49:
34:
63:
I think the picture is not only technically good, but also encyclopedic and artistic to a high degree. The highlights are hovering on the edge of pure white but this in itself is a feat. The scene had just about 6 effective stops of dynamic range and I actually tried a tone mapping sequence but there
140:
It looks too blue. You've said that sunlight reflected off snow is pure white, and that our eyes see it as pure white. Yet the snow is quite blue in the photo. It's normal for snow in shade to photograph blue when the photo also includes snow in full sun, but I'd find the photo more appealing if the
251:
The colour on the edit is superior, so I am leaning toward that image, but there is way too much dead space in this shot to get my full support. A shot of the same image size that focused solely on the house itself would be a better shot IMO. Considering the lack of focus in the surrounding area
271:. It's a nice picture, it really is -- good composition and color, and it is a perfect saltbox. But this photo doesn't show the asymmetry very well because the side wall is so deep in shadow. --
252:(particularly the gate), I think you'd be as well off just cropping. I understand you were probably on the edge of private / restricted property and might not have been able to get closer.
367:
357:
17:
362:
72:
so I think very encyclopedic. I also think it is a very pretty scene with the fresh snow and the picturesque setting. Decide for yourselves.
329:
308:. Shadows and the angle obscures the saltbox extension, reverting it back to Colonial style, therefore confusing the article. --
325:
82:
68:
pure white. That is, our eyes see it as pure white. It is somewhere around LV 17 (very bright). Anyway, it is a perfect
203:
179:
343:
312:
298:
279:
261:
241:
220:
207:
183:
159:
150:
130:
107:
257:
317:
309:
321:
295:
276:
237:
55:
Complete desaturation of the white snow (the shadows obviously are still blue as they should be).
122:
194:, encyclopaedic and good composition. I can still see some noise but most of it is gone. --
253:
199:
175:
351:
291:
272:
233:
146:
216:
since really it should have been done in the beginning, tell me what you think. -
217:
156:
116:
104:
94:
48:
33:
340:
195:
171:
287:
141:
snow were neutral. (I've tried it on this picture and it looks good to me.)
86:
142:
115:: It's a bit blurred at the left side, but overall it's a nice picture. —
78:
69:
41:
155:
OK, it looks like you're right, I'll upload an edit later today. -
170:, get rid of the noise and I will support. --
64:was little gain. Sunlight reflected off snow
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
368:Featured picture nominations/December 2007
212:I uploaded a noise reduced version over
47:
32:
7:
338:Promoted Image:Saltbox Concord 2.jpg
358:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
83:American colonial architecture
75:Articles this image appears in
44:style, outside of Concord, MA.
1:
344:02:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
313:16:30, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
299:09:05, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
280:08:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
262:04:52, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
242:14:07, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
221:14:35, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
208:11:45, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
184:14:03, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
160:17:14, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
151:04:19, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
131:03:33, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
108:03:20, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
363:Featured picture nominations
384:
56:
45:
40:- A house made in the
330:few or no other edits
51:
36:
332:outside this topic.
102:Support as nominator
249:Weak Support edit 1
28:New England Saltbox
57:
46:
333:
375:
315:
269:Reluctant oppose
383:
382:
378:
377:
376:
374:
373:
372:
348:
347:
306:Strongly Oppose
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
381:
379:
371:
370:
365:
360:
350:
349:
335:
334:
302:
301:
286:I added it to
283:
282:
265:
264:
245:
244:
230:Support edit 1
226:
225:
224:
223:
192:Support edit 1
188:
187:
164:
163:
162:
134:
133:
110:
98:
97:
92:
89:
76:
73:
61:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
380:
369:
366:
364:
361:
359:
356:
355:
353:
346:
345:
342:
339:
331:
327:
323:
319:
314:
311:
307:
304:
303:
300:
297:
293:
289:
285:
284:
281:
278:
274:
270:
267:
266:
263:
259:
255:
250:
247:
246:
243:
239:
235:
231:
228:
227:
222:
219:
215:
211:
210:
209:
205:
204:contributions
201:
197:
193:
190:
189:
186:
185:
181:
180:contributions
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
158:
154:
153:
152:
148:
144:
139:
136:
135:
132:
129:
126:
125:
121:
118:
114:
111:
109:
106:
103:
100:
99:
96:
93:
90:
88:
84:
80:
77:
74:
71:
67:
62:
59:
58:
54:
50:
43:
39:
35:
29:
26:
19:
337:
336:
305:
290:, though. --
268:
248:
232:Looks good.
229:
213:
191:
167:
166:
137:
127:
123:
119:
113:Weak Support
112:
101:
65:
52:
37:
27:
328:) has made
95:User:Fcb981
352:Categories
254:Matt Deres
124:discussion
288:clapboard
87:Clapboard
326:contribs
318:delowing
310:delowing
292:Dhartung
273:Dhartung
234:Schcambo
38:Original
168:Neutral
138:Comment
91:Creator
79:Saltbox
70:Saltbox
42:Saltbox
218:Fcb981
214:Edit 1
157:Fcb981
117:αἰτίας
105:Fcb981
60:Reason
53:Edit 1
341:MER-C
196:Aqwis
172:Aqwis
16:<
322:talk
296:Talk
277:Talk
258:talk
238:talk
200:talk
176:talk
147:talk
143:Fg2
354::
324:•
316:—
294:|
275:|
260:)
240:)
206:)
202:–
182:)
178:–
149:)
85:,
81:,
66:is
320:(
256:(
236:(
198:(
174:(
145:(
128:•
120:•
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
