496:
495:
470:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
430:
429:
428:
422:
421:
420:
406:
394:
382:. Definitely.
377:
376:
375:
344:
332:
320:
308:
296:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
243:
231:
219:
207:
206:
205:
184:curious...) --
178:
177:
176:
167:
141:
140:
128:
127:
113:
112:
111:
110:
90:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
557:
546:
543:
542:
540:
533:
530:
529:
526:
523:
517:
512:
504:
501:
498:
494:
491:
487:
486:
485:
482:
478:
474:
471:
469:
466:
462:
459:
453:
450:
445:
444:
443:
440:
436:
431:
426:
425:
423:
417:
416:
413:
412:
410:
407:
405:
402:
398:
395:
393:
389:
385:
381:
378:
374:
371:
367:
366:
365:
362:
360:
356:
354:
349:
345:
343:
340:
336:
333:
331:
328:
324:
323:( + ) Support
321:
319:
316:
312:
309:
307:
304:
300:
297:
295:
292:
289:
285:
282:
276:
272:
267:
266:
265:
262:
257:
256:
255:
251:
247:
244:
242:
239:
235:
232:
230:
227:
223:
220:
218:
215:
211:
208:
204:
201:
196:
195:
194:
191:
187:
182:
179:
175:
172:
168:
166:
162:
161:
160:
157:
155:
151:
149:
143:
142:
138:
135:
130:
129:
126:
123:
119:
115:
114:
109:
106:
101:
100:
99:
96:
91:
89:
86:
82:
81:self-nominate
78:
75:
74:
73:
71:
67:
63:
54:
46:
40:
35:
29:
26:
19:
531:
521:
520:
499:
472:
460:
408:
396:
379:
358:
352:
347:
334:
322:
310:
298:
283:
245:
233:
221:
209:
180:
165:searching...
163:
153:
147:
117:
80:
76:
65:
59:
38:
27:
286:.Looks nice
503:Flcelloguy
525:Raven4x4x
303:Deglr6328
214:Wikizwerg
539:Category
490:chowells
477:dbenbenn
449:Mstroeck
409:Comments
384:enochlau
370:Mstroeck
261:Mstroeck
226:ragesoss
200:Mstroeck
171:Mstroeck
105:Mstroeck
85:Mstroeck
500:Support
465:Wikimol
461:Support
397:Support
380:Support
348:Support
335:Support
327:Fir0002
315:Dschwen
311:Support
299:Support
288:Pschemp
284:Support
246:Support
234:Support
222:Support
210:Support
181:Support
134:Dschwen
122:Dschwen
95:Dschwen
77:Support
70:Dschwen
473:Oppose
66:Update
510:note?
401:Eteru
355:roken
339:Ali K
186:Janke
150:roken
16:<
481:talk
439:Talk
388:talk
361:egue
190:Talk
156:egue
79:and
271:JPM
250:JPM
541::
508:A
479:|
463:--
437:|
411:.
390:)
325:--
290:|
273:|
252:|
188:|
93:--
83:.
513:)
506:(
386:(
359:S
353:B
154:S
148:B
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
