195:
category, and there's no question that the world's largest country is an exceptionally big topic. So I'd say reducing the size ought to be on our minds when editing the page, but I'm not sure the current size is an argument for delisting.
124:
While it may once have been in the GA class it no longer meets those standards, the biggest issue is the dozens of instances of unsourced text. Needs serious work to get back to GA status, at the moment its probably a C.
243:
I agree with some of the other more specific concerns like all the titles in the infobox. Many of those should be pretty easy to address (e.g. just delete the lesser titles or collapse them with
150:
The significant number of citations present only in the lead is concerning, suggesting that the lead was not written as a summary of the rest of the article as it should per
157:
The article puts a great deal of emphasis on the Xia dynasty, despite there being no certainty that it really existed. The lead even includes it as an uncontested fact.
247:
134:
160:
The infobox includes a whole slew of
Government positions, the majority of which are minor enough to not even get a mention in the article.
17:
69:
106:
130:
65:
253:). Having a page this important as a GA is quite an accomplishment and I hope we don't have to end up delisting.
50:
232:
220:
177:
193:
Probably should be divided (although the scope of a topic can sometimes justify the added reading material)
224:
219:
The article is already divided, with a main page in place for every level2 section except
Infrastructure.
126:
42:
271:
236:
214:
181:
117:
228:
173:
188:
102:
163:
There are a number of short paragraphs and short sections scattered throughout the article.
286:
223:
actually notes 40kB to be the point at which extra material needs to be justified, while
169:
The images could use some pruning and organisation, although this is not required for GA.
151:
144:
90:
280:
111:
58:
259:
202:
99:: Delisted, identified issues have not been resolved after more than 2 weeks
166:
There's a few questionable sources, I doubt they've all been tagged.
35:
143:
The article has a huge 84 kB of prose, far above what it
85:
77:
46:
227:recommends beginning to shift stuff at 50kB.
8:
192:
7:
18:Knowledge:Good article reassessment
24:
86:Watch article reassessment page
1:
248:Collapsed infobox section top
187:Regarding size, according to
182:17:22, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
135:16:36, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
118:03:06, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
272:05:16, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
237:06:12, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
215:05:17, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
303:
191:, 84kb is within the
91:Most recent review
269:
257:
212:
200:
294:
270:
267:
266:
264:
255:
252:
246:
221:WP:Summary style
213:
210:
209:
207:
198:
127:Horse Eye's Back
114:
100:
88:
82:
73:
54:
302:
301:
297:
296:
295:
293:
292:
291:
277:
276:
260:
258:
254:
250:
244:
225:WP:Article Size
203:
201:
197:
112:
95:
84:
63:
40:
34:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
300:
298:
290:
289:
279:
278:
275:
274:
241:
240:
239:
171:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
148:
122:
121:
120:
93:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
299:
288:
285:
284:
282:
273:
265:
263:
249:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
217:
216:
208:
206:
194:
190:
186:
185:
184:
183:
179:
175:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
149:
146:
142:
141:
140:
137:
136:
132:
128:
119:
116:
115:
108:
104:
98:
94:
92:
87:
81:
80:
76:
71:
67:
62:
61:
57:
52:
48:
44:
39:
38:
33:
32:
29:
26:
19:
261:
204:
172:
138:
123:
110:
96:
78:
74:
60:Article talk
59:
55:
36:
27:
47:visual edit
139:Comments:
189:WP:TOOBIG
145:should be
281:Category
152:WP:LEAD
70:history
51:history
37:Article
287:GAR/65
113:buidhe
97:Result
79:Watch
28:China
16:<
262:Sdkb
256:{{u|
233:talk
205:Sdkb
199:{{u|
178:talk
131:talk
66:edit
43:edit
229:CMD
174:CMD
283::
268:}}
251:}}
245:{{
235:)
211:}}
180:)
133:)
109:)
105:·
89:•
83:•
68:|
49:|
45:|
231:(
176:(
154:.
147:.
129:(
107:c
103:t
101:(
75:·
72:)
64:(
56:·
53:)
41:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.