Knowledge

:Featured picture candidates/Non-intermediate phases of BML Traffic Model - Knowledge

Source đź“ť

113:
videos are arguably even stronger and certainly deserve their own FP status. The video quality is as high as I could get it to be with the Ogg Theora codec (which is the only one that Knowledge supports) whilst maintaining a reasonable filesize. Unfortunately, due to the limitations of Theora, there are some minor artifacts; nevertheless, these do not detract significantly from the quality. These videos ought to be added to the
55: 77: 59: 56: 92:. The red cars and blue cars take turns to move; the red ones only move rightwards, and the blue ones move downwards. Every time, all the cars of the same colour try to move one step if there is no car in front of it. Please note that the video has been sped up such that only one in four frames is shown. 70:. The red cars and blue cars take turns to move; the red ones only move rightwards, and the blue ones move downwards. Every time, all the cars of the same colour try to move one step if there is no car in front of it. Please note that the video has been sped up such that only one in four frames is shown. 81: 167:
As an editor who has made a number of animations myself for donating to Knowledge, I know first hand just how much time and effort this sort of thing requires. No single fixed image could demonstrate the concept of “traffic increasingly jamming up” than an animation such as this. Having an animation
112:
status. Since the non-intermediate phases tend to dominate more, especially at extreme traffic concentrations; and were discovered earlier (in fact the original paper by Biham, Middleton, and Levine only talks about the jammed and free flowing phases and not the intermediate ones), the EV with these
78: 287:: I'd like to see these put together with the other two BML FP's to make a set of four. It's the transition from free flowing to completely jammed as a function of density, with the transitional states in between, that give the sequence it's EV, the individual animations aren't that informative.-- 58: 80: 207:
does not appear to be jammed if the colors are interpreted as in these images, and vice versa. I'm not sure whether this is relevant to the FP nomination, but if the goal is perfection, all the images in the article should use the same convention. — Carl
203:, the red cars move up and the blue cars move right. In these, the red cars move right and the blue ones move down. Mathematically these are equivalent, but visually the appearance is not the same. In particular, 225:
Acknowledged. My bad... I will fix those other pictures later today or so. They only need to be rotated 90 degrees clockwise. Or maybe I will make completely new pictures! I'm also irked by how in
57: 79: 105: 168:
as the Featured Picture for one day on the Main Page will illustrate not only traffic patterns, it will illustrate the virtue of an electronic encyclopedia over a print edition.
390: 131: 114: 109: 380: 365: 350: 333: 315: 296: 275: 258: 241: 220: 194: 177: 159: 385: 17: 123: 185:
What Greg said. More than "a pretty animation", this is a technically sound, factually correct piece -- which makes it doubly valuable.
88:- The Biham-Middleton-Levine traffic model for a 144 x 89 lattice, with a traffic density of 28%. The model has self-organized to a 66:- The Biham-Middleton-Levine traffic model for a 144 x 89 lattice, with a traffic density of 60%. The model has self-organized to a 226: 204: 200: 361: 346: 329: 254: 237: 155: 357: 342: 325: 311: 322:
Promoted File:Biham-Middleton-Levine traffic model self-organized to a globally jammed phase.ogv
250: 233: 190: 151: 140: 339:
Promoted File:Biham-Middleton-Levine traffic model self-organized to a free flowing phase.ogv
292: 173: 374: 306: 270: 215: 186: 288: 169: 28:
Jammed and Free-Flowing Phases of the Biham-Middleton-Levine Traffic Model
266: 211: 75: 53: 263:
In case it isn't already clear, I support the nomination. — Carl
232:
the "cars" are circular and take up more space than they should.
35:
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.
249:now all the images in the article are consistent. 199:These are very nice animations. I noticed that in 8: 391:Featured picture nominations/January 2011 132:BML Traffic Model (featured picture set) 115:BML Traffic Model featured picture set 104:Earlier, the intermediate phases were 18:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates 7: 124:Biham-Middleton-Levine traffic model 120:Articles in which this image appears 381:Ended featured picture nominations 24: 1: 386:Featured picture nominations 366:05:02, 9 February 2011 (UTC) 351:05:02, 9 February 2011 (UTC) 334:05:02, 9 February 2011 (UTC) 316:12:53, 7 February 2011 (UTC) 297:21:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC) 276:14:44, 7 February 2011 (UTC) 259:06:41, 2 February 2011 (UTC) 242:17:54, 1 February 2011 (UTC) 221:16:20, 1 February 2011 (UTC) 195:04:26, 1 February 2011 (UTC) 178:02:34, 31 January 2011 (UTC) 160:00:59, 31 January 2011 (UTC) 407: 128:FP category for this image 304:As per nom. Nicely done. 227:File:BML N=200 P=36.png 205:File:BML N=200 P=36.png 201:File:BML N=200 P=36.png 93: 71: 39:Voting period ends on 84: 68:globally jammed phase 62: 148:Support as nominator 94: 90:free flowing phase 72: 274: 219: 98: 97: 82: 60: 47: 398: 264: 209: 110:Featured Picture 83: 61: 50: 49: 38: 36: 406: 405: 401: 400: 399: 397: 396: 395: 371: 370: 76: 54: 37: 34: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 404: 402: 394: 393: 388: 383: 373: 372: 369: 368: 356:Added to set. 319: 318: 299: 282: 281: 280: 279: 278: 244: 197: 180: 162: 144: 143: 138: 135: 129: 126: 121: 118: 102: 96: 95: 73: 45:00:59:53 (UTC) 33: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 403: 392: 389: 387: 384: 382: 379: 378: 376: 367: 363: 359: 358:Makeemlighter 355: 354: 353: 352: 348: 344: 343:Makeemlighter 340: 336: 335: 331: 327: 326:Makeemlighter 323: 317: 313: 309: 308: 303: 300: 298: 294: 290: 286: 283: 277: 272: 268: 262: 261: 260: 256: 252: 248: 245: 243: 239: 235: 231: 228: 224: 223: 222: 217: 213: 206: 202: 198: 196: 192: 188: 184: 181: 179: 175: 171: 166: 163: 161: 157: 153: 149: 146: 145: 142: 139: 136: 133: 130: 127: 125: 122: 119: 116: 111: 107: 103: 100: 99: 91: 87: 74: 69: 65: 52: 51: 48: 46: 42: 29: 26: 19: 338: 337: 321: 320: 305: 301: 284: 251:Purpy Pupple 246: 234:Purpy Pupple 229: 182: 164: 152:Purpy Pupple 147: 141:Purpy Pupple 89: 85: 67: 63: 44: 40: 32: 27: 375:Categories 41:9 Feb 2011 307:SMasters 106:promoted 86:Original 64:Original 302:Support 285:Support 183:support 165:Support 137:Creator 289:RDBury 170:Greg L 101:Reason 247:FIXED 230:et al 187:Jon C 16:< 362:talk 347:talk 330:talk 312:talk 293:talk 271:talk 255:talk 238:talk 216:talk 191:talk 174:talk 156:talk 267:CBM 212:CBM 108:to 43:at 377:: 364:) 349:) 341:-- 332:) 324:-- 314:) 295:) 269:· 257:) 240:) 214:· 193:) 176:) 158:) 150:-- 360:( 345:( 328:( 310:( 291:( 273:) 265:( 253:( 236:( 218:) 210:( 189:( 172:( 154:( 134:; 117:.

Index

Knowledge:Featured picture candidates
Jammed and Free-Flowing Phases of the Biham-Middleton-Levine Traffic Model
promoted
Featured Picture
BML Traffic Model featured picture set
Biham-Middleton-Levine traffic model
BML Traffic Model (featured picture set)
Purpy Pupple
Purpy Pupple
talk
00:59, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Greg L
talk
02:34, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Jon C
talk
04:26, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
File:BML N=200 P=36.png
File:BML N=200 P=36.png
CBM
talk
16:20, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
File:BML N=200 P=36.png
Purpy Pupple
talk
17:54, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Purpy Pupple
talk
06:41, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
CBM

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑