244:
sources. It is very important for understanding crepuscular rays because for example Papa Lima
Whiskey 2 believes that there are both kinds of rays "crepuscular and anticrepuscular " are present in this image File:Crepuscular rays at Sunset near Waterberg Plateau edit.jpg. That's why I nominated the image that illustrates rays going up and down and originating from a different source to replace the current FP because all rays in this image are crepuscular rays.--
63:
55:
220:
It's a question of how much each one adds. Naturally, we could and do have several FPs of the moon, each showing different aspects. But we aren't likely to need five different portraits of the same pop star, nor are we likely to need three pictures of the same flower. Do all of these pictures of the
243:
key features, or wait for a picture that does." It is what I was trying to explain unsuccessfully so far. A new image has much higher EV mostly because it depicts the rays originating from a different source: the sun, and the sun's reflection. It also has rays going in a different directions from
262:
If you are trying to have one of these pictures promoted to FP, that goes in the main section with the rest of the nominations, not the delist section. We can discuss its merits and whether to replace current FPs with this up there. This section is for delist discussions only.
346:
It's a flaw in the FP process that there is no way around this. What frequently ends up happening is two separate discussions are started, basically asking "which one should we have", and both conclude "this one", often with spurious reasoning about how they
293:
The first image is FP, the second one is not. I thought that the way to replace FP image with another one is to nominate it here. Sorry, if I did it in a wrong place. Maybe you could help me to do it in the right place please?
239:"Do all of these pictures of the rays show something different? If not, then we really can't justify them all being FPs. If they do, then we really need to ask why we shouldn't feature the one that shows
152:
The both images are good, but the second one has many more rays including the ones that are originated from the sun reflections in the lake. That is why this image is better for the article and for FP.--
187:
It is a wrong assessment. The new image has rays going up, and rays going down, and rays originating from a different light source. It is the best image for understanding crepuscular rays. --
69:. In the middle of the image one could also see a different set of the rays coming upward from the lake. The light source for these rays is the Sun's reflection. The image was taken at
221:
rays show something different? If not, then we really can't justify them all being FPs. If they do, then we really need to ask why we shouldn't feature the one that shows
21:
401:
396:
332:
As far as I know only new nominations go to FPC. If one is to delist an FP or replace it with a potentially better picture, they are to be listed here.
17:
318:
Other editors: What is the proper way to go about doing this? Do we nominate his candidate and nom the original for delisting, and link the two?
382:
360:
341:
327:
303:
272:
253:
234:
215:
196:
182:
161:
147:
130:
88:
The second image is used in the article "Crepuscular rays." This image is better because there are reflected rays too.
70:
378:
143:
356:
230:
374:
337:
62:
299:
249:
192:
177:
157:
139:
126:
110:
74:
66:
54:
323:
268:
211:
352:
226:
390:
333:
78:
295:
245:
188:
172:
171:
As Above. The proposed replacement is certainly no improvement. Only different.
153:
122:
106:
319:
264:
207:
100:
Link/s to the image's original FPC nomination, and any previous delist noms
206:
Since when have we had a rule limiting the number of FPs on a subject?
39:
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.
225:key features, or wait for a picture that does.
138:; better colours and lighting, more striking.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
61:
53:
7:
402:Featured picture delist nominations
397:Ended featured picture nominations
28:
58:A suitable caption for the image
91:Articles this image appears in
1:
383:04:27, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
361:11:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
342:02:32, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
328:08:56, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
304:17:53, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
273:09:37, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
254:02:35, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
235:21:33, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
216:11:30, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
197:00:24, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
183:12:43, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
162:03:46, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
148:23:23, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
131:15:19, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
418:
32:Crepuscular rays in ggp
81:
59:
43:Voting period ends on
97:Previous nomination/s
65:
57:
351:add to the article.
82:
60:
51:
409:
180:
175:
94:Golden Gate Park
75:Golden Gate Park
67:Crepuscular Rays
42:
40:
417:
416:
412:
411:
410:
408:
407:
406:
387:
386:
178:
173:
169:Keep Current FP
136:Keep current FP
41:
38:
35:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
415:
413:
405:
404:
399:
389:
388:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
306:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
257:
256:
201:
200:
199:
166:
165:
164:
133:
119:Delist/replace
115:
114:
104:
101:
98:
95:
92:
89:
86:
49:15:19:04 (UTC)
37:
34:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
414:
403:
400:
398:
395:
394:
392:
385:
384:
380:
376:
375:Makeemlighter
372:
362:
358:
354:
350:
345:
344:
343:
339:
335:
331:
330:
329:
325:
321:
317:
316:
305:
301:
297:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
283:
274:
270:
266:
261:
260:
259:
258:
255:
251:
247:
242:
238:
237:
236:
232:
228:
224:
219:
218:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
185:
184:
181:
176:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
150:
149:
145:
141:
137:
134:
132:
128:
124:
120:
117:
116:
112:
108:
105:
102:
99:
96:
93:
90:
87:
84:
83:
80:
79:San Francisco
76:
72:
68:
64:
56:
52:
50:
46:
33:
30:
23:
19:
370:
369:
348:
240:
222:
203:
168:
135:
118:
48:
44:
36:
31:
140:Crisco 1492
45:22 Dec 2011
391:Categories
71:Lloyd Lake
353:J Milburn
227:J Milburn
103:Nominator
204:Keep all
20: |
296:GXK147
246:GXK147
189:GXK147
179:(talk)
174:JFitch
154:GXK147
123:GXK147
107:GXK147
85:Reason
22:delist
371:Kept
320:Clegs
265:Clegs
208:Clegs
16:<
379:talk
357:talk
349:both
338:talk
334:O.J.
324:talk
300:talk
269:talk
250:talk
231:talk
212:talk
193:talk
158:talk
144:talk
127:talk
111:talk
241:all
223:all
73:in
47:at
393::
381:)
373:--
359:)
340:)
326:)
302:)
294:--
271:)
252:)
233:)
214:)
195:)
160:)
146:)
129:)
121:—
77:,
377:(
355:(
336:(
322:(
298:(
267:(
248:(
229:(
210:(
191:(
156:(
142:(
125:(
113:)
109:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
