34:
79:. It's in SVG, looks good, and demonstrates the concept, but I don't think it's the best Knowledge (XXG) has to offer. I also don't like the very short "predicted" segment at the end. It should either have a relatively long predicted segment, or none at all. This type of graph will have to be updated every year or so to remain accurate. --
113:
As an idea for a different graph, I'd like to see a cumulative chart of measured deviation from 0 leapseconds, with a second jagged line representing the official UTC time (including the effects of leapseconds). This one just looks like a jittery line, and makes it hard to grasp the actual variance
153:
Nothing really wrong as a matter of fact. But it is a common practise in scientific graphs to use "round" numbers whenever possible or adequate, with the aim of facilitating reading and interpretation. It is also a common practise to extend the ordinate axis a little beyond the extreme values, I
172:
I apologize if this is in the wrong place or I'm doing this wrong, I'm new to editing...But is there a possibility someone could point me to a graph of all the data since 73? I'd be curious to see, in a plain and simple graph, if there are any patterns or trends there.
43:
Graph showing the difference between UTC (based on an atomic clock with leap seconds) and UT1 (based on the movement of the Earth). This graph illustrates the effect of leap seconds, along with why there have been so few leap seconds in the past several years.
223:
203:
17:
39:
Vertical segments correspond to leap seconds. Red part of graph was prediction (future values) at the time the file was made.
209:
167:
158:
148:
139:
127:
105:
87:
71:
52:
193:
102:
198:
123:
119:
174:
189:
155:
145:
136:
135:. Ordinary science graph. The maximum value of the ordinate axis should be 1.0, not 0.8. --
115:
163:
Leap seconds are intended so that the difference never goes beyond +/- 0.9 seconds. --
217:
33:
164:
68:
48:
81:
56:
144:
Just out of curiosity, what's wrong with the value 0.8? -
97:. Yeah I guess it's encyclopedic, but it's certainly not
37:Plot showing the difference UT1−UTC in seconds.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
32:
7:
154:believe for aesthetical reasons. -
224:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
1:
210:16:21, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
168:12:57, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
159:10:30, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
149:07:52, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
140:20:42, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
128:09:01, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
106:23:44, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
88:17:40, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
72:16:04, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
240:
177:10:36, 01 April 2007 (EST)
53:Coordinated Universal Time
40:
36:
101:, or at least mine.
99:pleasing to the eye
41:
28:Leapsecond.ut1-utc
231:
206:
201:
196:
146:Adrian Pingstone
84:
239:
238:
234:
233:
232:
230:
229:
228:
214:
213:
204:
199:
194:
82:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
237:
235:
227:
226:
216:
215:
184:Not promoted
181:
180:
179:
178:
170:
161:
151:
130:
108:
91:
90:
74:
38:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
236:
225:
222:
221:
219:
212:
211:
208:
207:
202:
197:
192:
191:
185:
176:
171:
169:
166:
162:
160:
157:
152:
150:
147:
143:
142:
141:
138:
134:
131:
129:
125:
121:
117:
112:
109:
107:
104:
100:
96:
93:
92:
89:
86:
85:
78:
75:
73:
70:
66:
63:Nominate and
62:
61:
60:
58:
54:
50:
45:
35:
29:
26:
19:
188:
187:
183:
182:
132:
110:
98:
94:
80:
76:
64:
46:
42:
27:
156:Alvesgaspar
137:Alvesgaspar
114:over time.
77:Weak oppose
49:Leap second
116:Night Gyr
218:Category
47:Used in
190:Nautica
175:Curious
111:Comment
65:support
165:Billpg
133:Oppose
103:Robert
95:Oppose
69:Billpg
16:<
195:Shad
120:talk
83:Tewy
67:. -
57:DUT1
55:and
220::
186:--
173:--
126:)
124:Oy
59:.
51:,
205:s
200:e
122:/
118:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
