160:
It's not good enough now. It's violation after violation of the manual of style. Puffery, Unsupported attributions, Contentious labels, and
Editorializing pervade the entire work, both critiquing and lauding the subject. I've tried to correct some of this but I've met with resistance from one very
220:
I have to agree, based in part on what happened when I tried today to make a single edit restoring some balancing content that had been removed from the article without explanation:
245:
The instability seems to be getting worse. This article has problems, and we need to get editors on the same page before we can even think of this being GA again. –
142:
In fact, you are busy with a campaign to make the article non-neutral. In the way you are reworking it, it will never be good enough for the status Good
Article.
121:
to try and sell a controversial individual. We should state the facts in as encyclopedic a manner as we can and leave the reader to make their own opinions.
118:
69:
65:
161:
persistent editor. (At least when I've made changes to neutralize the puffery, removing items that attack the subject seems to be allowed.)
224:
and accused of making 3 reverts with a single edit. At this point the article needs a POV tag and doesn't qualify as a good article. --
50:
17:
42:
164:
Regardless, It would be better if the community as a whole would recognize that the article needs work and move to correct it.
272:
254:
233:
211:
196:
179:
155:
136:
109:
90:
202:
Right now, this article fails criteria #5: it is not stable. There's quite a bit of POV edit warring. –
149:
58:
229:
174:
131:
105:
268:
250:
207:
192:
187:
I personally haven't read the article yet, but at a glance I can tell the lead is too short. –
289:
144:
35:
225:
165:
122:
101:
283:
264:
246:
203:
188:
263:
The page just had to be fully protected due to the instability. –
221:
85:
77:
46:
145:
8:
7:
18:Knowledge:Good article reassessment
117:This article is overly reliant on
24:
86:Watch article reassessment page
1:
119:puffery and flowery language
273:21:07, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
255:23:56, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
234:23:47, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
110:18:48, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
306:
212:20:08, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
197:23:18, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
180:02:32, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
156:00:02, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
137:15:29, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
222:I was promptly reverted
91:Most recent review
297:
177:
172:
154:
147:
134:
129:
100:
88:
82:
73:
54:
305:
304:
300:
299:
298:
296:
295:
294:
280:
279:
175:
166:
143:
132:
123:
95:
84:
63:
40:
34:
31:
28:Margaret Sanger
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
303:
301:
293:
292:
282:
281:
278:
277:
276:
275:
258:
257:
239:
238:
237:
236:
215:
214:
185:
184:
183:
182:
162:
115:
114:
113:
93:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
302:
291:
288:
287:
285:
274:
270:
266:
262:
261:
260:
259:
256:
252:
248:
244:
241:
240:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
218:
217:
216:
213:
209:
205:
201:
200:
199:
198:
194:
190:
181:
178:
173:
171:
170:
163:
159:
158:
157:
153:
152:
148:
141:
140:
139:
138:
135:
130:
128:
127:
120:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
92:
87:
81:
80:
76:
71:
67:
62:
61:
57:
52:
48:
44:
39:
38:
33:
32:
29:
26:
19:
242:
186:
168:
167:
150:
125:
124:
116:
96:
78:
74:
60:Article talk
59:
55:
36:
27:
99:: Delisted.
47:visual edit
146:The Banner
226:Arxiloxos
169:Chrononem
126:Chrononem
102:Retrohead
284:Category
265:Muboshgu
247:Muboshgu
204:Muboshgu
189:Muboshgu
70:history
51:history
37:Article
290:GAR/60
243:Delist
97:Result
79:Watch
16:<
269:talk
251:talk
230:talk
208:talk
193:talk
151:talk
106:talk
66:edit
43:edit
286::
271:)
253:)
232:)
210:)
195:)
108:)
89:•
83:•
68:|
49:|
45:|
267:(
249:(
228:(
206:(
191:(
176:☎
133:☎
112:.
104:(
75:·
72:)
64:(
56:·
53:)
41:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.