Knowledge

:Featured portal candidates/Portal:American Civil War - Knowledge

Source 📝

1283: 825:. Again, none of these are featured. Most of them will probably never be. Should they be excluded from the portal? I say no. Should the featured articles be given a quicker rotation to allow these? I also say no. Featured articles are examples of our best work, and should be given a longer display period at the very top of the portal. Its a big part of why I prefer the queue style to randomization. I think most other editors would agree with me that there has to be some remedy where we can return this section and still become a featured portal. 140:. I've been slapping and banging everything into the handy layout templates, and I'm not done with all that stuff yet. I've held off on the instructions for the DYK and This week sections, mostly because of needing to work with the layout template a bit. Another day or two and I'll have all your concerns addressed. This has been an exhausting but fun changeover. I know lots about how I want to setup another portal now, but still need some new ideas. 728:
martial quality, which was commented upon positively, so I kept that. When I realized I had a number of FAs, I wanted to showcase those quarterly, but now with this rate of FA production, it's monthly, and I may never repeat an FA. I have no particular attachment to the SA subpage, but IMHO, it presents important and nuanced material which may never appear on the FA list. That's why the large number of subpages.
1320: 71:. I think it exceeds all of the featured portal criteria. It does not self-reference, it is ergonomic, it includes several self-updating sections all of which are informative, stylish, and examples of some of the best work I've seen here on Knowledge. I only recently realized that portals could become featured, and I was surprised to learn that ACW had not yet achieved that status. 1356: 1330: 859: 561: 520: 465: 157: 883: 1166:
many anniversary entries in a content area. This month of April, being the starting and ending month of the subject war, a lot of entries are inescapable, but in some weeks, finding entries is a difficult task. This weeks' and month's FA, GPotS and SB entries are actually intentionally puffed up to match the This week list.
353:
All of the "Featured articles" are featured (or were at time of display), as explained at the "talk" link appropriate to the section. The red links are places for new FAs when they are promoted. Including archives, I've listed 15 FAs. I've explained each archive page a bit better. Do you have another
924:
in the American Civil War from displaying at the portal. I think it should be returned as "Selected Topic". The consensus above clearly supported the portal with both sections. It also makes the portal unique from other portals, which should be another part of being featured. Are we really not going
1165:
Been wrestling with this because of the enormous variablility of the This week section (which is the section which requires the most effort to fortify, each subarticle taking several hours to create and edit). Eventually this will be a much shorter "This day" but it takes a long time to gather that
841:
We might remove this section, but looking at the newly fortified "Selected article" queue (Thanks MrPrada!), I suggest we change the subsection to "Selected event". Most of the entries listed can be tied to a date range, so with some minor changes and explanation in queue talk, this could reference
970:
I was not overly wedded to SA myself, though I do agree with some of MrPrada's comments above. It's possible the portal had too many ingredients, and it's entirely possible to highlight many of the SA-type stuff in Did you know or This week entries. I could always put it back in, but I also highly
1107:
As I've already stated, I came to the already assembled portal with little understanding of its mechanics or design; if I had to do it all over again (and I'm about to do so with Portal:Civil war), I would choose a much more elegant and modern style. But this portal is an antique, and I'll still
776:
No, I am sorry, but they are not redundant. The 'Featured Article' selection at the top is for featured articles, and rotates quarterly. There are only nine FAs, so this makes sense to me. The Selected Article/Event/Topic section was for everything else (the 112 articles that are not FAs), to be
742:
I have to agree with BusterD here. Simply because no featured portal has ever had both "Featured Article" and "Selected Article" does not mean its exclusionary criteria. There are a number of articles which would otherwise never be featured, this at least allows users to suggest ones that can be
620:
You kind of have me here, Cirt. The portal is based around the Knowledge:WikiProject Military history American Civil War task force, and its "to do" list is an integral part of this portal, featured or not. If that's a deal-breaker, then we should probably withdraw this portal from any future FP
727:
In my interest to present material which was not strictly battles and leaders, I originally had designed quite a lot of arcana into the portal (Selected artist's rendering, Selected photograph, Selected weapon, Selected map). Most of this was not that good, but GPotS had a resonance, perhaps a
1032:
31 complete so far this year, and more several months away from display already posted, and wanting formatting. This is a listed task on the to do list for "Selected pictures." I can either fill every slot, in which case there's no work for newcomer to jump into, or leave some future slots as
922:
disagree with removing this section. This portal had six votes support votes, plus the nomination, "as-is", prior to this comment. There is nothing in the FP criteria list that would preclude this, and we're inhibiting every Civil War related article that is not a FA, Biography, or <State:
1047:
I think the main issue here, is that perhaps I am not understanding the way you have the dynamic queue set up for the portal - I tend to use a purely randomized method for selections, without regard for dates, etc. But if the way you have it is okay, and the redlinks/empty selections won't
164:
I had to adjust the instructions a bit to fit the circumstances of two subpages, but all the instruction pages are linked on the main page now. I've also included to do lists on those instruction pages. I'm planning to use the to do lists to keep tasks available to newcomers to the portal.
1033:
incomplete and unfilled so as to demonstrate the need for entries (making some reviewers uncomfortable). Still not sure how to fit my square (time dynamic) portal through a round (random dynamic) filter. If you provide me a done/undone metric, I'll plug any hole still desiring filling.
955:
I was not implying that we count votes, rather I intended to convey that there was consensus when both sections were featured. Personally, I would have asked Buster to create a section to include non-FA battles, etc., prior to nominating the portal, if it had not existed at the outset.
89:
Looks like things have been randomized/formatted a bit - but the footers at the bottom of selected sections still lead to old versions of "Archives" - instead of lists of the randomized content and an instructions page on how to add more.
592:- the "Requested articles" list is a bit large, the amount of redlinks looks unseemly, would look better if it were reduced to 3-5 redlinks, and then a referral to a list of additional requested articles at a subpage of a WikiProject. 890:- This subsection still has selections which have nothing to do with "events", and I think that this subsection is subsumed by the "Featured article" subsection at the top of the portal, and thus redundant and should be removed. 1253:
Sorry to be confusing, I find the way it is archived very confusing because the photos are on different sides, if you could organize them one after the other it would make it much easier to see which photos go with each date.
1066:
itself. Because it reveals no content, the skeleton of the portal and its mechanisms can be better understood. For the record, I thought all this dynamic queue stuff was the way all portals were run. Foolish me.
704:
subsections) then I think this is simply a redundant subsection, and is confusing, especially since you already have a "Featured article" section at the top. In effect, the "Featured article" section functions
939:
When do we start counting !votes in featured portal nominations? And even if so, "comments" is a nicer way than saying "oppose" because it is not directed towards the nomination, but the portal itself.
108:
As a maintainer, I should point out that this portal uses a dynamic queue instead of randomized content. I agree some easier way might be provided to allow direct contributions to the queue.
136:
This has now been corrected. Where there used to exist a "Suggest" link, in most cases I've replaced this with a "Create" link which leads to the instruction pages, based on those used at
68: 709:
the "Selected article" section, just that all articles in rotation are featured. Yes, having both seems redundant and inappropriate for a featured portal - I don't know of any
701: 370: 122:
Where is the subpage where all the upcoming articles for the dynamic queue are listed, with instructions for other editors as to how to contribute new articles?
682:
There are only a few featured ACW articles. However there are numerous A-class and GA-class articles which would be candidates for "Selected Article" (see:
448:
Oh, that was something that is not that easy to understand at the outset - somehow those article titles should be wikilinked and bolded within each blurb.
639:
requested, and have some others of less priority at a subpage of the WikiProject, and then refer to those in a link within that subsection of the portal?
329: 1370:
Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the
40: 332:- where selections 1 and 2 are missing? Also, the "Featured article" section should be moved to "Selected article" - unless all of the articles 778: 635:
I'm just saying it is a lot of redlinks for a portal main page - if it is drawn from a WikiProject subpage, why not feature a few that are
30: 17: 1184:
with blurbs this long, I really think that the blurb text for these selected sections needs to be cut down drastically across the board.
325: 1371: 1217: 403: 395: 324:
Still some issues with the footer tabs at the bottom of the Selected sections. The "archive" leads to a page which looks like this
1401: 1346: 1315: 1248: 1229: 1193: 1175: 1160: 1117: 1102: 1076: 1057: 1042: 1023: 1011: 980: 965: 950: 934: 913: 899: 875: 851: 834: 771: 752: 737: 722: 695: 677: 648: 630: 615: 601: 577: 553: 535: 512: 480: 457: 443: 429: 415: 386: 363: 348: 312: 295: 277: 263: 239: 220: 201: 174: 149: 131: 117: 99: 80: 1429: 814: 399: 925:
to have any Battles, units, technology, etc., on the front page, even if they're GA-class or above? That is a little silly.
1392: 1282: 700:
If there is no main difference in the intent of the "Featured article" and "Selected article" section (i.e. bios, or your
544:
section could also use a highlighted image, perhaps in the upper left corner, that is indicative of the portal's topic.
1063: 1086: 790: 373:- What is this section sourced to? Are these each derived from Knowledge articles, or is each one a violation of 64: 57: 1386: 976: 782: 818: 1276: 946: 767: 961: 930: 830: 748: 691: 611: 411: 76: 802: 197: 972: 822: 806: 1147:
all seem to be a bit too long - each could be cut down to about a third of current length. Think
957: 926: 826: 744: 687: 607: 407: 72: 1363: 1355: 1235:
I'm not sure I understand your critique. Selected pictures are formatted precisely like those of
1220:" as per Knowledge’s featured portal criteria. If it gets fixed I would love to change my vote.-- 67:. I had been updating this manually last year, before another user stepped in and automated it. 866:
Still some cleaning to do, shifting two objects to events, but the basic visible work is done.
1342: 1311: 1273: 1244: 1225: 1171: 1113: 1090: 1072: 1038: 909: 871: 847: 733: 626: 573: 531: 476: 439: 425: 359: 308: 273: 260: 236: 170: 145: 113: 1303: 1295: 941: 842:
some battle or significant non-battle action, like a balloon ascent or steamboat explosion.
762: 1181: 1082: 786: 710: 500: 213: 193: 420:
This is another concept which is covered in the instructions page, perhaps inadequately.
1299: 1189: 1156: 1098: 1053: 1019: 895: 718: 673: 644: 597: 568:
Images rotate hourly, but I'm planning a rotation every minute, once I fill the queue.
549: 508: 453: 382: 344: 127: 95: 1423: 1236: 1216:
I like the portal but I can’t support it unless the photos are organized and become "
1148: 798: 137: 1338: 1307: 1269: 1240: 1221: 1167: 1109: 1068: 1034: 905: 867: 843: 810: 729: 622: 569: 527: 472: 435: 421: 374: 355: 336: 304: 269: 251: 227: 166: 141: 109: 794: 683: 606:
The request articles list comes from the WikiProject and not the portal itself.
1319: 1279:
is notable because of the unusual inclusion of his 8 year-old daughter Hettie.
328:, which isn't very helpful to the visitor. The "create" link leads to this - 288: 210: 971:
value the opinions of those who've been through this process multiple times.
1185: 1152: 1094: 1049: 1015: 891: 714: 669: 640: 593: 545: 504: 449: 378: 340: 123: 91: 777:
rotated weekly. Let's have a look at some of the titles of those articles:
192:. Dynamic is just fine (random is a tool and not an end all). Good work. - 1062:
I think the easiest way to visualize the dynamic queue is to look at the
1337:
Applied the same layout style to the older stuff in the 2007 archives.
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the portal's talk page or in
686:). I don't think thats actionable for preventing Featured status. 621:
consideration until the project has few requests (meaning never).
268:
I love the basic colors. But they're my choices, so I'm biased.
1350: 354:
suggestion as where to keep archives? I'm way open to ideas.
1318: 1281: 1081:
Well, I guess I am more used to visualizing portals such as
1014:- Some are filled in, some are empty/redlinked/missing. 1048:
accidentally pop in the portal's main page, then okay.
287:- Awesome portal. I really appericiate the good work. 1362:
This page is currently inactive and is retained for
702:
Portal:American Civil War/Grand Parade of the States
371:
Portal:American Civil War/Grand Parade of the States
326:
Portal:American Civil War/Featured article/Archive1
249:, nice work (although I don't like the colours). 1408:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. 1093:. Simpler to manage and less parts, I guess. 43:. No further edits should be made to this page. 406:, etc. Don't see what OR has to do with this? 1414:No further edits should be made to this page. 303:Everything looks good and up to snuff to me. 29:The following is an archived discussion of a 8: 69:Previous portal peer review is located here 1012:Portal:American Civil War/Selected picture 330:Portal:American Civil War/Featured article 225:I fixed the formatting of your support. 41:Knowledge talk:Featured portal candidates 499:section could use a footer, as in other 1290:September 10, 2007 - September 16, 2007 1239:, which is not getting this feedback. 779:Signal Corps in the American Civil War 743:selected from A-class, GA-class, etc. 668:subsections? That seems redundant. 7: 761:redundant. It only confuses people. 18:Knowledge:Featured portal candidates 1264:August 30, 2007 - September 9, 2007 404:Virginia in the American Civil War 396:Kentucky in the American Civil War 24: 1354: 1328: 1180:Well, I haven't come across any 881: 857: 559: 518: 463: 155: 1028:17 archived selected pictures, 1087:Portal:Sustainable development 815:Richmond and Danville Railroad 400:Ohio in the American Civil War 1: 255:WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN 231:WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN 434:A bit easier to understand? 1446: 1141:Grand Parade of the States 791:Battle of Chancellorsville 296:10:27, 31 March 2008 (UTC) 278:14:40, 28 March 2008 (UTC) 264:17:46, 27 March 2008 (UTC) 240:17:50, 27 March 2008 (UTC) 221:21:26, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 202:03:26, 17 March 2008 (UTC) 175:14:40, 28 March 2008 (UTC) 150:22:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC) 132:07:37, 22 March 2008 (UTC) 118:15:52, 16 March 2008 (UTC) 100:03:02, 15 March 2008 (UTC) 81:22:32, 13 March 2008 (UTC) 1402:07:24, 9 April 2008 (UTC) 1347:00:22, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 1316:21:43, 6 April 2008 (UTC) 1249:11:13, 6 April 2008 (UTC) 1230:05:07, 6 April 2008 (UTC) 1194:10:21, 8 April 2008 (UTC) 1176:13:33, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 1161:13:15, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 1118:13:33, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 1103:13:15, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 1077:12:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 1058:05:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 1043:01:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 1024:00:37, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 981:18:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 966:15:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 951:15:50, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 935:15:38, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 914:12:49, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 900:12:35, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 876:16:08, 6 April 2008 (UTC) 852:14:19, 4 April 2008 (UTC) 835:15:52, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 772:13:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC) 753:14:38, 3 April 2008 (UTC) 738:12:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 723:05:02, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 696:00:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 678:00:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 649:05:00, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 631:01:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 616:00:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 602:00:34, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 578:05:28, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 554:05:06, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 536:01:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 513:00:34, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 481:15:12, 6 April 2008 (UTC) 458:04:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 444:03:06, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 430:01:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 416:00:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 387:00:34, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 364:01:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 349:00:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 313:00:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC) 209:. Looks great, nice job. 65:Portal:American Civil War 58:Portal:American Civil War 31:featured portal candidate 1411:Please do not modify it. 36:Please do not modify it. 783:Battle of Fort Donelson 1430:Inactive project pages 1323: 1286: 819:Great Locomotive Chase 1322: 1285: 1277:Charles Pomeroy Stone 1135:- The blurb text for 52:07:25, 9 April 2008. 803:Battle of Gettysburg 394:. No, this links to 1387:dihydrogen monoxide 823:Sultana (steamboat) 807:Fifteenth Amendment 1324: 1306:in August, 1863.-- 1287: 1145:Selected biography 1400: 1379: 1378: 1274:Brigadier General 1108:polish it as is. 1091:Portal:Psychology 713:that have both. 590:Things you can do 337:Featured articles 1437: 1413: 1390: 1375: 1358: 1351: 1336: 1332: 1331: 1304:Washington, Ohio 1300:Morgan's Raiders 1298:etching depicts 1137:Featured article 889: 885: 884: 865: 861: 860: 787:Civil War tokens 666:Selected article 660:Featured article 567: 563: 562: 526: 522: 521: 471: 467: 466: 293: 262: 257: 238: 233: 163: 159: 158: 38: 1445: 1444: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1409: 1396: 1369: 1329: 1327: 1325: 1296:Harper's Weekly 1280: 882: 880: 858: 856: 560: 558: 519: 517: 464: 462: 289: 258: 253: 250: 234: 229: 226: 156: 154: 61: 48:The portal was 34: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1443: 1441: 1433: 1432: 1422: 1421: 1417: 1416: 1394: 1377: 1376: 1368: 1359: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1272:photograph of 1267: 1266: 1265: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 996: 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 987: 986: 985: 984: 983: 973:BusterD public 838: 837: 657: 656: 655: 654: 653: 652: 651: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 580: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 488: 487: 486: 485: 484: 483: 368: 367: 366: 321: 320: 316: 315: 298: 282: 281: 280: 252: 244: 243: 242: 228: 204: 186: 185: 184: 183: 182: 181: 180: 179: 178: 177: 103: 102: 60: 55: 54: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1442: 1431: 1428: 1427: 1425: 1415: 1412: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1398: 1389: 1388: 1383: 1373: 1367: 1365: 1360: 1357: 1353: 1352: 1349: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1335: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1289: 1288: 1284: 1278: 1275: 1271: 1263: 1262: 1257: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1237:Portal:Norway 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1212: 1211: 1207: 1206: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1131: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1065: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1031: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1010: 982: 978: 974: 969: 968: 967: 963: 959: 954: 953: 952: 949: 948: 945: 944: 938: 937: 936: 932: 928: 921: 917: 916: 915: 911: 907: 903: 902: 901: 897: 893: 888: 879: 878: 877: 873: 869: 864: 855: 854: 853: 849: 845: 840: 839: 836: 832: 828: 824: 820: 816: 812: 808: 804: 800: 799:Fort Corcoran 796: 792: 788: 784: 780: 775: 774: 773: 770: 769: 766: 765: 760: 756: 755: 754: 750: 746: 741: 740: 739: 735: 731: 726: 725: 724: 720: 716: 712: 708: 703: 699: 698: 697: 693: 689: 685: 681: 680: 679: 675: 671: 667: 664: 661: 658: 650: 646: 642: 638: 634: 633: 632: 628: 624: 619: 618: 617: 613: 609: 605: 604: 603: 599: 595: 591: 587: 579: 575: 571: 566: 557: 556: 555: 551: 547: 543: 539: 538: 537: 533: 529: 525: 516: 515: 514: 510: 506: 502: 498: 494: 482: 478: 474: 470: 461: 460: 459: 455: 451: 447: 446: 445: 441: 437: 433: 432: 431: 427: 423: 419: 418: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 397: 393: 390: 389: 388: 384: 380: 376: 372: 369: 365: 361: 357: 352: 351: 350: 346: 342: 338: 335: 331: 327: 323: 322: 318: 317: 314: 310: 306: 302: 299: 297: 294: 292: 286: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 266: 265: 261: 259: 256: 248: 245: 241: 237: 235: 232: 224: 223: 222: 219: 218: 217: 212: 208: 205: 203: 199: 195: 191: 188: 187: 176: 172: 168: 162: 153: 152: 151: 147: 143: 139: 138:Portal:Norway 135: 134: 133: 129: 125: 121: 120: 119: 115: 111: 107: 106: 105: 104: 101: 97: 93: 88: 85: 84: 83: 82: 78: 74: 70: 66: 59: 56: 53: 51: 44: 42: 37: 32: 27: 26: 19: 1410: 1407: 1385: 1381: 1380: 1372:village pump 1361: 1333: 1326: 1270:Mathew Brady 1255: 1213: 1209: 1208: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1029: 947: 942: 919: 886: 862: 811:Coal torpedo 768: 763: 758: 706: 665: 662: 659: 636: 589: 564: 541: 523: 496: 468: 391: 333: 300: 290: 284: 254: 246: 230: 215: 214: 206: 189: 160: 86: 62: 49: 47: 35: 28: 943:OhanaUnited 904:It's gone. 795:H.L. Hunley 764:OhanaUnited 684:Portal:Ohio 63:Nominating 1366:reference. 1364:historical 1268:This 1863 194:Susanlesch 1302:entering 1218:Ergonomic 1182:WP:FPORTs 757:Na, they 711:WP:FPORTs 501:WP:FPORTs 1424:Category 1382:Promoted 1083:WP:FPORT 920:strongly 887:Not done 87:Comment: 50:promoted 1339:BusterD 1308:CPacker 1256:Example 1241:BusterD 1222:CPacker 1214:Support 1210:Comment 1168:BusterD 1151:size. 1110:BusterD 1069:BusterD 1035:BusterD 958:MrPrada 927:MrPrada 906:BusterD 868:BusterD 844:BusterD 827:MrPrada 745:MrPrada 730:BusterD 688:MrPrada 623:BusterD 608:MrPrada 588:Under ' 570:BusterD 528:BusterD 473:BusterD 436:BusterD 422:BusterD 408:MrPrada 356:BusterD 319:Comment 305:Cromdog 301:Support 285:Support 270:BusterD 247:Support 207:Support 190:Support 167:BusterD 142:BusterD 110:BusterD 73:MrPrada 1205:Oppose 1149:WP:TFA 1143:, and 1133:Blurbs 637:really 392:Coment 216:/talk/ 1294:This 1064:queue 821:, and 542:Intro 497:Intro 375:WP:OR 291:Shyam 211:—dima 16:< 1343:talk 1334:Done 1312:talk 1245:talk 1226:talk 1190:talk 1186:Cirt 1172:talk 1157:talk 1153:Cirt 1114:talk 1099:talk 1095:Cirt 1089:and 1073:talk 1054:talk 1050:Cirt 1039:talk 1020:talk 1016:Cirt 977:talk 962:talk 931:talk 910:talk 896:talk 892:Cirt 872:talk 863:Done 848:talk 831:talk 749:talk 734:talk 719:talk 715:Cirt 692:talk 674:talk 670:Cirt 645:talk 641:Cirt 627:talk 612:talk 598:talk 594:Cirt 574:talk 565:Done 550:talk 546:Cirt 540:The 532:talk 524:Done 509:talk 505:Cirt 495:The 477:talk 469:Done 454:talk 450:Cirt 440:talk 426:talk 412:talk 383:talk 379:Cirt 360:talk 345:talk 341:Cirt 309:talk 274:talk 198:talk 171:talk 161:Done 146:talk 128:talk 124:Cirt 114:talk 96:talk 92:Cirt 77:talk 923:--> 759:are 663:and 503:. 377:? 339:. 334:are 1426:: 1384:-- 1345:) 1314:) 1247:) 1228:) 1192:) 1174:) 1159:) 1139:, 1116:) 1101:) 1085:, 1075:) 1056:) 1041:) 1030:14 1022:) 979:) 964:) 933:) 918:I 912:) 898:) 874:) 850:) 833:) 817:, 813:, 809:, 805:, 801:, 797:, 793:, 789:, 785:, 781:, 751:) 736:) 721:) 707:as 694:) 676:) 647:) 629:) 614:) 600:) 576:) 552:) 534:) 511:) 479:) 456:) 442:) 428:) 414:) 402:, 398:, 385:) 362:) 347:) 311:) 276:) 200:) 173:) 148:) 130:) 116:) 98:) 79:) 33:. 1399:) 1397:O 1395:2 1393:H 1391:( 1374:. 1341:( 1310:( 1243:( 1224:( 1188:( 1170:( 1155:( 1112:( 1097:( 1071:( 1052:( 1037:( 1018:( 975:( 960:( 929:( 908:( 894:( 870:( 846:( 829:( 747:( 732:( 717:( 690:( 672:( 643:( 625:( 610:( 596:( 572:( 548:( 530:( 507:( 475:( 452:( 438:( 424:( 410:( 381:( 358:( 343:( 307:( 272:( 196:( 169:( 144:( 126:( 112:( 94:( 75:(

Index

Knowledge:Featured portal candidates
featured portal candidate
Knowledge talk:Featured portal candidates
Portal:American Civil War
Portal:American Civil War
Previous portal peer review is located here
MrPrada
talk
22:32, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Cirt
talk
03:02, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
BusterD
talk
15:52, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Cirt
talk
07:37, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Portal:Norway
BusterD
talk
22:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
BusterD
talk
14:40, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Susanlesch
talk
03:26, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
—dima
/talk/

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.