631:
reviewer. Review timeframes vary from one nomination to the next, but a responsive nominator and reviewer can complete a review in about seven days. A reviewer may put the review "on hold" for about seven days to allow you time to fix any issues that may arise (reviewers may shorten/extend the time limit if they wish). If a review stalls or there is disagreement over interpretation of the good article criteria, you may want to consider allowing the review to fail, then renominating the article (to get a different reviewer). Or, you may try asking the nominator to
1136:
253:. If you are not a significant contributor to the article, secure the consent of the significant contributors before nominating. The reviewer will be making suggestions to improve the article to GA quality during the review process; therefore, the review will require your involvement as a nominator. Before nominating an article, ensure that you will be able to respond to these comments in a timely manner.
112:
1345:
966:
196:
1256:
684:
parameter from "status=onreview" or "status=onhold" to the blank setting "status=". You may also remove the transclusion of the former GA review from the article talk page if you wish, but this is not essential. Save the page. A bot will reset the nomination in its same position in the queue on the
941:
Review timeframes vary from one nomination to the next, but a responsive nominator and reviewer can complete a review in about seven days. Depending on the responsiveness of the nominator, you may decide to put the review "on hold" for about seven days to allow time for issues to be fixed. You may
665:
A reviewer who starts a review has committed to complete it in a timely manner, but in rare occasions a reviewer withdraws due to illness or other reasons. In such cases, the first step would be to contact the reviewer. If this does not resolve the issue, then a new reviewer is needed. In order to
630:
You are expected to respond to the reviewer's suggestions to improve the article to GA quality in a timely manner (if you absolutely cannot, make sure another editor can). Other editors are also welcome to comment and work on the article, but the final decision on listing will be with the first
715:
At the end of the review, the reviewer will either pass or fail the article. If your nomination has failed, you can take the reviewer's suggestions into account and renominate the article. If you believe that you did not receive an adequate review, you may ask for additional input on the
1238:
Be sure the review page specifies what needed to be done to the article for it to meet the good article criteria. Your review may also include a personal note of encouragement for the nominator, urging them to renominate the article once the problems have been
186:
and be familiar with its subject and cited sources. Reviewers have the discretion to remove any drive-by nominations they come across. The nomination may be reviewed by any registered user who has not contributed significantly to the article.
832:
Remember: Once you start a review, you are committing to complete it in a timely manner. Do not stop half way through and just leave it. Consider reviewing only one or two articles at a time and plan to wrap up your review in about seven
926:
If the article is considered only partially compliant or non-compliant with the good article criteria, provide a review on the review page detailing what criteria it does not meet and state what is needed to bring the article up to
1494:
If the nominator is either the author of less than 10% of the article or ranked sixth or lower in authorship, and there is no post on the article talk page, it may be uncontroversially considered a drive-by nomination. You can
555:
Depending on the size of the backlog, there may be a delay of many months before someone picks up the review. Conversely, it may only take a few days. If you are willing to do a review yourself, you can add your nomination to
937:
Often the nomination is brought up to standard during the review. If so, note this on the review page and close the review as a "pass". If not, close it as a "fail". You may also make suggestions for further improvements, if
915:
a spot-check of a sample of the sources in the article to verify that each source supports the text in the article that it covers, and that no copyrighted material has been added to the article from the
871:
If you are in a situation where you absolutely cannot continue to review the article, please contact the nominator. Consider helping them find a new reviewer. If necessary, leave a note on the
491:
If it fits under more than one category, choose the one that best fits. If it doesn't fit under any of the above categories, leave the field blank. The nomination will then be placed in the
840:
page that you would like to review. Please note that if someone else has started a review, you may add comments to the review page, but the review should be closed by the first reviewer.
1284:
if a few issues are fixed and you wish to prescribe an amount of time for these issues to be corrected (generally seven days), you may put the article on hold by doing the following:
66:
849:
link appearing on the GA nominations page or near the top of the article talk page. A new GA review page will be created. You may add opening remarks, an initial review, or one of
919:
If the article is considered fully compliant with the good article criteria, provide a review on the review page justifying that decision and "pass" the nomination. You may use
827:
Not be the nominator nor have made significant contributions to the article prior to the review—opening your own review is not allowed and will delay the article's review.
1199:
1036:
767:
1112:
Be sure the review page justifies how the article meets the good article criteria. Your review may also include a personal note of congratulations for the nominator.
947:
Using a review template is not a requirement; it is simply a way to help keep the review organized. If this is your first review, it is beneficial to ask one of the
500:
Save the page. A bot will add the nomination to the GA nominations page under the chosen subtopic heading to indicate that the article is ready to be reviewed.
920:
850:
604:
template from the article talk page. To withdraw a nomination after the review has begun, let the reviewer know; the reviewer will then fail the nomination.
723:
If the article has been promoted to good article status, consider submitting an interesting fact from the article within seven days to be featured on the
1202:; the template automatically converts GA nominee subtopics into GA topics. The page parameter should be the number of the review subpage; that is, the
1039:; the template automatically converts GA nominee subtopics into GA topics. The page parameter should be the number of the review subpage; that is, the
1474:
101:
1462:
1412:
1333:
1244:
1124:
1512:
872:
791:
717:
636:
87:
557:
508:
80:
1099:
Save the page. A bot will add the good article icon to the article, will remove the nomination from the GA nominations page, and will use
856:
Save the page. A bot will update the nomination on the GA nominations page to indicate that the article is being reviewed, and will use
94:
948:
837:
250:
168:
59:
17:
1090:
787:
763:
73:
560:. Do not start the review page yourself, as this may lead other reviewers to believe that your nomination is already under review.
762:. These are the standards an article must meet in order to be granted good article status. It is also suggested that you read the
1315:
Save the page. A bot will update the nomination on the GA nominations page to indicate that the article is on hold, and will use
1370:
1281:
1161:
998:
904:
759:
246:
172:
45:
1109:
to let the nominator know that the article has passed. Do not add the icon manually unless the bot fails to function properly.
1470:
685:
GA nominations page. If the reviewer has not made any comments other than opening the review, it may be better to request a
1404:
Save the page. A bot will update the nomination on the GA nominations page to indicate that a second opinion is requested.
1469:
Do not close a review started by another reviewer without first attempting to contact the first reviewer. While there is
758:
Thank you for deciding to review an article for GA. Before starting a review, you should familiarize yourself with the
1454:
Save the page. A bot will update the nomination on the GA nominations page to remove the request for a second opinion.
1511:
If you have any questions regarding anything on this page or good articles in general, please leave a message at the
1198:
number of the review by copying both parameter values from the replaced template. (The topic parameter refers to the
1035:
number of the review by copying both parameter values from the replaced template. (The topic parameter refers to the
1328:
Be sure the review page specifies what needs to be done to the article for it to meet the good article criteria.
1116:
517:. Helping to review articles will help the Knowledge community by cutting down the backlog as a way to help
176:
38:
111:
1496:
1373:, you may call for another reviewer or subject expert to provide a second opinion by doing the following:
526:
790:
are available to help you during your review. If you need further clarification, post a question at the
1080:
1066:
1446:
1431:
1396:
1381:
1307:
1292:
1172:
1009:
930:
In the case of a marginally non-compliant nomination, if the problems are easy to resolve, you may
670:
598:
583:
574:
942:
also ask for a second opinion. See below for how to pass, fail, hold, or ask for a second opinion.
588:. Save the page. A bot will update the nomination on the GA nominations page to display the note.
1352:
1263:
1143:
973:
885:
803:
741:
698:
648:
613:
538:
262:
208:
120:
297:
parameter, add one of the following 30 subtopic sections headers that best defines the article:
179:(GA). Instructions for both the nominator and the reviewer of the article are provided below.
1319:
1229:
1182:
1103:
931:
860:
249:
and make any improvements that you think are necessary. More information may be found at the
1225:
Save the page. A bot will remove the nomination from the GA nominations page and will use
1457:
Be sure the review page provides the requested second opinion and any other assistance.
775:
518:
230:
1059:
parameter with the revision number for the current revision at the time of promotion.
783:
724:
238:
1407:
Be sure the review page specifies in what way you are looking for a second opinion.
1344:
1222:
parameter with the revision number for the current revision at the time of failure.
965:
771:
686:
513:
284:
226:
1135:
1019:
779:
242:
234:
586:|...|note=I might not be able to respond to the review until next week. ~~~~}}
23:
290:
to the top of the article talk page. Do not place it inside another template.
195:
183:
1255:
1423:
Your call for a second opinion may be answered by doing the following:
1473:, keep in mind that protracted reviews show up as exceptions on the
594:: To withdraw a nomination before the review has begun, remove the
911:. An in-depth review must be provided in all other cases. This
903:
Read the whole article. Understand its sources. Based on the
866:
to let the nominator know that the article is being reviewed.
1343:
1254:
1134:
964:
676:
template on the article talk page as follows: Increment the
507:
two nominations for each one that you nominate or joining a
194:
110:
1190:
The five tildes supply the date of the review. Fill in the
1027:
The five tildes supply the date of the review. Fill in the
680:
parameter (e.g. from "page=1" to "page=2"), and change the
1360:
1271:
1151:
988:
981:
893:
811:
749:
706:
656:
621:
546:
270:
216:
142:
135:
128:
1325:
to let the nominator know that the article is on hold.
1235:
to let the nominator know that the article has failed.
1160:
If you determine that the article does not meet the
1072:templates on the article talk page by changing the
1096:add the parameter described only to that template.
566:: To leave a note related to the review, edit the
1280:If you determine that the article could meet the
824:Be a registered user—make sure you are logged in.
1437:template on the article talk page, changing the
1387:template on the article talk page, changing the
1298:template on the article talk page, changing the
632:
1465:can perform most of these steps automatically.
1415:can perform most of these steps automatically.
1369:If you are unsure whether an article meets the
1336:can perform most of these steps automatically.
1247:can perform most of these steps automatically.
1127:can perform most of these steps automatically.
635:. Otherwise, you may ask for assistance at the
529:can perform most of these steps automatically.
736:Step 1: Familiarize yourself with the criteria
8:
997:If you determine that the article meets the
689:deletion of the review page and start over.
1164:, you may fail it by doing the following:
1001:, you may pass it by doing the following:
907:, determine whether the article should be
923:to help organize your review if you wish.
155:explaining, step-by-step, exactly how to
1218:– a number only; no letters.) Fill the
1055:– a number only; no letters.) Fill the
184:contributed significantly to the article
1487:
1178:template on the article talk page with
1015:template on the article talk page with
580:on the article talk page. For example:
1438:
1388:
1299:
1219:
1195:
1191:
1073:
1056:
1032:
1028:
774:as expected of any article, including
768:what the good article criteria are not
681:
677:
567:
294:
229:as expected of any article, including
245:. Then check the article against the
7:
643:Step 4a: If a review seems abandoned
32:
853:to the bottom of this review page.
843:Start the review by following the
608:Step 4: What to do during a review
251:guide for nominating good articles
31:
18:Knowledge:Good article nominations
772:Knowledge policies and guidelines
764:guide for reviewing good articles
427:Culture, sociology and psychology
227:Knowledge policies and guidelines
1391:parameter to "2ndopinion", as in
1076:parameter value to "GA", as in
820:To review an article you must:
564:Leaving a note for the reviewer
403:Chemistry and materials science
157:
1441:parameter to "onreview", as in
873:GA nominations discussion page
718:GA nominations discussion page
504:
451:Magazines and print journalism
355:Mathematics and mathematicians
343:Royalty, nobility and heraldry
257:Step 2: Nominating the article
225:Ensure that the article meets
163:
1:
1086:. If they are grouped inside
880:Step 3: Reviewing the article
1302:parameter to "onhold", as in
1185:|~~~~~|topic=|page=|oldid=}}
1022:|~~~~~|topic=|page=|oldid=}}
956:Step 4: Finishing the review
1340:Asking for a second opinion
1251:Putting the article on hold
1119:in the appropriate section.
836:Choose an article from the
770:. Ensure all articles meet
301:Agriculture, food and drink
203:Step 1: Prepare the article
1529:
1419:Answering a second opinion
1350:
1261:
1141:
971:
883:
801:
739:
727:section on the main page.
696:
646:
611:
536:
260:
206:
118:
67:October 2024 Backlog Drive
1513:GA nominations discussion
798:Step 2: Starting a review
792:GA nominations discussion
637:GA nominations discussion
313:Computing and engineering
1399:|...|status=2ndopinion}}
1091:WikiProject banner shell
693:Step 5: After the review
633:ask for a second opinion
175:so that it may become a
115:Good article nominations
1200:topic values found here
1117:Knowledge:Good articles
1037:topic values found here
951:to look at your review.
558:the review circles page
457:Politics and government
421:Philosophy and religion
349:Language and literature
171:(GAN) according to the
169:good article nomination
1449:|...|status=onreview}}
1348:
1259:
1139:
969:
934:and fix them yourself.
511:. This does not imply
439:Economics and business
199:
116:
1475:GA nominations report
1371:good article criteria
1347:
1282:good article criteria
1258:
1162:good article criteria
1138:
999:good article criteria
968:
905:good article criteria
776:neutral point of view
760:good article criteria
503:(Optional): Consider
415:Physics and astronomy
247:good article criteria
231:neutral point of view
198:
182:Nominators must have
173:good article criteria
114:
1497:notify the nominator
1310:|...|status=onhold}}
1115:List the article at
949:good article mentors
788:Good article mentors
784:no original research
397:Biology and medicine
307:Art and architecture
239:no original research
1499:on their talk page.
666:find one, edit the
1349:
1260:
1140:
970:
200:
117:
109:
108:
22:(Redirected from
1520:
1500:
1492:
1461:The user script
1450:
1440:
1436:
1430:
1411:The user script
1400:
1390:
1386:
1380:
1363:
1332:The user script
1324:
1318:
1311:
1301:
1297:
1291:
1274:
1243:The user script
1234:
1228:
1221:
1217:
1197:
1193:
1186:
1177:
1171:
1154:
1123:The user script
1108:
1102:
1095:
1089:
1084:
1075:
1071:
1065:
1058:
1054:
1034:
1030:
1023:
1014:
1008:
991:
984:
896:
865:
859:
847:
814:
766:and an essay on
752:
725:Did You Know...?
709:
683:
679:
675:
669:
659:
624:
603:
597:
587:
579:
573:
569:
549:
525:The user script
296:
288:
273:
219:
145:
138:
131:
33:
27:
1528:
1527:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1509:
1504:
1503:
1493:
1489:
1484:
1444:
1434:
1428:
1421:
1394:
1384:
1378:
1367:
1366:
1359:
1355:
1342:
1322:
1316:
1305:
1295:
1289:
1278:
1277:
1270:
1266:
1253:
1232:
1226:
1207:
1180:
1175:
1169:
1158:
1157:
1150:
1146:
1133:
1106:
1100:
1093:
1087:
1083:|...|class=GA}}
1078:
1069:
1063:
1044:
1017:
1012:
1006:
995:
994:
987:
980:
976:
963:
958:
921:these templates
900:
899:
892:
888:
882:
863:
857:
851:these templates
845:
818:
817:
810:
806:
800:
756:
755:
748:
744:
738:
733:
713:
712:
705:
701:
695:
673:
667:
663:
662:
655:
651:
645:
628:
627:
620:
616:
610:
601:
595:
581:
577:
571:
553:
552:
545:
541:
535:
533:Step 3: Waiting
373:Media and drama
282:
277:
276:
269:
265:
259:
223:
222:
215:
211:
205:
193:
149:
148:
141:
134:
127:
123:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1526:
1524:
1508:
1505:
1502:
1501:
1486:
1485:
1483:
1480:
1459:
1458:
1455:
1452:
1442:
1420:
1417:
1409:
1408:
1405:
1402:
1392:
1365:
1364:
1356:
1351:
1341:
1338:
1330:
1329:
1326:
1313:
1303:
1276:
1275:
1267:
1262:
1252:
1249:
1241:
1240:
1236:
1223:
1188:
1156:
1155:
1147:
1142:
1132:
1129:
1121:
1120:
1113:
1110:
1097:
1060:
1025:
993:
992:
985:
977:
972:
962:
959:
957:
954:
944:
943:
939:
935:
928:
924:
917:
898:
897:
889:
884:
881:
878:
868:
867:
854:
841:
838:GA nominations
834:
829:
828:
825:
816:
815:
807:
802:
799:
796:
754:
753:
745:
740:
737:
734:
732:
729:
711:
710:
702:
697:
694:
691:
661:
660:
652:
647:
644:
641:
626:
625:
617:
612:
609:
606:
551:
550:
542:
537:
534:
531:
523:
522:
519:pay it forward
501:
498:
497:
496:
489:
409:Earth sciences
291:
275:
274:
266:
261:
258:
255:
221:
220:
212:
207:
204:
201:
192:
189:
151:These are the
147:
146:
139:
132:
124:
119:
107:
106:
104:
99:
97:
92:
90:
85:
83:
81:Review circles
78:
76:
71:
69:
64:
62:
57:
55:
50:
48:
43:
41:
36:
30:
24:Knowledge:GA/I
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1525:
1516:
1514:
1506:
1498:
1491:
1488:
1481:
1479:
1478:
1476:
1472:
1466:
1464:
1463:GANReviewTool
1456:
1453:
1451:
1448:
1433:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1418:
1416:
1414:
1413:GANReviewTool
1406:
1403:
1401:
1398:
1383:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1372:
1362:
1358:
1357:
1354:
1346:
1339:
1337:
1335:
1334:GANReviewTool
1327:
1321:
1314:
1312:
1309:
1294:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1283:
1273:
1272:WP:GAN/I#HOLD
1269:
1268:
1265:
1257:
1250:
1248:
1246:
1245:GANReviewTool
1237:
1231:
1224:
1215:
1211:
1205:
1201:
1189:
1187:
1184:
1174:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1163:
1153:
1152:WP:GAN/I#FAIL
1149:
1148:
1145:
1137:
1130:
1128:
1126:
1125:GANReviewTool
1118:
1114:
1111:
1105:
1098:
1092:
1085:
1082:
1068:
1061:
1052:
1048:
1042:
1038:
1026:
1024:
1021:
1011:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1000:
990:
989:WP:GAN/I#PASS
986:
983:
979:
978:
975:
967:
960:
955:
953:
952:
950:
940:
936:
933:
929:
925:
922:
918:
914:
910:
906:
902:
901:
895:
891:
890:
887:
879:
877:
876:
874:
862:
855:
852:
848:
842:
839:
835:
831:
830:
826:
823:
822:
821:
813:
809:
808:
805:
797:
795:
793:
789:
785:
781:
780:verifiability
777:
773:
769:
765:
761:
751:
747:
746:
743:
735:
730:
728:
726:
721:
719:
708:
704:
703:
700:
692:
690:
688:
672:
658:
654:
653:
650:
642:
640:
638:
634:
623:
619:
618:
615:
607:
605:
600:
593:
589:
585:
576:
570:parameter of
565:
561:
559:
548:
544:
543:
540:
532:
530:
528:
520:
516:
515:
510:
509:review circle
506:
502:
499:
494:
493:Miscellaneous
490:
488:
485:
482:
479:
476:
473:
470:
467:
464:
461:
458:
455:
452:
449:
446:
443:
440:
437:
434:
431:
428:
425:
422:
419:
416:
413:
410:
407:
404:
401:
398:
395:
392:
389:
386:
383:
380:
377:
374:
371:
368:
365:
362:
359:
356:
353:
350:
347:
344:
341:
338:
337:World history
335:
332:
329:
326:
323:
320:
317:
314:
311:
308:
305:
302:
299:
298:
292:
289:
286:
279:
278:
272:
268:
267:
264:
256:
254:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
235:verifiability
232:
228:
218:
214:
213:
210:
202:
197:
190:
188:
185:
180:
178:
174:
170:
166:
165:
160:
159:
154:
144:
140:
137:
133:
130:
126:
125:
122:
113:
105:
103:
100:
98:
96:
93:
91:
89:
86:
84:
82:
79:
77:
75:
72:
70:
68:
65:
63:
61:
58:
56:
54:
51:
49:
47:
44:
42:
40:
37:
35:
34:
25:
19:
1510:
1490:
1468:
1467:
1460:
1443:
1422:
1410:
1393:
1368:
1331:
1304:
1279:
1242:
1213:
1209:
1203:
1179:
1168:Replace the
1159:
1122:
1077:
1050:
1046:
1040:
1016:
1005:Replace the
996:
946:
945:
938:appropriate.
913:must include
912:
909:quick failed
908:
870:
869:
846:start review
844:
819:
757:
722:
714:
664:
657:WP:GAN/I#N4a
629:
591:
590:
563:
562:
554:
524:
514:quid pro quo
512:
492:
486:
483:
480:
477:
474:
471:
468:
465:
462:
459:
456:
453:
450:
447:
444:
441:
438:
435:
432:
429:
426:
423:
420:
417:
414:
411:
408:
405:
402:
399:
396:
393:
390:
387:
384:
381:
378:
375:
372:
369:
366:
363:
360:
357:
354:
351:
348:
345:
342:
339:
336:
333:
330:
327:
324:
321:
318:
315:
312:
309:
306:
303:
300:
287:|subtopic=}}
281:
224:
181:
177:good article
162:
156:
153:instructions
152:
150:
95:Reassessment
53:Instructions
52:
1471:no deadline
1361:WP:GAN/I#2O
1210:ArticleName
1081:WikiProject
1067:WikiProject
1062:Update any
1047:ArticleName
982:WP:GAN/I#R4
894:WP:GAN/I#R3
812:WP:GAN/I#R2
750:WP:GAN/I#R1
707:WP:GAN/I#N5
622:WP:GAN/I#N4
592:Withdrawing
547:WP:GAN/I#N3
481:Video games
271:WP:GAN/I#N2
217:WP:GAN/I#N1
60:Nominations
1507:Questions?
1447:GA nominee
1432:GA nominee
1397:GA nominee
1382:GA nominee
1308:GA nominee
1293:GA nominee
1239:addressed.
1173:GA nominee
1010:GA nominee
671:GA nominee
599:GA nominee
584:GA nominee
575:GA nominee
527:GAN-helper
475:Recreation
367:Television
295:|subtopic=
243:notability
191:Nominating
88:Discussion
74:Mentorship
1427:Edit the
1377:Edit the
1288:Edit the
974:Shortcuts
927:standard.
731:Reviewing
505:reviewing
433:Education
325:Geography
319:Transport
285:subst:GAN
121:Shortcuts
1439:|status=
1389:|status=
1353:Shortcut
1320:GANotice
1300:|status=
1264:Shortcut
1230:GANotice
1183:FailedGA
1144:Shortcut
1104:GANotice
886:Shortcut
861:GANotice
804:Shortcut
742:Shortcut
699:Shortcut
682:|status=
649:Shortcut
614:Shortcut
539:Shortcut
495:section.
463:Football
293:For the
263:Shortcut
209:Shortcut
158:nominate
129:WP:GAN/I
46:Criteria
1220:|oldid=
1208:{{Talk:
1192:|topic=
1131:Failing
1074:|class=
1057:|oldid=
1045:{{Talk:
1029:|topic=
961:Passing
932:be bold
916:source.
487:Warfare
136:WP:GANI
1515:page.
1196:|page=
1033:|page=
794:page.
782:, and
678:|page=
639:page.
568:|note=
469:Sports
379:Albums
331:Places
280:Paste
241:, and
164:review
143:WP:GAI
102:Report
1482:Notes
1477:page.
833:days.
391:Music
385:Songs
16:<
1194:and
1031:and
361:Film
161:and
39:Main
1212:/GA
1206:in
1049:/GA
1043:in
445:Law
1445:{{
1435:}}
1429:{{
1395:{{
1385:}}
1379:{{
1323:}}
1317:{{
1306:{{
1296:}}
1290:{{
1233:}}
1227:{{
1216:}}
1181:{{
1176:}}
1170:{{
1107:}}
1101:{{
1094:}}
1088:{{
1079:{{
1070:}}
1064:{{
1053:}}
1020:GA
1018:{{
1013:}}
1007:{{
864:}}
858:{{
786:.
778:,
720:.
687:G6
674:}}
668:{{
602:}}
596:{{
582:{{
578:}}
572:{{
283:{{
237:,
233:,
167:a
1214:n
1204:n
1051:n
1041:n
875:.
521:.
484:·
478:·
472:·
466:·
460:·
454:·
448:·
442:·
436:·
430:·
424:·
418:·
412:·
406:·
400:·
394:·
388:·
382:·
376:·
370:·
364:·
358:·
352:·
346:·
340:·
334:·
328:·
322:·
316:·
310:·
304:·
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
