139:
2:08 - 2:25 seems to have more clipping than the original, an artifact of restoration? In that area, I actually prefer the original recording. Also, is there a reason the original is 194kbps but the restoration is 66kbps? The timing of the chords at the beginning sounds fine to me.
219:: I agree that this is a valuable recording, and very much worthy of featured status on that basis. I was picking up some distortion myself a bit. I'll let better ears weigh in on that, but I'm inclined to support otherwise should the others come to a consensus on that point.
49:
37:
314:
Not the best transfer (probably a dirty disc?) requires too much distortion to bring to a listenable state. I wouldn't be opposed to a clean transfer of this recording. I actually have a clean copy of this disc, but no machine to play it on. :\
339:
Sadly, perhaps, the mountain this file has to climb to reach a super-majority is too great at this time. Participation at F.S. being what it is, I doubt this will see another three supports in any reasonable amount of time.
177:
per
Jujutacular. I noticed the clipping and then listened to the original and did not hear it. It could be a compression artifact as 66 kbps is small for so many notes are being played simultaneously in that stretch.
48:
129:
93:
384:
254:
Distorted in comparison to the original recording. Why 66k? Sounds like listening over a telephone circuit. Such a valuable recording deserves a better transfer.
77:
I fixed successfully. If there's problems, I want to know and fix them, not coast by, so please, double-check my work and don't let me get away with anything.
333:
263:
241:
211:
166:
148:
116:
121:
1919, but, of course, later recordings wouldn't be public domain recordings of him playing his own work. Added year of performance to the description.
56:
73:
is the original. Can you be hard on the restoration, particularly the timing of the first three chords, which had some extra damage, and which I
17:
157:
Excellent for a 1919 acoustic recording. The fact that it is an interpretation by the composer, in his prime, is especially compelling.
327:
281:
70:
232:
59:(Op. 3, No. 2), which he composed when he was 19, established his fame in America. It is here performed by himself in 1919.
185:
370:
302:
287:
47:
189:
124:
88:
361:
322:
276:
227:
198:
Is there much difference in the "clipping"? I find it hard to detect. This is a valuable recording.
347:
317:
271:
110:
182:
298:
259:
162:
142:
66:
One of
Rachmaninoff's most popular works, performed by a notable interpreter of his works.
222:
206:
378:
103:
179:
294:
255:
158:
199:
101:
Lots of background white noise in there. Is this an old recording?
269:
You !voted on this over a year ago, with a different opinion
8:
385:Knowledge (XXG) featured sound nominations
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured sound candidates
7:
24:
71:File:Prelude_3_2_Rach_playing.ogg
45:
69:One thing I must ask, though:
1:
371:06:23, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
334:06:59, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
303:03:25, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
288:06:59, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
264:00:15, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
167:04:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
149:20:27, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
130:09:23, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
117:02:56, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
94:20:23, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
41:– Prelude in C♯ minor, Op. 3
401:
242:23:38, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
212:17:29, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
293:Struck earlier !vote.
55:Rachmaninoff's famous
217:Conditional support
188:2010-03-16T16:12Z (
125:Shoemaker's Holiday
89:Shoemaker's Holiday
57:Prelude in C♯ minor
28:Sergei Rachmaninoff
368:
290:
50:
392:
367:
362:
359:
330:
325:
320:
284:
279:
274:
268:
240:
237:
230:
225:
209:
204:
145:
128:
115:
113:
108:
92:
52:
51:
400:
399:
395:
394:
393:
391:
390:
389:
375:
374:
363:
356:
352:
348:
328:
323:
318:
282:
277:
272:
236:
233:
228:
223:
220:
207:
200:
143:
122:
111:
104:
102:
86:
64:
63:
62:
61:
60:
53:
46:
43:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
398:
396:
388:
387:
377:
376:
354:
350:
337:
336:
309:
308:
307:
306:
305:
247:
245:
244:
234:
214:
193:
171:
170:
151:
134:
133:
132:
96:
54:
44:
36:
35:
34:
33:
32:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
397:
386:
383:
382:
380:
373:
372:
369:
366:
360:
358:
345:
341:
335:
332:
331:
326:
321:
313:
310:
304:
300:
296:
292:
291:
289:
286:
285:
280:
275:
267:
266:
265:
261:
257:
253:
250:
249:
248:
243:
239:
238:
231:
226:
218:
215:
213:
210:
205:
203:
197:
194:
191:
187:
184:
181:
176:
173:
172:
169:
168:
164:
160:
156:
152:
150:
147:
146:
138:
135:
131:
127:
126:
120:
119:
118:
114:
109:
107:
100:
97:
95:
91:
90:
84:
81:Nominate and
80:
79:
78:
76:
72:
67:
58:
42:
40:
29:
26:
19:
364:
349:
344:Not promoted
343:
342:
338:
316:
311:
270:
251:
246:
221:
216:
201:
195:
174:
154:
153:
141:
136:
123:
105:
98:
87:
82:
74:
68:
65:
38:
27:
144:Jujutacular
379:Category
196:Support.
137:Comments
106:Nezzadar
357:anguard
155:Support
83:support
312:Oppose
295:Edison
256:Edison
252:Oppose
224:Imzadi
208:(talk)
175:Oppose
159:Edison
329:Space
283:Space
75:think
16:<
365:Wha?
353:ven
324:From
319:Them
299:talk
278:From
273:Them
260:talk
229:1979
202:Tony
163:talk
39:1892
190:UTC
186:der
183:gin
381::
346:--
301:)
262:)
165:)
85:.
355:M
351:S
297:(
258:(
235:→
192:)
180:Z
161:(
112:☎
99:?
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.