216:- The reason size is important is that Knowledge (XXG) isn't intended only for online use. Our images should be of a high enough resolution to make decent copies in a printed version of the encyclopaedia - even assuming a print resolution of 200dpi, which is a bit on the low side (usually the standard is 300dpi), you'd be lucky to turn this into a 3"x3" print. Since it's an easily-replaceable image, it is fair to expect high resolution (at least the minimum 1000px). Also, I should point out that past discussions have led to a consensus that
38:
114:
Of course it doesn't give a sense of scale. That's not the point of a closeup. I'm not going to respond to the "too small" comment in detail so I can force myself to remain civil. Let's just it's really ticking me off. -
203:
I agree with
Bagginz: why does size really matter that much? This is simply an interesting image. I think that unless you want to volunteer to go and take a better, higher resolution copy you should keep this one.
129:
Please, can you elaborate? This is a good faith nomination and an uncontroversial one IMO. I'm surprised to see that someone would be "ticked off" by this. If you believe this should remain an FP please say so.
21:
316:
17:
280:
302:
284:
254:
233:
208:
192:
172:
156:
137:
122:
109:
98:
75:
93:
297:
228:
151:
120:
134:
72:
58:
250:
294:
225:
148:
116:
274:
131:
69:
55:
262:
It's always good to ask the original uploader if they have a larger version, rather than
242:
310:
106:
89:
270:
269:
Has any effort been made to replace this image with a Free one from flickr et al.?
189:
181:
169:
205:
37:
49:
Too small for a replicable subject, gives no sense of scale, uncompelling.
84:
164:
One of the more unusual and weirdly compelling FPs. This time, size
168:
matter, but I do wish those things would stop looking at me. --
263:
224:a valid reason for a Support or Keep vote. --
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
36:
41:a closeup of Frogspawn - type unknown
7:
317:Featured picture delist nominations
184:'s contributions consist of voting
28:
1:
333:
157:15:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
138:10:35, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
123:09:24, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
110:21:48, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
99:21:19, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
76:21:16, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
188:in delist nominations.--
303:19:07, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
285:17:16, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
255:20:50, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
234:18:00, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
209:17:42, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
193:04:56, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
173:04:52, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
42:
40:
218:go take a better one
43:
279:
253:
195:
180:Virtually all of
97:
324:
300:
277:
249:
247:
231:
179:
154:
87:
332:
331:
327:
326:
325:
323:
322:
321:
307:
306:
298:
243:
229:
152:
35:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
330:
328:
320:
319:
309:
308:
288:
287:
257:
251:Are you green?
236:
211:
197:
196:
176:
175:
159:
141:
140:
126:
125:
112:
101:
78:
62:
61:
53:
50:
47:
34:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
329:
318:
315:
314:
312:
305:
304:
301:
296:
292:
286:
282:
276:
272:
268:
264:
261:
258:
256:
252:
248:
246:
240:
237:
235:
232:
227:
223:
219:
215:
212:
210:
207:
202:
199:
198:
194:
191:
187:
183:
178:
177:
174:
171:
167:
163:
160:
158:
155:
150:
146:
143:
142:
139:
136:
133:
128:
127:
124:
121:
118:
113:
111:
108:
105:
102:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
79:
77:
74:
71:
67:
64:
63:
60:
57:
54:
51:
48:
45:
44:
39:
33:
30:
23:
19:
290:
289:
266:
259:
244:
238:
221:
217:
213:
200:
185:
182:User:Bagginz
165:
161:
144:
103:
80:
65:
31:
147:per nom. --
83:per nom. --
267:Question:
241:Per nom.
52:Nominator
32:Frogspawn
311:Category
291:Delisted
281:contribs
260:Comment:
107:Debivort
94:contribs
20: |
271:Samsara
214:Comment
190:Bagginz
170:Bagginz
166:doesn't
239:Delist
206:Vaelta
145:Delist
104:Delist
81:Delist
66:Delist
46:Reason
22:delist
132:Witty
70:Witty
56:Witty
16:<
275:talk
245:J
201:Keep
186:Keep
162:Keep
135:Lama
90:talk
73:Lama
59:Lama
295:YFB
226:YFB
222:not
220:is
149:YFB
117:Mgm
85:KFP
313::
293:--
283:)
265:.
204:--
92:|
68:—
299:¿
278:•
273:(
230:¿
153:¿
119:|
96:)
88:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
