127:- IMO the image does not have a lot of EV in either article. A sketchy, perhaps smudged drawing of a building does not effectively illustrate how the building used to look. As for the Joseph Pennell article, I believe the other image on the page (of the Bond ad) is much more valuable since it is mentioned in the article and reflects on of the things Pennell is known for. Also, Pennell (according to the article) spent a lot of his time and did a lot of his work in San Francisco, not New York, which is where the hotel is located. Yes, some of these flaws can be attributed to the stubby article, but I don't think it has "strong EV in two articles" at all.
34:
156:
since it shows the original hotel. Sure, it doesn't have the kind of detail you'd find in a photograph, but the picture definitely gives a sense of the magnificence of the original building. It has EV in
265:
255:
17:
241:
223:
206:
189:
170:
147:
136:
119:
102:
260:
214:. An excellent composition in an under-represented medium, well-restored, that has sufficient EV and is well-used in both articles.--
65:
44:
at the original location, Fifth Avenue and Thirty-Fourth Street, New York City. Charcoal and pastel on brown paper by
153:
74:
41:
132:
166:
115:
57:
185:
128:
237:
219:
202:
162:
141:
Can you find any other image of the original
Waldorf-Astoria? Much less one at this resolution?
111:
33:
181:
158:
86:
78:
45:
249:
233:
215:
198:
61:
142:
97:
180:- partly for its EV, partly because I like the medium.
110:
Another excellent image. Strong EV in two articles.
161:since it represents his work as an illustrator.
8:
230:Promoted File:Waldorf-Astoria 1904-1908b.jpg
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
266:Featured picture nominations/December 2008
56:A depiction of the original (destroyed)
32:
7:
28:Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, original site
256:Ended featured picture nominations
197:- per Xavexgoem, excellent image.
66:File:Waldorf-Astoria 1904-1908.jpg
24:
71:Articles this image appears in
1:
207:17:30, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
190:01:38, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
171:06:28, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
148:01:31, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
137:00:07, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
120:22:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
103:20:48, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
261:Featured picture nominations
242:05:20, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
224:04:17, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
282:
154:The Waldorf-Astoria Hotel
75:The Waldorf-Astoria Hotel
42:The Waldorf-Astoria Hotel
64:. Restored version of
49:
58:Waldorf-Astoria Hotel
36:
152:I feel it has EV in
94:Support as nominator
50:
273:
145:
100:
281:
280:
276:
275:
274:
272:
271:
270:
246:
245:
143:
98:
48:, c. 1904-1908.
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
279:
277:
269:
268:
263:
258:
248:
247:
227:
226:
209:
192:
175:
174:
173:
159:Joseph Pennell
150:
129:Intothewoods29
122:
108:Strong Support
105:
90:
89:
87:Joseph Pennell
84:
81:
79:Joseph Pennell
72:
69:
54:
46:Joseph Pennell
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
278:
267:
264:
262:
259:
257:
254:
253:
251:
244:
243:
239:
235:
231:
225:
221:
217:
213:
210:
208:
204:
200:
196:
193:
191:
187:
183:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
163:Makeemlighter
160:
155:
151:
149:
146:
140:
139:
138:
134:
130:
126:
123:
121:
117:
113:
112:Makeemlighter
109:
106:
104:
101:
95:
92:
91:
88:
85:
82:
80:
76:
73:
70:
67:
63:
62:New York City
59:
55:
52:
51:
47:
43:
39:
35:
29:
26:
19:
229:
228:
211:
194:
177:
124:
107:
93:
37:
27:
250:Categories
182:Xavexgoem
234:Wronkiew
216:ragesoss
199:Epson291
38:Original
212:Support
195:Support
178:Support
83:Creator
144:Durova
125:Oppose
99:Durova
53:Reason
16:<
238:talk
220:talk
203:talk
186:talk
167:talk
133:talk
116:talk
252::
240:)
232:--
222:)
205:)
188:)
169:)
135:)
118:)
96:--
77:,
60:,
40:-
236:(
218:(
201:(
184:(
165:(
131:(
114:(
68:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
