Knowledge

:Fringe theories/Arbitration cases - Knowledge

Source 📝

31: 172:
as an attempt to intimidate editors or further rather than solve a dispute, and the damage to the encyclopedia that is caused by polarization of editors into vociferous opposing camps. Other salient points include that Knowledge articles should not speculate on possible future levels of acceptance of
336:
and IP addresses registered to an organization editing that organization's article or related issues may be subject to additional scrutiny. Church of Scientology IP addresses are subject to immediate blocking, as with open proxies, and SPAs with a clear agenda may be blocked for up to one year. The
276:: Advocacy, unseemly conduct, and inappropriate sourcing are to be avoided. The topic area (broadly construed) is subject to discretionary sanctions. Novel approaches are encouraged to further the creation of high-quality content while minimizing disruption. 284:: Views should be represented according to their prominence in the relevant scholarly community; polarized sources should be replaced with higher quality independent sources rather than "balanced" with equally polarized sources. 62:
process. Most such cases have dealt with limited disruption from a small number of editors, but in a few cases the committee has interpreted policy concerning an entire topic or subtopic. These latter are outlined below.
353: 349: 253: 249: 237: 364:
Longevity is on discretionary sanctions, broadly construed. In this case, membership of a fringe group about a topic area, did not necessarily equate to a conflict of interest with respect to the fringe topic
197: 189: 94: 248:, and fairly weight the authority accorded each view in the relevant scholarly community. Discretionary sanctions may be applied across the topic area (broadly construed) after formal warning; 130:
This case emphasizes that Knowledge should include subjects generally regarded as non-existent by the scientific community when there is significant coverage by other independent sources. Per
113: 225: 356:, those who can't edit a particular article or topic neutrally are encouraged to voluntarily step away and edit other articles. The topic area is under discretionary sanctions. 205: 89:
to prevent disruption in articles related to pseudoscience and fringe science broadly construed. Application of sanctions requires prior formal notification, for instance {{
342: 85:
policy requires in encyclopedic coverage of pseudosciences as opposed to "significant alternatives to scientific orthodoxy". It further encourages administrators to apply
220:, and related articles have been subject to conflict-of-interest editing, inadequate sourcing, and over-reliance on material self-published by the Anthroposophy movement. 268:
is better presented by summarizing quality independent sources than trying to balance polarized sources against each other. The subtopic is subject to article probation.
151: 109: 98: 86: 72: 41: 297: 281: 361: 273: 261: 125: 142:
is also discussed, concluding that if there is a significant sourced viewpoint that a topic is pseudoscience, it is an aid to the reader to so categorize it.
370: 134:, exceptional claims require exceptional sources, and ideas should not be misleadingly characterized as generally accepted. Editing under a 40:. Please help update this Knowledge page to reflect recent events or newly available information. Relevant discussion may be found on 333: 315: 301: 265: 82: 327: 309: 229: 135: 51: 161: 169: 165: 59: 55: 17: 139: 285: 241: 289: 157: 305: 209: 131: 90: 323: 174: 354:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transcendental_Meditation_movement#Editors_reminded
319: 213: 78: 245: 217: 198:
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Neuro-linguistic_programming#Documentation_of_bans
193: 292:
and other unseemly conduct interfere with building comprehensive neutral articles.
192:: Following obsessive and POV editing, inadequate sourcing, and failure to follow 95:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Martinphi-ScienceApologist#Log of notifications
179:
a topic ban means "entirely prohibited from editing articles within the topic".
110:
all articles relating to pseudoscience and fringe science, broadly interpreted
244:. Articles should describe all significant views in accordance with their 337:
topic area (broadly construed) is placed under discretionary sanctions.
99:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience#Log of blocks and bans
350:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transcendental_Meditation_movement
264:: Knowledge is an encyclopedia, not part of an ideological struggle. 97:. Any sanctions applied for continued disruption should be logged at 238:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/September 11 conspiracy theories
177:
exception for disruptive behavior. This case also emphasizes that
196:, the topic area was put under probation. Sanctions to be logged 58:. Arbitration Committee rulings constitute the final step in the 190:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming
93:}}, to be issued by an uninvolved administrator and logged at 25: 240:: Prolonged edit wars are not a valid means of achieving 232:
guideline is especially important in controversial areas.
105: 226:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Attachment Therapy
206:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Waldorf education
77:
This case is the source for the original wording of
343:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change 138:and off-wiki campaigning are treated. The role of 152:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science 81:, as well as clarifying the differences that the 112:." A few old cases were modified to use the new 73:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience 324:philosophical, ideological or religious dispute 288:is not part of the consensus-building process. 298:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Scientology 282:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Cold fusion 362:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Longevity 274:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Homeopathy 262:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Prem Rawat 126:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Paranormal 8: 371:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/COVID-19 332:Factional editing is likewise prohibited. 108:extended the discretionary sanctions to " 54:heard in the topic area covered by the 254:Log of blocks, bans, and restrictions 7: 314:Use of the encyclopedia to advance 24: 173:fringe theories, and there is no 114:standard discretionary sanctions 36:This Knowledge page needs to be 29: 1: 160:and suppression, patterns of 50:There have been a number of 326:– or to publish or promote 387: 149: 123: 70: 312:can enhance content, but 308:. Careful editing with a 56:Fringe theories guideline 18:Knowledge:Fringe theories 334:Single purpose accounts 87:discretionary sanctions 320:advocacy or propaganda 168:editing, the abuse of 302:Neutral point of view 266:Neutral point of view 83:Neutral point of view 310:conflict of interest 250:Log of notifications 230:Conflict of Interest 136:conflict of interest 170:dispute resolution 60:dispute resolution 328:original research 210:Waldorf education 156:This case covers 52:Arbitration cases 48: 47: 378: 316:personal agendas 33: 32: 26: 386: 385: 381: 380: 379: 377: 376: 375: 306:is not optional 186: 154: 148: 128: 122: 75: 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 384: 382: 374: 373: 367: 366: 358: 357: 346: 345: 339: 338: 330:is prohibited. 294: 293: 278: 277: 270: 269: 258: 257: 234: 233: 222: 221: 214:Rudolf Steiner 202: 201: 185: 182: 147: 146:Fringe science 144: 140:categorization 121: 118: 91:subst:Ds/alert 68: 65: 46: 45: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 383: 372: 369: 368: 363: 360: 359: 355: 351: 348: 347: 344: 341: 340: 335: 331: 329: 325: 321: 317: 311: 307: 303: 299: 296: 295: 291: 287: 283: 280: 279: 275: 272: 271: 267: 263: 260: 259: 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 236: 235: 231: 227: 224: 223: 219: 218:Anthroposophy 215: 211: 207: 204: 203: 199: 195: 191: 188: 187: 183: 181: 180: 176: 171: 167: 163: 159: 153: 145: 143: 141: 137: 133: 127: 119: 117: 115: 111: 107: 102: 100: 96: 92: 88: 84: 80: 74: 67:Pseudoscience 66: 64: 61: 57: 53: 43: 42:the talk page 39: 35: 28: 27: 19: 313: 286:Edit warring 178: 155: 129: 103: 76: 49: 37: 162:tendentious 150:Main page: 124:Main page: 104:In 2012, a 71:Main page: 318:– such as 246:prominence 184:Sub-topics 166:disruptive 132:WP:REDFLAG 120:Paranormal 242:consensus 290:Advocacy 175:WP:TRUTH 158:advocacy 304:policy 79:WP:PSCI 38:updated 300:: The 228:: The 194:WP:ASF 106:motion 365:area. 352:From 16:< 322:and 164:and 252:, 216:, 212:, 208:: 116:. 101:. 256:. 200:. 44:.

Index

Knowledge:Fringe theories
the talk page
Arbitration cases
Fringe theories guideline
dispute resolution
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience
WP:PSCI
Neutral point of view
discretionary sanctions
subst:Ds/alert
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Martinphi-ScienceApologist#Log of notifications
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience#Log of blocks and bans
motion
all articles relating to pseudoscience and fringe science, broadly interpreted
standard discretionary sanctions
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Paranormal
WP:REDFLAG
conflict of interest
categorization
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science
advocacy
tendentious
disruptive
dispute resolution
WP:TRUTH
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming
WP:ASF
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Neuro-linguistic_programming#Documentation_of_bans
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Waldorf education
Waldorf education

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.