55:
34:
527:
45:
416:
nominated image here was not the best image for the articles it appeared in; I appreciate that others take the time to look into that situation -- but what a pain! And none of that is part of this review system. Where is the clean up section? Feel free to not count my vote here; I did "acknowledge the minimum requirements exist", I did not ignore them though. --
415:
I recently had to switch out a Delta Rocket image because of this contest. I am truly, honestly and obviously using the situation of this failing image to editorialize, in so many definitions of that word, if not all of them. There have been occasionally the suggestion in the reviews here that the
453:
In the reality of flora photographs, this is really pretty good. It does need the 90 degree rotation, what makes it a little better than just a perfectly sharp, awesome, wowful macro photograph of a flower is that it contains the seed pod. --
491:
Heh, it is 270 degrees rotated (clockwise is positive -- should be interesting to see how the word 'clockwise' gets redefined as the world becomes more and more digital. Those digital watches and displays on cellphones -- pretty cool, eh? --
132:
A FPC must be in at least one article as a main or side photo to be eligible for
Featured Picture status. It is also recommended that the species of the plant be given for encyclopedic value and support.
571:
481:
443:
159:
119:
94:
356:, but that's a common flower that we have plenty of nice shots of already; this one is unlikely to be used in any articles because of the blown highlights.--
576:
287:
as per above. You really can't nominate it first and then add it to articles later. One of the criteria we're voting on is its value to the article.
17:
187:
566:
200:
257:
400:
296:
536:
183:
253:
552:
540:
501:
486:
463:
448:
425:
404:
386:
377:
just haphazardly added to an article so that it would meet the minimum requirements of this review system. --
365:
342:
319:
300:
279:
261:
239:
225:
207:
164:
124:
175:
54:
532:
497:
470:
459:
432:
421:
382:
235:
179:
148:
138:
108:
83:
352:
275:
74:
252:
Bad photo, doesn't appear in any articles and doesn't even identify the flower so it has no value.
361:
33:
221:
493:
455:
417:
397:
378:
334:
293:
270:
too much of the flower is not in focus, it's not very clear, it's not in any articles, etc.
231:
134:
216:, but I'd need more details such as where it was taken before I could specify what type. --
315:
271:
196:
204:
560:
357:
549:
217:
171:
I need to know the name of this flower if possible so I may attach it to articles.
392:
328:
288:
311:
521:
Prefer this other image for DOF and lighting (but not intending to nominate):
526:
213:
44:
391:
You acknowledge the minimum requirements exist yet you ignore them?
230:
I am quite certain it needs to be rotated 90 degrees. --
195:
You should really do this before nominating... Try at
327:per Diliff and Capital photographer; blurred. —
8:
468:Added 90 degree tilt and placed in article.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
309:, unknown subject, appears in no articles.
53:
43:
32:
572:Featured picture nominations/June 2008
68:high res, very good quality. Detailed
7:
577:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
525:
71:Articles this image appears in
1:
430:Thanks for your vote, carol.
567:Featured picture nominations
593:
141:) 1:49, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
553:03:25, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
541:14:58, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
502:13:10, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
487:12:42, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
464:12:03, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
449:02:43, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
426:19:42, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
405:18:12, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
387:18:01, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
366:14:53, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
343:11:25, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
320:17:09, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
301:09:35, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
280:11:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
262:07:27, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
240:08:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
226:13:47, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
208:02:31, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
165:01:52, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
125:01:42, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
146:Check my comment below.
61:
51:
41:
201:WP:WikiProject Plants
57:
47:
36:
353:Aquilegia canadensis
254:Capital photographer
104:Support as nominator
75:Aquilegia canadensis
49:270 Degree Rotation
62:
59:90 Degree Rotation
52:
42:
533:Papa Lima Whiskey
403:
373:, because it was
299:
192:
178:comment added by
584:
529:
478:
476:
473:
440:
438:
435:
395:
291:
191:
180:Redmarkviolinist
172:
156:
154:
151:
116:
114:
111:
91:
89:
86:
592:
591:
587:
586:
585:
583:
582:
581:
557:
556:
484:
474:
471:
469:
446:
436:
433:
431:
173:
162:
152:
149:
147:
122:
112:
109:
107:
97:
87:
84:
82:
40:- A Red Flower.
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
590:
588:
580:
579:
574:
569:
559:
558:
546:Not promoted
523:
522:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
480:
442:
410:
409:
408:
407:
368:
345:
322:
303:
282:
247:
246:
245:
244:
243:
242:
210:
168:
167:
158:
143:
142:
127:
118:
100:
99:
93:
80:
77:
72:
69:
66:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
589:
578:
575:
573:
570:
568:
565:
564:
562:
555:
554:
551:
547:
543:
542:
538:
534:
530:
528:
520:
517:
516:
503:
499:
495:
490:
489:
488:
485:
483:
477:
467:
466:
465:
461:
457:
452:
451:
450:
447:
445:
439:
429:
428:
427:
423:
419:
414:
413:
412:
411:
406:
402:
399:
394:
390:
389:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
369:
367:
363:
359:
355:
354:
349:
346:
344:
341:
338:
337:
333:
330:
326:
323:
321:
317:
313:
310:
308:
304:
302:
298:
295:
290:
286:
283:
281:
277:
273:
269:
266:
265:
264:
263:
259:
255:
251:
241:
237:
233:
229:
228:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
209:
206:
202:
198:
194:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
170:
169:
166:
163:
161:
155:
145:
144:
140:
136:
131:
128:
126:
123:
121:
115:
105:
102:
101:
98:
96:
90:
81:
78:
76:
73:
70:
67:
64:
63:
60:
56:
50:
46:
39:
35:
29:
26:
19:
545:
544:
531:
524:
518:
479:
475:ṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ
441:
437:ṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ
374:
370:
351:
347:
339:
335:
331:
324:
307:Speedy Close
306:
305:
284:
267:
249:
248:
174:— Preceding
157:
153:ṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ
129:
117:
113:ṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ
103:
92:
88:ṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ
58:
48:
37:
27:
135:victorrocha
561:Categories
482:Review Me!
444:Review Me!
401:(Contribs)
336:discussion
297:(Contribs)
272:Matt Deres
160:Review Me!
120:Review Me!
95:Review Me!
28:Red Flower
214:columbine
205:Thegreenj
358:ragesoss
350:. It's
188:contribs
176:unsigned
38:Original
550:John254
371:Support
348:Opppose
218:Cynops3
212:It's a
130:Comment
79:Creator
519:Oppose
398:(Talk)
393:Diliff
329:αἰτίας
325:Oppose
294:(Talk)
289:Diliff
285:Oppose
268:Oppose
250:Oppose
65:Reason
494:carol
456:carol
418:carol
379:carol
312:D-rew
232:carol
197:WP:RD
16:<
548:. --
537:talk
498:talk
460:talk
422:talk
383:talk
362:talk
316:talk
276:talk
258:talk
236:talk
222:talk
184:talk
139:talk
472:Ṝέđ
434:Ṝέđ
375:not
199:or
150:Ṝέđ
110:Ṝέđ
85:Ṝέđ
563::
539:)
500:)
462:)
424:)
396:|
385:)
364:)
318:)
292:|
278:)
260:)
238:)
224:)
203:.
190:)
186:•
106:--
535:(
496:(
458:(
420:(
381:(
360:(
340:•
332:•
314:(
274:(
256:(
234:(
220:(
182:(
137:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
