Knowledge

:Good article reassessment/David Cameron/1 - Knowledge

Source ๐Ÿ“

96:: The article is demoted per unanimous consensus. Pretty good justification that the article is no longer the one which was nominated for GA. This is natural since the major aspects of his career (twice PM) happened after the GAR. Please note that I do not have much experience with GA generally, I am simply closing this per a request at 155:
the article obtained its "good" status, and the material that has been added to reflect these most important parts of his career is uneven at best. There are discussions taking place over reorganisation, but the present article is poorly-structured, lacks detail on some important aspects of his
156:
career whilst including entire subsections on lesser details, and has been insufficiently updated in the last couple of years. It is not by any stretch of the imagination a good article, and it will need a huge amount of editing to get near that status again.
131:
The article is also heavily unstable. This is a BLP for an influential figure and it is bad of us to give the impression that what's contained within is the creme la creme of encyclopedia content. With this in mind I support a speedy demotion.
151:
It's not the same article as the promoted article because the most significant aspects of the subject's career (two elections and becoming Prime Minister) have all happened
69: 65: 17: 115: 50: 125:
I'm bringing this up for reassessment, because it is a completely different article to the one which was originally promoted.
42: 104: 187: 165: 141: 118: 183: 112: 128:
On top of that the original review heavily lacked in rigour and was merely a quick 6 bullet point job.
179: 137: 161: 58: 109: 177:
large deletion without discussion of the good article content after this review was created
202: 133: 97: 196: 157: 35: 129: 176: 126: 85: 77: 46: 8: 175:unstable article - see this as an example, 7: 18:Knowledge:Good article reassessment 24: 147:I would second your vote for a 86:Watch article reassessment page 166:22:56, 23 September 2015 (UTC) 142:22:36, 23 September 2015 (UTC) 1: 119:13:39, 14 October 2015 (UTC) 188:16:45, 4 October 2015 (UTC) 219: 89:โ€ข GAN review not found 108: 105:non-admin closure 210: 149:speedy demotion. 102: 101: 88: 82: 73: 54: 218: 217: 213: 212: 211: 209: 208: 207: 193: 192: 180:Govindaharihari 92: 84: 63: 40: 34: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 216: 214: 206: 205: 195: 194: 191: 190: 169: 168: 123: 122: 121: 90: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 215: 204: 201: 200: 198: 189: 185: 181: 178: 174: 171: 170: 167: 163: 159: 154: 150: 146: 145: 144: 143: 139: 135: 130: 127: 120: 117: 114: 111: 106: 99: 95: 91: 87: 81: 80: 76: 71: 67: 62: 61: 57: 52: 48: 44: 39: 38: 33: 32: 29: 28:David Cameron 26: 19: 172: 152: 148: 124: 93: 78: 74: 60:Article talk 59: 55: 36: 27: 110:Kingsindian 47:visual edit 134:Brustopher 197:Category 158:Dtellett 98:WP:ANRFC 70:history 51:history 37:Article 203:GAR/60 173:demote 94:Result 153:since 79:Watch 16:< 184:talk 162:talk 138:talk 66:edit 43:edit 199:: 186:) 164:) 140:) 83:โ€ข 68:| 49:| 45:| 182:( 160:( 136:( 116:โ™š 113:โ™ 107:) 103:( 100:. 75:ยท 72:) 64:( 56:ยท 53:) 41:(

Index

Knowledge:Good article reassessment
David Cameron
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Watch article reassessment page
WP:ANRFC
non-admin closure
Kingsindian
โ™
โ™š
13:39, 14 October 2015 (UTC)


Brustopher
talk
22:36, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Dtellett
talk
22:56, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
large deletion without discussion of the good article content after this review was created
Govindaharihari
talk
16:45, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Category

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘