34:
136:
288:
My problem with that is that the article seems to be basically about human stretching (for sports). The text doesn't mention cats; I have the impression (from our vet) that stretching is an important activity for cats, so the article should discuss that, for the image to be appropriate.
155:- nothing is hugely in favour of this image. It shows the whole body but in an atypical position. Its eyes are closed. It's the bare minimum for resolution. It's a zoo shot rather than a nature shot. The lighting is pretty flat. Does it add a lot to
142:
I like the other FPC of a siberian tiger better than this one. This has a poor background, and area of the tigers coat looks strange (is it wet?) and it's really pushing the size limit. Perhaps if it were in higher res I would support.
250:
352:
17:
46:
195:
as per the general feel of other opposes. Also, it may be relatively minor, but I find that bit of log obscuring his leg offputting. --
262:
41:
How's this for a close call? Despite the size, I think this is another wonderful tiger photograph. I found it on the
338:
325:
309:
293:
283:
266:
236:
223:
211:
199:
187:
175:
163:
147:
129:
117:
105:
93:
75:
219:. Doesn't illustrate a tiger in the wild, doesn't seem to show anything significant about tigers in captivity. --
113:- Lovely photograph, excellent light conditions and DOF. Would strongly support a high-res version -
126:
318:
171:
I don't like the apparent lack of any eyes (I suppose they're closed) and the pose is awkward -
275:
article, but I couldn't bring myself to replace the current image, so I just moved it down. --
258:
160:
33:
172:
102:
207:
Does not contribute significantly to article by showing its differences from other tigers.
335:
306:
49:, and thought this too would make an excellent addition to featured pictures; appears in
208:
183:- Wonderful picture, but is there a higher res version? I would strongly support that.
156:
50:
42:
346:
290:
220:
184:
254:
144:
114:
135:
233:
54:
272:
246:
196:
64:
277:
87:
69:
32:
232:
is an exelent picture. It would be cool a higher verison.--
159:? Not really. It's not a very compelling case.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
253:, which seems to have a colour problem. -
47:Image:Siberischer tiger de edit02.jpg
7:
245:. It would probably add more to the
353:Ended featured picture nominations
125:- Im lovin' that pic. Looks good.
24:
305:Artistic and encyclopedic merit.
249:article, where it could replace
134:
63:. The image now appears in the
1:
339:01:08, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
326:05:03, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
310:21:43, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
294:18:55, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
284:00:40, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
267:15:28, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
237:15:26, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
224:01:30, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
212:01:43, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
200:12:15, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
188:23:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
176:14:17, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
164:14:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
148:12:02, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
130:10:18, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
118:06:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
106:04:50, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
94:00:21, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
76:00:42, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
369:
271:I added the image to the
45:article after nominating
101:- meets all criteria. --
38:
36:
67:article as well. --
57:created the image.
37:A stretching tiger.
39:
360:
323:
280:
173:Adrian Pingstone
138:
90:
72:
368:
367:
363:
362:
361:
359:
358:
357:
343:
342:
334:(+7.5/-5.5) --
319:
278:
88:
70:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
366:
364:
356:
355:
345:
344:
332:Not promoted
329:
328:
312:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
227:
226:
214:
202:
190:
178:
166:
157:Siberian tiger
150:
132:
120:
108:
99:Strong Support
96:
51:Siberian tiger
43:Siberian tiger
30:
28:Siberian tiger
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
365:
354:
351:
350:
348:
341:
340:
337:
333:
327:
324:
322:
316:
313:
311:
308:
304:
301:
295:
292:
287:
286:
285:
282:
281:
274:
270:
269:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
241:
240:
239:
238:
235:
231:
225:
222:
218:
215:
213:
210:
206:
203:
201:
198:
194:
191:
189:
186:
182:
179:
177:
174:
170:
167:
165:
162:
158:
154:
151:
149:
146:
141:
137:
133:
131:
128:
124:
121:
119:
116:
112:
109:
107:
104:
100:
97:
95:
92:
91:
84:
81:Nominate and
80:
79:
78:
77:
74:
73:
66:
62:
58:
56:
52:
48:
44:
35:
29:
26:
19:
331:
330:
320:
317:per above. —
314:
302:
276:
242:
229:
228:
216:
204:
192:
181:Weak support
180:
168:
152:
139:
122:
110:
98:
86:
82:
68:
60:
59:
40:
27:
153:Weak oppose
103:GoOdCoNtEnT
336:Moondigger
307:Rtcpenguin
273:stretching
251:this image
247:stretching
65:stretching
347:Category
291:Davepape
263:contribs
221:Davepape
185:HighInBC
315:Support
303:Support
255:Samsara
243:Comment
161:Stevage
145:Fir0002
123:Support
111:Support
83:support
61:Comment
234:Neo139
230:Suport
217:Oppose
205:Oppose
193:Oppose
169:Oppose
140:Oppose
55:Malene
53:, and
321:Aiden
197:jjron
127:AFL45
115:doniv
16:<
279:Tewy
259:talk
209:Jeeb
89:Tewy
85:. -
71:Tewy
349::
289:--
265:)
261:•
143:--
257:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
