51:
189:
Poor lighting, Both unattractive shadows and overexposure. DOF too shallow a lot of detail lost. Seems exceptionally noisy for only ISO250. Poor crop for original image size. Background distracting however that is less a technical problem and more my personal opinon. Overall the standard is certainly
167:
Different color eyes... didn't notice that until I uploaded it. I also gave him age spots or a powder burn on his forehead. It's not a good edit. The original, even with its faults is better. No sense in putting it here as an alternative. It will just muddy the water and get shot down faster than an
83:
277:
118:- I like the pose, to be honest. Background isn't too distracting. However, it does not appear especially sharp in my opinion, and the lighting is a little uneven.
267:
58:
17:
135:-- Nice picture, nice pose, nice expression... but too much shadow. Way too much shadow IMO. If the lighting were better, it would be perfect. (I
272:
168:
Arab jet. I mentioned it because I didn't want my effort to be completely in vain and it might at least serve as an amusing curiosity.
153:
I think that this is very good edit. The only problem is the shade of the eyes, imo. Can we put it here as an alternative version?--
136:
209:. At thumbnail, I was going to weakly support (weakly for the distracting background) but, at full size, the focus seems off.
231:
253:
235:
218:
201:
177:
162:
148:
127:
110:
139:
just for gits and shiggles trying to reduce the shadow, but the more I looked at it, the more I didn't like it.)
249:
227:
123:
158:
106:
214:
245:
196:
173:
144:
119:
154:
102:
210:
75:
261:
50:
191:
169:
140:
91:
49:
226:
per lighting. Also the background letters are a bit distracting.
57:– a portrait of the famous actor John Malkovich at the 44
35:
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.
84:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
190:not upto what we hold portraits to here at FPC.
69:Very good high resolution portrait of Malkovich.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
278:Featured picture nominations/October 2011
59:Karlovy Vary International Film Festival
7:
72:Articles in which this image appears
268:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
1:
273:Featured picture nominations
254:00:55, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
236:09:38, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
219:14:40, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
202:01:31, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
178:09:00, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
163:08:31, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
149:02:06, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
128:10:52, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
111:20:48, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
294:
80:FP category for this image
62:
39:Voting period ends on
53:
99:Support as nominator
63:
228:Materialscientist
61:, Czech Republic.
47:
285:
199:
194:
38:
36:
293:
292:
288:
287:
286:
284:
283:
282:
258:
257:
197:
192:
37:
34:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
291:
289:
281:
280:
275:
270:
260:
259:
242:Not Promoted
239:
238:
221:
204:
184:
183:
182:
181:
180:
130:
113:
95:
94:
89:
86:
81:
78:
76:John Malkovich
73:
70:
67:
45:20:48:47 (UTC)
33:
30:
28:John Malkovich
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
290:
279:
276:
274:
271:
269:
266:
265:
263:
256:
255:
251:
247:
246:Makeemlighter
243:
237:
233:
229:
225:
222:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
203:
200:
195:
188:
185:
179:
175:
171:
166:
165:
164:
160:
156:
152:
151:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
131:
129:
125:
121:
117:
114:
112:
108:
104:
100:
97:
96:
93:
90:
87:
85:
82:
79:
77:
74:
71:
68:
65:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
46:
42:
29:
26:
19:
241:
240:
223:
206:
186:
137:made an edit
132:
115:
98:
54:
44:
40:
32:
27:
207:Weak oppose
133:Weak Oppose
120:Crisco 1492
262:Categories
155:MrPanyGoff
103:MrPanyGoff
41:2 Nov 2011
211:J Milburn
55:Original
88:Creator
224:Oppose
198:(talk)
193:JFitch
187:Oppose
170:JBarta
141:JBarta
116:Oppose
66:Reason
16:<
250:talk
232:talk
215:talk
174:talk
159:talk
145:talk
124:talk
107:talk
92:Che
43:at
264::
252:)
244:--
234:)
217:)
176:)
161:)
147:)
126:)
109:)
101:--
248:(
230:(
213:(
172:(
157:(
143:(
122:(
105:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
