51:
267:
I had interpreted the smiley to be referring to the obvious. Oh well. Not that it is easy to convey emotion over text. I considered asking in his talk page, but then again, someone else here might have wanted the answers to the same questions and would have benefited from reading them. In any case,
203:
Let's not bash anyone's
English when a little thinking should make it obvious. :) He means if Pine's opinion were implemented the image would be less focused on the artists and what they are doing. More pole (which can be up to nine metres high) equals fewer pixels on the actual subject.
252:
Did you notice the :)? I wasn't assuming bad faith, I just think if you wanted clarification it could have been done relatively privately on his talk page instead of bringing it to everyone's attention here, which seemed to give it unnecessary weight and negativity.
408:
As
Jujutacular says, the likely environment makes this actually a decent capture and would be hard to improve. I don't see the need for more context necessarily, as the focus is the stunts that are performed on the pole, not how high the pole is.
222:
Having learned several languages myself, I have often wished someone asked me for clarification on a statement of mine instead of guessing what I meant, as oftentimes they will guess incorrectly. Simply treating others as I wish to be
85:
155:
To focus two cubans art acrobatic performance, we need to get the camera closer. end and top of
Chinese pole is not enough important. If User:Pine'S subjugation was significant the picture would be out of artists conduct.
226:
If your interpretation of his comment is correct, then I have to agree that there will be less pixels to admire their huge muscles, but there will be better context as to how high up the ground these guys are performing.
268:
it was not my intention to give it negativity. As I said earlier, I wanted a clarification, and I asked in what was, to me, a civil manner. My apologies for having assumed bad faith on your comments. --
63:
are vertical poles on which circus performers climb, slide down and hold poses. The poles are generally between 3 and 9 metres in height and approximately 2 to 3 inches in diameter.
471:
461:
17:
343:
for now. EV is OK, the article is not super long. Composition is sub par. I agree with Pine, more context would really help. Image is noisy, as
466:
441:
391:
362:
283:
242:
193:
136:
While this photo has good technical quality, it would have more EV if we could see the top and bottom of the pole to give more context.
447:
418:
396:
367:
335:
318:
288:
262:
247:
213:
198:
165:
146:
128:
112:
436:
384:
355:
276:
235:
186:
71:
Including High
Quality image lable, Featured picture in commons, Technical framing, suitable background.
331:
161:
108:
431:
428:
314:
377:
348:
269:
228:
179:
416:
260:
211:
124:
327:
157:
104:
218:
Julia, I'm the last person that would bash someone for how they speak a foreign language.
50:
310:
143:
455:
347:
Jujutacular points out. If it was only one of those flaws I would likely support. --
326:
Slightly noisy, but not bad considering the environment I'm sure this was taken in.
410:
254:
205:
120:
77:
59:
93:
86:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Sport
138:
49:
376:
Oops, sorry
Jkadavoor. Thank you for correcting that!--
35:
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.
8:
472:Featured picture nominations/September 2012
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
425:Promoted File:Leosvel et Diosmani - 4.jpg
7:
74:Articles in which this image appears
462:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
419:19:40, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
397:20:07, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
368:17:44, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
336:14:43, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
319:08:39, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
214:19:51, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
199:17:44, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
166:06:46, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
147:04:32, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
129:14:19, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
113:11:55, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
467:Featured picture nominations
448:22:27, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
289:22:01, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
263:17:47, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
248:17:33, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
170:What do you mean by Pine's
488:
82:FP category for this image
220:Way to assume bad faith.
64:
39:Voting period ends on
53:
101:Support as nominator
65:
47:
479:
444:
439:
434:
394:
389:
382:
365:
360:
353:
286:
281:
274:
245:
240:
233:
196:
191:
184:
145:
38:
36:
487:
486:
482:
481:
480:
478:
477:
476:
452:
451:
442:
437:
432:
392:
385:
378:
363:
356:
349:
284:
277:
270:
243:
236:
229:
194:
187:
180:
176:artists conduct
137:
37:
34:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
485:
483:
475:
474:
469:
464:
454:
453:
422:
421:
402:
401:
400:
399:
371:
370:
338:
321:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
224:
174:? And what is
150:
149:
131:
115:
97:
96:
91:
88:
83:
80:
75:
72:
69:
45:11:55:49 (UTC)
33:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
484:
473:
470:
468:
465:
463:
460:
459:
457:
450:
449:
445:
440:
435:
430:
426:
420:
417:
414:
413:
407:
404:
403:
398:
395:
390:
388:
383:
381:
375:
374:
373:
372:
369:
366:
361:
359:
354:
352:
346:
342:
339:
337:
333:
329:
325:
322:
320:
316:
312:
309:
306:
305:
290:
287:
282:
280:
275:
273:
266:
265:
264:
261:
258:
257:
251:
250:
249:
246:
241:
239:
234:
232:
225:
221:
217:
216:
215:
212:
209:
208:
202:
201:
200:
197:
192:
190:
185:
183:
177:
173:
169:
168:
167:
163:
159:
154:
153:
152:
151:
148:
144:
142:
141:
135:
132:
130:
126:
122:
119:
116:
114:
110:
106:
102:
99:
98:
95:
92:
89:
87:
84:
81:
79:
76:
73:
70:
67:
66:
62:
61:
60:Chinese poles
56:
52:
48:
46:
42:
29:
26:
19:
424:
423:
411:
405:
386:
380:Wingtipvorte
379:
357:
351:Wingtipvorte
350:
344:
340:
323:
307:
278:
272:Wingtipvorte
271:
255:
237:
231:Wingtipvorte
230:
219:
206:
188:
182:Wingtipvorte
181:
175:
171:
139:
133:
117:
100:
78:Chinese pole
58:
54:
44:
40:
32:
28:Chinese pole
27:
341:Weak Oppose
328:Jujutacular
172:subjugation
158:Alborzagros
134:Weak oppose
105:Alborzagros
456:Categories
41:2 Oct 2012
345:Jkadavoor
311:Jkadavoor
406:Support:
223:treated.
55:Original
429:King of
324:Support
308:Support
121:Tomer T
118:Support
90:Creator
94:Ludo29
68:Reason
412:Julia
256:Julia
207:Julia
16:<
332:talk
315:talk
178:? --
162:talk
140:Pine
125:talk
109:talk
387:PTT
358:PTT
279:PTT
238:PTT
189:PTT
43:at
458::
446:♠
427:--
334:)
317:)
227:--
164:)
127:)
111:)
103:--
57:–
443:♣
438:♦
433:♥
415:\
393:∅
364:∅
330:(
313:(
285:∅
259:\
244:∅
210:\
195:∅
160:(
123:(
107:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
