78:
21:
116:
This is not intended to apply to all administrators. Only those administrators who specifically commit to make themselves recallable though this process are subject to it; however, this commitment can not be revoked. Future administrators who agree to stand for adminship under these terms and
112:
ruling or
Walesian intervention can an editor's adminiship away. Sometimes people will go so far as to say, "I would support this candidate if only recall were binding." It is doubtless that many people have thought before that they would be more willing to give some candidates access to
113:
administrative tools if only there were an easier way to take them away if they use them poorly. This proposed policy intends to put teeth behind the idea of administrator recall, by outlining a process for recall that future administrators can promise to follow if they so choose.
120:
Bureaucrats would be charged with determining community consensus to demote. If a bureaucrat finds that consensus to demote exists, they will post a request for the editor to be desysoped on meta permissions.
39:
117:
current administrators who choose to enter this system voluntarily will forever be bound by the recall policy unless they stand again for RfA without any recall restrictions.
101:
87:
167:
43:
28:
149:", as RfAs are displayed under "Current nominations for adminship" and RfBs are displayed under "Current nominations for bureaucratship"
137:
105:
38:
for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use
124:
Details of the recall process are important and likely subject to much debate. Here are some starting points:
35:
52:
94:
will set the terms of their own recall, and this proposed policy is not intended to supersede that.
109:
161:
108:. Some feel that it's a red herring, since, once sysoped, little short of
128:
Requests for recall must be sponsored by 5 registered users (petitioners)
91:
131:
At least one of the petitioners must be an administrator/sysop.
72:
15:
145:
Petitions shall be displayed under a new section called "
60:
102:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) administrators open to recall
88:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) administrators open to recall
142:Petitions shall be opened for a minimum 1 week
8:
138:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship
106:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for Adminship
7:
136:Recall petitions shall be held on
14:
168:Knowledge (XXG) failed proposals
76:
19:
147:Current nominations for recall
1:
100:People frequently ask about
184:
50:
83:Please note that this is
42:or initiate a thread at
110:Arbitration committee
90:. Administrators in
104:in discussions on
98:
97:
71:
70:
175:
80:
79:
73:
63:
44:the village pump
23:
22:
16:
183:
182:
178:
177:
176:
174:
173:
172:
158:
157:
77:
67:
66:
59:
55:
47:
20:
12:
11:
5:
181:
179:
171:
170:
160:
159:
156:
155:
152:
151:
150:
143:
134:
133:
132:
96:
95:
81:
69:
68:
65:
64:
56:
51:
48:
34:
33:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
180:
169:
166:
165:
163:
153:
148:
144:
141:
140:
139:
135:
130:
129:
127:
126:
125:
122:
118:
114:
111:
107:
103:
93:
89:
86:
82:
75:
74:
62:
58:
57:
54:
49:
45:
41:
40:the talk page
37:
32:
30:
25:
18:
17:
146:
123:
119:
115:
99:
84:
26:
27:This is a
36:Consensus
31:proposal.
162:Category
92:CAT:AOTR
61:WP:FUBAR
53:Shortcut
29:failed
154:...
85:not
164::
46:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.