Knowledge (XXG)

:Featured picture candidates/Joseph Fourier - Knowledge (XXG)

Source đź“ť

134:
thing that makes it unbelievable as historic colouring: it's good, but not excessively good. Would've been nice to have an obvious flaw in the colour to fully assure me, but I compared it to some other examples, and... I can buy it. Plus, this is pretty minimal, so even if it is modern, it probably wouldn't rise to the level of copyrightable: flat face colour (the engraving provides highlights and shadows) and a tiny bit of lip colour. As for levels and balance, the white of the page is very white, but that's fine, I think.
51: 306:
Seems likely. Barring strong other information, I'd go with the name on the engraving. You do occassionally get some weird chains of art in engravings - close copies of other people's work - and it's possible the artist's singer is a work by his father, but nonetheless, there's literally no evidence
133:
I'm always a tiny bit dubious when colour is on an engraving, because a modern colonisation is by necessity speculative and might add copyright - but, at the same time, people did colour in engravings - I have several examples which all predate technology for coloured plates - and I'm not seeing any
69:
Joseph Fourier, a very prominent mathematician. Orphaned at the age of nine in 1770s, his work is used today on anything that has to do with motion, vibration, impact, etc. (examples: quantum physics, ocean waves, spaceships, digital signals, radio waves, car brakes, engines). His work significantly
260:. I'm not generally a fan of 19th-century engravings as portraits in our articles, because a lot of the time they were not drawn from life and there is no reason to believe they are anything close to the actual appearance of the subject (see 95: 264:). This one is an exception, in that we know Boilly did draw Fourier from life. It has plenty of EV as the correct choice of lead image for an important topic, and the quality is good enough. — 442: 261: 432: 17: 437: 194: 393: 87: 176:
Doesn't really look like the painting, bust and grave on his page? Artistic license? Was he fatter when this engraving was made? --
418: 405: 387: 369: 339: 321: 295: 273: 248: 223: 206: 184: 168: 152: 128: 291: 269: 202: 164: 237: 109: 279: 104: 283: 77:. The image needs a bit of restoration which I will do if this nomination gets a couple of supports. 75: 287: 265: 198: 160: 363: 190: 401: 383: 335: 310: 244: 141: 124: 326:
I updated the file description per the signature on the artwork and the info at this source:
220: 181: 316: 147: 330:. Feel free to update and adjust the file description if other reliable sources emerge. 50: 83: 58: 426: 415: 355: 397: 379: 331: 240: 120: 327: 278:
Only now I am confused about something. This engraving is credited to painter
216: 177: 286:, his son. This engraving is signed "J. Boilly". Is it misattributed? — 73: 236:
Google search shows the engraving is the predominately used image
49: 392:
FWIW, another opinion at Commons regarding 'artistic copyright':
96:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
71: 70:
advanced physics, engineering and mathematics. For details see
354: 239:. See Adam's comments above about contemporary claims. 35:
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.
262:Knowledge (XXG):Historical portraits and pictures 328:https://wellcomecollection.org/works/b4qh352u 8: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates 443:Featured picture nominations/January 2022 412:Promoted File:Fourier2 - restoration1.jpg 282:. The caricature is credited to engraver 7: 80:Articles in which this image appears 433:Ended featured picture nominations 374:I uploaded and replaced it with a 24: 88:History of climate change science 189:Not as fat as in the (I think 1: 438:Featured picture nominations 419:05:29, 20 January 2022 (UTC) 406:04:47, 1 February 2022 (UTC) 388:00:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC) 370:17:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC) 340:14:48, 16 January 2022 (UTC) 322:12:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC) 296:09:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC) 274:22:07, 15 January 2022 (UTC) 249:18:36, 15 January 2022 (UTC) 224:11:14, 15 January 2022 (UTC) 207:07:14, 15 January 2022 (UTC) 185:19:29, 14 January 2022 (UTC) 169:18:44, 14 January 2022 (UTC) 153:20:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC) 129:03:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC) 459: 92:FP category for this image 315:Has about 7.5% of all 146:Has about 7.5% of all 62: 39:Voting period ends on 284:Julien Léopold Boilly 110:Julien-Léopold Boilly 53: 280:Louis-Léopold Boilly 117:Support as nominator 105:Louis-Léopold Boilly 61:, early 19th century 108:update per below: 63: 47: 450: 368: 366: 362: 358: 320: 151: 38: 36: 458: 457: 453: 452: 451: 449: 448: 447: 423: 422: 364: 360: 356: 319: 308: 150: 139: 37: 34: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 456: 454: 446: 445: 440: 435: 425: 424: 409: 408: 390: 372: 347: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 314: 301: 300: 299: 298: 288:David Eppstein 266:David Eppstein 254: 253: 252: 251: 231: 230: 229: 228: 227: 226: 199:David Eppstein 171: 161:GrantHenninger 155: 145: 131: 113: 112: 101: 98: 93: 90: 84:Joseph Fourier 81: 78: 67: 59:Joseph Fourier 45:03:17:33 (UTC) 33: 30: 28:Joseph Fourier 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 455: 444: 441: 439: 436: 434: 431: 430: 428: 421: 420: 417: 413: 407: 403: 399: 395: 391: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 371: 367: 359: 352: 349: 348: 341: 337: 333: 329: 325: 324: 323: 318: 313: 312: 305: 304: 303: 302: 297: 293: 289: 285: 281: 277: 276: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 256: 255: 250: 246: 242: 238: 235: 234: 233: 232: 225: 222: 218: 214: 211:Magic word: " 210: 209: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 188: 187: 186: 183: 179: 175: 172: 170: 166: 162: 159: 156: 154: 149: 144: 143: 137: 132: 130: 126: 122: 118: 115: 114: 111: 107: 106: 102: 99: 97: 94: 91: 89: 85: 82: 79: 76: 74: 72: 68: 65: 64: 60: 56: 52: 48: 46: 42: 29: 26: 19: 411: 410: 375: 350: 311:Adam Cuerden 309: 257: 215:"...  ;-) -- 212: 173: 157: 142:Adam Cuerden 140: 135: 116: 103: 54: 44: 41:20 Jan 2022 40: 32: 27: 191:more famous 427:Categories 307:for that. 213:caricature 195:caricature 378:version. 416:Armbrust 376:restored 55:Original 398:Bammesk 380:Bammesk 351:Support 332:Bammesk 258:Support 241:Bammesk 174:Comment 158:Support 136:Support 121:Bammesk 100:Creator 66:Reason 365:here! 217:Janke 178:Janke 16:< 402:talk 394:Link 384:talk 357:Vulp 336:talk 292:talk 270:talk 245:talk 221:Talk 203:talk 182:Talk 165:talk 125:talk 361:❯❯❯ 353:.-- 317:FPs 197:. — 148:FPs 43:at 429:: 414:-- 404:) 396:. 386:) 338:) 294:) 272:) 247:) 219:| 205:) 193:) 180:| 167:) 138:. 127:) 119:– 86:, 57:– 400:( 382:( 334:( 290:( 268:( 243:( 201:( 163:( 123:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
Joseph Fourier

Joseph Fourier



Joseph Fourier
History of climate change science
Knowledge (XXG):Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
Louis-LĂ©opold Boilly
Julien-LĂ©opold Boilly
Bammesk
talk
03:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Adam Cuerden
FPs
20:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
GrantHenninger
talk
18:44, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Janke
Talk
19:29, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
more famous
caricature
David Eppstein
talk
07:14, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Janke

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑