Knowledge (XXG)

:Featured picture candidates/Lava cascade - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

51: 142:
Yeah, the image is quite small especially considering the subject of it, an image of a natural event of something has an even more important reason than most images to be large since it should be able to be big enough to be absolutely stunning, especially FP quality ones.
202:
Wow, if that detail is derived from the original photo then surely a much higher resolution image is available somewhere. I can't support either of them as-is, but I would definitely support a version that that is a similar DPI but of the overall scene.
258:
That oppose is for the first one. I will also oppose the second also; although the picture is quite stunning and I'm sure difficult to take, the large out of focus rock is annoying.
34: 221:
It's a different photo entirely - taken earlier, it appears: note the lack of partially solidified buildup at the bottom of the cascade in the second as opposed to the first.
325: 17: 96:
I had that one up before, actually, but I think it looks a little strange, like someone drew the lava on with a crayon. What do others think?
192:
Here is a larger image of the same lava cascade... 600x800, should It's a different picture, closer up, but it's stunning as well.
212: 23: 84: 310: 298: 286: 262: 253: 241: 225: 216: 196: 185: 173: 152: 137: 128: 114: 100: 91: 74: 278: 272:
second version. I think the size/resolution is fine in the second picture; stunning flow of lava.
222: 193: 182: 170: 97: 71: 209: 111: 295: 273: 80: 40: 307: 319: 259: 250: 145: 134: 133:
Yes, you've quoted the dimensions correctly. That's probably a tad too small though.
121: 238: 179: 167: 50: 204: 88: 39: 294:
second version - illustrative and instantly recognizable, great colors. -
199:(If this belongs in a new featured picture candidacy, please tell me.) 178:
And oppose the second image, too, due to the rock in the lower left. —
87:
one, if the recent lava falls were the subject. It's bigger too. --
83:
There are med/large image sizes (large is 600x800). I'm partial to
79:
Hrm. There are some more of the lava photos from the USGS website
49: 59: 62:. *grimace* Small, though. 00:34, 3 December 2005 (UTC) 24:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates/Lava Cascade
58:Created by US Geological Service, appears in 8: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates 166:. Smaller than the displayed thumbnail. — 119:Image is 298 px (width) x 425 px (height) 237:Low res, but otherwise pretty cool. -- 7: 326:Ended featured picture nominations 31: 1: 311:02:59, 17 December 2005 (UTC) 299:01:01, 12 December 2005 (UTC) 287:17:29, 11 December 2005 (UTC) 263:22:39, 12 December 2005 (UTC) 254:01:14, 11 December 2005 (UTC) 242:23:27, 10 December 2005 (UTC) 226:21:39, 10 December 2005 (UTC) 186:06:17, 13 December 2005 (UTC) 217:19:53, 7 December 2005 (UTC) 197:19:03, 7 December 2005 (UTC) 174:11:44, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 153:18:01, 4 December 2005 (UTC) 138:15:41, 4 December 2005 (UTC) 129:05:07, 4 December 2005 (UTC) 115:10:12, 3 December 2005 (UTC) 101:17:27, 3 December 2005 (UTC) 92:04:35, 3 December 2005 (UTC) 75:00:34, 3 December 2005 (UTC) 342: 81:Kilauea Eruption Images 55: 47: 53: 45: 56: 48: 285: 215: 150: 126: 42:File:Lavafall.jpg 22:(Redirected from 333: 282: 276: 207: 148: 144: 124: 120: 112:Adrian Pingstone 43: 27: 341: 340: 336: 335: 334: 332: 331: 330: 316: 315: 280: 146: 122: 41: 38: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 339: 337: 329: 328: 318: 317: 313: 305:Not promoted 302: 301: 289: 267: 266: 265: 244: 232: 231: 230: 229: 228: 190: 189: 188: 161: 160: 159: 158: 157: 156: 155: 110:- too small - 105: 104: 103: 77: 37: 32: 30: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 338: 327: 324: 323: 321: 314: 312: 309: 306: 300: 297: 293: 290: 288: 283: 275: 271: 268: 264: 261: 257: 256: 255: 252: 248: 245: 243: 240: 236: 233: 227: 224: 220: 219: 218: 214: 211: 206: 201: 200: 198: 195: 191: 187: 184: 181: 177: 176: 175: 172: 169: 165: 162: 154: 149: 141: 140: 139: 136: 132: 131: 130: 125: 118: 117: 116: 113: 109: 106: 102: 99: 95: 94: 93: 90: 86: 82: 78: 76: 73: 69: 66:Nominate and 65: 64: 63: 61: 52: 44: 36: 33: 25: 19: 304: 303: 291: 269: 246: 235:( − ) Oppose 234: 223:Zafiroblue05 194:Zafiroblue05 163: 107: 98:Zafiroblue05 72:Zafiroblue05 67: 57: 54:Lava cascade 46:Lava cascade 35:Lava cascade 249:. Low res. 296:JustinWick 274:Flcelloguy 213:(Contribs) 308:Raven4x4x 320:Category 260:Enochlau 251:Enochlau 147:Jtkiefer 135:Enochlau 123:Jtkiefer 292:Support 270:Support 239:Fir0002 180:Cryptic 168:Cryptic 68:support 247:Oppose 210:(Talk) 205:Diliff 183:(talk) 171:(talk) 164:Oppose 108:Oppose 89:vaeiou 281:note? 151:---- 127:---- 16:< 85:this 70:. - 60:lava 322:: 279:A 208:| 284:) 277:( 26:)

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates/Lava Cascade
Lava cascade
File:Lavafall.jpg

lava
Zafiroblue05
00:34, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
Kilauea Eruption Images
this
vaeiou
04:35, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
Zafiroblue05
17:27, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
Adrian Pingstone
10:12, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
Jtkiefer
05:07, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
Enochlau
15:41, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
Jtkiefer
18:01, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
Cryptic
(talk)
11:44, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Cryptic
(talk)
06:17, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Zafiroblue05
19:03, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.