Knowledge (XXG)

:Featured picture candidates/iguazu falls - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

34: 234:
Wow, I don't know what your problem is Aitias, I'm just trying to be friendly and thought it'll be a nice picture to see. If you want to complain that it's boring and all, why don't you go ahead and take an image of it yourself? Muhammad Mahdi Karim and Thegreen, thank you for your kind comments :)
338:
Well, it is my picture and I do want people to know how I feel about it. If they reply positive, I thank them, if nagative, I thank them but yes, you are right, I kind of took Aitias personal. But I still think its nice to comment on every comment. For now, I'll put it on picture peer review. Note
323:
Would "spamming the page" include commenting on every single opposition vote? Please don't take it personally when someone is critical of your image, nominating an image for FP is an invitation for criticism. No need to reply to every single comment.
48:
I think its a great picture. There might be a little contrast problem, but if I could get some support to fix it, or anyone be interested in seeing other photos I have of Iguazu Falls and choose the best one, I will put them
306:
Ok, and don't you think one opinion is enough? Why are you spamming this page now? All I need is one vote/opinion from one person, now you're just trying to make everyone agree with you and pushing your opinion.
459: 282:
to be a FP. It has to meet some criterias which lift it up. This image doesn't fit in such criterias - It's an averagely image: That's not enough for a FP. Sorry. —
449: 17: 134:
I hope you know that Iguazu Falls is a long stretch of falls, and the one in the article is the "devil's neck". My picture is different one. --
454: 207:
Please stay civil. Saying an image is of the worst quality is not helpful to any and doesn't justify your points. Anyhow this image
211:
meet the resolution requirements, so that's not a valid reason on its own, and boring is a very vague and subjective comment.
178: 88:? Upload all your pics, post them there and we'll have a look at them without the formality of a featured picture candidacy. 373: 174: 435: 419: 401: 377: 348: 333: 316: 297: 278:
LOL: He is just saying his opinion straightly. Its just my humble opinion, that an image must be more than just
269: 244: 229: 202: 182: 168: 143: 129: 106: 92: 79: 260:
Nice image. Mitchipr, please do not take it personally with αἰτίας. He/she likes to go with strong opposes :)--
411: 340: 329: 308: 236: 223: 135: 125: 98: 71: 415: 344: 312: 240: 139: 102: 75: 393: 289: 194: 160: 85: 369: 325: 265: 212: 121: 443: 117: 55: 410:
Aqwis, thank you for putting it nicely :) Aitias, I already heard your opinion. --
387: 283: 188: 154: 432: 365: 89: 261: 33: 187:
You're right - It's more than that. Just because of the worst quality. —
116:
Due to composition. There are several more encyclopedic photos on the
339:
that I did not take your comment personal, and replied generally, --
153:
Exposure bad, resolution not high enough, not sharp, boring. —
120:
page. This one only shows a small fraction of the falls.
8: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates 460:Featured picture nominations/December 2007 32: 7: 450:Ended featured picture nominations 24: 97:Thanks, I think I'll do that -- 52:Articles this image appears in 1: 436:02:25, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 420:05:02, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 402:22:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 378:22:11, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 349:01:30, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 334:02:34, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 317:05:02, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 298:22:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 270:04:13, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 245:02:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 230:21:11, 18 December 2007 (UTC) 203:19:18, 18 December 2007 (UTC) 183:18:26, 18 December 2007 (UTC) 169:17:59, 18 December 2007 (UTC) 144:02:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 130:22:58, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 107:02:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 93:13:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 80:10:56, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 455:Featured picture nominations 476: 173:It certainly isnt boring! 41: 36: 175:Muhammad Mahdi Karim 69:Support as nominator 86:picture peer review 364:, underexposed. -- 42: 228: 216: 467: 226: 222: 220: 214: 84:Might I suggest 475: 474: 470: 469: 468: 466: 465: 464: 440: 439: 224: 213: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 473: 471: 463: 462: 457: 452: 442: 441: 427: 426: 425: 424: 423: 422: 405: 404: 381: 380: 358: 357: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 320: 319: 301: 300: 273: 272: 255: 254: 253: 252: 251: 250: 249: 248: 247: 225:Are you green? 148: 147: 146: 111: 110: 109: 82: 65: 64: 61: 58: 53: 50: 46: 40:- Iguaçu Falls 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 472: 461: 458: 456: 453: 451: 448: 447: 445: 438: 437: 434: 431: 430:Not promoted 421: 417: 413: 409: 408: 407: 406: 403: 400: 397: 396: 392: 389: 385: 384: 383: 382: 379: 375: 374:contributions 371: 367: 363: 360: 359: 350: 346: 342: 337: 336: 335: 331: 327: 322: 321: 318: 314: 310: 305: 304: 303: 302: 299: 296: 293: 292: 288: 285: 281: 277: 276: 275: 274: 271: 267: 263: 259: 256: 246: 242: 238: 233: 232: 231: 227: 221: 219: 210: 206: 205: 204: 201: 198: 197: 193: 190: 186: 185: 184: 180: 176: 172: 171: 170: 167: 164: 163: 159: 156: 152: 151:Strong oppose 149: 145: 141: 137: 133: 132: 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 112: 108: 104: 100: 96: 95: 94: 91: 87: 83: 81: 77: 73: 70: 67: 66: 62: 59: 57: 54: 51: 47: 44: 43: 39: 35: 29: 26: 19: 429: 428: 398: 394: 390: 361: 294: 290: 286: 279: 257: 217: 208: 199: 195: 191: 165: 161: 157: 150: 118:Iguazu Falls 113: 68: 56:Iguazu Falls 37: 28:Iguaçu Falls 27: 444:Categories 395:discussion 386:correct. — 291:discussion 196:discussion 162:discussion 326:Cacophony 215:thegreen 122:Cacophony 412:Mitchipr 341:Mitchipr 309:Mitchipr 237:Mitchipr 136:Mitchipr 99:Mitchipr 72:Mitchipr 38:Original 258:Support 60:Creator 388:αἰτίας 362:Oppose 284:αἰτίας 189:αἰτίας 155:αἰτίας 114:Oppose 63:myself 45:Reason 433:MER-C 366:Aqwis 90:MER-C 16:< 416:talk 370:talk 345:talk 330:talk 313:talk 280:nice 266:talk 262:Mbz1 241:talk 218:J 209:does 179:talk 140:talk 126:talk 103:talk 76:talk 446:: 418:) 376:) 372:– 347:) 332:) 315:) 307:-- 268:) 243:) 235:-- 181:) 142:) 128:) 105:) 78:) 49:up 414:( 399:• 391:• 368:( 343:( 328:( 311:( 295:• 287:• 264:( 239:( 200:• 192:• 177:( 166:• 158:• 138:( 124:( 101:( 74:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
Iguaçu Falls

Iguazu Falls
Mitchipr
talk
10:56, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
picture peer review
MER-C
13:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Mitchipr
talk
02:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Iguazu Falls
Cacophony
talk
22:58, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Mitchipr
talk
02:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
αἰτίας
discussion
17:59, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Muhammad Mahdi Karim
talk
18:26, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
αἰτίας
discussion
19:18, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thegreen J

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.