Knowledge (XXG)

:Files for deletion/2011 February 19 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

919:
factually established than it is, and at least some of images are disputed based on actual science reasoning. "Here is a known fake image of this thing" just doesn't seem worthwhile. Rather, some could be photographed and just haven't been (we don't draw stick-figures if a living person doesn't have a free image provided), and others either can't or haven't yet been available in sufficient quantity--that latter actually might be an interesting factoid to put in the articles.
1200: 938: 1513:, however, the image does not actually identify the video packaging, any of the character, or any other aspects of the television series. In fact, the image of the logo is indistinguishable with that of the toyline. There is also no critical cometary about the image on the article. Therefore the image provides no contextual significance to the article and fails criterion #8 of 1021:: Of course this is no astatine, but it could look like that. Crystals similar to iodine, but darker in color than these, which due to the extreme radioactivity glow blue and evaporate to dark purple gas. This sight would only last for a fraction of a second. Such an amount of astatine would produce so much heat, it would evaporate almost immediately. 1033:: Of course this is no francium, but it could look like that. The melting point of francium is approximately at room temperature, but the highly radioactive metal produces so much heat, even in the amount of some milligrams it would end up in glowing fume immediately. However, such a large amount hasn't been isolated yet. 890:
Wait, other wikis are using the images from en.wp? Or other wikis are using the same images from commons that en.wp is using? The former seems less likely (the whole point of commons is a place to share cross-wiki, and each wiki follows its own criteria and hosting of local-use files), the latter is
786:
No single reference is provided to support any of these simulations, and I claim at least some of them are not correct (see below): the green fluorine, bright blue Md, orange/yellow glow of protactinium/californium (can't have yellow glow in small crystals on a substrate - defies heat dissipation),
1300:
pictures of fluorine, but I have not seen one that is free-licensed. The images-of-elements is the image we have now...it's a reliable source for what one person thinks it might look like without reference to why his representation has factual basis (and it does not seem to match the actual photo
1208:
I do not expect anyone who finds it necessary to pad their argument with an analogy between these images and stick figures to listen to this reasoning, but Artists Impressions are not OR and they most certainly are not fake. They are based on sound scientific observation, and declare openly their
918:
to discuss that subset. In general it serves no encyclopediac purpose to say "it might look like this if you believe some artist's imagination" for an actual real-world entity that nobody has made an actual free picture for. It does a dis-service to readers to suggest that its appearance is more
805:
Uh...the fluorine is under pressure, and francium is meant to be a red vapour (as it would generate so much heat that it would self-boil). You're right about the Pa, Cf and Md though. However, it would then be nice to have a placeholder image going "Element has not been isolated in macroscopic
754:
not correctly illustrate the sample colour (although most are based on reported details with the exception of those that have never been observed in macroscopic quantities), it is not true that the images are being used believing that they correctly illustrate the sample. The images themselves
476:. However, it should be noted that with only one exception, all of these images are also on Commons. Additionally, it should be noted that of those, with only one exception, they are all up for deletion over there. Users are encouraged to participate in the Commons discussion. 1228:
The arguments to delete are relatively speaking, fake, as they are not based on these considerations or any other, and do not declare that they are copies of another argument, or in the aforementioned case, that they are an inaccurate representation.
985:: Fluorine gas, but only as photomontage, because fluorine reacts even with glass. It could look like that (under a high pressure, otherwise fluorine is nearly colorless), before it would corrode the glass and the gas would be used up. 1001:: Of course this is no promethium, but it could look like that: an otherwise typical lanthanoid, which however due to its radioactivity produces quite some heat and therefore on the surface quickly oxidizes to pink Pm 762:. You will notice that it labels those images clearly as "image d'artiste" - artist's impressions. If we properly include a disclaimer that these images are artist's impressions, I don't see any problem. 1442: 329: 132: 1328:
because it appears that these are fakes. It would be better to have real images from reliable sources. And each of the new images should state its reliable source, or be linked to its reliable source
915: 867: 1093:: Decay traces in a spark chamber, not of rutherfordium, but of a pion. This is a completely different, unrelated particle, but the decay of rutherfordium would make streaks there, too. 731:. Although the caption clearly states so, the images are being used believing that they correctly illustrate the sample color. They do not (or at least there is no evidence they do) 649: 1027:: This is no radon, but it could look like that. Radon is said to glow red in discharge tubes, although it practically is never used for this, due to its strong radioactivity. 696: 38: 33: 1478: 1075:: Of course this is no mendelevium, but it could look like that. Chemically similar to Thulium, the highly radioactive heavy metal emits very energetic α-radiation. 602: 1039:: This is no radium, but it could look like that. In a totally inert environment, the otherwise very reactive radium is a silvery, faintly blue luminescent metal. 1260:. Is this web site not considered a reliable source? Does this image appear to agree with the description of flourine? (scroll down to see "yellow" image). ---- 848:(revising vote): however, create placeholder image going "Element has not been isolated in macroscopic quantities." or "No image of this element is available." 1015:: This is no polonium, but it could look like that. A silvery, radioactive metal, producing so much heat that it gets liquid and ionizes the surrounding air. 820:
I don't understand how can density of (free) vapor spatially fluctuate so much (it looks like fume), and how pressure can turn yellow-brown gas into green.
1510: 1051:: Of course this is no protactinium, but it could look like that. A compact chunk of the radioactive heavy metal produces so much heat that it glows red. 168: 1045:: Of course this is no actinium, but it could look like that. A soft, silvery metal, which is reported to glow blue. This is due to its radioactivity. 555: 365: 755:
include captions that show that they are merely artist's impressions. If one thinks that they should go, what are you going to do with stuff like
508: 1514: 914:(note, most of the images in the gallery are actually on commons not en.wp so they are out-of-scope for deletion-discussion here. Instead, 1057:: This is no curium, but it could look like that. Chemically similar to gadolinium, but highly radioactive, the metal produces much heat. 1081:: This is no nobelium, but an illustration. Nobelium can only be made in very small amounts and emits strong radiation of various kinds. 716: 669: 622: 575: 528: 988:
It is possible to show real pure fluorine gas in a long (50-100cm) quartz ampoule. A 100% dry quartz glas ampoule (heated of at : -->
1406: 756: 720: 673: 626: 579: 532: 293: 96: 1203:
can be used here? It is a convention that is about as old as the printing press; the exact phrase gets 5 million hits on Google.
17: 1528: 1498: 1418: 385: 305: 188: 108: 416:
per nom. There are thousands of ways an image could be color-coded, no sense having one with no particular article-purpose.
219:
per nom. There are thousands of ways an image could be color-coded, no sense having one with no particular article-purpose.
1087:: This is no lawrencium, but an illustration. Lawrencium can only be made in very small amounts and emits strong radiation. 1436: 1424: 323: 311: 126: 114: 641: 1412: 1274:
That web site is a personal collection of nice photos. I don't recall seeing who that person is. For fluorine color see
299: 102: 1546: 1382: 1356: 688: 464: 440: 269: 243: 72: 1502: 1430: 1287: 1217: 1212:
Just one point to note - no source has been declared for any of the images (on wikipedia or at the original website).
825: 796: 736: 389: 317: 192: 120: 1243:
The main for me is: it lacks any scientific evidence. Sorry it is simple pure fantasy, for our star treck fans :) --
1069:: This is no californium, but it could look like that. The strong α and neutron emitter produces a considerable heat. 1470: 633: 594: 680: 990: 1462: 1366: 586: 160: 1063:: This is no berkelium, but it could look like that. The highly reactive, silvery metal is a strong β-emitter. 547: 1545:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
1381:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
1355:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
463:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
439:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
357: 268:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
242:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
71:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
1129: 1101: 956: 875: 853: 811: 767: 706: 659: 612: 565: 518: 500: 1532: 1455: 1341: 1310: 1291: 1283: 1269: 1252: 1248: 1238: 1221: 1213: 1191: 1174: 1170: 1147: 1143: 1133: 1105: 960: 928: 900: 879: 857: 829: 821: 815: 800: 792: 771: 740: 732: 485: 425: 407: 342: 228: 210: 152: 145: 56: 539: 1337: 1265: 1234: 1165:
a fake image is a "fake", not others. Pure fantasy. Need we it? I think no, in a true encyclopiedia. --
1121: 492: 1400: 481: 287: 200: 90: 401: 204: 1450: 337: 140: 937: 1524: 1488: 1125: 1097: 952: 871: 849: 807: 763: 397: 375: 349: 253: 178: 1138:
The astatine image wasn't a candidate for a feautered picture. It was only a joke discussion. --
1244: 1187: 1166: 1139: 1375:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below.
1333: 1306: 1261: 1230: 989:= 1000°C) filled with pure and dry fluorine gas and melted closed it. Please read that too: 924: 896: 457:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below.
421: 262:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below.
224: 65:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below.
1395: 866:(changing vote yet again): These images are in use on other wikis too; see my argument on 477: 282: 85: 788: 728: 1447: 334: 137: 1329: 780:: Complete gallery of fake images: (the data being used to generate this images is at 1519: 1279: 1275: 760: 1183: 1302: 920: 892: 417: 220: 1124:
has been nominated for featured picture before on the German Knowledge (XXG)!
1258: 404: 207: 787:
etc. Francium picture is just a joke. This all is a blatant violation of
948:
The rutherfordium image from there is copyrighted, so we can't use it,
916:
commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Fake pictures of chemical elements
868:
commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Fake pictures of chemical elements
781: 1296:
Google-images and youtube have several images that appear to be
1539:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1349:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
433:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
236:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1493: 1482: 1474: 1466: 711: 700: 692: 684: 664: 653: 645: 637: 617: 606: 598: 590: 570: 559: 551: 543: 523: 512: 504: 496: 380: 369: 361: 353: 183: 172: 164: 156: 1385:). No further edits should be made to this section. 467:). No further edits should be made to this section. 272:). No further edits should be made to this section. 75:). No further edits should be made to this section. 1549:). No further edits should be made to this section. 1359:). No further edits should be made to this section. 443:). No further edits should be made to this section. 246:). No further edits should be made to this section. 8: 1511:List of Bakugan: Mechtanium Surge episodes 1515:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content criteria 950:but where's the problem with the others? 933: 37: 29: 1182:they aren't even high quality fakes. 891:out-of-scope for the .en discussion. 7: 806:quantities" if these were deleted. 1390:The result of the discussion was: 472:The result of the discussion was: 277:The result of the discussion was: 80:The result of the discussion was: 24: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Files for deletion 1199:None of you think the expression 936: 757:File:Simulated view of Naiad.jpg 750:. While I agree that the images 634:File:Californium imitation.jpg 1: 1533:20:22, 19 February 2011 (UTC) 1456:06:08, 27 February 2011 (UTC) 1342:07:49, 26 February 2011 (UTC) 1311:16:06, 26 February 2011 (UTC) 1292:07:28, 26 February 2011 (UTC) 1270:07:21, 26 February 2011 (UTC) 1253:23:03, 23 February 2011 (UTC) 1239:01:24, 21 February 2011 (UTC) 1222:01:33, 21 February 2011 (UTC) 1192:17:45, 19 February 2011 (UTC) 1175:11:30, 19 February 2011 (UTC) 1148:11:30, 19 February 2011 (UTC) 1134:08:05, 19 February 2011 (UTC) 1106:08:02, 19 February 2011 (UTC) 961:07:54, 19 February 2011 (UTC) 929:10:08, 20 February 2011 (UTC) 901:13:34, 23 February 2011 (UTC) 880:11:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC) 858:09:47, 19 February 2011 (UTC) 830:09:52, 19 February 2011 (UTC) 816:09:38, 19 February 2011 (UTC) 801:08:33, 19 February 2011 (UTC) 772:07:48, 19 February 2011 (UTC) 741:06:11, 19 February 2011 (UTC) 486:19:00, 26 February 2011 (UTC) 426:02:40, 23 February 2011 (UTC) 408:00:06, 19 February 2011 (UTC) 343:20:13, 26 February 2011 (UTC) 229:02:40, 23 February 2011 (UTC) 211:00:04, 19 February 2011 (UTC) 146:20:13, 26 February 2011 (UTC) 26: 759:? Take a look at this, too: 681:File:Berkelium imitation.jpg 1257:Question - What about this 1566: 1463:File:Mechtanium Surge.PNG 1367:File:Mechtanium Surge.PNG 587:File:Curium imitation.jpg 1542:Please do not modify it. 1378:Please do not modify it. 1352:Please do not modify it. 1201:"Artist's impression of" 460:Please do not modify it. 436:Please do not modify it. 265:Please do not modify it. 239:Please do not modify it. 68:Please do not modify it. 450:Fake chemical elements 396:orphaned, replaced by 199:orphaned, replaced by 201:File:Sulfacytine.svg 153:File:Sulfacytine.png 57:File:Sulfacytine.png 540:File:Lawrencium.jpg 951: 860: 774: 400:, does not follow 398:File:Sulfoxone.svg 350:File:Sulfoxone.png 254:File:Sulfoxone.png 203:, does not follow 1509:Image is used in 1284:Materialscientist 1214:Materialscientist 1122:File:Astatine.jpg 949: 844: 822:Materialscientist 793:Materialscientist 746: 733:Materialscientist 493:File:Nobelium.jpg 47: 46: 1557: 1544: 1496: 1486: 1453: 1446: 1380: 1354: 1120:. It seems that 940: 714: 704: 667: 657: 620: 610: 573: 563: 526: 516: 462: 438: 383: 373: 340: 333: 267: 241: 186: 176: 143: 136: 70: 43: 32: 27: 1565: 1564: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1547:deletion review 1540: 1492: 1461: 1451: 1398: 1383:deletion review 1376: 1370: 1363: 1357:deletion review 1350: 1008: 1004: 944: 941: 710: 679: 663: 632: 616: 585: 569: 538: 522: 491: 465:deletion review 458: 452: 447: 441:deletion review 434: 379: 348: 338: 285: 270:deletion review 263: 257: 250: 244:deletion review 237: 182: 151: 141: 88: 73:deletion review 66: 60: 53: 48: 41: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1563: 1561: 1552: 1551: 1507: 1506: 1487:– uploaded by 1388: 1387: 1371: 1369: 1364: 1362: 1361: 1345: 1344: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1301:others note). 1226: 1225: 1224: 1205: 1204: 1194: 1177: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1095: 1094: 1088: 1082: 1076: 1070: 1064: 1058: 1052: 1046: 1040: 1034: 1028: 1022: 1016: 1010: 1006: 1002: 996: 995: 994: 979: 978: 977: 976: 975: 974: 946: 945: 942: 935: 932: 931: 908: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 883: 882: 861: 841: 840: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 725: 724: 705:– uploaded by 677: 658:– uploaded by 630: 611:– uploaded by 583: 564:– uploaded by 536: 517:– uploaded by 470: 469: 453: 451: 448: 446: 445: 429: 428: 394: 393: 374:– uploaded by 275: 274: 258: 256: 251: 249: 248: 232: 231: 197: 196: 177:– uploaded by 78: 77: 61: 59: 54: 52: 49: 45: 44: 36: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1562: 1550: 1548: 1543: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1521: 1516: 1512: 1504: 1500: 1495: 1490: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1454: 1449: 1444: 1441: 1438: 1435: 1432: 1429: 1426: 1423: 1420: 1417: 1414: 1411: 1408: 1405: 1402: 1397: 1394:; deleted by 1393: 1386: 1384: 1379: 1373: 1372: 1368: 1365: 1360: 1358: 1353: 1347: 1346: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1324: 1323: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1299: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1210: 1207: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1195: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1178: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1161: 1160: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1126:Lanthanum-138 1123: 1119: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1098:Lanthanum-138 1092: 1091:Rutherfordium 1089: 1086: 1083: 1080: 1077: 1074: 1071: 1068: 1065: 1062: 1059: 1056: 1053: 1050: 1047: 1044: 1041: 1038: 1035: 1032: 1029: 1026: 1023: 1020: 1017: 1014: 1011: 1000: 997: 992: 991:real fluorine 987: 986: 984: 981: 980: 972: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 963: 962: 958: 954: 953:Lanthanum-138 943:Rutherfordium 939: 934: 930: 926: 922: 917: 913: 910: 909: 902: 898: 894: 889: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 881: 877: 873: 872:Lanthanum-138 869: 865: 862: 859: 855: 851: 850:Lanthanum-138 847: 843: 842: 831: 827: 823: 819: 818: 817: 813: 809: 808:Lanthanum-138 804: 803: 802: 798: 794: 790: 785: 784: 782: 779: 776: 775: 773: 769: 765: 764:Lanthanum-138 761: 758: 753: 749: 745: 744: 743: 742: 738: 734: 730: 727:Fake image - 722: 718: 713: 708: 707:Lanthanum-138 702: 698: 694: 690: 686: 682: 678: 675: 671: 666: 661: 660:Lanthanum-138 655: 651: 647: 643: 639: 635: 631: 628: 624: 619: 614: 613:Lanthanum-138 608: 604: 600: 596: 592: 588: 584: 581: 577: 572: 567: 566:Lanthanum-138 561: 557: 553: 549: 545: 541: 537: 534: 530: 525: 520: 519:Lanthanum-138 514: 510: 506: 502: 498: 494: 490: 489: 488: 487: 483: 479: 475: 468: 466: 461: 455: 454: 449: 444: 442: 437: 431: 430: 427: 423: 419: 415: 412: 411: 410: 409: 406: 403: 399: 391: 387: 382: 377: 371: 367: 363: 359: 355: 351: 347: 346: 345: 344: 341: 336: 331: 328: 325: 322: 319: 316: 313: 310: 307: 304: 301: 298: 295: 292: 289: 284: 281:; deleted by 280: 273: 271: 266: 260: 259: 255: 252: 247: 245: 240: 234: 233: 230: 226: 222: 218: 215: 214: 213: 212: 209: 206: 202: 194: 190: 185: 180: 174: 170: 166: 162: 158: 154: 150: 149: 148: 147: 144: 139: 134: 131: 128: 125: 122: 119: 116: 113: 110: 107: 104: 101: 98: 95: 92: 87: 84:; deleted by 83: 76: 74: 69: 63: 62: 58: 55: 50: 40: 35: 28: 19: 1541: 1538: 1518: 1508: 1439: 1433: 1427: 1421: 1415: 1409: 1403: 1391: 1389: 1377: 1374: 1351: 1348: 1325: 1297: 1245:Alchemist-hp 1196: 1179: 1167:Alchemist-hp 1162: 1140:Alchemist-hp 1117: 1096: 1090: 1084: 1078: 1072: 1066: 1060: 1054: 1049:Protactinium 1048: 1042: 1036: 1030: 1024: 1018: 1012: 998: 982: 970: 947: 911: 863: 845: 777: 751: 747: 726: 473: 471: 459: 456: 435: 432: 413: 395: 326: 320: 314: 308: 302: 296: 290: 278: 276: 264: 261: 238: 235: 216: 198: 129: 123: 117: 111: 105: 99: 93: 81: 79: 67: 64: 1419:protections 1334:Steve Quinn 1262:Steve Quinn 1231:Anarchangel 1073:Mendelevium 1067:Californium 306:protections 109:protections 51:February 19 39:February 20 34:February 18 1431:page moves 1396:SchuminWeb 1085:Lawrencium 999:Promethium 912:Delete all 478:SchuminWeb 474:delete all 402:WP:MOSCHEM 318:page moves 283:SchuminWeb 205:WP:MOSCHEM 121:page moves 86:SchuminWeb 1448:AnomieBOT 1425:deletions 1061:Berkelium 335:AnomieBOT 312:deletions 138:AnomieBOT 115:deletions 1499:contribs 1489:MegaHL90 1407:contribs 1209:source. 1079:Nobelium 1043:Actinium 1031:Francium 1019:Astatine 1013:Polonium 983:Fluorine 717:contribs 670:contribs 623:contribs 576:contribs 529:contribs 386:contribs 376:Louisajb 294:contribs 189:contribs 179:Louisajb 97:contribs 1503:uploads 1475:history 1332:. ---- 1184:Nergaal 1118:Comment 973:: Info: 971:Comment 778:Comment 721:uploads 693:history 674:uploads 646:history 627:uploads 599:history 580:uploads 552:history 533:uploads 505:history 390:uploads 362:history 193:uploads 165:history 1494:notify 1467:delete 1437:rights 1413:blocks 1392:Delete 1326:Delete 1303:DMacks 1298:actual 1180:Delete 1163:Delete 1055:Curium 1037:Radium 921:DMacks 893:DMacks 846:Delete 712:notify 685:delete 665:notify 638:delete 618:notify 591:delete 571:notify 544:delete 524:notify 497:delete 418:DMacks 414:Delete 381:notify 354:delete 324:rights 300:blocks 279:Delete 221:DMacks 217:Delete 184:notify 157:delete 127:rights 103:blocks 82:Delete 1520:Farix 1479:links 1025:Radon 789:WP:OR 729:WP:OR 697:links 650:links 603:links 556:links 509:links 366:links 169:links 42:: --> 16:< 1483:logs 1471:talk 1401:talk 1338:talk 1330:WP:V 1307:talk 1288:talk 1278:and 1266:talk 1249:talk 1235:talk 1218:talk 1197:Keep 1188:talk 1171:talk 1144:talk 1130:talk 1102:talk 957:talk 925:talk 897:talk 876:talk 864:Keep 854:talk 826:talk 812:talk 797:talk 768:talk 748:Keep 737:talk 701:logs 689:talk 654:logs 642:talk 607:logs 595:talk 560:logs 548:talk 513:logs 501:talk 482:Talk 422:talk 405:Leyo 370:logs 358:talk 288:talk 225:talk 208:Leyo 173:logs 161:talk 91:talk 31:< 1517:. — 1443:RfA 783:.) 752:may 330:RfA 133:RfA 1531:) 1527:| 1505:). 1501:| 1497:| 1481:| 1477:| 1473:| 1469:| 1340:) 1309:) 1290:) 1282:. 1268:) 1251:) 1237:) 1220:) 1190:) 1173:) 1146:) 1132:) 1104:) 959:) 927:) 899:) 878:) 870:. 856:) 828:) 814:) 799:) 791:. 770:) 739:) 719:| 715:| 699:| 695:| 691:| 687:| 672:| 668:| 652:| 648:| 644:| 640:| 625:| 621:| 605:| 601:| 597:| 593:| 578:| 574:| 558:| 554:| 550:| 546:| 531:| 527:| 511:| 507:| 503:| 499:| 484:) 424:) 392:). 388:| 384:| 368:| 364:| 360:| 356:| 227:) 195:). 191:| 187:| 171:| 167:| 163:| 159:| 1529:c 1525:t 1523:( 1491:( 1485:) 1465:( 1452:⚡ 1445:) 1440:· 1434:· 1428:· 1422:· 1416:· 1410:· 1404:· 1399:( 1336:( 1305:( 1286:( 1280:2 1276:1 1264:( 1247:( 1233:( 1216:( 1186:( 1169:( 1142:( 1128:( 1100:( 1009:. 1007:3 1005:O 1003:2 993:. 955:( 923:( 895:( 874:( 852:( 824:( 810:( 795:( 766:( 735:( 723:) 709:( 703:) 683:( 676:) 662:( 656:) 636:( 629:) 615:( 609:) 589:( 582:) 568:( 562:) 542:( 535:) 521:( 515:) 495:( 480:( 420:( 378:( 372:) 352:( 339:⚡ 332:) 327:· 321:· 315:· 309:· 303:· 297:· 291:· 286:( 223:( 181:( 175:) 155:( 142:⚡ 135:) 130:· 124:· 118:· 112:· 106:· 100:· 94:· 89:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Files for deletion
February 18
February 20
File:Sulfacytine.png
deletion review
SchuminWeb
talk
contribs
blocks
protections
deletions
page moves
rights
RfA
AnomieBOT

20:13, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
File:Sulfacytine.png
delete
talk
history
links
logs
Louisajb
notify
contribs
uploads
File:Sulfacytine.svg
WP:MOSCHEM
Leyo

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.