3052:. That is true. However, citations should be formatted consistently, and a plain external link is not enough: cite templates are one way to achieve such consistency. Another issue is that the article may need a copyedit. It is easy for the prose to become bloated and tortuous when multiple editors revise content. I've trimmed the legacy section, but I'm not ready to support listing until a couple of reviewers with copyediting experience have given the article a once-over. I could be one of them.
2651:"First" and "last" is for the writter of the source, eg Ben Shepard. "URL" is the link. "Title" is the name of the story. "Publisher" eg BBC, Fox news, Reuters. "Date" is when the source was made. "Accessdate" is todays date, the date you read the link. This is just to clarify if you have any confusions. You must fill each block if the info is available, if the info isnt available for a particular source delete the empty blocks as they take up unnessary space. Any confusion just ask. Cheers. —
1586:. My first instinct on seeing this article was that it could be saved, and was probably worth saving as a GA. If I had more time I would have made a small attempt myself by removing unsourced and digressive material so the article remained broad yet focused and verifiable, hence good enough to be a GA, if not perfect. (I didn't have time, but at least I removed the Camilla ref!)
3491:. The length of this discussion is partly my fault for thinking this article could easily be saved. That has proved not to be the case. I read through the article again today and it has multiple problems. The lead is weak, too short, fails to summarize the article, and wastes its energy listing albums. The prose is poor in many places: for instance "
677:. While I don't concur with all of Realist's points, it's obvious that the article is deficient. There are several citation request tags. Some sources are less than stellar. Several sections, such as "Legacy", are underdeveloped, while the "Influence on Taxonomy" section should be removed. And yes, the lead is a tad on the bulky side.
3298:
need a minimal degree of formatting, more info on the new album is needed, pov issue need resolving & favourably obsessed fans should be banned from the article until they learn what a reliable source is. Ive seen how the editers on the article behave and im quite sure we will be back here in another four months. —
3654:
I still see plenty of problems: I encourage you to read through the references yourself. I understand about the various dates. Part of the problem is that cite news and cite web format differently (which is stupid, but nevermind) so if you want to use cite news at all, you have to use it consistently
3297:
Agree with Giggy, infact ive had this article on my watchlist for 3 weeks now, monitering EVERY edit. There hasnt been a single instance of vandalism.... unless you count fan gush and cruft as vandalism? Popularity should have nothing to do with it. Fundamentally the article needs a copyedit, sources
1517:
Ive replied to my comments above, i feel hat some parts that have been marked as DONE are not sufficent. There are still insufficient sources, lack of source formatting. Lengh is still a concern but i think that will come along as this process reaches a conclusion. The articles still does not satisfy
853:
comment: I've re-added the overview of her filmography, the article cannot be considered comprehensive without and overview of her film career. Also, although the lead has been shortened, the ave length of a
Featured article is 60 kilos. The overall size of the article still needs to be trimmed down.
3454:
Well only one, maybe two, people have said "keep", the vast majority have said "delist". Work on the article has slowed to about 4 edits a day and only picks up again when editers are worried we are about to close the reassessment, then we keep it open and the level of work slows down. This is not a
3063:
Im still concerned about formatting, either needs to be a basic level of neatness weither it be through templates or some other method. The article needs a copy edit and the new album details need updating. We still need to actually read the sources and ensure the source backs up the claim, its been
1845:
comment: The PETA stuff should be moved within the biography. Once that is done, two paragraphs wont warrant a full section to criticism. Those two paragraphs can rightfully be merged into the "Legacy" section. Being a controversial artist, is in fact, a big aspect of
Madonna's legacy as a recording
1791:
Please remove repetition, a lot of the criticism section is already repeated in other areas. Infact the only aspect of the criticism section that is new is the animal fur part. Almost ALL of it is already elsewhere in the article. Please consider adding the fur comments to their chronological place
3366:
Im not so sure they have kept it encyclopedic, like I said I monitered the article. I put about 80 fact tags in the article, a slim majority of the content was simply deleted to avoid having to source. A lot of which seemed like legitimately worthwhile material for the article. To save the article
3329:
May was the third highest month in total of edits for this article since it was crated in 2002. I am just saying that the editors have done a fine job of keeping the page encyclopedic. I have not followed the page closely and none of the last 500 edits are marked rv, but the page is and has been
2017:
Agree, if a single source can be found for every chart position then it can be added to the end of a sentance and all those tags can be removed. However if a single source cant be found then each one needs a source. As for other citation requests, the editer has removed some giving reasons why the
2010:
to clear up the rather absurd number of citation-needed tags. Note that for a sentence like ""Live to Tell" (U.S. #1), "Papa Don't Preach" (U.S. #1), "Open Your Heart" (U.S. #1), "True Blue" (U.S. #3) and "La Isla Bonita" (U.S. #4)." just one use of the ref at the end sentence is enough (since its
2706:
I see a lot of stuff that can be cut down, to reduce amount of text and enhance readability. For eg: "It produced five successful singles: "Live to Tell" (U.S. #1), "Papa Don't Preach" (U.S. #1), "Open Your Heart" (U.S. #1), "True Blue" (U.S. #3) and "La Isla Bonita" (U.S. #4)" can be cut down to
1941:
Unless the criticism is a majority view and is a longterm aspect of her biography (not a single instance such as the Brit and
Christina kiss for example) it should not be mentioned in the lead. I don't believe any aspect of her personal life is significant enough to warrant its own section in the
1608:
Agree, length is now sufficent that its no longer a primary concern, it was however originally 106,000 bytes which was ..... So anyway, if everyone supports (i see you do ;-)) im prepared to citation tag it where needs be and we can see the full extent of the articles deteriation in the paste few
127:
Im quite sure this article no longer deserves a GA states (at least i woundn't have passed it today as a GA reviewer myself, which is a shame being a fan). Maybe standards have improved since its last review. These are just some of the basic issues I have found with the article. I didnt delist it
3699:
Have some major concerns after going through the article today. I found multiple instances where the sources didnt support the claims made in the article or inflated what the source was saying in a sneaky manner. For example one sentance said ".... went to #1 in the charts". However it wasnt the
3633:
the date is placed for newspaper articles and other periodicals: this should be consistent. In addition, I noticed general inconsistencies still with 34, 40, 43, 68, 102, 116, 118 and 135. I hope that the next time this is "DONE" and I go through it again, I will only find two or three remaining
1596:
does the biz in 90K does not mean that this article must. It depends upon the nature of the topic and the way summary style spinoffs are structured. I would encourage all editors to write the best possible article (or family of articles) that they can for the encyclopedia, and not let artificial
1397:
Undue weight applies to more than just viewpoints. Just as giving undue weight to a viewpoint is not neutral, so is giving undue weight to other verifiable and sourced statements. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject, but should strive to treat each aspect with a
174:
The article as a whole is overly long, not too long just unnessarly long. I know full well its within the upperlimits of the guidelines, thats not an excuse to write everything and anything though. Its 105,000 bytes long, compare this to the
Michael Jackson and Janet Jackson articles which are a
1591:
I'm now delighted to see another editor doing that, and would like to keep this GAR open for another week to see if the initial concerns can be addressed. I would like to note, however, that absolute length is not a GA criterion. If there is encyclopedic information about
Madonna which is worth
1912:
Still have concerns about the LEAD. A large part of this article talks about various controversies and her personal life, none of which are mentioned. The LEAD does not provide a sufficient overview of the article or her life. It should also be neutral, when talking about her acting abilities
1518:
the requirements of GA. If there are no objections im going to remove any dead links and unreliable sources, replacing them with fact tags. I could also add fact tags to unsourced areas. I think this might make the job of the edit easier so that they can see what is exactly needed. Thoughts?
1597:
measurements hinder that process. The recent cutback has probably been beneficial, but please don't forget the true purpose of the encyclopedia. I will support listing this article according to whether it meets the GA criteria, not according to whether or not it falls under 100K in length.
2179:
in March 2006 (Vol. 1154, pages: 1-36). The authors' justification for the name of the new species was: "We take great pleasure in dedicating this species to one of the most significant artists of our times, Madonna Louise
Veronica Ritchie." The Integrated Taxonomic Information System
2850:
a user-contributed site and is one of the most reliable websites on the internet (if you see the page, they say the chart info is courtesy of
Billboard). Since all the chart positions are in that one Almusic page, its so much simpler, neater and more compact to just use that on ref.
1592:
presenting in this article, then please present it. Please consider summary style and spinout articles if this information grows out of hand. However, I would emphasise that any reasonable length (my own ballpark for this one would be 60K to 120K) is acceptable: just because
2714:
A whole paragraph to her movie career gives undue weight to it, besides its mostly just a list names. How about "In addition to her music career, Madonna has also acted in a number of films. Although her performances have mostly been critically panned, her titular role in
3133:
I've checked about nine of them at random so far, and the sources all support the assertions. However, several of the citations aren't properly formatted. Some of them are just hyperlinks. This will need to be addressed before the article is up to standard.
1344:
could you go through FA's of other people (not just musicians), especially those of multiple marriages, affairs and children? They have personal life separate as its flow is lost if you write all of it in career. But the politics bit - I'll try and merge.
785:: I rewrote the LEAD as it currently appears, I have to say it's vastly improved from where it was and although it is a bit long, lets remember just how extensive Madonna's career is- being a member of two music groups, a recording career and film career.
1192:
Madonna's criticisms and personal life should not be given separate sections in the article. Any relevant information should be placed within the
Biography section where it applies according to chronological events. Any other info should be deleted.
1637:. If adding citations and supporting information lengthens the article, I have no problem with that. The article must be judged against the GA criteria, not an ideal list, although the list presented by Realist2 is quite close to the GA criteria.
3544:
103,108,110,117,121,122,132,137,140,144,155,157,163,168,169,175,185. The main issue is websources: the title of the webpage/article should be linked, with the publisher and/or website supplied afterwards; there should be no raw urls on display.
3218:
s site. I think 200+ FAs and FLs will vouch for
Allmusic's reliability by the way. In any case, the Allmusic page acknowledges that "Chart information courtesy of Billboard.com © 2006 VNU eMedia, Inc. All rights reserved.", so there's no doubt.
2866:
Yes, agree, just make sure what written in the sources maches the claims in the article before adding it as a source. Also remember madonna new album, needs more detail. Its underperforming against her confessions album but is still a hit. —
2437:. Too many passages needing citation. The editor has not yet addressed those comments above. Too many work to do so its better to extinguish the pressure this GAR is giving to the article and to the editor as well. Let's give him the time. --
2900:
Why not use this billboard link more, youve already used it at least twice in the article, it seems to be a definitive list of her singles positions. Its already formatted correctly in the article so you only have to use the <"ref name":
3543:
Well, you fixed some things, but barely touched the notes. Your determination to fix issues raised is much appreciated. Here is a list notes which are not well formatted: 5,12,13,15,18,28,35,41,44,46,50,60,66,68,70,74,87,88,89,91,92,96,99,
3622:
Second, published books should provide only a year, not a full date: a full date should only be provided for newspaper articles and other periodicals (and websites if possible). This may be an issue for 26, 33, 45, 50, 54, 56, 103,
3516:
The notes are still an inconsistently formatted mess. On the other hand, I do believe that the article has improved, and at the GA level, deletion of unsourced material not a bad thing: broadness, not comprehensiveness, is our goal
3655:
for all news sources. Since most of these are weblinks, it might be easier to use cite web throughout. 27, 33 and 55 have no author. 67 has no date. And I think a better way to format the album notes (44 and 102) would be helpful.
1398:
weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Note that undue weight can be given in several ways, including, but not limited to, depth of detail, quantity of text, prominence of placement, and juxtaposition of statements.
2719:(1996) won her a Golden Globe award." If you agree to my suggestion of cutting down details (chief culprits are often lists of names), I'd be glad to help. A list of her studio albums (discography) is pretty much mandatory BTW.
2311:
I dont mean to be rude but I wish you would stop leaving sharp, abrupt replies, it can appear in civil. Youve done it a few times on my talkpage too, its really not helpful when we are trying to build consensus. Cheers. --—
3700:
billboard chart but some obscure radio chart. Pros are poor to the extent that certain sections dont make sense. The article isnt neutral but ive improved that today. I even see a source retrieved date that says 1984. —
3092:
I examined six citations picked at random, and they all checked out fine. However, I agree that it's best to audit as many as possible. Equally as important is to make sure that the citations are from reliable sources.
3048:. The article now meets many of the concerns raised. From my point of view, the main remaining issues are minor. One is the formatting of the references. It was pointed out above that the use of cite templates is not a
1273:
why do we need to know about her personal relationships with Dan Gilroy and
Stephen Bray when they can be mentioned in the early life section? This applies to all of her relationships- move them into the body of the
1554:
I went through removing dead links and unreliable sources. I will add more tags to areas that need citations later, for now im really tired after looking through 150 sources lol. I have now 100% tagged the article.
742:. Notably, her new album has resulted in a lot of poorly controlled information being added. I don't think the lead is as bad as some make out (perhaps it's improved...) but yeah, the article isn't currently a GA.
1970:
Ouch, lol, poor madonna ;-( . Maybe your right, im not totally familiar with her person life and its media coverage, im only aware of her career. Reading the lead you would think shes was a respected actress.....
3574:
You need to correctly format 5,83,85,148,160,161,170. On 107 the date has a mistake. None of the sources you formatted give the details of who wrote the piece (and please dont write names out all in capitals!).
2276:
Is it appropriate to delist this article yet, the review was opened on May 16, the article is still way off GA standard and hasnt seen much in the way of improvement in recent days. Thoughts welcome. Cheers. —
3213:
often don't list some of the older entries. Why? I guess because they reserve some stuff for their pay-only part of the site. For example, none of Madonna's 1983 singles (maybe others too) have been listed at
2774:
Trimmed down. Nothing except Golden Globe is significant enough for lead. About the singles listing: I know there are many but it's rare that one album produces five or six hits. So those lines are mentioned.
2011:
the same one.) Alot of the cite needed are being used for self-referential stuff. For eg: "n 1985, Madonna entered mainstream films, beginning with a brief appearance as a club singer in the film Vision Quest.
1033:
Needs sourcing to a lot of sections. Paragraphs are stubby in some sections. References are inconsistenly formatted. A lot of unnecessary information in the discog section; only studio albums. MoS issues.
3064:
time consuming enough just checking all the sources manually and reading the article. The sources might be of good quailty now but I have deep suspicitions that not all of them support the claims. —
3013:
Yes, i wasnt questioning you at all, i was just unsure how you wanted to approach it. I was the one who got it reassessed and ive expressed that im near satisfied with the articles quality now. --—
111:
34:
2048:
Note:Amazon.com is not a reliable source and can't be used for anything. Their aim to shift as many CDs so it can be argued that they'll refer to every new record in more-or-less positive terms.
646:
I havent read the article indepth in over a month, so ill do that and add to this list. However, regardless, the examples i have already provided indicate that its no longer worth of its states.
3484:
Simply put, no way this is a good article, beginning with the opening paragraph, where someone has described her as a "multi-instrumentalist". That's like describing George Bush as an athlete.
2575:
Still not formatted, also you need to add more stuff about the success of her new album, it only mentions the title, the album has been out long enough now that you can write something on it. —
2967:
Updated assessments are needed by reviewers on this article which has been much improved. Without prejudice about continuing the above discussion, I propose adding such (re)reassessments here.
2018:
tag isnt needed in the summary, i have monitered these actions and where the reasoning is good i have agreed and let it be. Infact i will link the editer to your point because its very valid.
1700:
templates here, it makes the GAR page load significantly longer. (Please remove the currently used and replace with a plain "done".) I've no objections to leaving this open a while longer.
895:
I think this is because the people who used to look after the article have long stopped editing wikipedia. There doesnt seem to be any experienced editers who really work at it anymore.
3150:
Yes, there seems to be some confusion over what degree of formatting is minimally required for GA. Giggy pointed out that formatting isnt compulsary for GA but they look really messy,
2540:
No, sorry, if the the article isnt worry of its states thats not our problem. Please, if you can communicate in English do so. Im doing my best so its the least you can do too. —
1543:
I support removing deadlinks, unreliable sources, and controversial material (likely to be challenged) which is unsourced or relies upon or is sourced by such unreliable sources.
702:
As a side comment, another user , who i have quite some respect for tried to sort the lead but was shouted down on the talk page. I dont see improvements being made by free will.
3239:
This article requires an inordinate amount of citation and much of that has been done. I think a few citations might be necessary here and there, but for an article requiring a
3107:
Yes all sources now come from reliable places, ive checked that much ;-), however now me have to make sure that whats written in the article accurately reflects these sources. —
2707:
just "It produced five singles that broke into the Top 5 of the Hot 100." There is no need to list the chart position or even name every single she's released (becaause she has
1121:
Im taking away my "delist" decision. This article is worth GA, only that it needs to be referenced well and references should be formatted well, among others. Maybe you can use
3738:
The ones I found I changed myself but I only looked through the career section (where I found 15-20 errors) because thats where I expected to find most of the fan craft. I
3178:
Additionally, the article still needs copyediting. I'm finding numerous issues from punctuation to half-baked prose. I fixed a couple of problems, but there's plenty more.
1364:(such as the scandal over kissing Britney and Christina). These events do not need to be mentioned twice. Other BLPs may be different, when marriages, affairs and children
3501:
The New York Post claimed animal lovers were "horrified" by Madonna dyeing her sheep for a photograph, and "vilified" for organising pheasant-hunting parties at her estate
3367:
before it was deleted tons of unsourced material was just deleted, I DONT thing thats in the best interest of the article. The information needed sourcing not removing. —
1648:
Went through adding tags to unreliable sources and dead links, will add more tags to other unsourced areas later. Which I have now done, the article is 100% tagged. --
3455:
game, I, like a number of other edits have invested a lot of time monitering the process, this has now gone on for more than 3 weeks with a consensus to delist. This
1291:
all of her political views in the article are from 2006-present and can be moved into the biography under "2003-2007: American Life and Confessions on a Dance Floor".
306:
Nothing can be done about this. Old photos from commons are copyvios and the past editors just blanked them, edit warring without proving infringement for long.
76:
3645:
Fixe inconsistencies. About placement of date - it depends on the cite templates. Their origdate, date, archivedate, accessdate are all at different locations.
2194:
OK, are these sources strong enough to make these claims, im struggling to see how they prov they were named after madonna, it could just be pure coincidence. —
1141:
to better achieve this. I am not leaning towards "support", however, until all concerns are addressed and not just by putting "done" where in fact, its not. --
972:: As the original nominater i obviously support delisting, im even more user of it now, looking at the article history, there hasnt been a rush to improve it.
3325:
I am not saying that I vote keep because the article is getting a lot of its. I am saying that in spite of the number of active viewer/editors. Based on
175:
healthy 92,000 and 65,000 respectively. The MJ article has been significantly improved and the JJ article is a recent GA article under the improved system.
72:
3742:
checked the other half of the article though/yet. That would be the lead, early life (pre 1982), legacy, influences and all the personal life sections. —
3858:
Nit-picking? If the article doesnt match what the sources say thats a VERY serious issue, its not nit picking. That on top of the other complaints.... —
3459:
roll into a 4th week, it should be closed as delist and editers should spend time doing this properly rather than widely deleting unsourced material. —
2711:
many), that's what a discography does; only mention it if it is famous for other reasons. Eg: "Papa Don't Preach" and single teenage mother controversy.
1256:
move the David Banda adoption controversy to the "2003-2007: American Life and Confessions on a Dance Floor" section as this event took place in 2006.
57:
2226:, Vol. 1154, pages: 1-36)? If so, then I'd say that there is a strong case to be made that the species is named after the artist known as Madonna.
405:
The last two mini paragraphs still seem undersourced, maybe everythings covered in the sources provided? They arent formatted correctly though. --
49:
3279:
The number of hits is irrelevant to GA status, and vandalism is not part of the criteria. It should not influence an article's GA-worthiness.
17:
927:: per poor quality overall. The size of the overall article needs to be trimmed considerably in addition to the numerous issues raised here.
1760:
OK, this has got very long now so i want to make the list of nessary improvements needed crystal clear here. Other edits please add theirs.
815:
Oh dont get me wrong the lead is far from the major problem with this article. I think its the build up of little things that has done it.
739:
3439:(<-)This discussion is now so long and twisted it reminds me of FAC :) Are we near to closing or should we try a procedural restart?
3783:
I am back to keep on this one. The editor is doing everything possible here. At worst it is a restart. It is certainly not a delist.--
2902:
1447:
should always be in italics. I want to edit this but it seems its prevalent in the article. It should be formatted this way: ] and ]. --
2929:
The article is set up to use the link, if you what to use that billboard link you only need to use <ref name = billboardcharts/: -->
3836:
3793:
3401:
3344:
3257:
469:
10 sources for that section, there still seems to be information that is unsourced, again they arent correctly formatted either. --
2222:
Does the above-mentioned quote ("We take great pleasure in dedicating this species to...") come from the above-mentioned article (
300:
There seems to be a lot of recentism, for example, there are at least 3 pictures of madonna from 2006 and a few even more recent.
3840:
3797:
3405:
3348:
3261:
3209:, I can tell you for a fact that, oddly enough, the Allmusic charted singles list for an artist is almost always complete, while
23:
1609:
months. I also support extending the period to give the editer more time to implament improvements and complete the list above.
2756:
2374:
I would like to avoid it too, ive put a lot of time into checking through the article and sources, but at some point..... --—
1952:
1886:
1856:
1412:
1378:
1322:
1203:
937:
864:
795:
3667:
3646:
3608:
3559:
3535:
3243:
amount:) of citations just to retain good article status the editors have done a good job. Furthermore, any article getting
2892:
2809:
2776:
2734:
2567:
2532:
2452:
2424:
2303:
1799:
1502:
1465:
1346:
1225:
1051:
1018:
959:
883:
845:
770:
694:
632:
552:
506:
461:
442:
397:
352:
307:
264:
193:
183:
138:
2185:
2490:
1708:
750:
2122:
1000:
There are some unnecessary informatios in the lead especially the fourt one. Its like a mere collection of her films. --
201:
The length is a good improvement, although im sure more can be done, ill read through the article again let you know. --
3247:, has the additional vandalism concern and contrary editor problems. This article is now very worthy of good status.--
3577:
You need more details on the new album. We need the US peak position, first week US sales, first week worldwide sales.
3505:
Other promotion of the album will include the Sticky & Sweet Tour due to kick off in August 2008 in Cardiff, Wales
3666:
Added authors wherever they exist, put date, and album notes need not be cited as video template is already in use.
3520:
I will close this as delist in the next day or so unless someone beats me to it or there are dramatic developments.
1798:
moved event specific criticisms up. The rest is long-term criticism (Throughout career) and has no place to merge.
2747:
1943:
1877:
1847:
1403:
1369:
1313:
1194:
928:
855:
786:
65:
1059:
Silly me, i probably should have delisted it and not hastled everyone like this, i was just scared of a backlash.
2788:
2484:
1702:
744:
1400:
3724:
Thanks for checking, Realist. Can you please tell us which particular citation numbers don't support claims?
3877:
3853:
3832:
3810:
3789:
3761:
3733:
3719:
3694:
3670:
3661:
3657:
3649:
3640:
3636:
3611:
3598:
3562:
3550:
3546:
3538:
3526:
3522:
3478:
3448:
3418:
3397:
3386:
3361:
3340:
3317:
3292:
3274:
3253:
3228:
3187:
3173:
3143:
3126:
3102:
3083:
3058:
3054:
3032:
3008:
3004:
2997:
2973:
2969:
2949:
2924:
2895:
2886:
2860:
2812:
2803:
2779:
2769:
2737:
2728:
2670:
2644:
2620:
2594:
2570:
2559:
2535:
2526:
2499:
2469:
2455:
2446:
2427:
2418:
2393:
2369:
2355:
2331:
2306:
2296:
2259:
2235:
2213:
2165:
2147:
2115:
2082:
2057:
2037:
1990:
1965:
1932:
1899:
1869:
1826:
1802:
1779:
1745:
1717:
1667:
1643:
1639:
1628:
1603:
1599:
1574:
1549:
1545:
1537:
1505:
1496:
1468:
1456:
1425:
1391:
1349:
1335:
1312:
a quick overview which is a featured article on a solo artist for an idea of how to reformat the article.
1228:
1216:
1174:
1150:
1116:
1092:
1078:
1054:
1043:
1021:
1009:
991:
962:
950:
917:
886:
877:
848:
834:
810:
773:
759:
724:
697:
686:
668:
635:
616:
579:
555:
533:
509:
488:
464:
445:
424:
400:
379:
355:
334:
310:
291:
267:
251:
220:
196:
186:
165:
141:
121:
117:
3616:
The formatting of the references has been improved, but there are still many inconsistencies: I refer to
3729:
3444:
3183:
3139:
3098:
3002:
Yes. All that matters to GAR is whether the article currently meets the criteria, not how it got there.
2414:
2365:
2231:
1083:
No. It should be better in here. This article is so huge so comments from fresh eyes would be better. --
682:
42:
2978:
As in reassess it from where it is now? Like pretend the above reassessment never occured sort of? --—
2843:
2007:
3844:
3801:
3409:
3352:
3265:
2743:
3822:
level on many issues. In terms of whether this article is of equal quality to that which we call
3205:/Allmusic thing again: having worked on two featured list discographies and regularly reviewed at
1357:
3867:
3751:
3709:
3684:
3588:
3468:
3376:
3307:
3163:
3116:
3073:
3022:
2987:
2939:
2914:
2876:
2660:
2610:
2584:
2549:
2516:
2383:
2345:
2321:
2286:
2249:
2203:
2137:
2105:
2072:
2027:
1980:
1922:
1816:
1769:
1735:
1657:
1618:
1564:
1527:
1164:
1135:
1106:
1068:
981:
906:
824:
713:
657:
606:
569:
523:
478:
414:
369:
324:
281:
241:
210:
155:
3049:
2600:{{cite web |first= |last= |url= |title= |publisher= |date=]|accessdate=2008-05-27}}</ref: -->
2093:
1634:
1726:
as an indicater per my own edits on this page. Im in a rush so cant do it myself, later folks.
229:
A number of dubious, unreliable sources, they would have been changed had i reviewed it today.
3827:
3784:
3493:
During this time she also had a controversial appearance on the Late Show with David Letterman
3392:
3335:
3248:
3224:
2856:
2724:
2053:
1694:
1481:
1125:
3848:
3805:
3620:
in the following. First, print sources should provide a year: 22, 27, 41, 142 and 149 don't.
3413:
3356:
3269:
3244:
2746:. Trim if you must but the article and the lead cannot due without an overview of her films.
3725:
3440:
3179:
3135:
3094:
2410:
2361:
2227:
2171:
Michalczyk & Kaczmarek, 2006 was named after Madonna. The paper with the description of
678:
3819:
3331:
3206:
1938:
1362:
most of her personal life and criticisms are already mention within the body of the article
3896:
3287:
2639:
2125:
1593:
1309:
3823:
2360:
Let's not close this one yet. I am going to take a second look at the article tomorrow.
3509:
The lyrics were themed on the aspects of the American dream, fame, fortune and society
3890:
3859:
3743:
3701:
3676:
3580:
3460:
3368:
3299:
3155:
3108:
3065:
3014:
2979:
2931:
2906:
2868:
2799:
2652:
2602:
2576:
2541:
2508:
2465:
2442:
2375:
2337:
2313:
2278:
2241:
2195:
2129:
2097:
2064:
2019:
1972:
1914:
1808:
1807:
Agree, although the PETA stuff could be moved to ite relevant section in fairness. --
1761:
1727:
1684:
1649:
1610:
1556:
1519:
1492:
1474:
1452:
1156:
1146:
1098:
1088:
1060:
1039:
1005:
973:
896:
816:
703:
647:
598:
561:
515:
470:
406:
361:
316:
273:
233:
202:
147:
3326:
2891:
Have you all read allmusic's privacy policy? It gathers info from logged in users.
3240:
3220:
2852:
2720:
2240:
I have no idea sorry. How can we find out other than buying the article somehow? —
2049:
882:
What needs to be trimmed down? There is nothing off-topic or overly detailed now.
1876:
Also, her work at the Kabbalah Center can be considered an aspect of her legacy.
1241:
I disagree, it is possible and will help to condense the article. For instance:
3281:
2633:
2158:
2154:
107:
2063:
Noted, will take out, if you see anymore please let us know, cheers. ;-) --—
1788:
Resolve POV issues - i see words like outrage, uproar etc on every other line
514:
This is much better, its still small but its ok, sources need formatting. --
642:
Resolve all FACT tags adding reliable sources that are formatted correctly.
2795:
2461:
2438:
1488:
1448:
1142:
1084:
1035:
1001:
106:. In an attempt to find consensus, a new discussion has been started by
2599:
Please format website sources using this template. <ref name="": -->
2176:
1360:. Madonna's marriages are not a vital aspect of her overall biography,
3497:
In mid-2006, Madonna signed on to become the worldwide face of H&M
2460:
I would recommend you use "number" instead of "#". It reduces mess. --
1913:
dedicating 3 positive lines and half a negative line isnt neutral. --
2096:. Ive always thought they were a little tacky for an encyclopedia? —
3391:
I did not know good information was chopped. I scratched my keep.--
132:
The lead has grown out of control, it needs significant improvement
1155:
I will be adding further tags later today when im not busy. ;-) --
3634:
issues, not over 20. Please self-review for consistency as well.
24:
Knowledge (XXG):Good article reassessment/Madonna (entertainer)/1
2181:
738:; there has been significant deterioration since I passed this
2175:
was published in the international journal of animal taxonomy
2089:
2784:
Good point. It must be concisely mentioned to avoid many
3617:
2742:
A paragraph about her film career is not undue weight.
92:
84:
53:
315:
Ill let you off on that one, its not so bad anymore --
626:- Remove as trivia or put somewhere else in article.
3558:No raw url+title left now. Any more things to fix?
112:
WP:Good article reassessment/Madonna (entertainer)/2
2507:- Until all is sourced and correctly formatted. —
545:- Three paragraphs, why, needs a serious trimming
1942:article, let alone become mentioned in the lead.
2167:Scanning Electron Microscope photomicrograph of
344:2007-Present: New record deal and film direction
2121:Is linking people to random pictures reliable?
2705:How much longer is this review gonna last: -->
1368:. However, with Madonna, this isn't the case.
258:A large number of sources are not formatted.
8:
3675:Consistancy needed i see both US and U.S. —
1785:Resolve citation tags and format all sources
2842:Can we agree upon the uniform usage of the
272:I still see a lot of unformatted sources?--
2631:a requirement, it is merely recommended.
1792:and then removing the criticism section.
1356:The article has a poor representation of
591:- 4 sources for this section, not enough
391:- Lack of sources towards end of section
146:Im not sure thats a significant change --
128:automatically as i dont want hate mail.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Good article reassessment
3629:There is also some inconsistency about
2123:Italians do it better shirt (JPG file)
1633:Yes, please add tags according to the
1366:are what the person is best known for
434:2005-2007: Confessions album and tour
7:
2126:Madonna - Ciao from Italy (JPG file)
346:- Almost entirely unsourced section
2478:I still find myself in favour of a
2423:All of them have been dealt with.
2336:Glad to see you've continued. --—
2184:) number of the species is 711164.
31:
543:David Banda adoption controversy
436:- Monster huge quote at the end
389:1998-2002: Return to prominence
93:Watch article reassessment page
2744:The woman has been in 22 films
2409:. Too many missing citations.
854:I'd say at least to 70 kilos.
769:new album info controlled now
1:
360:The sources need formating --
2844:Billboard charts at Allmusic
2794:tags. Its annoying right? --
2008:Billboard charts at Allmusic
3607:sales, format, peak, names
2451:Hold on. I am continuing.
1939:WP:BLP#Criticism_and_praise
1464:ok. why Billboard Hot 100.
589:Work at the Kabbalah Center
3913:
958:This is 95 kilobytes now
3878:05:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
3854:05:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
3811:15:59, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
3762:03:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
3734:03:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
3720:03:30, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
3695:00:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
3671:11:03, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
3662:10:07, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
3650:08:36, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
2905:. Will this link help? —
551:All are now much shorter
182:This is 95 kilobytes now
122:18:26, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
3818:The nit-picking is at a
3641:20:43, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
3612:22:12, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
3599:16:50, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
3563:12:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
3551:10:13, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
3539:07:49, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
3534:I did all the changes.
3527:20:36, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
3479:18:10, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
3449:14:37, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
3419:23:17, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
3387:17:00, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
3362:14:11, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
3318:02:58, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
3293:02:46, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
3275:01:27, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
3229:20:02, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
3188:02:05, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
3174:02:07, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
3144:01:55, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
3127:01:51, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
3103:01:48, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
3084:20:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
3059:20:32, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
3033:20:47, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
3009:20:32, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
2998:20:24, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
2974:20:21, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
2950:19:07, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
2925:18:56, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
2896:18:39, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
2887:15:35, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
2861:14:31, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
2813:09:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
2804:08:51, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
2780:09:13, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
2770:09:03, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
2738:09:20, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
2729:08:43, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
2671:20:35, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
2645:08:47, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
2621:20:03, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
2595:19:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
2571:19:40, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
2560:19:15, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
2536:18:59, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
2527:18:37, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
2500:08:27, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
2470:01:55, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
2456:16:20, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
2447:07:18, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
2428:09:16, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
2419:01:56, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
2394:01:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
2370:01:14, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
2356:22:22, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
2332:16:03, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
2307:15:59, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
2297:15:55, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
2260:02:00, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
2236:01:55, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
2214:00:33, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
2148:00:17, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
2116:00:12, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
2083:23:44, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
2058:23:39, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
2038:21:25, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
1991:22:27, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
1966:22:11, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
1933:00:40, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
1900:22:16, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
1870:22:11, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
1827:17:13, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
1803:17:04, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
1780:00:28, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
1746:10:41, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
1718:09:38, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
1668:23:00, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
1644:20:28, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
1629:20:21, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
1604:20:11, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
1575:22:59, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
1550:20:11, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
1538:15:59, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
1506:06:56, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
1497:06:40, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
1469:06:34, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
1457:06:40, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
1426:03:14, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
1392:02:50, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
1350:14:54, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
1336:07:15, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
1229:05:50, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
1217:00:11, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
1175:08:56, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
1151:06:49, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
1117:14:02, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
1093:09:04, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
1079:14:25, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
1055:20:28, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
1044:09:01, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
1022:19:58, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
1010:08:56, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
992:05:44, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
963:19:51, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
951:10:12, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
918:02:01, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
887:15:10, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
878:23:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
849:21:42, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
835:08:43, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
811:08:30, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
774:19:57, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
760:01:48, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
725:04:31, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
698:19:52, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
687:04:25, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
669:17:10, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
636:19:16, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
617:15:51, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
580:15:51, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
556:15:06, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
534:15:47, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
510:19:26, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
489:15:45, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
465:20:55, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
446:19:11, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
425:15:42, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
401:19:26, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
380:15:38, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
356:19:38, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
335:15:36, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
311:15:06, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
292:15:36, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
268:21:35, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
252:15:36, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
221:15:36, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
197:15:07, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
187:19:22, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
166:15:52, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
142:19:22, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
3826:, the answer is yes.--
2733:Cut out the numbers.
2044:Further dubious links
624:Influence on taxonomy
560:Its ok, well done. --
110:. It can be found at
35:Madonna (entertainer)
1473:The result is this:
232:Nothing done here?--
2962:Updated assessments
2485:dihydrogen monoxide
2189:Echiniscus madonnae
2169:Echiniscus madonnae
2163:Echiniscus madonnae
1703:dihydrogen monoxide
970:Delist as nominater
745:dihydrogen monoxide
3154:has to be done. —
2930:as your source. —
1680:Please do not use
3852:
3809:
3417:
3360:
3273:
3245:20,000 hits a day
2846:ref, Allmusic is
2767:
2498:
1963:
1897:
1867:
1716:
1423:
1389:
1333:
1214:
948:
911:Come Speak To Me'
875:
844:94 kilobytes now
808:
758:
718:Come Speak To Me'
662:Come Speak To Me'
455:- Hardly sourced
22:(Redirected from
3904:
3874:
3871:Come Speak To Me
3864:
3830:
3787:
3758:
3755:Come Speak To Me
3748:
3716:
3713:Come Speak To Me
3706:
3691:
3688:Come Speak To Me
3681:
3595:
3592:Come Speak To Me
3585:
3475:
3472:Come Speak To Me
3465:
3395:
3383:
3380:Come Speak To Me
3373:
3338:
3314:
3311:Come Speak To Me
3304:
3251:
3170:
3167:Come Speak To Me
3160:
3123:
3120:Come Speak To Me
3113:
3080:
3077:Come Speak To Me
3070:
3029:
3026:Come Speak To Me
3019:
2994:
2991:Come Speak To Me
2984:
2946:
2943:Come Speak To Me
2936:
2921:
2918:Come Speak To Me
2911:
2883:
2880:Come Speak To Me
2873:
2793:
2787:
2766:
2757:
2754:
2667:
2664:Come Speak To Me
2657:
2617:
2614:Come Speak To Me
2607:
2591:
2588:Come Speak To Me
2581:
2556:
2553:Come Speak To Me
2546:
2523:
2520:Come Speak To Me
2513:
2488:
2390:
2387:Come Speak To Me
2380:
2352:
2349:Come Speak To Me
2342:
2328:
2325:Come Speak To Me
2318:
2293:
2290:Come Speak To Me
2283:
2256:
2253:Come Speak To Me
2246:
2210:
2207:Come Speak To Me
2200:
2144:
2141:Come Speak To Me
2134:
2128:. Thoughts. --—
2112:
2109:Come Speak To Me
2102:
2079:
2076:Come Speak To Me
2069:
2034:
2031:Come Speak To Me
2024:
2013:
2012:
1987:
1984:Come Speak To Me
1977:
1962:
1953:
1950:
1929:
1926:Come Speak To Me
1919:
1896:
1887:
1884:
1866:
1857:
1854:
1823:
1820:Come Speak To Me
1813:
1776:
1773:Come Speak To Me
1766:
1742:
1739:Come Speak To Me
1732:
1706:
1699:
1693:
1689:
1683:
1664:
1661:Come Speak To Me
1654:
1625:
1622:Come Speak To Me
1615:
1571:
1568:Come Speak To Me
1561:
1534:
1531:Come Speak To Me
1524:
1422:
1413:
1410:
1388:
1379:
1376:
1332:
1323:
1320:
1308:Please give the
1213:
1204:
1201:
1171:
1168:Come Speak To Me
1161:
1140:
1134:
1130:
1124:
1113:
1110:Come Speak To Me
1103:
1075:
1072:Come Speak To Me
1065:
988:
985:Come Speak To Me
978:
947:
938:
935:
914:
903:
899:
874:
865:
862:
831:
828:Come Speak To Me
821:
807:
796:
793:
748:
721:
710:
706:
665:
654:
650:
613:
610:Come Speak To Me
603:
576:
573:Come Speak To Me
566:
530:
527:Come Speak To Me
520:
500:- 5 lines, why?
485:
482:Come Speak To Me
475:
421:
418:Come Speak To Me
411:
376:
373:Come Speak To Me
366:
331:
328:Come Speak To Me
321:
288:
285:Come Speak To Me
278:
248:
245:Come Speak To Me
238:
217:
214:Come Speak To Me
207:
162:
159:Come Speak To Me
152:
115:
95:
89:
80:
61:
27:
3912:
3911:
3907:
3906:
3905:
3903:
3902:
3901:
3887:
3886:
3868:
3860:
3752:
3744:
3710:
3702:
3685:
3677:
3627:166 and/or 171.
3589:
3581:
3469:
3461:
3437:
3377:
3369:
3308:
3300:
3291:
3164:
3156:
3117:
3109:
3074:
3066:
3023:
3015:
2988:
2980:
2964:
2940:
2932:
2915:
2907:
2877:
2869:
2791:
2789:Citation needed
2785:
2758:
2748:
2661:
2653:
2643:
2611:
2603:
2585:
2577:
2550:
2542:
2517:
2509:
2494:
2384:
2376:
2346:
2338:
2322:
2314:
2287:
2279:
2274:
2271:Time to delist?
2250:
2242:
2204:
2196:
2157:species (Latin:
2138:
2130:
2106:
2098:
2073:
2065:
2046:
2028:
2020:
2005:
1981:
1973:
1954:
1944:
1923:
1915:
1888:
1878:
1858:
1848:
1817:
1809:
1770:
1762:
1758:
1755:Sum up requests
1736:
1728:
1722:Yes please use
1712:
1697:
1691:
1687:
1681:
1658:
1650:
1619:
1611:
1594:Michael Jackson
1565:
1557:
1528:
1520:
1443:to the editor.
1414:
1404:
1380:
1370:
1324:
1314:
1310:John Frusciante
1205:
1195:
1165:
1157:
1138:
1132:
1128:
1122:
1107:
1099:
1069:
1061:
982:
974:
939:
929:
907:
900:
897:
866:
856:
825:
817:
805:
797:
787:
754:
740:four months ago
714:
707:
704:
658:
651:
648:
607:
599:
570:
562:
524:
516:
479:
471:
415:
407:
370:
362:
325:
317:
282:
274:
242:
234:
211:
203:
156:
148:
98:
91:
70:
47:
41:
38:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3910:
3908:
3900:
3899:
3889:
3888:
3885:
3884:
3883:
3882:
3881:
3880:
3777:
3776:
3775:
3774:
3773:
3772:
3771:
3770:
3769:
3768:
3767:
3766:
3765:
3764:
3697:
3614:
3572:
3571:
3570:
3569:
3568:
3567:
3566:
3565:
3518:
3513:
3512:
3482:
3481:
3436:
3433:
3432:
3431:
3430:
3429:
3428:
3427:
3426:
3425:
3424:
3423:
3422:
3421:
3285:
3199:
3198:
3197:
3196:
3195:
3194:
3193:
3192:
3191:
3190:
3131:
3130:
3129:
3087:
3086:
3061:
3050:GA requirement
3042:
3041:
3040:
3039:
3038:
3037:
3036:
3035:
2963:
2960:
2959:
2958:
2957:
2956:
2955:
2954:
2953:
2952:
2840:
2839:
2838:
2837:
2836:
2835:
2834:
2833:
2832:
2831:
2830:
2829:
2828:
2827:
2826:
2825:
2824:
2823:
2822:
2821:
2820:
2819:
2818:
2817:
2816:
2815:
2751:The Bookkeeper
2731:
2712:
2686:
2685:
2684:
2683:
2682:
2681:
2680:
2679:
2678:
2677:
2676:
2675:
2674:
2673:
2649:
2648:
2647:
2637:
2502:
2492:
2476:
2475:
2474:
2473:
2472:
2432:
2431:
2430:
2404:
2403:
2402:
2401:
2400:
2399:
2398:
2397:
2396:
2273:
2268:
2267:
2266:
2265:
2264:
2263:
2262:
2217:
2216:
2153:In 2006 a new
2086:
2085:
2045:
2042:
2041:
2040:
2004:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1947:The Bookkeeper
1909:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1881:The Bookkeeper
1874:
1873:
1872:
1851:The Bookkeeper
1834:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1789:
1786:
1757:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1710:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1588:
1587:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1407:The Bookkeeper
1401:WP:UNDUEWEIGHT
1394:
1373:The Bookkeeper
1353:
1352:
1339:
1338:
1317:The Bookkeeper
1299:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1198:The Bookkeeper
1186:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1081:
1057:
1025:
1024:
995:
994:
967:
966:
965:
932:The Bookkeeper
922:
921:
920:
893:
892:
891:
890:
889:
859:The Bookkeeper
839:
838:
837:
799:
790:The Bookkeeper
779:
778:
777:
776:
752:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
644:
643:
640:
639:
638:
621:
620:
619:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
450:
449:
448:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
256:
255:
254:
227:
226:
225:
224:
223:
192:88 kb today.
190:
172:
171:
170:
169:
168:
125:
124:
96:
37:
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3909:
3898:
3895:
3894:
3892:
3879:
3875:
3873:
3872:
3865:
3863:
3857:
3856:
3855:
3850:
3846:
3842:
3838:
3834:
3829:
3825:
3821:
3817:
3814:
3813:
3812:
3807:
3803:
3799:
3795:
3791:
3786:
3782:
3779:
3778:
3763:
3759:
3757:
3756:
3749:
3747:
3741:
3737:
3736:
3735:
3731:
3727:
3723:
3722:
3721:
3717:
3715:
3714:
3707:
3705:
3698:
3696:
3692:
3690:
3689:
3682:
3680:
3674:
3673:
3672:
3669:
3665:
3664:
3663:
3660:
3659:
3653:
3652:
3651:
3648:
3644:
3643:
3642:
3639:
3638:
3632:
3628:
3624:
3619:
3615:
3613:
3610:
3606:
3603:
3602:
3601:
3600:
3596:
3594:
3593:
3586:
3584:
3578:
3564:
3561:
3557:
3554:
3553:
3552:
3549:
3548:
3542:
3541:
3540:
3537:
3533:
3530:
3529:
3528:
3525:
3524:
3519:
3515:
3514:
3510:
3506:
3502:
3498:
3494:
3490:
3487:
3486:
3485:
3480:
3476:
3474:
3473:
3466:
3464:
3458:
3453:
3452:
3451:
3450:
3446:
3442:
3434:
3420:
3415:
3411:
3407:
3403:
3399:
3394:
3390:
3389:
3388:
3384:
3382:
3381:
3374:
3372:
3365:
3364:
3363:
3358:
3354:
3350:
3346:
3342:
3337:
3333:
3328:
3324:
3321:
3320:
3319:
3315:
3313:
3312:
3305:
3303:
3296:
3295:
3294:
3289:
3284:
3283:
3278:
3277:
3276:
3271:
3267:
3263:
3259:
3255:
3250:
3246:
3242:
3238:
3237:
3233:
3232:
3231:
3230:
3226:
3222:
3217:
3212:
3208:
3204:
3189:
3185:
3181:
3177:
3176:
3175:
3171:
3169:
3168:
3161:
3159:
3153:
3149:
3148:
3147:
3146:
3145:
3141:
3137:
3132:
3128:
3124:
3122:
3121:
3114:
3112:
3106:
3105:
3104:
3100:
3096:
3091:
3090:
3089:
3088:
3085:
3081:
3079:
3078:
3071:
3069:
3062:
3060:
3057:
3056:
3051:
3047:
3044:
3043:
3034:
3030:
3028:
3027:
3020:
3018:
3012:
3011:
3010:
3007:
3006:
3001:
3000:
2999:
2995:
2993:
2992:
2985:
2983:
2977:
2976:
2975:
2972:
2971:
2966:
2965:
2961:
2951:
2947:
2945:
2944:
2937:
2935:
2928:
2927:
2926:
2922:
2920:
2919:
2912:
2910:
2904:
2903:See link here
2899:
2898:
2897:
2894:
2890:
2889:
2888:
2884:
2882:
2881:
2874:
2872:
2865:
2864:
2863:
2862:
2858:
2854:
2849:
2845:
2814:
2811:
2807:
2806:
2805:
2801:
2797:
2790:
2783:
2782:
2781:
2778:
2773:
2772:
2771:
2768:
2764:
2763:
2762:of the Occult
2755:
2753:
2752:
2745:
2741:
2740:
2739:
2736:
2732:
2730:
2726:
2722:
2718:
2713:
2710:
2704:
2703:
2702:
2701:
2700:
2699:
2698:
2697:
2696:
2695:
2694:
2693:
2692:
2691:
2690:
2689:
2688:
2687:
2672:
2668:
2666:
2665:
2658:
2656:
2650:
2646:
2641:
2636:
2635:
2630:
2626:
2625:
2624:
2623:
2622:
2618:
2616:
2615:
2608:
2606:
2598:
2597:
2596:
2592:
2590:
2589:
2582:
2580:
2574:
2573:
2572:
2569:
2566:
2563:
2562:
2561:
2557:
2555:
2554:
2547:
2545:
2539:
2538:
2537:
2534:
2530:
2529:
2528:
2524:
2522:
2521:
2514:
2512:
2506:
2503:
2501:
2496:
2487:
2486:
2481:
2477:
2471:
2467:
2463:
2459:
2458:
2457:
2454:
2450:
2449:
2448:
2444:
2440:
2436:
2433:
2429:
2426:
2422:
2421:
2420:
2416:
2412:
2408:
2405:
2395:
2391:
2389:
2388:
2381:
2379:
2373:
2372:
2371:
2367:
2363:
2359:
2358:
2357:
2353:
2351:
2350:
2343:
2341:
2335:
2334:
2333:
2329:
2327:
2326:
2319:
2317:
2310:
2309:
2308:
2305:
2301:
2300:
2299:
2298:
2294:
2292:
2291:
2284:
2282:
2272:
2269:
2261:
2257:
2255:
2254:
2247:
2245:
2239:
2238:
2237:
2233:
2229:
2225:
2221:
2220:
2219:
2218:
2215:
2211:
2209:
2208:
2201:
2199:
2193:
2192:
2191:
2190:
2186:
2183:
2178:
2174:
2170:
2166:
2164:
2160:
2156:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2145:
2143:
2142:
2135:
2133:
2127:
2124:
2118:
2117:
2113:
2111:
2110:
2103:
2101:
2095:
2091:
2084:
2080:
2078:
2077:
2070:
2068:
2062:
2061:
2060:
2059:
2055:
2051:
2043:
2039:
2035:
2033:
2032:
2025:
2023:
2016:
2015:
2014:
2009:
2003:
2000:
1992:
1988:
1986:
1985:
1978:
1976:
1969:
1968:
1967:
1964:
1960:
1959:
1958:of the Occult
1951:
1949:
1948:
1940:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1930:
1928:
1927:
1920:
1918:
1911:
1910:
1901:
1898:
1894:
1893:
1892:of the Occult
1885:
1883:
1882:
1875:
1871:
1868:
1864:
1863:
1862:of the Occult
1855:
1853:
1852:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1828:
1824:
1822:
1821:
1814:
1812:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1801:
1797:
1794:
1793:
1790:
1787:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1777:
1775:
1774:
1767:
1765:
1756:
1753:
1747:
1743:
1741:
1740:
1733:
1731:
1725:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1714:
1705:
1704:
1696:
1686:
1679:
1678:
1669:
1665:
1663:
1662:
1655:
1653:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1642:
1641:
1636:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1626:
1624:
1623:
1616:
1614:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1602:
1601:
1595:
1590:
1589:
1585:
1582:
1581:
1576:
1572:
1570:
1569:
1562:
1560:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1548:
1547:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1535:
1533:
1532:
1525:
1523:
1507:
1504:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1486:
1484:
1479:
1477:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1467:
1463:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1439:
1438:
1427:
1424:
1420:
1419:
1418:of the Occult
1411:
1409:
1408:
1402:
1399:
1395:
1393:
1390:
1386:
1385:
1384:of the Occult
1377:
1375:
1374:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1354:
1351:
1348:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1337:
1334:
1330:
1329:
1328:of the Occult
1321:
1319:
1318:
1311:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1230:
1227:
1223:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1215:
1211:
1210:
1209:of the Occult
1202:
1200:
1199:
1191:
1188:
1187:
1176:
1172:
1170:
1169:
1162:
1160:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1137:
1127:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1114:
1112:
1111:
1104:
1102:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1080:
1076:
1074:
1073:
1066:
1064:
1058:
1056:
1053:
1050:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1032:
1031:
1027:
1026:
1023:
1020:
1017:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
993:
989:
987:
986:
979:
977:
971:
968:
964:
961:
957:
954:
953:
952:
949:
945:
944:
943:of the Occult
936:
934:
933:
926:
923:
919:
915:
913:
912:
904:
902:
894:
888:
885:
881:
880:
879:
876:
872:
871:
870:of the Occult
863:
861:
860:
852:
851:
850:
847:
843:
840:
836:
832:
830:
829:
822:
820:
814:
813:
812:
809:
804:
803:
802:of the Occult
794:
792:
791:
784:
781:
780:
775:
772:
768:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
756:
747:
746:
741:
737:
734:
733:
726:
722:
720:
719:
711:
709:
701:
700:
699:
696:
693:
690:
689:
688:
684:
680:
676:
673:
672:
671:
670:
666:
664:
663:
655:
653:
641:
637:
634:
631:
628:
627:
625:
622:
618:
614:
612:
611:
604:
602:
596:
593:
592:
590:
587:
581:
577:
575:
574:
567:
565:
559:
558:
557:
554:
550:
547:
546:
544:
541:
535:
531:
529:
528:
521:
519:
513:
512:
511:
508:
505:
502:
501:
499:
496:
490:
486:
484:
483:
476:
474:
468:
467:
466:
463:
460:
457:
456:
454:
451:
447:
444:
441:
438:
437:
435:
432:
426:
422:
420:
419:
412:
410:
404:
403:
402:
399:
396:
393:
392:
390:
387:
381:
377:
375:
374:
367:
365:
359:
358:
357:
354:
351:
348:
347:
345:
342:
336:
332:
330:
329:
322:
320:
314:
313:
312:
309:
305:
302:
301:
299:
293:
289:
287:
286:
279:
277:
271:
270:
269:
266:
263:
260:
259:
257:
253:
249:
247:
246:
239:
237:
231:
230:
228:
222:
218:
216:
215:
208:
206:
200:
199:
198:
195:
191:
189:
188:
185:
181:
177:
176:
173:
167:
163:
161:
160:
153:
151:
145:
144:
143:
140:
137:
134:
133:
131:
130:
129:
123:
120:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
94:
88:
87:
83:
78:
74:
69:
68:
64:
59:
55:
51:
46:
45:
40:
39:
36:
33:
25:
19:
3870:
3869:
3861:
3828:TonyTheTiger
3815:
3785:TonyTheTiger
3780:
3754:
3753:
3745:
3739:
3712:
3711:
3703:
3687:
3686:
3678:
3658:Geometry guy
3656:
3637:Geometry guy
3635:
3630:
3626:
3621:
3618:this version
3604:
3591:
3590:
3582:
3576:
3573:
3555:
3547:Geometry guy
3545:
3531:
3523:Geometry guy
3521:
3508:
3504:
3500:
3496:
3492:
3488:
3483:
3471:
3470:
3462:
3456:
3438:
3393:TonyTheTiger
3379:
3378:
3370:
3336:TonyTheTiger
3322:
3310:
3309:
3301:
3280:
3249:TonyTheTiger
3235:
3234:
3215:
3210:
3202:
3200:
3166:
3165:
3157:
3151:
3119:
3118:
3110:
3076:
3075:
3067:
3055:Geometry guy
3053:
3045:
3025:
3024:
3016:
3005:Geometry guy
3003:
2990:
2989:
2981:
2970:Geometry guy
2968:
2942:
2941:
2933:
2917:
2916:
2908:
2879:
2878:
2870:
2847:
2841:
2761:
2760:
2750:
2749:
2716:
2708:
2663:
2662:
2654:
2632:
2628:
2627:Cite web is
2613:
2612:
2604:
2601:. Cheers. —
2587:
2586:
2578:
2564:
2552:
2551:
2543:
2519:
2518:
2510:
2504:
2483:
2479:
2434:
2406:
2386:
2385:
2377:
2348:
2347:
2339:
2324:
2323:
2315:
2289:
2288:
2280:
2275:
2270:
2252:
2251:
2243:
2223:
2206:
2205:
2197:
2188:
2172:
2168:
2162:
2152:
2140:
2139:
2131:
2120:
2119:
2108:
2107:
2099:
2087:
2075:
2074:
2066:
2047:
2030:
2029:
2021:
2006:
2001:
1983:
1982:
1974:
1957:
1956:
1946:
1945:
1925:
1924:
1916:
1891:
1890:
1880:
1879:
1861:
1860:
1850:
1849:
1819:
1818:
1810:
1795:
1772:
1771:
1763:
1759:
1754:
1738:
1737:
1729:
1723:
1701:
1660:
1659:
1651:
1640:Geometry guy
1638:
1621:
1620:
1612:
1600:Geometry guy
1598:
1583:
1567:
1566:
1558:
1546:Geometry guy
1544:
1530:
1529:
1521:
1516:
1482:
1475:
1461:
1444:
1440:
1417:
1416:
1406:
1405:
1396:
1383:
1382:
1372:
1371:
1365:
1361:
1327:
1326:
1316:
1315:
1222:Not possible
1221:
1208:
1207:
1197:
1196:
1189:
1167:
1166:
1158:
1109:
1108:
1100:
1071:
1070:
1062:
1048:
1029:
1028:
1015:
997:
996:
984:
983:
975:
969:
955:
942:
941:
931:
930:
924:
910:
909:
901:
869:
868:
858:
857:
841:
827:
826:
818:
801:
800:
789:
788:
782:
766:
743:
735:
717:
716:
708:
691:
674:
661:
660:
652:
645:
629:
623:
609:
608:
600:
594:
588:
572:
571:
563:
548:
542:
526:
525:
517:
503:
497:
481:
480:
472:
458:
452:
439:
433:
417:
416:
408:
394:
388:
372:
371:
363:
349:
343:
327:
326:
318:
303:
284:
283:
275:
261:
244:
243:
235:
213:
212:
204:
179:
178:
158:
157:
149:
135:
126:
118:Geometry guy
116:
104:No consensus
103:
99:
85:
81:
67:Article talk
66:
62:
43:
3726:Majoreditor
3441:Majoreditor
3180:Majoreditor
3136:Majoreditor
3095:Majoreditor
2411:Majoreditor
2362:Majoreditor
2228:Majoreditor
2173:E. madonnae
2092:, reliable
1635:GA criteria
679:Majoreditor
54:visual edit
3845:WP:CHICAGO
3802:WP:CHICAGO
3410:WP:CHICAGO
3353:WP:CHICAGO
3266:WP:CHICAGO
3216:Billboard'
3201:The whole
2159:Tardigrada
2155:water bear
453:Influences
3489:Apologies
3332:protected
3327:this tool
3211:Billboard
3203:Billboard
3152:something
2088:Is this,
1937:Remember
1483:Billboard
1476:Billboard
1462:Billboard
1445:Billboard
1358:WP:WEIGHT
1136:Cite news
3891:Category
3507:", and "
3435:Too long
1846:artist.
1695:not done
1274:article.
1126:Cite web
3862:Realist
3849:WP:LOTM
3816:Comment
3806:WP:LOTM
3746:Realist
3704:Realist
3679:Realist
3583:Realist
3463:Realist
3414:WP:LOTM
3371:Realist
3357:WP:LOTM
3323:Comment
3302:Realist
3270:WP:LOTM
3221:indopug
3158:Realist
3111:Realist
3068:Realist
3046:Comment
3017:Realist
2982:Realist
2934:Realist
2909:Realist
2871:Realist
2853:indopug
2808:Done.
2721:indopug
2655:Realist
2605:Realist
2579:Realist
2544:Realist
2511:Realist
2378:Realist
2340:Realist
2316:Realist
2281:Realist
2244:Realist
2224:Zootaxa
2198:Realist
2187:ITIS -
2177:Zootaxa
2132:Realist
2100:Realist
2067:Realist
2050:indopug
2022:Realist
2002:comment
1975:Realist
1917:Realist
1811:Realist
1764:Realist
1730:Realist
1652:Realist
1613:Realist
1584:Comment
1559:Realist
1522:Realist
1485:Hot 100
1441:Comment
1190:Comment
1159:Realist
1101:Realist
1097:OK ;-)
1063:Realist
998:Comment
976:Realist
898:Realist
819:Realist
783:comment
705:Realist
675:Comment
649:Realist
601:Realist
564:Realist
518:Realist
473:Realist
409:Realist
364:Realist
319:Realist
276:Realist
236:Realist
205:Realist
150:Realist
77:history
58:history
44:Article
3897:GAR/38
3820:WP:FAC
3740:havent
3668:Ultra!
3647:Ultra!
3609:Ultra!
3560:Ultra!
3536:Ultra!
3457:cannot
2893:Ultra!
2810:Ultra!
2777:Ultra!
2735:Ultra!
2568:Ultra!
2533:Ultra!
2531:stop.
2505:Delist
2480:delist
2453:Ultra!
2435:Delist
2425:Ultra!
2407:Delist
2304:Ultra!
1800:Ultra!
1503:Ultra!
1466:Ultra!
1347:Ultra!
1226:Ultra!
1052:Ultra!
1030:Delist
1019:Ultra!
960:Ultra!
925:Delist
884:Ultra!
846:Ultra!
771:Ultra!
736:Delist
695:Ultra!
633:Ultra!
553:Ultra!
507:Ultra!
498:Legacy
462:Ultra!
443:Ultra!
398:Ultra!
353:Ultra!
308:Ultra!
265:Ultra!
194:Ultra!
184:Ultra!
139:Ultra!
100:Result
3824:WP:GA
3631:where
3625:144,
3517:here.
3282:giggy
3241:gross
2717:Evita
2634:giggy
2302:No.
108:Giggy
86:Watch
16:<
3781:Keep
3730:talk
3623:140,
3605:DONE
3556:DONE
3532:DONE
3503:", "
3499:", "
3495:", "
3445:talk
3236:Keep
3225:talk
3207:FLCs
3184:talk
3140:talk
3099:talk
2857:talk
2800:talk
2725:talk
2565:done
2466:talk
2443:talk
2415:talk
2366:talk
2232:talk
2182:ITIS
2094:link
2054:talk
1796:DONE
1724:DONE
1690:and
1685:done
1493:talk
1487:. --
1480:and
1453:talk
1147:talk
1131:and
1089:talk
1049:DONE
1040:talk
1016:DONE
1006:talk
956:DONE
842:DONE
767:DONE
692:DONE
683:talk
630:DONE
595:DONE
549:DONE
504:DONE
459:DONE
440:DONE
395:DONE
350:DONE
304:DONE
262:DONE
180:DONE
136:DONE
73:edit
50:edit
3841:bio
3798:bio
3406:bio
3349:bio
3334:.--
3262:bio
2901:-->
2848:not
2796:Efe
2629:not
2462:Efe
2439:Efe
2161:),
2090:TMZ
1501:ok
1489:Efe
1478:200
1449:Efe
1143:Efe
1085:Efe
1036:Efe
1002:Efe
3893::
3876:)
3851:)
3808:)
3760:)
3732:)
3718:)
3693:)
3597:)
3579:—
3511:".
3477:)
3447:)
3416:)
3385:)
3359:)
3316:)
3288::O
3272:)
3227:)
3186:)
3172:)
3142:)
3125:)
3101:)
3082:)
3031:)
2996:)
2948:)
2923:)
2885:)
2859:)
2802:)
2792:}}
2786:{{
2727:)
2709:so
2669:)
2640::O
2619:)
2593:)
2558:)
2525:)
2482:.
2468:)
2445:)
2417:)
2392:)
2368:)
2354:)
2330:)
2295:)
2258:)
2234:)
2212:)
2146:)
2114:)
2081:)
2056:)
2036:)
1989:)
1931:)
1825:)
1778:)
1744:)
1698:}}
1692:{{
1688:}}
1682:{{
1666:)
1627:)
1573:)
1536:)
1495:)
1455:)
1224:.
1173:)
1149:)
1139:}}
1133:{{
1129:}}
1123:{{
1115:)
1091:)
1077:)
1042:)
1034:--
1008:)
990:)
916:)
833:)
723:)
685:)
667:)
615:)
597:--
578:)
532:)
487:)
423:)
378:)
333:)
290:)
250:)
219:)
164:)
102::
90:•
75:|
56:|
52:|
3866:(
3847:/
3843:/
3839:/
3837:c
3835:/
3833:t
3831:(
3804:/
3800:/
3796:/
3794:c
3792:/
3790:t
3788:(
3750:(
3728:(
3708:(
3683:(
3587:(
3467:(
3443:(
3412:/
3408:/
3404:/
3402:c
3400:/
3398:t
3396:(
3375:(
3355:/
3351:/
3347:/
3345:c
3343:/
3341:t
3339:(
3306:(
3290:)
3286:(
3268:/
3264:/
3260:/
3258:c
3256:/
3254:t
3252:(
3223:(
3182:(
3162:(
3138:(
3115:(
3097:(
3072:(
3021:(
2986:(
2938:(
2913:(
2875:(
2855:(
2798:(
2765:)
2759:(
2723:(
2659:(
2642:)
2638:(
2609:(
2583:(
2548:(
2515:(
2497:)
2495:O
2493:2
2491:H
2489:(
2464:(
2441:(
2413:(
2382:(
2364:(
2344:(
2320:(
2285:(
2248:(
2230:(
2202:(
2180:(
2136:(
2104:(
2071:(
2052:(
2026:(
1979:(
1961:)
1955:(
1921:(
1895:)
1889:(
1865:)
1859:(
1815:(
1768:(
1734:(
1715:)
1713:O
1711:2
1709:H
1707:(
1656:(
1617:(
1563:(
1526:(
1491:(
1451:(
1421:)
1415:(
1387:)
1381:(
1331:)
1325:(
1212:)
1206:(
1163:(
1145:(
1105:(
1087:(
1067:(
1038:(
1004:(
980:(
946:)
940:(
908:'
905:(
873:)
867:(
823:(
806:)
798:(
757:)
755:O
753:2
751:H
749:(
715:'
712:(
681:(
659:'
656:(
605:(
568:(
522:(
477:(
413:(
368:(
323:(
280:(
240:(
209:(
154:(
114:.
82:·
79:)
71:(
63:·
60:)
48:(
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.